User talk:Julie Saeger Nierenberg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Julie Saeger Nierenberg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Bis-choline tetrathiomolybdate. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Julie Saeger Nierenberg, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Welcome, but be careful[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed your edits to Bis-choline tetrathiomolybdate and related articles. Here are suggested readings: WP:SECONDARY and WP:COI. The gist of these guidelines are:

  • Wikipedia prefers citations to reviews and books, not primary journal references (tens of thousands appear annually). Citing secondary sources is the encyclopedic style and it is essential for matters medical.
  • Do not cite yourself or your colleagues. It's called conflict of interest. Many new editors cite themselves or their colleagues mainly. That behavior is inappropriate.

If you have questions, many editors can offer advice. Happy editing. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Wilson's disease[edit]

I have previously moved your additions to the talk page because I was not convinced that they added much to what the article was already saying. You have not responded to this, instead simply adding the same stuff again. Please take a minute to read WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS, which is consensus guidance on how we present medical science and how we select our references. However fascinating, we cannot say much more about molybdate treatment than that it is (still) considered experimental but has some supportive data. I'm afraid that you're going to need to convince me that what you're adding meets the MEDMOS/MEDRS criteria.

Rather than reinsert the same content, please respond to my post on Talk:Wilson's disease. JFW | T@lk 09:12, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I think we have had discussions before about adding content on ongoing trials. Can you explain why you now again added discussions about ongoing studies on the Wilson's disease article? JFW | T@lk 14:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your message, Dr. Wolff. If references about ongoing investigations of bis-choline TTM are inappropriate to use, even in the specific context of that wording, then I'm happy to take those off the article. Julie Saeger Nierenberg (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Wilson Therapeutics (June 29)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
Onel5969 (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 5 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilson Therapeutics has been accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Wilson Therapeutics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 16:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UserTesting (April 12)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Millermk was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Millermk (talk) 09:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UserTesting (April 27)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
wia (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meditope (September 6)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:UserTesting concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:UserTesting, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:UserTesting[edit]

Hello, Julie Saeger Nierenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "UserTesting".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Face-smile.svg samtar {t} 13:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Meditope concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Meditope, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meditope (February 24)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Meditope[edit]

Hello, Julie Saeger Nierenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Meditope".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 16:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Meditope Biosciences Inc.[edit]

Hello, Julie Saeger Nierenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Meditope Biosciences Inc.".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —MRD2014 talk contribs 00:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Cytokinetics[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Cytokinetics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2016/11/07/887461/0/en/Cytokinetics-Announces-New-Results-From-COSMIC-HF-to-be-Presented-at-the-American-Heart-Association-Scientific-Sessions-2016.html?culture=fr-ca. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I do apologize for any and all infractions. I have no intention of plagiarizing others' materials. I was in the process of composing a draft and thought that was mine to do without it being submitted for review or publication at this time. How do I get to the draft and make the wording changes I need to make at this point? Should I move it to another place? Please advise! Julie Saeger Nierenberg (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Just create a new one, rewritten from scratch. We can't have the copyrighted version anywhere on Wikipedia. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Julie Saeger Nierenberg, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Cytokinetics have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I do apologize for any and all infractions. I was in the process of composing a draft and thought that was mine to do without it being submitted for review or publication at this time. How do I get to the draft and make the wording changes I need to make at this point? Should I move it to another place? Please advise! Julie Saeger Nierenberg (talk) 13:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)