User talk:Jenny.s2379

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:51, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jenny.s2379 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for not following the guidelines as it is my frst time editing an article. I Just used my co worker's wikipedia account to edit some articles. I was searching for sources how to add wikipedia citations and it showed me steps that caused me to be blocked. I promise and assure you that this will not happen again if ever my account gets unblocked and I will understand and read the guidelines thoroughly in order to avoid this problem again. Thank you so much for your kind consideration. Jenny.s2379 (talk) 03:53, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First, if this happened because you were "using [your] coworker's account", by which it would seem that you mean this one, then it's obviously too compromised for us to unblock if we want to preserve "one user, one account".

Second, you say you were "searching for sources how to add wikipedia citations and it showed me steps that caused me to be blocked". Yes, like repeatedly posting links at the top of articles to buyroids.canada.co? That doesn't come across as a good-faith mistake to me. In fact, it doesn't even come across as a mistake. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jenny.s2379 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really do apologize for this. I have read the guidelines and terms and have since reflected on the mistake that I have made. I have no intention of spamming or spreading any negative information. If any chance is given, this will be the last time that this will happen and I will make sure that every action that will take place from here on, will be within guidelines. This will now be returned to the real owner and if the IP address will be given a chance to be unblocked, it will have clean record on your database. I am once again hoping for your kind consideration. Thank you. Jenny.s2379 (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Returned to the real owner"? No. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.