User talk:Jamie Tubers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome Wikipedian!

Click here to post your Message :)

When you post a message here, watch this talk page, 'cause I will reply on this page and not on your talk page. When I post messages on your talk page, please post your replies on your talk page as well. Regards.


Seasons Greetings[edit]

Merry Xmas and a prosperous New year in advance. I find it hard to believe you are still an undergraduate, anyways when you finally convocate send me your CV, we pay smart people in 6 digits at my workplace lol. I am even considering doing my Masters at Ilorin, if that happens we might just have a cocktail dinner then discuss the future of Wikiproject Nigeria. Konga.com delivered my package (Phone Swap) sometime this week so I shud really enjoy this yelutide season with the film and prolly add a few more lines to its wiki article when I eventually watch it. As you already know #AMVCA2015 nominees list is out, do you still think ALL the films/actors/actresses nominated have been featured in at least a arm of Dstv franchise? I know October 1 is on box office but what about the other films? I still think the heading of that article is misleading.

Hollywood have a way of knowing the highest grossing films in cinemas, I believe Nollywood can also achieve that if we can come together and do some deeper research. Silverbird started showing Nigerian films in the 2000s, we can create a list that documents the list of highest grossing Nigerian cinematic films of all time. The table will be incomplete at first but with time it will begin to have full shape. References do exist, since it is just about 10 years old. What do you think about it?

Here is a comparative review of October 1 and HOAYs by 2 angry men. They also spoke of their Wikipedia articles. Darreg (talk) 21:22, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Lol..thanks Darreg, I wish you the same. About DStv, I really don't know cos I don't use DStv lol. I think list of highest grossing film is still premature.....most times, they are not very transparent with their figures. And those two angry men cracked me up big time! Really, HOAYS is a bad film...fact.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
The funny thing abt HOAYS was that the people in charge of its publicity did a real good job, that even the outbreak of Ebola in Nigeria (+ poor production and acting) could not stop people from watching it. Concerning the HGNF, I will still go ahead to create it, your reasons are not solid enough. Transparency is irrelevant on Wikipedia, what matters is RELIABLE SOURCES! Darreg (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Lol, I wish you luck....cos I don't know how you'll find links for many other films released in cinemas....even phone swap didn't publish their gross past the first week. But well....its up to you :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year[edit]

Sydney Bridge Happy New Year.jpg Happy New Year
Thanks Tubers for the barnstar and Happy New Year to you. Wishing you a productive year on Wikipedia. Versace1608 (Talk) 05:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Comment on Terra Kulture AFD[edit]

Please don't speak for me, particularly as you are involved in the discussion. If you'd read my comments, I wasn't saying that I wanted yet to strike my Delete comment; I explained further down that I think the article has not proved notability - all I did was get rid of the promotional language and pare it down so statements proving its notability could be added by someone with access to the Kaye Whiteman book. It's a bit rude to do that, and while I'm not going to take any action over it, please respect other people's opinions and comments and leave them alone. (See the point here about not misrepresenting other people and the following section of that page under Editing Comments.)

Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page. Striking text constitutes a change in meaning, and should only be done by the user who wrote it or someone acting at their explicit request.

As it happens, you've bounced me into declaring as neutral, but seriously, please don't do that again. LouiseS1979 (talk) 11:30, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

  • hello,
Sorry for striking the comment! I did it in good faith assuming that's what you meant with the first statement in your second post. I also did it neutrally as a form of fix, even though i commented on the discussion. And that's the reason i explained in detail in the edit summary, so you can spot and easily revert it, if i was wrong. I infact wanted to notify you on your talk page, but it skipped my mind somehow. Sorry for that once again. However, moving the rest of your comments to the first one is appropriate. It gives easy readability to participants. Regards.-Jamie Tubers (talk) 13:11, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Sure, I can understand why you did it, and saw the edit summary OK. The reason I put the comments down there originally was that the conversation was taking place at that point and people looking at the article and adding their comments might have seen what I'd done to the article - intending to try and rescue it, as it happens - before they voted delete. Just be careful next time, that's all.
As it happens, I'm staying on the fence. The actual closure of the AFD is now pretty much in the hands of a closing admin. Hopefully Eruditescholar has done enough to keep it; the Business Day source about the art auction should IMO help matters. In the end there was no real harm done, and I can see where I could have been clearer. LouiseS1979 (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Order of Nigeria[edit]

Order of the Federal Republic (civil) - Nigeria - ribbon bar.gif Ribbon of the Order of Nigeria
Thank you for your contribution to Nigerian-related articles. Omo Obatalá (talk) 00:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Hey! Thanks a lot :)--Jamie Tubers (talk) 01:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

TY Bello[edit]

Greetings Tubers. I finally moved the TY Bello article to mainspace; it has been long overdue. Can you please take a look at it and add more info if need be? Thanks. Versace1608 (Talk) 03:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Hello Versace, Good job as usual! I'll check it out :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:49, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

October 1[edit]

Greetings Jamie Tubers. Newspapers always get italicized on Wikipedia. If you don't believe me, check out all the newspaper articles on Wikipedia. Versace1608 (Talk) 18:31, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

  • I thought I replied this! Thanks for the heads up Versace :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:03, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

damilola adegbite and chris attoh[edit]

They both got married on the 14th of February 2015, your biography of the says they are in a relationship, you should update that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.203.67.163 (talk) 15:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Project Fame West Africa[edit]

Stickwitu is the right spelling for the performance of Chidinma in Project Fame West Africa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judor92 (talkcontribs) 22:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:


  • Hello,
Thanks :)--Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Advance-fee fraud[edit]

Hello Jamie Tubers. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Advance-fee fraud, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 419 scams are a subset of advance-fee frauds. Discuss it on the talk-page. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 08:42, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Misleading statistical information list of cities proper by population[edit]

Hi please take a look at Talk:List_of_cities_proper_by_population#Ankara_and_how_Wikipedia_editors_make_up_things_as_they_go_along and the discussion going on about the definitions used for compiling this table. --Navops47 (talk) 02:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Responding to your revert on MSAs by population[edit]

Hi Jamie, per your request, I've responded on the relevant Talk Page in detail to your revert of my recent edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_metropolitan_areas_by_population#New_York_.28part_2.29 I think my change should stand, as it was actually a restoration of correct data & citation. --Kingsidebishop (talk) 02:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Project Fame West Africa[edit]

Greetings Jamie Tubers. The edit I made to the Project Fame West Africa article was not harmful in any way. I should have used "purposes" instead of "reasons" as shown in the Peach Bowl article. I think this info needs to be included in the lead. Versace1608 (Talk) 03:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Hey, I didn't think your edit was harmful. Ofcourse, I also strongly 'think' the MTN is added for sponsorship purposes, but we can't prove it with any reliable source! But we can prove that the the show is also called "MTN Project Fame West Africa", which is added to the article. It is also stated in the article that MTN sponsors the show....now let the readers infer the reasons behind the alternative names. We including "for sponsorship reasons" simply because it is obviously logical is an original research.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't think this classifies as "original research" since I was able to find this and this. Versace1608 (Talk) 22:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Origins of Nigeria's name[edit]

There is a man by the name of Emeka Keazor (a lawyer and did post-graduate study in history) who had a research paper he released not too long ago. He also did a presentation. He had said that the name Nigeria was in existence before 1914, that Flora Shaw did not come up with the name Nigeria. This is where he has his paper. It may be worth the look: http://www.slideshare.net/EdKeazor/the-journey-to-amalgamation-a-brief-summary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.21.61.158 (talk) 01:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

All Necessary References have been provided for[edit]


You keep reverting the Nigerian article to it's inaccurate version- even after various sources and references have been provided. Maybe you should bother to check all of them out, before making you next revert on that article.

1: What makes the CIA more reliable than a reference from the Information board of the country in question itself (The fascinating Nigeria magazine) 2: All provided sources are coherent, and within the time frame of statistical validity 3: What do you stand to gain from all this? Why are you reverting all more accurate changes made to the article? 4: You will need to provide multiple reliable sources to back up the CIA figures.

  • The CIA citation has also been reverted cos, it isn't as explicit as the former source. Please do explain what you are adding to the article on the talkpage, with the reliable citations. The page is very important and shouldn't be place for users to include their opinions. Regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 09:33, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

References for a picture[edit]

Hey Jamie,

I am not really sure this is the right place to ask, but let's try.

I am currently writing a report about monogamy/polygamy in human societies and I was interested in writing also about the legal status of poligamy in the world.

Do you maybe still have the references that used to create this map (-> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygamy)?

Best regards,

Isabella — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.20.212.123 (talk) 16:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Hello, I believe the image is generated with information from the individual countries' official sources.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism[edit]

You made some changes in this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African_countries_by_GDP_(nominal). The changes you made are patently innacurate and constitutes vandalism. I have put the correct info as per the source higlighted in the header.DanJazzy (talk) 21:58, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit Summary - moving info around from wikis[edit]

Kindly remember to include that you sourced info from other wikis in your edit summary, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lagos_State&diff=667173613&oldid=666983995 It makes checking copy right violations easier. Thanks. --Lucas559 (talk) 22:11, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

  • Thanks, I'd remember to include it. Regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Misclick[edit]

Sorry about that. Huggle is dangerously powerful, and the only reason I can think of for having reverted you is an unnoticed finger slip. Thanks for taking it with good humor! FourViolas (talk) 00:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

List of Nigerians by net worth[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Nigerians by net worth. Cruks (talk) 01:44, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

It is not the real-time net worth but the 2015 ranking. Stop please your disruptive edits. Cruks (talk) 01:33, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) The warning you issued here is inappropriate. The article is entitled, "List of Nigerians by net worth". Any Nigerian Billionaire may be included in the list as long as there are reliable sources to validate the claim. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 12:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
  • @Cruks: Just listen to read yourself: "not the real-time net worth but the 2015 ranking". Are we in 2017? The citation on the article clearly states 17 billion as Dangote's net worth,and it's for 2015....In 2014, he was worth 25 billion. What exactly is your point? where did you get 14 billion from? And then again, the list is not complete, cos it should also include billionaires from other years, as the article is not year-specific. That's why it's a "list of Nigerian billionaires" and not "2015 list of Nigerian billionaires"--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Mail[edit]

Hi Jamie,

I sent you a mail, last week and I haven't see the effects. Please kindly work on the mail. Thanks. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 08:56, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Town square[edit]

Good call, but what should we do with Town Square which is a redirect to Town Square (Las Vegas)? I think you should list it at RfD. What a mess. Si Trew (talk) 16:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Thanks for bringing this to my notice. It's indeed a mess!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 09:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Hi, Jamie. I appreciate your edits in wikipedia .I understand that the writers of the episodes may be wrong but I have the real once its only time that am short of but I will correct in the course of the week. Could you please clarify about the cast arrangements in the opening credits of Desperate Housewives Africa.This is to use the same arrangement in the infobox. Thanks for the banstar. Regards Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 08:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Hello, I suggest you remove the information about the crew members then, until you update it with the correct information. The article might be misleading as it is. Also, are you sure Quinty Pillay is the director of the series? Cos As far as I know she's just a programming director at ELTV. About the cast line up, perhaps we can follow how they are listed on ELTV website, here, pending when I (or you) get the time to catch an episode and see the cast arrangement?--Jamie Tubers (talk) 12:22, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
I emailed one of the Ebony Life TV staff and clarified that Quinty Pillay is the director. On the matter of opening credits, I haven't watched it yet. But since you live in Nigeria could you please check that if you can. I also have a long list of cast members that I have no idea where to add them Lastly, could you "mention me" so that I can know you gave a feedback. Best regards-- Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 11:11, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
  • @Nyanchoka: I can't watch it right now, as I'm not at home. That's why I said; till i get to watch the series again; I saw a few episodes while I was at home, but I didn't take notice of the cast line up and crew. Either way, you did a great job. Regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 12:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I sized up the image in the infobox since it was left hanging living alot of space hanging. But if you size it, it fills in well giving a good visual appearance. I suggest you use a PC to check that issue. Thanks. -- Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 16:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "hanging". Generally, when you size images, you are giving them a specific size for all range or devices, which can make them display awkwardly on most devices. Like when you scaled the image up, it made the entire infobox look disproportionately large on my PC. But when left without forced sizes (especially in infobox), the images automatically adjusts to most devices in the best way possible. Hence, there must be a really good reason before using the "Image_size" column. Read WP:IMAGESIZE.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 15:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Research on New Nigerian Cinema[edit]

Hey Jamie Tubers. Good job on your work on Nigerian Cinema on Wikipedia. I'm currently doing some research work on New Nigerian Cinema. We should talk. Mail me back: colafattah@gmail.com

Eagerly expecting your reply. Hasta! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.211.52.24 (talk) 11:18, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Hello,
Thanks for the commendation, I'd appreciate if you could say what you want to discuss on my talkpage. It's perfectly okay to do so, as long as it is based on Wikipedia subjects.
Regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)


Oh well, there's an on going argument as to which movie can be cited as the spear head of New Nigerian Cinema. Most sources would cite Irapada (2006) or Figurine,but I am of the opinion that Jeta Amata's The Amazing Grace (2006) should have that honour, not only because it was the first new era movie to be shot on Celluloid (Irapda wasnt) and taken to cinemas. I saw the movie at Genesis Deluxe Cinemas back in '06 and on seeing scenes from the movie again recently on Youtube, I am of the opinion that it is of a better standard than the afore mentioned and more worthy of that honour. Your thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.211.52.26 (talk) 16:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
  • OH!
1. Where's the argument going on?
2. Films don't have to be shot on celluloid, most films all over the world are now being shot using digital cinematography. So the only criteria for the New Wave is for the film to have "film quality", and not the camera they are shot on. Reliable sources cite Irapada and Amazing grace as the first set of films in this era, but The Figurine was the one that drove in the attention. Just as Soso Meji and Ekun were the first home videos, but Living in Bondage drove the attention to the home video era.
3. Wikipedia doesn't work based on original research, but rather on third party reliable sources. So basically, it doesn't matter what I feel, but what has been established by credible film scholars and historians out there. Regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 15:26, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Kwara (State)[edit]

Were you aware of this follow-up discussion to your recent RM nomination of the Kwara pages? Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Nigeria literacy rate[edit]

You have a message at Talk:List of countries by literacy rate#Nigeria rate. Please let us know where in the source the literacy rate was taken from. Jolly Ω Janner 01:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Tallest Buildings in Africa[edit]

Hi, I'm not going to undo your edit. I'm just going to say that the current version is full of incorrect information and the current sources don't have any information relating to heights, check therm yourself. I was going to continue editing and contributing until it was as correct as possible, but I can't. Dovikap : Talk 00:41, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

  • I just spot checked some of the towers you removed, many of them have valid citations, but you still removed them anyway, some are incorrect, some have deadlinks. It's okay to re-rank the ones with incorrect information, but for those with inappropriate information, you can just search for information about them online or better still, remove the dubious citations and add citation tags. But then, make sure the citations you're removing are actually inappropriate. Then I saw you added a rank column; this was formerly in the article, but was removed because it takes much work to re-rank the table when it's time to add or remove an info. Regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 01:05, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Community notification[edit]

Hi Jamie Tubers,

I wish to remind you that Wikipedia is turning 15 on January 15, 2016. On this occasion, the Wikimedia Usergroup Nigeria intends to celebrate the 15th birthday of Wikipedia in Nigeria. We aim to bring new editors as well as gather most of the current editors in Nigeria to celebrate Wikipedia @15. Your endorsement will be appreciated. Thanks in anticipation. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 12:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent reversion of edit at Nigeria page[edit]

Jamie Tubers, Greetings. I send this friendly communication in regards to your reverted edit to the encyclopedia's Nigeria entry. As my reference to "international observers" was added merely to revise the passive construction conveyed by the sentence's original phrasing, I will remove that portion of the edit and leave it without any subject agency (although I'm not quite sure who could have compelled the "included" parties to whom you refer -- including the mainstream Nigerian media -- to believe that the election of Goodluck Jonathan took place in a historically free and fair fashion, if not "international observers"). That said I am restoring the rest of my edit, as what was most assuredly "wrong" [and awkward, and trite and overwrought and ill-thought) was the inclusion of three near-sequential adverbs ("reasonably", "freely" and "fairly") within the span of four words at the close of an authoritative encyclopedic paragraph. If you have any inquiries in light of my correction, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia talk page. Cheers, Rande M sefowt[[|Rande_M_Sefowt|sefowt_fred]] 05:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

  • I still believe the revision is not useful, for the reason I stated in the edit summary. Before you make further revisions, can you please state the problem you have with the original phrase? If you had none, then there's absolutely no reason to make a revision in the first place. Regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 13:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
I will re-post again what is stated above, and place the very same information in my reversion at the entry's edit page: . . . "I am restoring the rest of my edit, as what was most assuredly "wrong" [and awkward, and trite and overwrought and ill-thought) was the inclusion of three near-sequential adverbs ("reasonably", "freely" and "fairly") within the span of four words at the close of an authoritative encyclopedic paragraph. If you have any inquiries in light of my correction, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia talk page." Since I have already removed the portion that spurred your original issue as stated at the Nigeria edit page {to remind, you made mention of the deficient inclusiveness engendered through my reference to "international observers") you should have no further problem with my correction of the original sentence's poor phrasing. Thank you. Rande M Sefowt (talk)
  • Please do use the article's talkpage to explain clearly what you find wrong with the former statement, and why you think your revision is better. You've refused to do that in your edit summaries; neither have you on my talkpage; please post on the article's talkpage (which is the more appropriate place), maybe someone might be able to understand what you are saying, cos I honestly can't.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 12:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


"[C]os" there is nothing unclear about my above response to you. Let me also point out that you reverted the sentence that I corrected several days back, only to have your reversion subsequently reverted by an unknown user (User: OluwaCurtis), who returned the text to my original edit -- an edit which I further augmented to reflect your concern regarding the lacking "inclusiveness" of my reference to international observers. I did so despite the fact that the very same Nigeria entry includes a later reference to the connection between the 2011 federal elections and international observation fostering the perception of historic free and fairness (Under the "Democritization (1999-)" section).

I point this out to render clear to you that I have manifested willingness to work with you, or anyone else, who has concern over the grammatical, stylistic, textual caliber of this entry. I have further exhibited an appreciation and acknowledgement of the entry's original comntent. What I do not appreciate, and will not countenance, is a spurious back-and-forth over a matter of this sort. The problem with the original phrasing of the sentence in question is that it is poorly constructed, redundant, littered with superfluous adverbs, and beneath the quality of an authoritative encyclopedia entry maintained at a global reference tool intended for the provision of information to literate, critically astute readers.

I hope this is sufficiently clear for you, "cos" I will not engage further back-and-forth on the matter. All Best, [[|Rande_M_Sefowt|sefowt_fred]] 20:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

  • State what you find wrong with the former sentence, and your reasons for doing so. It would also be helpful, if you can first paste what you think would be a better version (without losing the important points) of the sentence on the article's talkpage to discuss with other editors. Also, if you think some points in the sentence are wrong, give reasons why you think so. The page is a Top importance page, with many readers/watchers, it is important to clearly explain what you do (especially when it becomes controversial) before making a significant change to the long standing version. Lastly, please read WP:TALK#USE, WP:TPYES and WP:TLDR - You can see how short and straight forward I get points across to you; it is in the interest of the encyclopaedia that you do the same, in order to avoid misinterpretations. I've enjoined you to do this several times; if you refuse to budge, I'm sorry I won't engage you any further in a discussion, because it will be hopeless, since we can't communicate effectively. Regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 09:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Have at it. Good luck. Short Enough (for you)? All Best, [[|Rande_M_Sefowt|sefowt_fred]] 15:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Something for the next time you are fighting vandalism[edit]

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Petroleum industry in Nigeria: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Jamie![edit]

Jamie, wishing you a Happy New Year[edit]

Wikipedia Happy New Year.png Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016!

Hello Jamie Tubers, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016.
Happy editing,
Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 17:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Greetings[edit]

2016 Happy New Year.png Happy New Year
Happy New Year Jamie Tubers! Thanks for the barnstar! May God continue to bless you in all your current and future endeavors. Versace1608 (Talk) 18:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Weldone for your contributions to Wikimedia movement Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 05:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you sir! Weldone as well.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 16:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for participating[edit]

  • Thanks Wikicology, and thanks for your participation as well. Regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Community notification[edit]

Hi JT,

I trust you're doing fine. I want to let you know that the students have been divided into 4 groups consisting of 6 students per group, Group A - Group D. You are to adopt the users in group B.

Members of the group includes;

You may want to use User:Wikicology/Adopt as a guild. I sent you a mail. Please, check your box. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 13:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Thanks a lot for this reminder. Pardon me for the extremely late response; I had a major issue with my internet provider. I'll oversee the users as soon as I can. Regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:13, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Request for the removal of the porn video, THE BENJAMINS[edit]

Please can you help in deleting the video of The Benjamins?

  • Hello, I do not understand your request. Can you be more explicit? Regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)