User talk:Cannolis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Jonathanfu)
Jump to: navigation, search

Is really my contribution not "constructive"? Or is it maybe vandalism? Why did you revert my contribution, I believe it is interesting and informative and let other people know that as well. "Wikipedians who undertake Recent Changes patrol. These users use the recent changes section to monitor what others do to Wikipedia articles, and revert or undo the changes if they are identified as vandalism." — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 09:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

The main reason I reverted your edit was the address of the Ponant offices on the island and the link to the hiring page of their website, which would be prohibited per WP:ELNO. I'm also note quite convinced their headquarters are on Uvea - the Compagnie du Ponant article lists it in Marseille, and while the careers link you placed gave that address for crew applicants, there's also an address for office staff applicants. If you could find a source that definitively says their headquarters is in Uvea that would indeed be interesting information. Cannolis (talk) 09:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Bugger off and leave MY edits alone — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm Amilea Wang :) I'm currently taking most of the Kpop Fandom by my raps and the fact that I'm a trainee under a full storm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 02:54, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

See [[WP:RS] and WP:COI]. Anything you add to Wikipedia needs to be supported by sources, and it is almost never a good idea to write an article about yourself. Cannolis (talk) 03:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


Sorry if you think the edit was like that but most youth love to call Hukuntsi that way. Bonang Tracy Mokgethe (talk) 08:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Why you blocking me man, Gil day is legit Yo woosey (talk) 10:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

flashping — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:C803:D0A0:C19F:CAC7:4A46:73F3 (talk) 05:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


Strictly, that only applies to stuff like printer's pie ("gfyttyv uivyutrrfgfc") or stuff that is otherwise incomprehensible ("steak rotifer flanges overcasting breadfruit commonwealth"). If it can be read as an English statement, it doesn't count as nonsense. Bronzefish was an attempt at humour, and mildly funny (to me, at least). I deleted it as A1 (insufficient context), but hoax would have done too. Peridon (talk) 11:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Talk Italo-Greek War[edit]

Did you notice that there's a sock investigation re your correspondent? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 14:54, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

It is important to remove the reference to the brave Italian soldiers who fought in that campaign as the "macaroni boys". It is derogatory and unnecessary and adds nothing to the Analysis section. Secondly, it would be right and historically accurate to include a brief statement about the surrender of the Greek forces to the Italians and the terms of that surrender. After all, the armistice was signed by the Greeks to both the Germans and the Italians. Why mention only the German armistice and not the Italian one a few days later? The omission is rather odd.

I have tried several times to rectify the above but my good faith edits are constantly reverted because I am suspected of being a sock puppet of a previous banned editor called AnnalesSchool. I can only verify that I am not he! Generally, natural justice dictates that one should be presumed innocent first until proven guilty! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Cannolis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)