User talk:JimWae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
User:JimWae : Talk to me! | Check on my contributions!| Check my edit count!| Email Me!
Editor - rhodium star III.jpg This editor is a Senior Editor III
and is entitled to display this Platinum
Editor Star
Master editor 2.png

  • If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page to avoid fragmenting the discussion.
  • If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will be watching it, so you're most welcome to reply there rather than here.
  • If appropriate, I will move talk from here to relevant article talk page, so that everyone can share in the discussion.


Defender of Wikipedia[edit]

For outstanding efforts in defending Wikipedia from vandalism, in particular the JFK article, I award you the Defender of Wiki Barnstar -Husnock

--Hey, thank you very much, Husnock. I have now noticed vandalism on several articles that seems to be part of a class assignment gone astray --JimWae 19:39, 2005 Mar 26 (UTC)

history articles on wikipedia?[edit]

Hello Jim, I'm an historian working at the Center for History and New Media at George Mason University ( and we are very interested in digital historical works, including the writing of history on Wikipedia. We'd like to talk to people about their experiences working on articles in Wikipedia, in connection with a larger project on the history of the free and open source software movement. Would you be willing to talk with us about your involvement, either by phone, a/v chat, IM, or email? This could be as lengthy or brief a conversation as you wish.

Thanks for your consideration.

Joan Fragaszy

Sounds interesting - I am going to be very busy the next month - and cannot plan exact times to chat - so let's start with e-mails --JimWae 18:34, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)

Hi Jim, if you're more available now, I'm still very interested in speaking with you about your work on Wikipedia. Feel free to drop me an email at jfragasz_at_gmu_dot_edu. - Joan, 8/22/05

re: history articles on Wikipedia[edit]

Hi Jim, if you'd like to email me when you have some time I'm still very interested in speaking with you. Thanks, Joan Fragaszy. jfragasz at gmu dot edu

September 11, 2001 attacks[edit]

Examination of public videos reveals evidence of substantially different facts. Consider the contents of this video:* New Video Documentary of WTC Collapse As you watch, note particularly the differences in fact between this video and the wikipedia article, that are verifiable by you by reviewing the sources yourself (ie renting, buying or downloading). We are being lied to. Maybe we want to believe the lies because the truth implies intent from within. -unsigned by anon IP

Wikipedia 10[edit]


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, JimWae. You have new messages at Template talk:Personal beliefs.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, JimWae. You have new messages at Template talk:Personal beliefs.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TUSC token 1f1747f8c6381b915c04cb28ced74777[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Thank you for your work on the existentialism article. After going through the definition issue for the "libertarianism" and "anarchism" pages, I understand how nerve-wracking establishing a definition for a term is when there's never been much general agreement on what the hell it actually means. Byelf2007 (talk) 18 April 2012

LED lamps[edit]

Before starting another editwar, we should discuss the point "Comparison to other lighting technologies". Did you own the G7 Power LED Light Bulb, 900 Lumen, Warm White, 9 Watt? This lamp is bad, it has an CRI of <75 in real. I have tested over 40 different LED-Lamps from all known brands (Pilips, Osram, Toshiba, Samsung, LG, Ledon, Megaman, Bioledex...) and know their quality. In my opinion the referenced lamps should be well known, proved models who are really representive for the possible quality of the LED technology. So why not use the winner of the US Department of Energy's L-Prize, holder of the EPA ENERGY STAR ? This lamp has moren REAL lumen, an good CRI and costs the same? In my opinion, we should change back the LED-Lamp to the Philips Ambient 12.5W.

DYK for Agnosticism[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

I am descendant of the Livingstons and the Andre family (helped Benedict Arnold). I have great documentation from this generation, back to where you left off I brlieve, dates/names/and 1st/2nd hand written accounts of the families. You may email me at

John Spencer

Merger discussion for 1864 Republican National Convention [edit]


An article that you have been involved in editing— 1864 Republican National Convention —has been proposed for merging with 1864 National Union National Convention. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. olderwiser 18:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

I've merged the articles, via changing the 1864 Republican National Convention article, into a redirect to the 1864 National Union National Convention article. GoodDay (talk) 00:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


I reverted your entire edit to Vancouver rather than pick through each edit. Vancouver is a border city, and major geographic areas such as Canada should not be linked. Thanks for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

I did not link Canada, I moved a sentence from 1 paragraph to another. It must have already been linked. I live in BC, south of the city of Vancouver. Windsor is a border city. Vancouver is NEAR the border. Please revert your revert--JimWae (talk) 00:18, 12 August 2016 (UTC)