User talk:JaconaFrere

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi! I welcome your constructive comments. I will respond to them soon. Please:

1. Be Civil
2. Please be sure and let me know what article you are referring to by providing a wikilink.
3. Sign your comments, this is easy to do by placing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post.
4. Create a new section when starting a new topic.
5. Add new comments to the bottom of the appropriate section.
6. Do not edit or move comments which have been replied to, or have been on the page more than a couple of days.

Have a nice day!

Removal of sourced material[edit]

Your recent edit to the article for Steinert High School removed sourced material with the edit summary "rv:reintroduction of nonencyclopedic material, this is WP:PUFFERY/WP:PROMOTION/WP:TRIVIA)". The material in the article is encyclopedic material, backed by reliable and verifiable sourcing, regarding a state champion athlete who attends the school and won a state title competing on behalf of the school. How this becomes "puffery", "promotion" or "trivia" is rather difficult to understand. Some explanation of your position and a reference to a policy that supports your claims would be appropriate. Unless, of course, this is more of the usual stalking. Alansohn (talk) 02:57, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Discussion of the merits of the material would be appropriate on the talk page of the article in question, not my user page.Jacona (talk) 12:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Your pathetic excuses for removal of sourced content, are just that; pathetic excuses. Puffery? Promotion? Trivia? Prove it or move on to harass other editors who will tolerate your crap. Stop being a WP:DICK, or at least stop trying so hard to prove that you're stalking. Alansohn (talk) 12:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your incivility here. If you really want to accuse me of stalking, take it to the appropriate board, not here. If you want to discuss why you think your trivia should be part of the encyclopedia, do it at the article talk page, not here. As a matter of fact, stay away from this talk page, as you have been asked to do so on numerous occasions, unless required to post here by policy. Please quit trying to bully editors from editing articles you evidently feel you own. Jacona (talk) 13:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Just calling a spade a spade, and you're one heck of a spade. Winning a state championship is encyclopedic and the fact is backed by reliable and verifiable sourcing. Calling that puffery, promotion and trivia is a blatant falsehood and such a further persistence of your WP:DICKishness. You've been repeatedly asked to stop stalking my edits, see how much good that's done. Alansohn (talk) 13:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Your definition of stalking seems to be that if I edit any article of yours, I am therefore stalking you. You don't WP:OWN any articles, and I rarely interact with you. Now, please stop posting here. If you want to accuse me of talking, being the excellent wikilawyer that you are, take it to the wikipedia stalking commission or whatever it's called. If you want to discuss article content, take it to the article talk page and try to establish consensus for keeping your trivia rather than continuing calling me names, bullying, and harassing me here.Jacona (talk) 13:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
One final comment to others who read this. While Alansohn's incivility is undesirable, his ethnic slurs are a clear violation of policy and have no place in any discourse about editing. He is not welcome in my home, nor on my talk page.Jacona (talk) 20:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Get Low edits[edit]


Sorry, I don't know how to use Wikipedia. I came across the Get Low page. It has been vandalised. I tried to undo some changes but couldn't work out how to revert back to the correct version which was yours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I've taken care of it, and also posted some helpful information at User talk: Thanks for your help in making Wikipedia a better place! Jacona (talk) 12:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

2016 NFL Draft - Patriots' forfeited pick[edit]

The Pats' tampering of footballs is alleged and not scientifically proven. In fact, there is much scientific evidence to the contrary. The report itself states that it is more likely than not that Brady and the team knew that footballs were deflated despite lots of evidence to the contrary. The opposing team's balls were not tested. It is alleged, nothing more.[1]

al·leged əˈlejd/Submit adjective (of an incident or a person) said, without proof, to have taken place or to have a specified illegal or undesirable quality Beldenak (talk) 13:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

The NFL felt there was sufficient proof, as evidenced by the penalty, so "alleged" doesn't belong in this context. Feel free to take it to the article page, if you want to try to develop consensus. Jacona (talk) 14:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

  • Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)