User talk:Jbhunley/Archives/2015/December

Casey Conway[edit]

Can you expand its lede? --George Ho (talk) 19:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@George Ho: Sure. I will take a look at it this weekend. Cheers. Jbh ^Talk 01:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Jbh ^Talk 16:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Little help[edit]

@Randysokofelet: I repeat: I prefer to keep discussion about Wikipedia on Wikipedia. This allows others to participate and keeps a public record that may help others. Also, to be blunt, I will not give out an email address to an unknown user with no editing history who states they want to hide the conversation. I have no reason to receive non-public information from you. If you need help with a private matter please contact info-en@wikimedia.org and I or another WP:OTRS volunteer can help you through that system which is set up for such matters. Jbh ^Talk 13:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I am a new user of Wikipedia so I'd like to talk to you on how best to begin their contribution to Wikipedia percent perceive that you are efficient users. I would like to give me some Gmail through which I could and discreetly contact you. Randysokofelet (talk) 23:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The best place to go for general information is the WP:TEAHOUSE. There are volunteers there who specialize in helping out new editors. I have placed a welcome message with several links which describe how to edit a Wikipedia article as well as the policies and guidelines which apply to content. If, after looking over that material, you have some specific questions or need some help please feel free to leave a message for me here or {{ping}} me by placing {{ping|Jbhunley}} on any talk page and signing the edit with ~~~~. Cheers! Jbh ^Talk 00:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jbhunley: I would like to leave me an gmail or if you do not have to define your Gmail so I can discreetly talk to you, that our conservation be hidden from the public took. Randysokofelet (talk) 00:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer to keep discussion about Wikipedia on Wikipedia. This allows others to participate and keeps a public record that may help others. Also, to be blunt, I do not give out an email address to unknown users with no editing history who states they want to hide the conversation. I have no reason to receive non-public information from you. If you need help with a private matter please contact info-en@wikimedia.org and I or another WP:OTRS volunteer can help you through that system which is set up for such matters. Jbh ^Talk 09:42, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd ask you to leave Gmail through whom I could contact you. Our entire conservation through Gmail will refer to the rules of Wikipedia, and nothing else. Please leave Gmail to ask you question. Randysokofelet (talk) 13:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Little help 2[edit]

Editor attempting to avoid scrutiny at AfD. @Randysokofelet: please read WP:CANVASS for why your request is completely inappropriate. Please read notability guidelines for geographic places. The article you note is a named geographic feature and there is enough material to write an article. It needs sourcing but it is very unlikely the article would be deleted at AfD. I have placed the article on my watchlist. If you wish to nominate the article for deletion yourself then do so but do not attempt to avoid scrutiny again by asking another editor to do it in your place. Jbh ^Talk 12:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

My question relates to whether it might be asking a page for deletion by substafd but note that in the discussions in person you write it or copy it when you write it here. I hope that you as a perennial users with good reputation would have a greater chance for successful completion substafd process and permanently delete a page than I, and why would I want to put comment. Randysokofelet (talk) 21:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The easiest way to nominate an article for deletion is enable WP:TWINKLE by clicking here and selecting Enable Twinkle Gadget click save and clear your browsers cache. You then go to the article you wish to nominate where you will see a menu item TW select it and then XFD, choose AFD from the drop down list and write the policy based reason for why you think the article should be deleted. The reasons an article can be deleted are described in our Deletion policy. Typically articles are deleted for failing to pass out General notability criteria, other notability criteria. After you nominate the article you can let me know and I will take a look at the nomination and post a comment or !vote.

If nominating the article is too involved for you to do just tell me the article title and why you think it should be deleted. I will take a look at it and see what I think. If I feel it should be nominated, based on our deletion policy, I will list it at WP:AFD for you and note your request in the nomination. Jbh ^Talk 22:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. Only my request that you personally write a comment for deletion and do not write that I'm suggesting that you do anything. If you can not accept this and I'll write the name of items for deletion. Randysokofelet (talk) 20:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I accept no conditions - that is not how this works. If I feel the article needs deletion I will nominate it, if it needs improvement I will see if I can improve it, if I think it is OK I will do nothing. I will not act to help you avoid scrutiny. As it is I find your behavior very dodgy and bordering on inappropriate. If you want me to take a look an an article then tell me the article and why you think it needs to be deleted. Otherwise we are done here. Jbh ^Talk 23:56, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I remind you that I urge you to personally put a comment for deletion and there is absolutely no mention of my account. I hope you set up a page on the discussion to delete because of this my remarks. I remind you that I want to stay completely anonymous for various reasons. I'm asking you to act like you're asked to delete the item without anyone's suggestions. Tornik is part of Zlatibor mountain and not any particular part.There are peaks such as Čigota,small Tornik,Ljuljaš,Tornik...Height top of Tornik not 1502 meters and it is one of the reasons why the page is applied to erase. Height Tornik is not over 2000 meters and it is the norm of high peaks that are supposed to have their own page in relation to the mountains where they are located. In the case of Serbian mountains, all the peaks over 2,000 meters have their own special pages such as Pogled,Pančić's Peak,,Midžor...Tornik is much lower and it is not necessary to allocate a special page of the page Zlatibor. I have therefore submitted an application for deleting pages Tornik. I hope I have your support in deleting unnecessary and redundant pages Tornik. Simply existent page Zlatibor that mentions enhancing the offer is enough. It would be best to completely copying this to my comments, and set it in the discussion as if your without mentioning me. Or that you get the best part comments percent're efficient and exemplary user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randysokofelet (talk • contribs) 06:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]