||This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Doc_James.
Advise for the Editing
Dear Dr. James,
Thank you for your kind advise in this regard. i will try to come with more authentic content in future.
thank you again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MBehzadKhan (talk • contribs) 20:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, with respect to copyright, please show me that particular part in an article, I copied verbatim to remove it, because one thing is used sources and other text. I generally make partial translations, not copies. thanks--Warairarepano&Guaicaipuro (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:19, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi Doc, with regard to the unblock request made by Nairspecht, I'm curious what data you were looking at to edify your decision. On his talk page you mentioned finding something, and I was just curious what that was. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:03, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- One can make out the details by doing an in depth analysis of their edits and those of the account associated with them. It helps to have off WP data to guide you but the concerns can be determined without it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- I guess I was curious if there were some sort of CU logs that you happened to find and that I was unaware existed. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:23, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- No just did a combination of looking around the internet and looking at the articles edited by the accounts in question. It becomes apparent that this is undisclosed paid editing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:25, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- Gotcha. Thanks for the explanation. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- Doc, I think the decline was malformed. There's a substituted template thing happening at the end of it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:08, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks and fixed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi Doc James. I recently AfD'd  and you PROD'd   recently created persons of Somali origin. There seems to be a cabal of accounts that are protecting each other's articles against deletion, either by removing speedy and AfD tags, or leaving comments contesting deletion. Could this be a valid SPI case, or do you think it's meat puppetry? In either case, there is a person or persons who desperately want these articles to stay. --Drm310 (talk) 06:28, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Agree SPI would be useful. These are likely articles by the people themselves. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Semen virus or SV
Semen virus or SV -- LOL! That cracked me up. :) Damotclese (talk) 16:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Yup Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
The situation at FGM reminded me of the image you uploaded of the half-naked 13-year old disabled girl, which I see still hasn't been deleted. Discussion here and here. Rich has blacked out her eyes, but she's still identifiable. I can nominate it for deletion, but knowing Commons there's no guarantee that will succeed.
It might succeed if you were to request speedy deletion as the uploader, on the grounds that you uploaded it in error. See Commons:Deletion policy. You could argue that the girl is identifiable and has not consented (and there's no evidence that her parents consented to widespread use); that another editor had already uploaded an image of her with the head cropped off; and that the image is unlikely to be used. They might still require a deletion discussion, but it's worth a try. Are you willing to do that? SarahSV (talk) 17:14, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- We are not using it anymore as it is not a simple case of Marfan's. So I have no object to it being deleted.
- With respect to consent, it was published in 2012 by BioMed Central so I would imagine that they got appropriate consent. Their is no reason to believe they wouldn't have. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Okay so nominated the version I uploaded. The other was not uploaded by me. User:CFCF I think uploaded the other one. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:42, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Speech Synthesis article
Saw that you reverted my edit in this article citing cut and paste from some other website. It did [b]NOT[/b] come from that site but rather Wikipedia itself at this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Instruments_TI-99/4A — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 01:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Sounds good. You need to state that in the edit summary to comply with the cc BY sa license we are under. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
http://www.wikimp3.org/album/wwe-hall-of-fame-2012-the-music-2012/140018/ undelete my edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmm134 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- It is unreferenced and copied from elsewhere. Right now I am trying to figure out what you are doing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
adding missing cd infos via itunes and wikipedia sister page wikimp3.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmm134 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Not notable IMO. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:42, 24 October 2016 (UTC)