User talk:Jnestorius

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Joestynes)
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives[edit]

2004[edit]

2005[edit]

2006[edit]

2007[edit]

2008[edit]

2009[edit]

2010[edit]

2011[edit]

2012[edit]

  1. Civil parish of St Jude
  2. Disambiguation pages
  3. Template:Athletics events
  4. Category:Athletics (track and field) in the United States
  5. Baronies templates
  6. Road names
  7. A beer for you!
  8. 1.5 billion viewers?
  9. The Liberties, Dublin
  10. Right- and left-hand traffic
  11. Athletics at the 1908 Summer Olympics
  12. Template:Dictionaries of English
  13. Howler (error)
  14. Rogue Article, or not?
  15. MfD nomination of User:Jnestorius/Ireland national football team (IFA) proposal 1

2013[edit]

  1. Disambiguation pages
  2. Enclave and exclave
  3. Seleka
  4. Coney Island
  5. New scheme for Irish bishops
  6. Irish referendum articles
  7. few points
  8. Nomination of List of national football teams by penalty shootout record for deletion
  9. Discussion at Category_talk:Women_and_death
  10. MfD nomination of User:Jnestorius/List of Bands whose names form complete sentences
  11. Muckanaghederdauhaulia
  12. User:Jnestorius/List of Bands whose names form complete sentences
  13. Next matchday scenarios

Biography of a living person[edit]

Please note this talk page message. Thanks, --Tóraí (talk) 10:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

That being the case, you may wish to amend the Talk page as well. jnestorius(talk) 11:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
I took a look. I didn't see anything that explicitly mentioned the allegations (just talked around it) so I left things be. Is there something in particular on the talk you're worried about? --Tóraí (talk) 12:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nope. jnestorius(talk) 21:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Vincent Black Lightning[edit]

While I wholly agree with you, did you see the Talk Page there? Regards, Martinevans123 (talk) 17:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

I only moved the sentence from Vincent Black Shadow to Vincent Black Lightning, which I think we can all agree is at least less bad. jnestorius(talk) 17:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes, less bad I'm sure and, as I said, I quite agree. But I'd be surprised if other editors will agree to the addition. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Bad tricolour move[edit]

You could initiate a Wikipedia:Move review; I agree that it not clear that it was what supporters of the move wanted. walk victor falk talk 13:59, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Your article may be deleted.[edit]

The article you created, Shamrock Rovers XI vs Brazil, has been nominated for deletion. You may join the discussion if you wish. — O'Dea (talk) 01:18, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Yikes! Just spotted this. Whew. jnestorius(talk) 10:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your Irish County 'trasfers'(sic) page.[edit]

Hi.

This would be a very valuable article were it a full wiki article rather than appearing as a user page of yours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jnestorius/Irish_county_trasfers

eg perhaps as

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_county_transfers_1800_present

Unless you are not sure it is complete that is. It looks pretty well bar the abolition of town councils and the creation of 'Municipal Districts' in their place on the 1 June 2014.

Kind Regards...do tell me your plans on your or my talk page. Have a look at the OSM townlands project as well, www.townlands.ie

Wikimucker (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

It is one of many works in progress in my user space, all of which I intend to migrate to the article space when ready. However, some have languished there for years. jnestorius(talk) 10:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Cantred[edit]

Nice work. Succinct but readable. Laurel Lodged (talk) 21:38, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. jnestorius(talk) 09:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

203[edit]

I consider two hundred [and] three (whether or not the "and" is bolded) to two hundred and three or two hundred three. I'm not sure it's necessary, but it probably should be discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers. The current standard seems to be two hundred [and] three, although most were added by a single editor without any attempted at consensus. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Vietnamese reunification listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vietnamese reunification. Since you had some involvement with the Vietnamese reunification redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 10:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Anchor template[edit]

Hello there! I noticed that you recently placed an "anchor" template on the Libertarianism page and I was wondering, as I have never encountered this template before, what it does. The Help page on it implies that it places a HTML ANCHOR tag in the text, but... doesn't a heading already do that? Just curious. Thank you and have a great day! — MisterDub (talk | contribs) 15:24, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

@MisterDub: see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking#Prefer anchor linking to section linking jnestorius(talk) 16:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation! — MisterDub (talk | contribs) 16:31, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

RfC: linking pre- and post-nominals[edit]

Greetings! There seems to be a new discussion, this time an RfC, about the linking of pre- and post-nominals. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 21:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Hmm... Just an idea, but perhaps e.g. KG would serve the purpose? :P Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 23:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Carrickfergus (barony)[edit]

Discussion moved to Talk:Carrickfergus (barony)#Bold names jnestorius(talk) 11:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Dead link[edit]

Hi, the source that seems to support most of the Brussels massacre article and that you've just added to Eucharistic miracle has a dead link, and Google isn't helping me find a live version. Do you have anything firmer? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

See WP:LINKROT. jnestorius(talk) 10:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

United Original Secession Church[edit]

I found User:Jnestorius/Church of Scotland family tree while making an RFD nomination for United Original Secession Church; if you'd comment there, I'd appreciate it. One note on your family tree — your Cameronians links, or at least the latter one, should go to Reformed Presbyterian Church of Scotland, which is yet extant. Nyttend (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. Regarding your SOFIXIT comment, I didn't know where to look — I had no real idea of where to find anything off-wiki about the United Original Secession Church, Original Secession Church, or Synod of United Original Seceders (Scotland), aside from their years of existence. I assumed that they were descendants of the Associate Church, judging by the name alone, and from synodical minutes of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of Scotland, I knew that there were relations of a sort between them (e.g. UOSC minister William McKane was appointed as a fraternal delegate to the RPCS Synod of 1955), but that was all I knew. A bigger problem is that I really don't have much knowledge of sources on the Associate Church in general: I would have written an article years ago on the Associate Synod of North America if I had anything solid beyond Scouller's Manual; minor mentions in Glasgow's History and appearances in less general sources such as Buckeye Presbyterianism and the testimony of the Reformed Dissenting Presbytery (I have access to a print copy) really aren't enough to sustain an article. Nyttend (talk) 01:55, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
I would say never be afraid of writing a stub. Even one sentence, if that's all your references can support. Adding it to the right categories increases the likelihood of someoone with more sources finding and expanding it. jnestorius(talk) 04:05, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

A beer for you![edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png Cheers for dabbing that, looks cleaner now! Funny we took such a grilling in putting it through FAC and nobody thought to create a dab! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Mhairi Black[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Seles ranking[edit]

You made an incorrect assessment of the situation of Seles' ranking. While she was out injured no one wanted her to have her ranking preserved during her 28 month recovery. But when she announced a comeback in August of '95 only a very few players were against her being given a co-number-one ranking. Graf specifically was for it. The comeback section could contain that fact. It was only her maintaining a number 1 ranking while recovering first physically and then mentally that players were against. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:58, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Well, thank you for your correction; let me point out that the version to which you reverted did not contain any of the information you offer, only a cryptic allusion to Sabatini. It would have been as easy for you to fix the article rather than leave this Talk page message. jnestorius(talk) 10:46, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Murder of Moll McCarthy[edit]

You made a good job of the article. Do you know if the President has issued the pardon yet for Harry Gleason?

Thanks. I don't think it has happened yet, but it's hard to prove a negative. jnestorius(talk) 18:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)