User talk:JamesKillsFour

JamesKillsFour, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi JamesKillsFour! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Stop changing Infoboxes

The changes that you are making to the Infoboxes of various battles are not improvements and have been reverted by me and other editors. If you wish to discuss your reverted changes you must follow WP:BRD and take it up on each Talk Page. Mztourist (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And if that is you making similar changes under User: ElanorGreedy here: [1] and [2] that is WP:SOCK and will lead to an immediate ban. Mztourist (talk) 10:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ElanorGreedy? Who the heck is that? If we're from the same IP address there must have been a mistake. I am only using a single account under the email cossackcomrade@gmail.com and nothing else. Thank you. JamesKillsFour (talk) 10:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

I have opened an SPI here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JamesKillsFour. Mztourist (talk) 05:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JamesKillsFour. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:01, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes again

Stop adding "decisive" before victory in Infoboxes, few battles are truly decisive and policy is that the term should not be used. Also the results should only reflect the direct results of a battle and not the cumulative results of a series of battles or an offensive. I have reverted you recent changes to Battle of Yultong that breach these rules. Mztourist (talk) 04:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Saarbrücken moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Saarbrücken, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources, not just a newspaper on another continent, and a web site--you need modern histories of the period..There ae many such books. (?) (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 11:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Saarbrücken

Hello, JamesKillsFour. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Saarbrücken, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]