User talk:Jonjonjohny

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Deathcore[edit]

Well; I get the gist of your argument: it's metalcore with brutal death metal elements chucked in, but you can't define it by 'level of punk to metal ratio'. If that were the case, the more hardcore-influenced thrash metal, (think arise-period Sepultura) sludge metal (think eyehategod or iron monkey) and groove metal bands would not qualify as 'metal' when they clearly do. Would appreciate (intelligent-as I'm sure it will be :)) reply. JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 20:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

I can understand why your interested in making sure all these sub-genres are being distinguish, I've seen that your contributions have been specifically targeted metalcore and deathcore, although we are on the same page on nintendeocore since its metal influence is indistinguishable; to be honest near enough gone. But you have to understand that you can't just join wikipedia and then model articles to your concept of what is "heavy metal". Extreme metal is an umbrella term which includes grindcore as well, it that heavy enough to you to be left, is it just your superficial distaste for deathcore? I identify your edit as vandalism because like every metal head out their you're annoyed at the existence of fusion genres like these because your annoyed that scene kids are calling Suicide silence and The Red Chord metal. Truth is they are, you have a sensationalist and narrow opinion of metal and assume if you don't like it, it's not metal.
You are right though; you can't define it by 'level of punk to metal ratio' because you just made that up. Your typing things in your edits and implying I'm saying that those genres don't classify as metal. No reliable source has ever pondered or debated the amount of metal in this genre because it is clear, it is extreme metal because it's nothing like hardcore punk, and is close proximity to death metal. I hope your rebuttal is justified and without fabricated accusations :). Jonjonjohny (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

On the contrary, where did I mention I 'disliked' deathcore? Or any other genre for that matter? "it is clear, it is extreme metal because it's nothing like hardcore punk" -death metal sounds nothing like power metal. Power metal sounds nothing like sludge metal. Allare clearly subgenres of heavy metal. Ditto as regards deathcore and grindcore, metalcore etc. as regards their relationship to hardcore punk: just because the musical relationship is not obvious; doesn't mean they don't belong to the same genre.

"you can't define it by 'level of punk to metal ratio' because you just made that up."-apologies; not sure what you mean by that.

"you're annoyed at the existence of fusion genres like these because your annoyed that scene kids are calling Suicide silence and The Red Chord metal" -which would be their opinion, which they'd rightly or wrongly- be entitled to; and I frankly wouldn't care what 'scene kids' or anyone else for that matter thought on the matter: essentially, if it is metal; it is. if it isn't, it well, isn't.

"Extreme metal is an umbrella term which includes grindcore as well" -It doesn't include grindcore; as 'pure' grindcore has no metal elements whatsoever because it's essentially speeded-up, (often-droptuned) hardcore punk. Siege, (early) Napalm Death, Anal Cunt, etc. have nothing whatsoever to do with metal of any subgenre. Hence why it's called grindCORE, oddly enough :) I would also like to point out I deleted grindcore as well.

"No reliable source has ever pondered or debated the amount of metal in this genre" -I'm not 'pondering' the 'amount of metal' in deathcore: clearly, it's heavily influenced by metal; brutal death metal in particular, but being influenced by a genre doesn't mean you are a subgenre of that genre: by that logic, thrash metal is a hardcore punk subgenre, in the sense that it's heavy metal that's heavily influenced by hardcore punk. JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 20:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Look in all fairness I don't fully understand why you've dragged this discussion onto my page. Instead of debating this on the talk page like how it's done around here you decided to make an unexplained edit onto a frequently vandalised page. And taking it further, you've made this a debate on my talk to so you could annotate my reply in the most condescending way possible. And please ignore giving me the history lesson of bands in these genres, I can read those articles for 5 seconds and learn what you told me. Just winding it back in a bit going back to the actual article at hand, it is described as a fusion genre, not just influence by death metal, but a fusion of it with hardcore punk. And to add to this, you wrote yourself in your edit summary that metalcore is metallic hardcore and then how does adding more metal influence practically make it hardcore. If anything this proves that this article needs more coherent specifying of how it is Punk metal because clearly people still try to argue it isn't metal. Jonjonjohny (talk) 01:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

-because 'metallic' means 'influenced in some way by heavy metal'. 'hardcore' refers to hardcore punk, punk rock's faster, more aggressive offspring. Hence, the portmanteau 'metalcore' means 'hardcore (punk) that's got metal elements chucked in'. So its clearly hardcore, albeit hardcore with metal influences. Hence the genre names metalCORE, deathCORE, grindCORE etc. as opposed to '___ metal'.92.3.157.107 (talk) 19:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

also, the concept of 'punk metal' doesn't exist outside of wikipedia: its either metal influenced by punk/hardcore (thrash metal, sludge metal, groove metal) or punk/hardcore influenced by metal (crust punk, thrashcore, the more metallic grindcore, deathcore, metalcore)JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 19:58, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Awards[edit]

Please do not remove the awards that BMTH received for worst band of the year. Those actually happened, sorry if you don't like it, but that doesn't apply on this site. • GunMetal Angel 16:19, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

So let me get this straight. You deleted the kerrrang! awards table and a readers poll which WAS sourced (fyi, i mentioned that they got the best and worst result) and replaced it for a old, unsourced section. what implies that im a butthurt jack-over-oli-sykes fan when you are clearly too lazy to add sources for the negetive points yourself and just delete my work. How about the fact that you keep deleting deathcore off their page even though their are examples of them still being seen as deathcore (i.e. metal hammer october 2010 I believe the issue was). I know what wikipedia is and what it is not so how about not looking at it as vadalism and just find a damn source because I sure as hell couldn't when I re-wrote that article. what also makes me laugh, is how you didn't target the history where someone added about the predocessing side projects which were unsourced. Jonjonjohny (talk) 00:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
You're getting way too pissed, I never said anything was vandalism for one. And as for the whole deathcore ordeal, even from reading the history, there was someone that mentioned two years ago that there is a source that they haven't touched that genre beyond just their second album. I'm just getting things done right for the page, I mean so many fans of that shitty band don't exactly have common sense whatsoever and thus that lack of knowledge reflects when writing an article for Wikipedia. But looking at your explanation, I just want to say I wasn't trying to get you all angry at nothing nor did I ever even think you didn't know what you were doing. You're a lot wiser than about 80% of those that have ever edited that page, that's for sure. • GunMetal Angel 15:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry bro just was a bad time, you can tell it was the time stamp of how late it was, I get why you dealt with it in such a way, I'll find a source for it some other time for my sandbox work and then add it when ever, frankly youtube is better. Jonjonjohny (talk) 22:03, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Associated acts & La Dispute[edit]

The guidelines for the "associated acts" at Template:Infobox musical artist#associated_acts field reads, "Other acts with which this act has collaborated on multiple occasions, or on an album, or toured with as a single collaboration act playing together." While the groups in The Wave do tour together, they don't tour together as a single act–they tour as individual bands on the same bill. An example of this level of collaboration would be the group Melvins and the singer Jello Biafra who collectively wrote, recorded, and toured together in support of the albums Never Breathe What You Can't See and Sieg Howdy! under the moniker "Jello Biafra with the Melvins". Fezmar9 (talk) 18:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough, just undid my own edit, in all fairness it looks like a tacky addition anyway. I'll streamline this on Make Do and Mend's page as well. Jonjonjohny (talk) 18:23, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Soul Punk PR[edit]

I reviewed the PR for SOul Punk Wikipedia:Peer review/Soul Punk/archive1. Sorry it took so long, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 19:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Parting the Sea Between Brightness and Me, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Fezmar9 (talk) 23:49, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Ah sorry didn't mean to tick the box, accidental. Jonjonjohny (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
It was just a friendly reminder the future edits, no real harm done. Also, if you're unfamiliar with what constitutes a "minor edit," that automated template message I sent you gives a few examples and a link to a further/more in depth rationale. Happy editing! :) Fezmar9 (talk) 23:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

In case you want something to do[edit]

You could establish the "reception" section to the Dead Throne album by The Devil Wears Prada, you seem to find great sources for that sort of thing and write them better than I do. I've worked on that page recently in my free time, I'll be busy writing up Until I Feel Nothing soon. • GunMetal Angel 05:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

You know what I might just do that, that album with Zombie EP changed my opinion on them and I find it weird that it got all these sectoions added but then dumped by the time it got released. I'll see what i can add. Jonjonjohny (talk) 09:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

30STM talk page[edit]

Hey there, sorry to bother you. You recently commented on this discussion on the 30 Seconds to Mars talk page. Care to weigh in again if you have time? The editor still seems to disagree about the inclusion of the genre in the article, preferring it were included only on the one album page, and I have since provided more sources. Thanks. HrZ (talk) 13:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

A cookie for you![edit]

Choco chip cookie.png Thanks again for giving me that article for my Botch rewrite! Enjoy this delicious cookie as a token of my appreciation. Fezmar9 (talk) 06:24, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

For Original conversation, see here.

User:Frammis4242[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you've recently reverted some of Frammis4242 (talk · contribs)'s edits. I've started a discussion about his behavior at WP:ANI#User:Frammis4242. You are welcome to comment there if you wish. --IllaZilla (talk) 20:13, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Bury Tomorrow members[edit]

It was no test at all, Wikipedia is meant to display TRUE facts, and Bury Tomorrow have been a band since 1999. I remember the shows, have the CD, and frankly it's quite insulting to ex members to not be given recognition. The second CD they released even shows Andy on vocals and Dani on synth. I don't quite know what you're aiming to achieve by lying to the public and discounting ex members when people know the real story behind BT and how they got to where they are today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killingwithasmileuk (talkcontribs) 01:25, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry, it isn't as if I'm trying to 'lie to the public' or not credit other members. Fact is when I created and researched the article I was sure there was membership change but couldn't find a source. My main reason for undoing your edits is per the policy Wikipedia:Verifiability (See also Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth). The fact is without sources to imply this band is an extra 7 years and that none of the current members strictly were there when Bury Tomorrow started it's quite a hard accusation to digest. However I'm not reverting your edits because I don't believe you, I'm doing it because it's unsourced and poorly researched. Another example of this kind of thing is on the Fall Out Boy talk page with the massive discussion about Brandom Hamm, a supposed member but who was supported by a dubious source. Jonjonjohny (talk) 09:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Unsourced? I don't see how you can call a fucking EP, with music I shall link below, featuring those members, nor the fact that their drummer has been in the band for that many years 'unsourced'. There are members from across the bands history who have given this information. You will find that you either put the truth on wikipedia, or 100's of others will do it for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killingwithasmileuk (talkcontribs)
Can I please ask you to be civil during discussions. And as I have said about "the truth", Wikipedia is based upon research and reliable sources which supports the band history. All the former members involvement in the band has not been verified by any reliable sources, including both the band and journalists, making the grounds of their membership very contentious. And as for that image of a early Bury Tomorrow (BT), it is just five kids out in the cold looking at a camera, not resembling the modern BT and has never been confirmed as members. And finally please sign you comments in the relevant discussions with the four tildes (~) Jonjonjohny (talk) 13:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Apologies for the angry reply, an ex member was annoyed on my account. Evidence for 'Tobias Young' in the band can be seen in the casting shapes video. The picture of the lineup from 2002/03 also features Adam, the only member still in the band from the original lineup. The back cover of 'the sleep of the innocents' will also confirm Andy on vocals, and Dani on synth - and i believe Chris on guitar. Several members of bands from Portsmouth and Southampton can confirm all of the information RE: Bury Tomorrow's history, ex members of 'The Saddest Day', 'Ghosts On Pegasus Bridge', 'Tight Like Strings', 'To Every End', 'Don't Cross The Dead' and more, I shall get them to pass this info on to you. This is a picture of Andy on vocals in 2007 at his last show, just before Dani properly took over fully - http://www.flickr.com/photos/katie_anderson/358567842 Will pass on more info as I find the sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killingwithasmileuk (talkcontribs) 19:38, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
also have found a couple of the old tracks uploaded on soundcloud - http://soundcloud.com/seasickpromotionsuk/bury-tomorrow-the-champion http://soundcloud.com/seasickpromotionsuk/bury-tomorrow-when-angels-meet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killingwithasmileuk (talkcontribs) 19:54, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for helping to stitch information together in a way for us to use on the article, I hope you chose to stay and comfortably edit Wikipedia, there is still more needed, If you could get the band to get the information about their old members then that would be great. And just as a side note: please sign you comments with the four tildes (~) and also make sure you posts your comments in the right discussion by clicking [edit] next to the "Bury Tomorrow members" title. Jonjonjohny (talk) 23:34, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion[edit]

Peacedove.svg

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Crunkcore, Talk:Kesha/Archive 4, Talk:Kesha/Archive 2". Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 22:52, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

La Dispute[edit]

Haha I saw your edit on the La Dispute page. I can't believe I didn't notice that terrible piece of writing on the page before. Regards. Ozhu (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Those IPs can be very sneaky when they do multiple vandalising edits, you don't even notice what they've put into the article. Jonjonjohny (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Fightstar[edit]

You might want to look into this [1]. One of the criteria for a Good article is that "valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content". It is listed under images, but applies to sound files as well. This could potentially result in the article being quickfailed, but is an easy fix. AIRcorn (talk) 04:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

As no effort has been made to fix the raised issue I have quickfailed the Good article nomination. AIRcorn (talk) 05:29, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Sempiternal (album)[edit]

Hi. This edit made it look as if the album had already been released. Can you please adjust the article to no longer give that impression? See also User talk:Jeff G. No Citations on Bring Me The Horizon's album "Sempiternal"?. Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 22:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Have your say[edit]

Please have your say about a topic found on Bring Me the Horizon here. Thanks. --124.184.178.248 (talk) 11:05, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Re:Regarding the audio files[edit]

Hi- 30 seconds is the top end length. Our guideline recommends 30 seconds or 10% of the song, whichever's shorter. You can just upload a new version over the top, then tag the samples using this template. It's not the worst thing in the world, but it's worth getting right when you're nominating at GAC! J Milburn (talk) 22:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Noted. Thanks I'll get it done sometime today. Jonjonjohny (talk) 07:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

The two GANs I failed[edit]

I apologize if that seemed abrupt. However, the WP:Good article criteria state that articles with cleanup banners describing issues that must be addressed and haven't been addressed yet can be failed immediately. I was looking for articles to review and I found those two had non-free content issues, so I felt it prudent to delist them until those issues were fixed. At the time of the review, those banners were still valid and had only just been placed by someone who has done over 200 reviews before; had he actually reviewed the articles he likely would have failed them for the reasons for which he would have posted the templates. In other words, I saw his attachment of the templates to be the same thing as reviewing and then failing. If the outstanding issues are fixed now, feel free to renominate and try again. Hope they pass! LazyBastardGuy 16:26, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Small technical error[edit]

Hello I was wondering If you could give me some help. I created an article for an album, Lost Forever // Lost Together, and it doesn't come up in the wikipedia search bar and has strange page view statistics. I'm just wondering if the album's title doesn't work in wikipedia, I've seen some articles have to put a disclaimer that their titles are different for technical reasons. Thanks in advance. Jonjonjohny (talk) 23:41, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed this when you first posted it. I've just taken a look, and it seems fine now. Are you still having problems? SilkTork ✔Tea time 12:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Yeah it's fine now. Thanks for replying. Jonjonjohny (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
OK. SilkTork ✔Tea time 18:45, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Awesomeness[edit]

Music.png Great taste in music Barnstar
I love your taste in music! Mirror Freak 17:02, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Thankyou for my first Barnstar! This is awesome. Bring Me The Horizon are phenomenal aren't they? Jonjonjohny (talk) 09:13, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

I removed one of your GOCE requests[edit]

Hi Jonjonjohny. I've removed your request for a copy edit of The Blackest Beautiful from the GOCE requests page as it was your third concurrent one and you're only allowed two at a time. Sorry. Please check out the instructions at the top and wait till one of your other requests is archived before you add another. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 19:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I thought my request for Daybreaker had been properly archived and removed? I didnt think adding a Copy-edit template to the A Flash Flood Of Colour article counted as a request? I'll give it a week or two then. Jonjonjohny (talk) 09:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Apologies, it was my mistake. I was sure I had found three, but it seems there weren't. I've restored the The Blackest Beautiful request to the same place you put it, so you haven't been bumped down the queue. As "There is a Hell ..." has now been archived, you're entitled to add another one. Just adding a template to an article doesn't count against your allocation -- you can do as many of those as you like. Kind regards, --Stfg (talk) 11:46, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
Nice job with that big edit to Bring Me The Horizon's album. You really helped me out with that one. Why don't you join the Guild of copyeditor's? Mirror Freak 12:18, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Really It should be me thanking you for speeding up the process and doing a good job but none the less thanks. And although it's not serious affliction I am dyslexic so I would be a terrible copy-editor, there's a reason I line-up up all my GA candidates for the guild first, I suck at grammar. Jonjonjohny (talk) 14:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Daybreaker (Architects album) copyediting[edit]


Hi Jonjonjohny. You need to undo most of this edit. Per WP:MOS and its offshoots, song titles are given in double quotes, not single quotes; album titles are italicized; and the names of journals, magazines and the like are italicized. That's why I made those corrections. Rgds, --Stfg (talk) 08:13, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

My apologies, I'm doing it now. And it's good now I know for future reference. Jonjonjohny (talk) 08:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

The Blackest Beautiful copyediting[edit]

I'm starting GOCE copyediting on The Blackest Beautiful. It involves a bit of trimming of details, so hopefully that should improve things. I tagged that I'm reserving the article, but since you're the main contributor, you can continue editing on it if I screwed up any accuracy on the writing. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Just flicked through the trim down, always thought professional reviews of gigs was usually common but if it just overly pads out the article then fair enough. But none the less thank you it looks and reads a lot better, nominating it now. :) Jonjonjohny (talk) 18:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
The reviews are good since they detail the aspects of the songs. I tagged a few statements that would need to be sourced/verified or spelling cleaned up during GAN. Have fun! -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:28, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

A Flash Flood of Colour copyediting[edit]


Your GA nomination of There Is a Hell, Believe Me I've Seen It. There Is a Heaven, Let's Keep It a Secret.[edit]

Review started[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article There Is a Hell, Believe Me I've Seen It. There Is a Heaven, Let's Keep It a Secret. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Retrohead -- Retrohead (talk) 11:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Review finished[edit]

The article There Is a Hell, Believe Me I've Seen It. There Is a Heaven, Let's Keep It a Secret. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:There Is a Hell, Believe Me I've Seen It. There Is a Heaven, Let's Keep It a Secret. for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Retrohead -- Retrohead (talk) 07:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Abrupt Failure[edit]

The article There Is a Hell, Believe Me I've Seen It. There Is a Heaven, Let's Keep It a Secret. you nominated as a good article has failed Symbol unsupport vote.svg; see Talk:There Is a Hell, Believe Me I've Seen It. There Is a Heaven, Let's Keep It a Secret. for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Retrohead -- Retrohead (talk) 09:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

There Is a Hell c/e[edit]

Hi! I finished the c/e on There Is a Hell, Believe Me I've Seen It. There Is a Heaven, Let's Keep It a Secret.. Hope it works for you. I did not deal with the non-free issue. Onel5969 (talk) 23:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daybreaker (Architects album)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daybreaker (Architects album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 03:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Blackest Beautiful[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Blackest Beautiful you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 03:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daybreaker (Architects album)[edit]

The article Daybreaker (Architects album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Daybreaker (Architects album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 19:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Flash Flood of Colour[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Flash Flood of Colour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 04:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Blackest Beautiful[edit]

The article The Blackest Beautiful you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Blackest Beautiful for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 22:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Blackest Beautiful[edit]

The article The Blackest Beautiful you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:The Blackest Beautiful for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daybreaker (Architects album)[edit]

The article Daybreaker (Architects album) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Daybreaker (Architects album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 17:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Flash Flood of Colour[edit]

The article A Flash Flood of Colour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:A Flash Flood of Colour for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 03:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Flash Flood of Colour[edit]

The article A Flash Flood of Colour you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:A Flash Flood of Colour for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)