User talk:Jotamide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

re: List of Square Enix downloadable games[edit]

Alright, I was basing it off of List of Square Enix games, a featured list that I wrote. Like I said, I prefer it to all be in one big list so that you can sort everything by date and such, but I do see where you're coming from. I'll open a discussion at WT:VG to get some other opinions. --PresN 22:54, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Consensus for whether there should be a separate section Lords of Shadow series[edit]

Hello you're invited to vote and express your views on Template talk:Castlevania series#Separate section for Lords of Shadow series?. KahnJohn27 (talk) 10:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

Information icon Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles, as you did in the article Kill la Kill. It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative. Deleting such information makes the article less useful for a reader who is specifically trying to find out more about the subject. For more information, see Wikipedia's guidelines on spoilers. Thank you. (talk) 10:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Games With Gold games (North America) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Games With Gold games (North America) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Games With Gold games (North America) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Moving "List of Games with Gold games" outside of the Draft namespace?[edit]

I don't mean to be rude, nor do I mean to imply that I "own" the article, but I would like to know why you moved the article from Draft:List of Games with Gold games without discussing it on the Talk page or notifying me whatsoever? The article was not completed, and seeing as I was the main contributor to the article, it would be reasonable to expect that I receive some form of notification on this?

I imagine this wasn't out of malice, and I shouldn't act as though it was, but I must admit that this has annoyed me quite a bit simply for the fact that it's now up for deletion. I appreciate your additions to the article, but I would ask that you discuss large changes to the article (e.g. removing the Platforms and Notes columns, as well as renaming the article to only cover North America) before making them, or at least make them in the Draft version rather than making them in the full article at the time of "publishing". --Nicereddy (talk) 01:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The best of roxy music.jpg[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:The best of roxy music.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Re: The current state of shmup articles[edit]

Hi, Jotamide. Thank you for your invitation, but I am afraid at this moment I am rather busy and, therefore, my work on Wikipedia is not as intense as it used to be. In addition, I spend most of the little time I have on reviewing and fixing contributions from certain anonymous IPs to video game related articles, specially on Spanish Wikipedia. Anyway, I take note of your project and list of sources. Have a nice day! --Canyq (talk) 22:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:SUPERBEAT: XONiC has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:SUPERBEAT: XONiC. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SUPERBEAT: XONiC (July 22)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 04:18, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Teahouse logo
Hello! Jotamide, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 04:18, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
When your draft is not approved, it's not okay to just move it into mainspace anyway – czar 04:29, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


Hi Jotamide, I wanted to get in touch with you regarding this article. I'd cleaned it up several months ago in response to an AfD that (rightly) criticized it for failing to demonstrate notability. I'd like to improve the article to the point where I'm satisfied that it's no longer a borderline case and I am glad to see your efforts there. Basically I'm wondering what you would think about the idea of expanding the article to include coverage of vinyl data storage for video games. For example there were a number of ZX Spectrum games released on vinyl (flexidisks mostly) and I know of at least one video game that was stored on Capacitance Electronic Discs (the whole game was stored there, mind you, so soundtrack as well as everything else). Sources for these releases will probably be difficult to track down. I have a good RS for the CED game, but the Speccy flexidisks may prove hard to verify. If this seems like a good idea to you then I'd be happy to work on expanding the article, but do you think it would need a new title then? It's true these games have soundtracks and so technically they are "video game soundtracks released on vinyl", but it's obviously stretching it a bit since it's really the game as vinyl data rather than the soundtrack alone. Any thoughts? -Thibbs (talk) 18:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)