Hi, I am all new to this, very excited to start writing, not only about myself, but also others as well, I think this is so great to be able to write articles, I like writing, always have, not the greatest writer but I like to, so you know! I am starting a project, it is called "Lost in God". I am very new to creating articles, so this will take some time. If I don't talk to you again, hopefully I will, peace. Nathan — Preceding unsigned comment added by LostinGod (talk • contribs) 20:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Welcome. Please see the information I posted on your Talk page. It is here. --Jersey92 (talk) 21:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
It says that I have new messages, I only saw an old message I wrote earlier, how do I check that, I am trying very hard on creating an article "Lost in God,"
What do I to get a speedy nomination off, and I was wondering does someone else add the biography I wrote, or am I the one to put it back in, I am trying do the correct things LostinGod (talk) 19:40, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Just letting you know I undid your recent edit. Per WP:CONTESTED, even a bad-faith de-prod can't be undone. The next step, if you still consider deletion the way to go, is WP:AFD. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:10, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Why on earth would you contest the article when you've done no research on the subject.. You have many positive things on your page claiming to be a non cyber bully, and a helper of Wikipedia... Well, it seems you are doing the opposite of your personal credo.. Why not rather than flag the page for immediate removal behind your cloak of aninimitty, would you not send a message listing tips on how to improve the page? It seems you are not the person you are pretending to be, instead you are a keyboard Hercules who surfs this site in the wee hours of the morning like a zombied phantom flagging subject matter you personally do not like. If this is not the opposite of what you preach then forgive me for saying it is.
Good Day Jersey92
- I did not nominate for immediate removal with speedy deletion. I tagged with PROD. The reason was (and remains): "WP:1E - Notability seems to be from single event criticizing the US President which is not a major event." I am going to wait to see what happens with this piece and the subject before going with AfD as suggested by the last editor of the page. --Jersey92 (talk) 13:33, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Critiquing the President? That's just flat out crazy... In no way shape or form is it a critique of the President.. You clearly did not read it.
Speedy deletion nomination of Emily Willoughby
thx for seeing my page im aware of the speedy deletion whatever thing i know the problem the person is alive so let me see if she allows me to put her personal info thank you for reading this. from Insygnia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insygnia (talk • contribs) 02:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- The issue is not if the subject is alive. Please see WP:A7. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:50, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
I actually came to your talk page for reasons pertaining to this very subject. The YouTuber in question seems notable enough to be referenced by BBC and the Guardian. Definitely take it up with AfD, don't Speedy it. Westroopnerd (talk) 03:14, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'll go with PROD. Should Wikipedia have an article for everyone who was mentioned once in the BBC and The Guardian...--Jersey92 (talk) 03:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)