User talk:Jgp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search





We need your help at Talk:Tokusatsu :3—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Pentium M revisions[edit]

Hi, recently you reverted an addition I made to

where I added the fact that Pentium-M are also Socket 478 (not just Socket 479). Please visit these links to convince yourself that they edits were not "vandalism".

Here is a socket 478 motherboard for pentium M

From that page: "Note: On Intel Pentium-M/Celeron-M Dothan CPU, with a choice of 478pins and 479pins P-M CPU socket, MSI designed 478pins P-M CPU socket on this board."

You might also be interested in looking a the pictures on the right side of "The BalusC Server". The pictures show both "PM Banias S478 pins" and "PM Banias S479 balls". The picture shows 478 pins and 479 balls respectively. 13:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Alright. I'm fine with having separate entries. But deleting the S-479 entries was a big no-no. jgp TC 13:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Okay. I guess the problem we were having is that I was looking up the "part number" on Intel's website (which said 478 pin) while you were remembering the 479 pin version that also exists, but didn't match the part number on the page. 18:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my changes without first investigating. Thanks

--- There are both socket 479 AND 478 pentium M. Only those that Intel's website say are 478 pin are changed to socket 478.


Hi, just wondered what your objection was to my last edit to the Celeron article. Yonah-1024 surely belongs in the Core architecture section rather than the Pentium M (Banias/Dothan) section? Letdorf 12:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC).

Because it doesn't use the Core microarchitecture (and sorry about leaving no edit summary--it's been a long time since I used popups, and I'm atill getting used to them again). jgp TC 12:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Hmmmm....more confusion from Intel; the Core Solo isn't Core microarchitecture! I will still reinstate the other edits in that revision though. Letdorf 13:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC).


What do you mean by the image thing you were talking about? Rtkat3 T 1:55, 25 December 2006 (UTC).

Read Wikipedia's fair use policy. Flooding articles with utterly irrelevant images is not allowed. jgp TC 18:57, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


I can understand your frustration, as I have been dealing with a similar vandal recently. It is very difficult for an admin on AIV to make that judgement without knowing the subject matter. Please stay in contact, so we can find a way to make it easier to report those kind of cases. Agathoclea 10:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism to my user page. Hatch68 19:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Removing talk page comments[edit]

At the moment, User:FasterPussycatWooHoo is not banned or even blocked. Therefore, your removal of his comments here was absolutely improper, and if you do so again, you will be blocked. | Mr. Darcy talk 16:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

His posts were highly incivil and filled with personal attacks. Even without his ban, the removal would be no different than, for example, the removal of similarly-offensive comments by User: and User: from Talk:Power Rangers: Operation Overdrive and Talk:Juuken Sentai Gekiranger, which was performed by miltiple users. Furthermore, the consensus for his ban was unanimous, and it has been made very clear by _everyone_ who weighed in that FP is not welcome on that page. jgpTC 22:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I do not appreciate you threatening and harrassing me over this. You know what? I will not going to edit the encyclopedia anymore until FP is gone. I have no desire to participate in an environment where disruptive trolls like FP are mollycoddled and get to run free, while I get attacked and threatened for trying to do something about it. You have only yourself to blame for this. You can have FP editing the enyclopedia or you can have me editing the encyclopedia, but not both. jgpTC 22:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I have no idea what that threat is supposed to accomplish. Your behavior was out of line. You haven't been blocked or sanctioned in any way. The best response would be to acknowledge your mistakes and alter your behavior in the future. FWIW, you don't seem to understand how we ban users. The fact that a small number of users, most of whom were directly involved in the content dispute, think he should be banned is immaterial. Have a look at Wikipedia:Banning policy, which states quite clearly that community bans must result from the dispute resolution process, which hasn't been undertaken here. The best course of action here is to see if FPWH alters his behavior, because if he doesn't, he's going to end up blocked anyway. | Mr. Darcy talk 06:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
It's been about a week since I last edited anything, and you deserve some kind of response: it's not a threat. I simply do not feel comfortable in a community when those who do nothing but disrupt are given free rein, and those who actually try to do something about it are threatened. It's not something I want to participate in. For the record, I'm enjoying my Wikibreak -- I've found that my stress goes down considerably when I disassociate myself from this hotbed of politics and drama. jgpTC 02:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and his posts since the brief block have been obnoxious, but not all that uncivil, and I haven't seen any new personal attacks. His major violation is disruption, and if he doesn't stop, he'll be blocked. | Mr. Darcy talk 06:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Requesting your comments on the Everywhere Girl section in The Inquirer article[edit]

Since you are one of the involved users who support the Everywhere Girl section, I'd appreciate it if you can leave a comment in the talk page. Dionyseus 00:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Bad faith?[edit]

Hi there! I've asked you a followup question on the AN/I thread, but you may have missed it, it's a pretty active discussion. Specifically, I'd like to know why you characterized those endorsements of the deletion as bad faith edits. That's a very, very serious charge, as many of the people who made the edits you identified are long time contributors and editors in good standing. If you wish to assert that all of those people made bad faith edits, then I encourage you to provide some evidence and immediately bring it to the noticeboard separately so that the appropriate parties can be blocked/sanctioned appropriately. If, on the other hand, you meant to use a different term, I'd ask you to consider rephrasing your accusation of bad faith edits to avoid a misunderstanding. - CHAIRBOY () 22:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Userbox "archive"[edit]

Since that page is intended merely an archive of code, I'm going to remove the Wikipedian categories from the page, since it's incorrectly categorising you (and due to the several redlinked categories on that page as well). - jc37 01:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron[edit]

I notice some of your templates on your user page, and I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever to Wikipedia, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 17:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for King Mondo[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of King Mondo. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Exxolon (talk) 21:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_Attacks_and_Damaging_Statements]]. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Jgp. You have new messages at Powergate92's talk page.
Message added 14:44, 17 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Powergate92Talk 14:44, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rekonq[edit]

Hi Jgp. You've made a factually incorrect statement regarding the number of !votes here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rekonq. Would you mind correcting that? Thanks. Jayjg (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

If you think I'm wrong, post a correction yourself instead of harassing me. jgpTC 01:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Romanization for words of English origin[edit]

On the MOS:JP talk page, a discussion has been started about including or not including romanizations for words of English origin, such as Fainaru Fantajī in Final Fantasy (ファイナルファンタジー, Fainaru Fantajī) (for the sake of simplicity, I called this case "words of English origin", more information on semantics here).

Over the course of a month, it has become apparent that both the parties proposing to include or not include those romanizations cannot be convinced by the arguments or guidelines brought up by the other side. Therefore, a compromise is trying to be found that will satisfy both parties. One suggestion on a compromise has been given already, but it has not found unanimous agreement, so additional compromises are encouraged to be suggested.

One universally accepted point was to bring more users from the affected projects in to help achieve consensus, and you were one of those selected in the process.

What this invitation is:

  • You should give feedback on the first suggested compromise and are highly encouraged to provide other solutions.

What this invitation is not:

  • This is not a vote on including or excluding such romanizations.
  • This is not a vote on compromises either.

It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the MOS:JP talk page and helped find a solution. Thank you in advance. Prime Blue (talk) 11:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Arbitration notice[edit]

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#MOS:JP – Romanization for words of English origin and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, Prime Blue (talk) 22:18, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Kamen Rider Verde[edit]

You had previously edited at the AFD for Kamen Rider Verde, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider Verde. There is now an AFD for a related page, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider Ryuki Special: 13 Riders. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)


Didn't mean to harsh you mellow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Incredibly Obese Black Man (talkcontribs) 03:55, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Request for mediation of Video games developed in Japan[edit]

A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Video games developed in Japan was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.

Thank you, AGK 22:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Request for mediation of Video games developed in Japan, second notice[edit]

You are one of the people who could still qualify as interested in the mediation process regarding the romanization issue. If you wish to partake, please leave a message in this section of the request page. Thank you. Prime Blue (talk) 11:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Request for mediation accepted[edit]

The request for mediation concerning Video games developed in Japan, to which you were are a party, has been accepted. Please watchlist the case page (which is where the mediation will take place). For guidance on accepted cases, refer to this resource. A mediator should be assigned to this dispute within two weeks. If you have any queries, please contact a Committee member or the mediation mailing list.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK 21:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Message delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.

Mediation of Video games developed in Japan[edit]

The dispute about romanizations for katakana words of non-Japanese origin has now entered mediation and is currently being talked about in this discussion page section. If you still wish to participate, please join the discussion. Thank you. Prime Blue (talk) 14:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

RfC: New helper policy[edit]

Hello member of Category:Wikipedians who use IRC! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "#wikipedia-en-help connect" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.
Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page.
This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:58, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)