Hi! I welcome your constructive comments. I will respond to them soon. Please:
- 1. Be Civil
- 2. Please be sure and let me know what article you are referring to by providing a wikilink.
- 3. Sign your comments, this is easy to do by placing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post.
- 4. Create a new section when starting a new topic.
- 5. Add new comments to the bottom of the appropriate section.
- 6. Do not edit or move comments which have been replied to, or have been on the page more than a couple of days.
Have a nice day!
One user, Alansohn has been asked to stay away from this page due to use of racial/ethnic slurs and profanity. Everyone else is welcome.
The radiative greenhouse conjecture is contrary to the laws of physics
For proof see http://www.climate-change-theory.com/Planetary_Core_and_Surface_Temperatures.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 02:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- that's really beside the point. Your edit to Climate change in Australia is inappropriate for an article - for one thing, we don't place bets in an encyclopedia. Other parts of your entry are possibly appropriate for the article talk page. Try discussing it there. Jacona (talk) 11:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)