User talk:Jan CZ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A belated welcome![edit]

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm! Face-smile.svg

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jan CZ. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! meco (talk) 13:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to AfD[edit]

Greetings, Jan CZ, and welcome to Wikipedia's deletion process! Thank you for your contributions. As a newcomer, it may be helpful for you to read Wikipedia's deletion policy, and the pages describing the articles for deletion process, proposed deletion, and speedy deletion. Remember that deletion debates are not votes, and reasons matter, especially reasons relating to the central content policies of verifiability, neutral point of view, no original research, and what Wikipedia is not, and to the consensual community guidelines for biographies, corporations, music, and fiction. Also remember that deletion is not always the answer to a bad article. Feel free to drop me a line at my talk page if you have any questions. Again, welcome! Michaelzeng7 (talk) 14:59, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

SVG map[edit]

Hi Jan CZ, what do you edit the SVG map with? I tried Inkscape, but when I use the "bucket" to color a country it doesn't reach all the way to the borders, but leaves some small bands uncolored (that have to be manually colored one by one, etc.) - also all small islands have to be individually colored, etc. Surely there has to be a better tool for that. Japinderum (talk) 13:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi Japinderum, You must specify a color copy. A tool other than Inscape I don't know. Jan CZ (talk) 15:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Japinderum (talk) 10:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)


A complaint regarding disruptive behavior of editor User:Emmette Hernandez Coleman was issued on Administrators Noticeboard here. The complaint has to deal with your interaction with User:Emmette, as appears in this edit [1].Greyshark09 (talk) 22:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Abkhazia-Vanuatu relations[edit]

Your recent editing history at Abkhazia–Vanuatu relations shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Since you keep misrepresenting the sources, I've removed them entirely. While I think this content should be included, we need to represent what the sources actually say, not your personal analysis of what they mean. Please discuss on the talk page before adding the content into the article again. TDL (talk) 01:26, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Dan, I hope you don't think that, seriously. We work for a long time and without problems and obviously the aim both of us what most fair the appearance of articles without personal opinions. You repeatedly edited my (text 1.7.) according to speculation and even deleted. Could You be blocked for this?
The original memorandum from 23.5. clearly says that relations were established on 23.5. by this memorandum. On 1.7. It is clearly confirmed that this memorandum (which established relations on 23.5.) remains in force. So establishing relations confirm is no speculation. On the contrary, your claim that the vote on the relations on 1.7. indicates that has not yet been established, it is your personal opinion. The source didn't say anything like that, but that's purely your speculation.
However, I do not think it is necessary to waste time on long discussions over the banal by changing a few texts, though it may solve two or three rounds of modifications to optimal tuning. Your last edit, (1.7.text) is good, in the traditional spirit of our editing, in particular, leaves the conclusions to the reader. I hope that my edit, (18.3.) is also correct.
Please, remember that the other editor is also guided by good intentions. There is no need in a lot of effort just to see the war. Only in a good way. With best regards, Jan CZ (talk) 11:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Please note that I was just trying to make you aware of the WP:BRD and WP:3RR policies, because I didn't see any prior notices on your talk page. The text of the message is from the template {{uw-3rr}}, so please don't take offence. I agree that you're a reasonable editor, and that we usually work things out.
I completely agree with you that the original memorandum is quite clear. But just as obviously, the authorities in Vanuatu have been attempting to distance themselves from that very memorandum. While their claims that relations have never been established are dubious at best, but if that's what they say, then that's what we need to report. For instance, the 1.7 note says they "voted in favour of supporting the Republic of Abkhazia in establishing diplomatic and financial ties". This sentence is written in the future tense. How could they establish diplomatic ties, if they had already been established? This is why I disagree with you that the source supports the claim that Vanuatu believes they had already established diplomatic relations with Abkhazia.
Your latest edit looks good to me, so hopefully this resolves the issue. TDL (talk) 18:48, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Current relations of SADR.svg[edit]

You should update that map with +Honduras. Regards,--HCPUNXKID (talk) 17:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Done. Jan CZ (talk) 07:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:States with limited recognition[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:States with limited recognition has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lfdder (talk) 10:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


Show me this consensus then please. IJA (talk) 11:45, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

This is a long-term, stable version of the article. If you want to change the stable version of the article, please try to get consensus on the talk page before edit. Thank You. Jan CZ (talk) 11:51, 13 December 2013 (UTC)


Why did you revert my ENGVAR edit? Restore them unless you can give a valid explanation. IJA (talk) 11:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Why? IJA (talk) 12:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
I only restored the article to version by Estlandia (12. 12. 2013, 16:39), i.e. ‎before dispute edits. Editing, which you mention, is correct, I agree with restore it. Of course, I have no desire to block good quality edits to the article, I only can not agree, if someone carries out essential modifications without prior consultation and without reaching consensus. That's all. Jan CZ (talk) 12:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foreign relations of Iraqi Kurdistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guardian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Removal of information from "International recognition of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic"[edit]

I found it amazing that an article called "International recognition of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic" didn't have the information of how many countries currently recognise the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic anywhere in its introduction. To follow the pattern of the Wiki articles for all other states with limited recognitions, I've included this information ("As of 2015, 45 of the 193 member-states (23%) of the United Nations recognise the Sahrawi Republic."). You have removed it without justification. I hope it was an honest mistake, otherwise it would constitute a biased undue edition that could warrant ban from Wikipedia. If it happens again, I will have to take the case to Wiki's moderation. Lkginqlmntkocjnfrh (talk) 15:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Abkhazia infobox RfC[edit]

Farm-Fresh eye.png Due to previous participation in a discussion on the subject, you are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Abkhazia#RfC on Infobox. CMD (talk) 12:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Jan CZ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)