- 1 re: List of Square Enix downloadable games
- 2 Consensus for whether there should be a separate section Lords of Shadow series
- 3 March 2014
- 4 Nomination of List of Games With Gold games (North America) for deletion
- 5 Moving "List of Games with Gold games" outside of the Draft namespace?
- 6 Orphaned non-free image File:The best of roxy music.jpg
- 7 Re: The current state of shmup articles
re: List of Square Enix downloadable games
Alright, I was basing it off of List of Square Enix games, a featured list that I wrote. Like I said, I prefer it to all be in one big list so that you can sort everything by date and such, but I do see where you're coming from. I'll open a discussion at WT:VG to get some other opinions. --PresN 22:54, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Consensus for whether there should be a separate section Lords of Shadow series
Hello you're invited to vote and express your views on Template talk:Castlevania series#Separate section for Lords of Shadow series?. KahnJohn27 (talk) 10:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles, as you did in the article Kill la Kill. It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative. Deleting such information makes the article less useful for a reader who is specifically trying to find out more about the subject. For more information, see Wikipedia's guidelines on spoilers. Thank you. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 10:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Games With Gold games (North America) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Games With Gold games (North America) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Games With Gold games (North America) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Moving "List of Games with Gold games" outside of the Draft namespace?
I don't mean to be rude, nor do I mean to imply that I "own" the article, but I would like to know why you moved the article from Draft:List of Games with Gold games without discussing it on the Talk page or notifying me whatsoever? The article was not completed, and seeing as I was the main contributor to the article, it would be reasonable to expect that I receive some form of notification on this?
I imagine this wasn't out of malice, and I shouldn't act as though it was, but I must admit that this has annoyed me quite a bit simply for the fact that it's now up for deletion. I appreciate your additions to the article, but I would ask that you discuss large changes to the article (e.g. removing the Platforms and Notes columns, as well as renaming the article to only cover North America) before making them, or at least make them in the Draft version rather than making them in the full article at the time of "publishing". --Nicereddy (talk) 01:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The best of roxy music.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The best of roxy music.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Re: The current state of shmup articles
Hi, Jotamide. Thank you for your invitation, but I am afraid at this moment I am rather busy and, therefore, my work on Wikipedia is not as intense as it used to be. In addition, I spend most of the little time I have on reviewing and fixing contributions from certain anonymous IPs to video game related articles, specially on Spanish Wikipedia. Anyway, I take note of your project and list of sources. Have a nice day! --Canyq (talk) 22:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)