User talk:Jbower47

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Jbower47, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

River Oaks[edit]

Please see Talk:River_Oaks,_Houston#Local_Government_Info - Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 23:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Ernest Hemingway[edit]

Hi, I replied to your comments on the Ernest Hemingway on the on the talkpage. As I explained there, I actually agree with your edits and was in the process of rewriting the sentence but you got to it first. Sorry about the reversion, it was an intermediate fix. You've highlighted information that needs to be added to the article. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 15:40, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


Battle of Agincourt[edit]

Hi, I've written you a reply on the Battle of Agincourt talk page.

Regards, merlin. --Merlinme (talk) 09:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Good call on the comfort women article[edit]

I think you were right to remove the offending paragraph, controversial and uncited since 2007. Yaush (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

EPA Union link on the EPA article[edit]

I agree with you that the EPA Union site should be included on the EPA article. Now would be a good time to give more reasons to include it since people are trying to remove it.

The EPA Union's site has even been put on Wikipedia's backlist so the link can not be posted. But it is NTEU280 . org —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 03:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Muammar Gaddafi[edit]

Thank you for providing a voice of reason on Talk:Muammar Gaddafi. The article and talk page have been rather incendiary lately, and virtually everyone is trying to push their POV. It's good to see somebody is fighting the sock puppets and trying to keep things neutral. - NickGrayLOL (talk) 02:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Legal status of Texas and Republic of Texas (group)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, "Republic of Texas (group)" and another, "Legal status of Texas" has been proposed for a merge with Texas Secession Movement. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Otr500 (talk) 06:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

River Oaks, Houston[edit]

Hi! Talk:River_Oaks,_Houston#Local_Government_Info WhisperToMe (talk) 04:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC)