User talk:Juleskoundes
April 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Juleskoundes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand what I have done. I'm truly sorry for anything that I've caused on Wikipedia. I didn't mean to vandalize or create hoaxes, I just want to contribute. About the feudal earldom of Errol I believe that it is something that shouldn't be marked as hoaxes. I even included Lord Lyon's notice, so I'd hope it'll be reinstated. Juleskoundes (talk) 23:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I can't figure out how one doesn't mean to vandalize or create hoaxes. Both those activities require several deliberate decisions; it's like saying "I didn't mean to rob the bank". In any event, you're probably going to need to describe a specific edit you would make to the encyclopedia if unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@331dot: Apart from some articles that were supposed for sandboxes/drafts, most of my edits (not new creations) have proper citations, and so far only 1 was reverted for vandalism (which is a misinterpretation implied by a user). Juleskoundes (talk) 11:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please make a new request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 12:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Juleskoundes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry if my edits annoy some of the users on Wikipedia. While there are some articles that were supposed for sandboxes/drafts and I published them as main articles (which is the main reason that I was blocked) I believe that I have made some useful edits and really hope to be able to contribute again. Juleskoundes (talk) 12:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
June 2024
[edit]Juleskoundes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I apologize if my edits have been bothersome to certain Wikipedia users. While I understand that some of the articles I published were intended for sandboxes or drafts and should not have been made into main articles (which led to my block), I believe that I have also made valuable edits and I sincerely desire to contribute again.
I acknowledge that directly publishing incomplete articles to the main Wikipedia space was an error on my part, and I comprehend how it could disrupt and frustrate other users. As a newbie, I am still in the process of learning the intricacies of Wikipedia's editing and publishing procedures. Nevertheless, I genuinely believe that I have provided worthwhile contributions by presenting well-researched and accurate information.
My intention is not to cause annoyance, but to genuinely aid in expanding and enhancing Wikipedia's knowledge repository. I genuinely regret any disruption my previous actions may have caused, and I am dedicated to exercising more caution and thoughtfulness in the future. I hope that the administrators will consider lifting the block so that I may demonstrate my ability to make constructive and positive contributions to the platform. I assure you that these mistakes would not happen again if I was given a chance. Juleskoundes (talk) 10:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Did you use AI to create your request? It isn't very good. I suggest you have another try. PhilKnight (talk) 17:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Juleskoundes (talk) 10:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Feudal barony of Chilham
[edit]
Hello, Juleskoundes. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Feudal barony of Chilham, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Bailiwick of Stalmine
[edit] Hello, Juleskoundes. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bailiwick of Stalmine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Count of Charny
[edit] Hello, Juleskoundes. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Count of Charny, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)