User talk:Jedi94

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

2016 entries[edit]

Please comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello! And a request...[edit]

Hello! I don't believe we've ever interacted before (and if we have, my apologies). I'm Gen. Quon, and I'm a user pretty active in the X-Files, The Office, and Adventure Time fandoms. Anyway, I'm currently in grad school working on an MA thesis on Wikipedia, fandom, and canon, and I saw on the Star Wars project page that you were/are pretty active in the Star Wars fandom. (also, the username was a clue!) I was wondering if I could ask you a few (~10) questions about how fans like yourself aggregate and define "canon" on Wikipedia in regards to cultural media objects (e.g. TV shows, movies)? You're under no obligation to say yes, but I just thought I'd ask! I'm sorry that this might seem super-weird or out of the blue!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Cinderella Castle and Partners statue at Magic Kingdom.jpg[edit]

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cinderella Castle and Partners statue at Magic Kingdom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pete's Dragon, 2016.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pete's Dragon, 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016[edit]

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

I noticed your recent edit to Frozen (2013 film) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! —  Rebbing  talk  05:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Caravan (1936 song)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Caravan (1936 song). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 16 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Top Model (Scandinavia)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Top Model (Scandinavia). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Disney category mergers[edit]

Look at those

The Muppets split[edit]

Honestly, I don't think this split is a good idea at all. The characters are the feanchise and vice versa. It seems like an unnecessary split that will lead to a great deal of redundancy. I'm tempted to just reverse your moves, to be honest. oknazevad (talk) 16:37, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Really? I thought it would be good idea. Obviously, the current state of the articles is not what intend. I was planning on continuing to working on both to flesh them out and have them differentiate from one another in topic. Previously, the article depicted both the characters and the franchise in the same vein but the prose would drift between describing the franchise as whole and then the characters and their specifics. There's a fairly certain amount of information about the characters themselves that exists that has not been included, such as casting history and in-depth character development. Also, the article was very large and had a lot of content, so splitting it would help out with the overall length. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 18:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Isn't that why we have List of Muppets? To serve as a location for quick material about the characters and their casting? That's the appropriate place for that info. We don't need a huge, detailed write up of characterization; this isn't the Muppet Wiki. It just seems to me that the article titled The Muppets should be the article about the franchise, the one to list the tv shows and movies which make up the franchise, and such. It jet seems to me like a distinction without a difference, that major real-world info such as that should be in the main article, and that character material belongs in the character list article. oknazevad (talk) 01:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
What I meant was that there's a lot about the Muppets that can be discussed about in great detail (e.g. creation, history, physical design, operation, creative team, cast of performers, etc.), and not the individual characters (characterization) themselves, which is already addressed in the list article. These aforementioned topics are ones that I'm currently expanding upon, and the aim I'm intending is to have the article depict the characters in a broader sense, akin to a performing group, and have it distinguish from the media franchise itself. Do you think this idea really might be all for naught? I would really like to know, cause I'm doing this mainly to improve on the presentation of information we currently have and don't have. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 22:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Sad to say, but, yes, I do think it's an unneeded bifurcation. That sort of information belongs in the franchise article, as it's real-world production information, which is important to the franchise as a whole. It's good info (really god info, actually), but I don't think readers are served by having it split over two articles instead of in the one article. Especially considering many of these aspects of development, casting, etc, are directly tied to a particular production; keeping the media productions separate doesn't make sense to me. I think it makes best sense to merge back in most of the info you moved to The Muppets (franchise) back into the main article. For the purposes of WP:SUMMARY, it might make sense to have a List of The Muppets productions for the lists of movies and TV shows, but that should be just that and a pretty barebones list. The history of he franchise belongs with the history of the performing group, as they are one and the same. oknazevad (talk) 00:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Alright, I can concede to that reasoning. I'm going to continue modifying the content I'm working on and then I/we can merge everything back into place. I'm also very partial to your suggestion of creating a "List of The Muppets productions" considering that the majority of what I moved to the new franchise article were lots of tables and lists, which would make the reunified article lengthy and cluttered again (that's something I'd like to avoid). Perhaps we should enact that—maybe that would be a more wiser move than what I did. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 00:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, I think that's just a better way to spin off a daughter article per WP:SUMMARY while still providing the best scope for the main article. oknazevad (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Okay. I'm going to merge most of the content back to original article now, and create the new article for the list of media productions. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 00:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Sounds like a plan. I've already take care of most of the links. oknazevad (talk) 01:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Awesome and thank you. I've created the new article at List of The Muppets productions. Feel free to edit and give feedback. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 01:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Looks good. Great job! I love when collaboration works out well! oknazevad (talk) 04:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Yup, the feeling is mutual, lol. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 19:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Muppets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reboot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Sup[edit]

Just dropping by to say that your user page makes me nostalgic about how mine used to look. So very similar only with some spam images of me. Also thanks for being one of the valuable contributors to Miami articles, as there has long been a near-dearth of "normal" and reasonable attention to them. B137 (talk) 02:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Museum Park (Miami) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bicentennial
Universal Studios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Mummy (film)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Photography[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Photography. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob Iger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital Cities (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

What are you doing?[edit]

What are you doing? You are changing a link from the DisneyParksBlogs to some other media outlet source... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawkeye75 (talkcontribs) 18:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

My provided Los Angeles Times link is from a reliable, third-party, published source that verifies the attraction's closure in January 2017. This falls in line with the guidelines of WP:SOURCES. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 18:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Stop promoting your media page[edit]

Stop or I will try to get you bannedd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawkeye75 (talkcontribs) 18:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Hawkeye75. What media page? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
This problem has been resolved — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawkeye75 (talkcontribs) 09:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Tower of Terror talk page[edit]

Hello. If you have a chance, please offer your thoughts to the discussion that I started on The Twilight Zone Tower of Terror talk page.Wikicontributor12 (talk) 05:37, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

(Edit; things seem to be better now.)Wikicontributor12 (talk) 06:20, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

RfC at WikiProject Amusement Parks[edit]

Super Star, Freak Out and KMG Booster, night.jpg A change to the list of available statuses for Amusement Park infoboxes is being considered at the following discussion:

Please share any thoughts or comments you might have there. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 14:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

You are receiving this notification, because you are listed as a member of WikiProject Amusement Parks

Disambiguation link notification for July 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marvel Music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Music publishing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Unseen character[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Unseen character. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

The Jungle Book: Alive with Magic closing[edit]

I noticed that you added a closing date to The Jungle Book: Alive with Magic article. Do you happened to have a citation that proves that it is closing on September 5, 2016? Elisfkc (talk) 20:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Harmonic series (music)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Harmonic series (music). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Logo for Disney's Animated Storybook[edit]

Hi Jedi94! I've been admiring your work on the Disney franchise articles I created. Those logos add so much to the articles! I was wondering if you could have a look at doing the same thing for a widely popular video game series called Disney's Animated Storybook? Thanks in advance.--Coin945 (talk) 05:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Ready Player One (film)[edit]

Hi. There was a lot of edit warring over the production companies at Ready Player One (film). That's why I cited a source for the production companies and copied verbatim what it said. Everyone seems to have their own interpretation of who the production companies should be; what I added is what a reliable source explicitly says. Let's just stick to that instead of original research. If you think that Variety is wrong, you could always raise the issue at the talk page, but Variety is pretty much the golden standard for sourcing on film articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Hundred-Foot Journey (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ziegfeld Theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)