User talk:Jsarvey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Campus outreach opportunity league[edit]

I've restored the article, but it does appear promotional (the fact that the organization is no longer active aside). The fact that there were no sources was problematic, and also contributed to the feeling that the article only served to promote the organization. I would recommend adding the references you have as soon as possible, and editing the article to show specifically why the organization is/was notable. Additional news coverage, even if it's a citation from an off-line source (old newspaper, etc), would go a long way to proving the organizations notability. Sorry for the confusion, and please let me know if I can be of further assistance. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 20:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

It is better to create a finished article before posting to Wikipedia; what was there looked like a promotion of the group, and was without sourced references. A new, properly sourced (and properly capitalized) article can be created at any time. Also: please remember to sign your postings to talk pages like this one. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

July 2010[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Global Warming. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. TeaDrinker (talk) 16:24, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Campus Outreach Opportunity League for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campus Outreach Opportunity League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campus Outreach Opportunity League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)