User talk:JankoNilovic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

{{subst:var1|</}}{{subst:var1|span>}}--Tommyang (talk) 07:55, 10 July 2011 (UTC){{subst:var1|<}}{{subst:var1|1=span style="display:none">}}--Tommyang (talk) 07:55, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space[edit]

Hey there JankoNilovic, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User talk:JankoNilovic/Incubation/Holocaust denial. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.
  • Shut off the bot here.
  • Report errors here.
  • If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


Regarding your recent edits to Holocaust denial, your edits were reverted because CODOH is not a reliable source. Please see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, thanks. WilliamH (talk) 12:49, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


You seem awfully close to edit warring on Holocaust denial‎, so I am cautioning you with regards to the three-revert rule. Please read the guideline. Please note that the guideline applies, even when editing while logged off. Singularity42 (talk) 20:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Kevin Myers, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 20:34, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Holocaust denial[edit]

Hello, I believe that this article is misleading and does not adhere to an academical standard. Especially the heavy bias in favor of the political pressure group ADL does not help to get an adequate description. Please consider these data:

Your recent edits to the Holocaust denial article[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nick-D (talk) 00:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Holocaust denial, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Arxiloxos (talk) 01:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring and POV pushing, as you did at Holocaust denial. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

JankoNilovic (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)

Request reason:

I believe the charge of POV pushing is not justified. I am just not familiar with the way Wikipedia operates. I just tried to be bold (Wikipedia:Be bold). I did not break the 3RR rule (within 24h, I waited even 2 days after the last revert and edited the Talk Page). Please look up my editing history. Nick-D should not have reported after such a short time. How can anyone learn editing and become familiar in such a short time? JankoNilovic (talk) 08:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

While you didn't violate 3RR, as that page says, "any edit warring may lead to sanctions". In other words, you can be blocked for edit warring without having violated 3RR. As you were. And you were warned aplenty. Nor are you "new" ... you were doing this three years ago, as well. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.