User talk:Jaellee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

October 2007[edit]

Information.svg Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Hamster: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 14:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you![edit]
Bubble Tea.png Thank you kindly and I hope you like this Tea as a token of my appreciation for your non aggressive and educated reply! Bangers&Mash12 (talk) 10:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Special Barnstar Hires.png The Special Barnstar
Thanks for your contributions. SwisterTwister talk 00:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Information about Mario Mandzukic are accurate, I took them with Bayern officinal page...Thanks for the correction, but it is inaccurate Hnkhajduksplit (talk) 22:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
StricFric (talk) 08:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hakan Sukur[edit]

Hello, I don't mean any disrespect but can you please point out how my edit didn't make sense? I looked at your most recent edit on the page and you didn't seem to change anything from my edit, just write 'I severely doubt your improvements'. So if you doubt my improvements, why didn't you revert/change it again?

Again, I'm not trying to seem rude or cocky or disrespectful or whatnot, I just want to try to figure out your thought process.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PokeFan10025 (talkcontribs) 14:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

@PokeFan10025: I'm not a native speaker, but the convention is "in February 2016" but "on 5 February 2016". You changed two times "in February 2016" (or "In November 2017") and that's why I doubted your grammar improvements. --Jaellee (talk) 14:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I understand that I've made an error for the 'in February 2016' and not 'on', but that doesn't necessarily mean that you have to revert my whole edit. You can just edit the page to fix my mistakes.

Reverting my whole edit because of one or two mistakes, when you could clearly see that I've improved it in other areas, is a bit rude, but I'm hoping that you did it out of good-nature and/or ignorance.

I'm not trying to start any fights or whatnot, I'm just stating my opinion. Hopefully you can take it as constructive criticism for the future.

Have a nice day, PokeFan10025 (talk) 04:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

@PokeFan10025: When I saw your edit, the first two changes were not not really an improvement and (together with the fact that I did not know the editor) I classified the change as either "test edit" (someone doing an edit in order to see if it really works) or as an edit of someone who really tried to improve something, but failed. In any case, I did not read any further and reverted because I thought that the edit did not improve the article. Most of the work I do is vandalism reverts and in most cases seeing the first change is enough to make a correct assessment. Maybe I should read further in the not so clear cases, but I even then I don't see it generally as my job to fix edits which are partly no improvement. I do this sometimes, but in other cases I revert and hope that the original editor will do an improved change the next time. If the editor doesn't then the article is not worse off than before. --Jaellee (talk) 17:47, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

iker casillas height[edit]

how can you proof that iker casillas is 185cm tall i see his real madrid card on celebrityheights in which his height is 180cm. 23 Harsh.v (talk) 08:17, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

@23 Harsh.v: I recommend to read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. As long a you cannot provide a reliable source where his height is 1.80 m, we will have to use the height that is sourced. Your personal opinion of his height does not matter. If you continue to change his height without providing a source, you will eventually get blocked. --Jaellee (talk) 10:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)


How i provide you a source tell me 23 Harsh.v (talk) 13:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

@23 Harsh.v: Please have look at Wikipedia:Citing sources. It explains why sources are needed and how sources have to be provided. --Jaellee (talk) 17:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)