Similar comment.... your bare url tag at Global warming made me waste time checking 230+ citations to find a single bare url, which was outdated anyway. Cleanup is great; thanks for caring..... HOWEVER..... it wouldn't hurt to try harder to distinguish between a single piece of litter you just bend over to pick up and a bear-trashed garbage can scattered up and down the road for which you need to call grounds keeping. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 10:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Either you used a control key search in which case you are complaining about typing at most ten keystrokes, or you used a naked eye search which is very slow and misses things. As it did this time. How about instead of lecturing others you try to improve your editing skills? JanetteDoe (talk) 01:56, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
- I always like to learn. I made a WP:AGF effort at locating the offending items on the article page I most care about, and found just one. If you are correct, then I did not know about my ignorance and need to take your advice about improving my editing skills! But I still don't know what I don't know. Would you please help me fix this problem by pointing out examples that existed at the time of my comment (10:30 6 August) and teaching me what the faster, more reliable alternative means I could have used to find them? NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 03:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Please don't add this tag for just a few bare links. It would be better to use Reflinks directly instead of tagging with "please can someone else do it?" In Barbie, Reflinks found only one link to fill in, while in Great Recession it did not find any at all. This type of tagging makes articles look ugly without actually improving anything.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 05:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the page on the previously missing Anson Parsons Hotaling. I never knew his given name, but i had the feeling he was not one of those on the dab page Hotaling, so i searched for others, then added him to that page -- and also created a series of Redirects to your bio on him.
--Jerzy•t 22:07, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)