User talk:Jun Nijo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jun Nijo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on [[User talk:Closedmouth (talk) 08:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)|my talk page]], or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Closedmouth (talk) 08:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

July 2009[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Bobby Jindal. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jindal is Indian American. That article says India is South Asia, The category fits. Do not remove content without explanation. Get consensus on the article talk page before making such a change again. Edison (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Removing categories[edit]

Hi,

I just saw that you were removing categories such as Converts to Islam and Former Protestants from multiple pages. Any reason for doing so? -- Raziman T V's Alternate account (Talk - Contribs) 18:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Why can't we remove redundant categories? Converts to Islam from Protestantism contains Converts to Islam and Former Protestants. Removing overlaped categories, Pages will be clear. --Jun Nijo (talk) 06:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Alfred Döblin[edit]

Hi,

I just saw you removed the category "converts to roman catholicism", probably because you thought it overlapsed with the category "converts to roman catholicism from judaism". I think Döblin should also be classified under "converts to roman catholicism" since he was only ethnicly jewish, but didn't practice the jewish religion.--Chris2000 (talk) 04:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Editing etiquette nudge[edit]

Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. —Eustress talk 04:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Adding biographies to categories without sourcing[edit]

Could you please stop adding various biographical articles to categories that are not supported by the article text or sourced. Without adding sources to the articles, you have violated WP:BLP in a number of cases, so please stop. --DAJF (talk) 09:32, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Gavan McCormack, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Please share your thinking[edit]

Please provide edit summaries with your edits. Without them, other editors have difficulty understanding what you're trying to accomplish. Edits that have edit summaries are much less likely to be reverted. Thanks, CliffC (talk) 03:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Please help by reading what you're editing[edit]

While you're plowing though articles trying to assign or combine religious categories, please take time to read the article to determine whether a category is justified at all – for example, in Peter J. Brennan you changed "American Roman Catholics" to "American Roman Catholic politicians", although the article gives no indication of his religion. By simply removing the original unwarranted category, you could have improved the encyclopedia instead of compounding the error. --CliffC (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Reform rabbis categories[edit]

Why did you remove relevant categories from the Reform rabbi categories? These are valid supercategories for the rabbis articles. --AFriedman (talk) 05:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Jewish members of the Cabinet of the United States[edit]

Info talk.png

Category:Jewish members of the Cabinet of the United States, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Converts to agnosticism[edit]

I have nominated Category:Converts to agnosticism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Agnostics by religion (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries[edit]

Hi! Everyone appreciates your contributions, but I have to ask, as others have already, that you always add an edit summary when submitting changes. Many of your changes involve adjustments to categories, which can be hard to follow when you don't explain what you're doing. This small effort on your part saves time for many other people. It's also courteous, when someone leaves you a message here on your talk page, to acknowledge what they say, whether you agree with it or not. EEng (talk) 11:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Richard Dawkins[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Richard Dawkins, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 02:20, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Cardiovascular disease deaths[edit]

Were you planning on populating all of these new cardiovascular disease deaths in XXX categories, or are you going to leave each one with just one or two articles in it? Good Ol’factory (talk) 09:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello? (I noticed you continued to edit after my question, and apparently have continued more under an IP?) I just want an idea of what your idea or goal is with these. Good Ol’factory (talk) 10:56, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Hi again—same question as before. Are you populating these in some sort of systematic way or just creating them? It would be nice if you could respond. Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Converts to agnosticism[edit]

Info talk.png

Category:Converts to agnosticism, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 19:36, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010[edit]

Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. CliffC (talk) 13:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

re Category:Divorcees[edit]

Whoa. This category is going to include a large chunk of the human race. Are we also going to have a category "Married people"? What is your rationale for the existence of this category? Absent some convincing argument, I'm opposed to it. Herostratus (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

At least, this category's purpose is clear and what about categorized people. Must we delete Category:Billionaires, Category:Criminals, Category:Centenarians, Category:Survivors, and Category:Adoptees? Jun Nijo (talk) 16:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_October_28#Category:Divorcees. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keith Springer[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Keith Springer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable financial advisor. No notable reference on the subject himself.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edcolins (talk) 20:29, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Keith Springer for deletion[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A discussion has begun about whether the article Keith Springer, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Springer until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Edcolins (talk) 11:43, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Twin people - Discussion[edit]

Hi there NIJO, VASCO from Portugal here,

please have a look at this discussion (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Raising_the_bar.3F), as you can see, "Twin people" is enough in the name of category. Please leave your opinion there if you want.

Domo arigato, happy week - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

July 2011[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Collin Peterson. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Cognate247 (talk) 19:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

TOTD[edit]

Tip of the day...


Please summarize your work using the Edit summary box

If you make anything other than a minor edit to an article, it helps others if you fill in the edit summary. Edit summaries are visible in the page history, watchlists, and on Recent changes, so they help others users keep track of what's happening to a page. If you use section editing, the summary box is filled in with the section heading by default (in gray text), which you can follow with more detail. You also can put links to articles in the edit summary. Just put double brackets around [[the article title]] like you would normally. The summary is limited to 200 characters, so many people use common abbreviations, such as sp for correcting spelling mistakes.

Read more: Edit summary

Prior tip - Next tip

Konnichiwa Jun_Nijosan. 4 editors have already asked you to follow consensus, which is to Help:Edit_summary#Always provide an edit summary. It's a shame you've so far failed to supply ESs - is there some reason why you've done so?

Arigatou, Trafford09 (talk) 16:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Parents of national leaders[edit]

Category:Parents of national leaders, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 06:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Presidents of the National Rifle Association[edit]

Category:Presidents of the National Rifle Association, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:19, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of richest American politicians for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of richest American politicians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of richest American politicians until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dezastru (talk) 19:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:American women sheriffs[edit]

Category:American women sheriffs, which you created, has been nominated for upmerging to Category:American female police officers and Category:Women sheriffs. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 03:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:Voice actors who committed suicide[edit]

Category:Voice actors who committed suicide, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:School board members in Japan[edit]

Category:School board members in Japan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 20:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)