User talk:Jackyd101

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Your GA nomination of Action of 6 November 1794[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Action of 6 November 1794 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:40, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Battle of Mykonos[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Battle of Mykonos at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK request[edit]

Hi, could you do me a tiny favor, and add the "approved" tick icon to your last comment at Template:Did you know nominations/La Nymphe surprise? People (and the bot) only go by the last icon which appears on a nomination, which is currently "Symbol redirect vote 4.svg ". Thanks a lot! MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 01:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Raid on Genoa[edit]

Harrias talk 09:27, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 6 November 1794[edit]

The article Action of 6 November 1794 you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Action of 6 November 1794 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Henry Towry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pierre Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of Mykonos[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

List of public art in the City of Westminster FLC review[edit]

Hi Jackyd101, do you feel that your comments have been addressed at the FLC review for List of public art in the City of Westminster? Ham II (talk) 10:52, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 -- Tomandjerry211 (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Action of 24 June 1795[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Another list of Somerset scheduled monuments at FLC[edit]

As you have previously commented on one or more of nominations of the lists of scheduled monuments in Somerset, I wondered if you would be kind enough to take a look at the List of scheduled monuments in West Somerset which is now nominated at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of scheduled monuments in West Somerset/archive1?— Rod talk 21:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801[edit]

The article Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 -- Tomandjerry211 (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Boat Race review[edit]

Sport Barnstar Hires.png The Running Man Barnstar
Hey Jackyd101, just a quick barnstar to say thanks for the review of one of Boat Race articles you conducted over the past year. As of this morning, I completed my (initial) goal of ensuing that every Boat Race had, not only its own article, but one that was either of GA or FA status: we now have 158 GAs and 3 FAs that we can all be proud of! It doesn't stop here, for me at least, I'm going to keep up with improving the quality of the GAs and look for more FA opportunities. Plus, there's the small matter of 70 Women's Boat Race articles to get up and running! But thanks again, I couldn't have done it without your help. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)


Speedy deletion nomination of Pierre Lemonnier (anthropologist)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pierre Lemonnier (anthropologist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Postcard Cathy (talk) 04:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

The final FLC nom of a list of Scheduled monuments in Somerset[edit]

As you have kindly added comments to one or more of the FLC nominations of Scheduled monuments in Somerset I wanted to let you know that the final list, List of scheduled monuments in Mendip, is nomination for Featured List status at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of scheduled monuments in Mendip/archive1. If you had any comments that would be great.— Rod talk 20:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello from the team at Featured article review![edit]

Cscr-featured.svg

We are preparing to take a closer look at Featured articles promoted in 2004–2010 that may need a review. We started with a script-compiled list of older FAs that have not had a recent formal review. The next step is to prune the list by removing articles that are still actively maintained, up-to-date, and believed to meet current standards. We know that many of you personally maintain articles that you nominated, so we'd appreciate your help in winnowing the list where appropriate.

Please take a look at the sandbox list, check over the FAs listed by your name, and indicate on the sandbox talk page your assessment of their current status. Likewise, if you have taken on the maintenance of any listed FAs that were originally nominated by a departed editor, please indicate their status. BLPs should be given especially careful consideration.

Thanks for your help! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:34, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801[edit]

The article Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801 you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 -- Tomandjerry211 (talk) 00:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Bali Strait Incident[edit]

Harrias talk 19:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Raid on Manila (1798)[edit]

I think footnote 27 is wrong. I don't have the book and don't know exactly what you intended. It seems to be part of footnote 28, and when I reformatted to SFN, I may have introduced an error. Please correct as necessary. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen () 15:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, good job on catching that - it was my fault, a copy and paste error. I've fixed it now. Much appreciated--Jackyd101 (talk) 15:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
I tidied the citations. Hope that you find SFn to your liking. Very nice article. Good job! 7&6=thirteen () 15:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
IMO, The hook needs to be clarified as to loss of life. Compare, "Cooke's opportunistic diversion had determined that the Spanish forces in the Philippines posed no immediate threat, although the mission had cost 18 lives." 16:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Those lives were lost in a shipwreck and an attack on Zamboanga after the raid on Manila. No lives were lost in the raid itself. I'll try and rephrase if you think its best?--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
It's a little confusing, as it all appears in the same article. And the DYK powers that be get real picky. Maybe put in the date of the raid? Or an Alt hook about the false flag, impersonation, anti-Brit toasts, etc. The story is rally intriguing and amusing, I think. 17:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
OK, good point, I'll think again.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

GTG. We'll see. 7&6=thirteen () 17:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

This citation and the ISBN are inconsistent. Gardiner, Robert, ed (2001) [1998]. The Victory of Seapower. Caxton Editions. ISBN 1-84067-359-1. The ISBN connects to Woodman, Richard. The Victory of Seapower: winning the Napoleonic War, 1806-1814. London: Caxton in association with the National Maritime Museum, 2001. Print. What gives? 7&6=thirteen () 17:44, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
I've looked into it - Gardiner was the editor and he and Woodman were co-authors. I'll change the citation--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I tweaked it further. Bon apetit! 7&6=thirteen () 18:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Action of 28 February 1799[edit]

Hello, I completed a review of your nomination and think that your feedback could help with a few issues. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Action of 30 June 1798[edit]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Nice article. Do you have access to any of the online newspaper archives? Should be plenty of material available. Mjroots (talk) 19:27, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
I should, through my university. I hadn't considered looking there, but it might be interesting. I'll see what I can turn up. Thanks!--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795)[edit]

The article Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 05:55, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Mahé, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Portuguese, Soundings and Red flag (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bali Strait Incident[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bali Strait Incident you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 19:21, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Jackyd101, I just wanted to touch base and let you know that I have completed reviews of both Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795) and Bali Strait Incident. They are both Good Article ready, but I had a few very minor suggestions for each. Once those are addressed, both are good for passage to Good Article status! It's been a privilege to review several of your recent articles, and I always look forward to seeing what you write next. -- West Virginian (talk) 18:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Raid on Manila (1798)[edit]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bali Strait Incident[edit]

The article Bali Strait Incident you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bali Strait Incident for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 18:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Mahé[edit]

The article Battle of Mahé you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Mahé for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bali Strait Incident[edit]

The article Bali Strait Incident you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Bali Strait Incident for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

USS Essex in the East Indies Theatre of the French Revolutionary War[edit]

Here is a pretty extensive source detailing the frigate USS Essex's deployment in the East Indies, [[1]]. I also have a source that describes some details about a few engagements between American privateers and French privateers, which spurred the deployment of Essex. None are particularly notable in my own opinion except for the American ship Rebecca 's (16 guns) action with Jean Dutertre's brig Malartic (12 guns), where the Rebecca severely mauled the Malartic enabling it to be captured with ease by the HEIC ship Phoenix the next day on 10 November 1800.XavierGreen (talk) 21:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Macau Incident (1799)[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 01:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Action of 28 February 1799[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Capitulation of Saldanha Bay[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Capitulation of Saldanha Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Capitulation of Saldanha Bay[edit]

The article Capitulation of Saldanha Bay you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Capitulation of Saldanha Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 9 September 1796[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Action of 9 September 1796 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:21, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Raid on Manila (1798)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Raid on Manila (1798) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Port Louis[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Port Louis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 9 September 1796[edit]

The article Action of 9 September 1796 you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Action of 9 September 1796 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 12:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Port Louis[edit]

The article Battle of Port Louis you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Battle of Port Louis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 18:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795)[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Capitulation of Saldanha Bay[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Raid on Manila (1798)[edit]

The article Raid on Manila (1798) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Raid on Manila (1798) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 30 June 1798[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Action of 30 June 1798 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 28 February 1799[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Action of 28 February 1799 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 20, 2015[edit]

A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. It mostly follows the lead section; how does it look? I took a guess on one thing: "a fourth was unable to close to within effective gun range, and later seized as it left the harbour." - Dank (push to talk) 00:06, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Looks good, thanks for the heads up --Jackyd101 (talk) 00:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 28 February 1799[edit]

The article Action of 28 February 1799 you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Action of 28 February 1799 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Action of 28 February 1799, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mast and Bulkhead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

New article[edit]

Hello there, I created this article Battle of Bishops Court‎ - just wondered if this was one that you wanted to create as well? Regards. Shire Lord (talk) 23:51, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 30 June 1798[edit]

The article Action of 30 June 1798 you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Action of 30 June 1798 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars[edit]

The article East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 12:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)