User talk:January2009

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, January2009! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Refs[edit]

Please use secondary sources per WP:MEDRS. Thank Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

80 years war[edit]

I have answered your comment here. –Sietecolores (talk) 16:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Levinson, PhD[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Levinson, PhD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 02:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philbert Maurice d'Ocagne (April 7)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! January2009, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Philbert Maurice d'Ocagne[edit]

Hi, I have responded on the page as I spotted your message. I've suggested some routes, although this is really not my area. He looks very notable from the position of someone who scraped through maths, and I'm happy to offer any help I can to point you in the right direction. Libby norman (talk) 23:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hooker Chemical Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Sperry and Sulfur chloride
Energy Future Holdings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Grid
Northeast blackout of 2003 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Right of way
Sound amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Coherent

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of VersionOne, Inc. for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VersionOne, Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VersionOne, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Malke 2010 (talk) 20:17, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Novavax, Inc. for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Novavax, Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novavax, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Malke 2010 (talk) 20:17, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 8 May[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Philbert Maurice d'Ocagne was accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Philbert Maurice d'Ocagne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 08:59, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aral Sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watershed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bequest motive may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • developed by economists Yaari (1965) and Davies (1980). Here it is not assumed that the disponer ([[testator]]} gains any specific benefit from leaving a bequest, but rather that lifetime is uncertain, and so

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:59, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 22 December[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 9 January[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

July 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and other details can be found at MCST Web.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mcst.gsfc.nasa.gov/ MCST Web]|title=MODIS Characterization Support Team|accessdate= 18 Jul 2015}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:11, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Chemoproteomics - suggestion[edit]

Hello, just been reading the article. Would it be worth putting at the start "Chemoproteomics, or chemical proteomics" and putting in a redirect, or indeed switching to that title? A pubmed search suggests that 'chemical proteomics' is more commonly used than 'chemoproteomics', although both terms are used by very eminent researchers. Blythwood (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

-RE: Hi Blythwood, thank you for your recommendation. I think this sounds like a good idea. Can you help me with this? I am a little rusty on wikipedia editing, having taken a break for a little while. Let me know what you can recommend wrt how to execute on your recommendation, thanks!. January2009 (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Well, that depends on what you think we should do! If you think chemoproteomics is an OK title but the terms are interchangeable, then the article might be worth starting as "Chemoproteomics, or chemical proteomics, is a..."-I can create a redirect for you but you just do that here. If you feel moving the article to a different title is better then click move next to 'view history'.
Sorry for the pedantry, though - just came off a case where an article on a field every expert on it calls magnetoreception was called 'magnetoception' for a decade, apparently because the original page creator made an honest mistake. So I'm a bit obsessive now! Blythwood (talk) 04:00, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

-RE2:

Thanks for your messages. Yes, in this case, there isnt already an existing page called 'chemical proteomics'. I did my due-dilligence when creating this page to be sure it wasnt a duplicate of the same concept described differently. And my research shows the term 'chemoproteomics' is quite well represented. If you are recommending a create a new page for an alternative term, 'chemical proteomics' then create a redirect, Im not sure 1) what content to put in to the chemical proteomics page and 2) which page redirects to which. Hopefully my confusion explained more explicitly will show you what Im looking for your advice on to lead/action on your idea presented to me. I am very comfortable with you creating this synonym concept, and performing any work needed for wikipedia policy to handle such. I did find zero content in wikipedia on the concept, and am familiar with the term chemoproteomics, and thus created the page as such. Anything you want to do to augment, thats great. We are going from 0 to 11 instead of just to 10.

fundinguniverse.com[edit]

I've been looking at links to fundinguniverse.com and found you've been adding it at least a few times. Please note that in edits like [1], only the first external link, the citation url= field, is appropriate.

Also, if you have thoughts on the reliability of the website and the International Directory of Company Histories which it looks to be mostly (entirely?) derived, it would be helpful. Some of the entries I've run across look like they were submitted from the companies themselves, and were published with very little or no editing. --Ronz (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, January2009. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)