User talk:Jnestorius

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives[edit]

2004[edit]

2005[edit]

2006[edit]

2007[edit]

2008[edit]

2009[edit]

2010[edit]

2011[edit]

2012[edit]

  1. Civil parish of St Jude
  2. Disambiguation pages
  3. Template:Athletics events
  4. Category:Athletics (track and field) in the United States
  5. Baronies templates
  6. Road names
  7. A beer for you!
  8. 1.5 billion viewers?
  9. The Liberties, Dublin
  10. Right- and left-hand traffic
  11. Athletics at the 1908 Summer Olympics
  12. Template:Dictionaries of English
  13. Howler (error)
  14. Rogue Article, or not?
  15. MfD nomination of User:Jnestorius/Ireland national football team (IFA) proposal 1

2013[edit]

  1. Disambiguation pages
  2. Enclave and exclave
  3. Seleka
  4. Coney Island
  5. New scheme for Irish bishops
  6. Irish referendum articles
  7. few points
  8. Nomination of List of national football teams by penalty shootout record for deletion
  9. Discussion at Category_talk:Women_and_death
  10. MfD nomination of User:Jnestorius/List of Bands whose names form complete sentences
  11. Muckanaghederdauhaulia
  12. User:Jnestorius/List of Bands whose names form complete sentences
  13. Next matchday scenarios

Biography of a living person[edit]

Please note this talk page message. Thanks, --Tóraí (talk) 10:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

That being the case, you may wish to amend the Talk page as well. jnestorius(talk) 11:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
I took a look. I didn't see anything that explicitly mentioned the allegations (just talked around it) so I left things be. Is there something in particular on the talk you're worried about? --Tóraí (talk) 12:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nope. jnestorius(talk) 21:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bishop’s borough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Freeholder, Freeman, Cashel and Cocket

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mardyke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dyke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Vincent Black Lightning[edit]

While I wholly agree with you, did you see the Talk Page there? Regards, Martinevans123 (talk) 17:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

I only moved the sentence from Vincent Black Shadow to Vincent Black Lightning, which I think we can all agree is at least less bad. jnestorius(talk) 17:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes, less bad I'm sure and, as I said, I quite agree. But I'd be surprised if other editors will agree to the addition. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Bad tricolour move[edit]

You could initiate a Wikipedia:Move review; I agree that it not clear that it was what supporters of the move wanted. walk victor falk talk 13:59, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Your article may be deleted.[edit]

The article you created, Shamrock Rovers XI vs Brazil, has been nominated for deletion. You may join the discussion if you wish. — O'Dea (talk) 01:18, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Yikes! Just spotted this. Whew. jnestorius(talk) 10:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your Irish County 'trasfers'(sic) page.[edit]

Hi.

This would be a very valuable article were it a full wiki article rather than appearing as a user page of yours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jnestorius/Irish_county_trasfers

eg perhaps as

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_county_transfers_1800_present

Unless you are not sure it is complete that is. It looks pretty well bar the abolition of town councils and the creation of 'Municipal Districts' in their place on the 1 June 2014.

Kind Regards...do tell me your plans on your or my talk page. Have a look at the OSM townlands project as well, www.townlands.ie

Wikimucker (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

It is one of many works in progress in my user space, all of which I intend to migrate to the article space when ready. However, some have languished there for years. jnestorius(talk) 10:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Cantred[edit]

Nice work. Succinct but readable. Laurel Lodged (talk) 21:38, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. jnestorius(talk) 09:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

203[edit]

I consider two hundred [and] three (whether or not the "and" is bolded) to two hundred and three or two hundred three. I'm not sure it's necessary, but it probably should be discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers. The current standard seems to be two hundred [and] three, although most were added by a single editor without any attempted at consensus. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Vietnamese reunification listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vietnamese reunification. Since you had some involvement with the Vietnamese reunification redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 10:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Anchor template[edit]

Hello there! I noticed that you recently placed an "anchor" template on the Libertarianism page and I was wondering, as I have never encountered this template before, what it does. The Help page on it implies that it places a HTML ANCHOR tag in the text, but... doesn't a heading already do that? Just curious. Thank you and have a great day! — MisterDub (talk | contribs) 15:24, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

@MisterDub: see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking#Prefer anchor linking to section linking jnestorius(talk) 16:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation! — MisterDub (talk | contribs) 16:31, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

RfC: linking pre- and post-nominals[edit]

Greetings! There seems to be a new discussion, this time an RfC, about the linking of pre- and post-nominals. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 21:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Hmm... Just an idea, but perhaps e.g. KG would serve the purpose? :P Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 23:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Carrickfergus (barony)[edit]

Discussion moved to Talk:Carrickfergus (barony)#Bold names jnestorius(talk) 11:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)