User talk:Justice007

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Saeed Aasi[edit]

I just feel you might have some personal issues with the article; why are you deleting the contents everything is provided with references and have valid links. Please stop playing around. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahidaasi (talkcontribs) 13:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Please do not teach me, you are breaching the wiki-rules, some times as IP addresses and sometimes sock puppetry, you are adding the WP:Original research and WP:Promotional content without citing WP:Reliable sources. What you are providing links of Youtube, daily Motion, and subject's own website that are not the reliable sources. I warn you, stop adding original research content, if you remain reverting good faith edits, you will be blocked from editing. I hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 14:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm not teaching you but you are showing your personal hate and referring the contents to Unreliable. The videos on YouTube and daily motion are not uploaded by me or the subject. And apart from personal website the link of Daily Nawa-i-Waqt is provided which is more than enough as a reliable source if you just Google the name Saeed Aasi you will find dozens of reliable links. And there is not a single word which seems like any promotion I'm not selling any product here so open your eyes and if you still not willing to accept the fact just mention your real name and I will send you full authentic and reliable source which you can never deny. Shahidaasi (talk) 15:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

ANI[edit]

Just to let you know, I have mentioned your name in this discussion Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Viriditas_and_User:Anupam. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Juristicweb (talk) 12:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

WikiDefender Barnstar.png The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Dear Justice007, thank you for the kindness that you showed to me recently. I really appreciate your efforts to stand up for me and ensuring that the community realizes that my intention is to make Wikipedia a better place. It means a lot to me. I hope to see kind spirited editors like yourself editing on Wikipedia. Your friend, AnupamTalk 18:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


  • I did as the policies of wikipedia,a lot of thanks for barntar.Justice007 (talk) 02:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Final !!![edit]

Mr. Justice, Rather than giving the funny names to article section of Muhammad Iqbal you, kindly do some constructive work to develop the article. If you keep on reverting my constructive edits, You will leave no option for me rather than take your case to Wikipedia:RFC or WP:DRN, where you will be stopped from editing on particular or WP articles until you develop your skills, and the entire article of Muhammad Iqbal will be tagged with multiple remarks if the case reaches at Wikipedia:RFC or WP:DRN, and before reaching Wikipedia:RFC or WP:DRN, I supposed to warn you for the consequences of it, rest is upto you. Best wishes. --Omer123hussain (talk) 14:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Go ahead happily,I know my rights.Justice007 (talk) 18:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Orissa and Odisha[edit]

Please go through this discussion to know about the name change discussion. thanks for contributions to wikipedia. --Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 14:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Do not involve in edit warring[edit]

You removed template

, from the article Muhammad Iqbal, with the edit summary of Copy edit, and main article mentioning as reference for further study is itself stub article unsourced ,not clear notability,and just newly created by Omer123hussain Please discuss on talk page for this [1] and next time you do any edit first discuss on talk page to avoid edit warring. :))--Omer123hussain (talk) 09:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Do not apply blogs as a Source.[edit]

In your recent edits at Tarana-e-Milli, you had applied a blog as an source here, which will put the article in more trouble. Blogs cannot be applied as an source, (except in very rare exceptional cases). Please stop this !!!, Please read and understand WP:MOS before you make any edit. :) Cheers.--Omer123hussain (talk) 12:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

  • I am very sorry to say that please learn more before preaching anyone, and take a look at this WP:RSOPINION. Justice007 (talk) 13:54, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarana-e-Milli. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Sorry and thanks Dark, I am aware of that, but I could not stop myself to say that.Justice007 (talk) 14:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

MPhill Thesis for Idris Azad BioGraphy[edit]

i have cited or ref the mphil thesis of Abbas, Mohisn (Urdu adab kay faroog may Khushab ka hissa)and it is published from Allama Iqbal Open University. is it not a worthy reference to any content?? kindly plz tell me how can i cite this so that it is acceptable ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qasimyad (talkcontribs) 12:33, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Tehelka[edit]

Thanks a tonne , and I would be happy to learn from you. Woh to dost hain nahin jo haste meri gaflat pe hain, Zindadilon se dosti , nacheez ka bhi shauq hai Realnews7 (talk) 10:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Shreya[edit]

Thanks for cleaning up this article. Just wanted to remind you that the formatting should be italics for film titles and quotes "" for song titles. Please don't change that. BollyJeff | talk 13:05, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Everything will be OK, I am still busy to update ,cleanup and layout.If anything goes wrong please correct it or let me know.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 13:13, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Nazia Iqbal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharjah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

The Deity[edit]

Please will you explain why you have reverted my edits to this article. If you fail to do so and revert my next edit I will report you to administration. 81.106.127.14 (talk) 22:43, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Because you added the content without providing reliable sources, and removal of anything needs sources too,and all changes should be first discussed on the talk page of the article, not on my talk page. Thanks. Justice007 (talk) 09:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Well, The Oxford English Dictionary is the most authoritative dictionary of the English language. There simply is not a more reliable source in existence. Secondly, your claim that any change to an article must be discussed on the article's talk page is also untrue. This would be an extremely laborious protocol would it be wikipedia policy. Fortunately no such policy exists. 81.106.127.14 (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Sandra Seaton Revision[edit]

Dear Justice007, I see that you commented on the need for revisions to the article about Sandra Seaton. I just noticed that your recommendation to revise the article by adding more documentation and references has been followed through on. There are now more references and footnotes. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lavender21 (talkcontribs) 23:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

WikiDefender Barnstar Hires.png The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Excellent work keeping out POV and poorly formatted edits out of Pakistan, Allama Iqbal and many other articles. lTopGunl (talk) 16:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


  • It's a great encouragement from an experienced editor's appreciation of my work.I am very pleased.Thank you very much.Justice007 (talk) 16:53, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
  • You're welcome. You've done quite some work around keeping the poor edits out and further improving the articles.. this was long due. Cheers. :] --lTopGunl (talk) 17:46, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Comma in Pakistan[edit]

Hi Justice007. Actually, TopGun was right to revert it. Commas are only correct where there is one of quite a small number of specific reasons for them. If you're interested, this page gives a very clear, accurate introduction. Cheers, --Stfg (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Hi,got it,thanks.No problem,TopGun is a good editor.You too.Justice007 (talk) 12:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Dunes Review[edit]

Justice, could you check out my other article, Dunes Review User:Guillaume2303 deleted the whole thing from a starter class down to nothing and then put it up for deletion. Dunes Review is the first and only literary magazine in Michigan NOT controlled by a government educational institution. --David Holmer (talk) 20:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Deletion tag is removed. Try to find some more reliable sources.Justice007 (talk) 00:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Justice, just read your comment about staying away... I'm sure you have the articles best interest at heart. I will stay away. If I made things worse, please be bold and edit it out. --David Holmer (talk) 23:04, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Article is notable in my view according to reliable sources.Thanks for staying away, it's better because creator of the subject should not much involve in the discussion, let's do other editors.Justice007 (talk) 23:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Please look over my comments did they make it worse? Should I delete? or is it fine the way it stands now?--David Holmer (talk) 23:20, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Better to remove that.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 23:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Remove everything or just my undecided comment?--David Holmer (talk) 23:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Justice, I appreciate it.--David Holmer (talk) 23:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Justice007, it really is very inappropriate to change another user's comments in an AfD discussion. I see from the discussion above that you did this with David's agreement, but people at the AfD will only see that you changed his comments and that doesn't look good. In future, it's better if David would do these things himself. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 08:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Ok,I take care, and thanks for---.Justice007 (talk) 09:02, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Guillaume, I just wasn't sure the policy about removing my inappropriate comments.
Justice, I removed the other comments after thinking about it. They were in response to JoannaSerah's comment about my person. --David Holmer (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Rescue Barnstar Hires.png The Article Rescue Barnstar
Great job saving Dunes Review from deletion at AFD – David Holmer (talk) 09:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

Hey, you are involving in edit warring, by reverting poets name here, Kindly clear your misunderstanding that this is a list of poets, but not the list of poets who have article on WP. Please self revert your edit, rather than involving in edit warring. lastly do maintain the adequate and mannerism in your edit summary. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 23:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

  • I think you need rest, on wikipedia, everthing should be according to wiki rules, and stop posting "Edit warring",that is not, you cannot add the red links, those do not have the notability.Justice007 (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Omer you are mistaken. The talk page clearly prohibits red links, as well as the hidden comments in the list--which you had to have seen. Omer: if you want to add red links you must gain consensus on talk first. Justice: just because someone is ignoring consensus and you know they're ignoring consensus and I know they're ignoring consensus is not a justification for edit warring. Put a warning on their talk, post a message on WPIndia, or go to ANI to report disruptive editing. I'm not watching that article--but feel free to drop a note if there's any more trouble. – Lionel (talk) 02:09, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── (Edit conflict):* This is not a first time, that kind of "Edit warring", I am receiving from him every time, which I am ignoring of his lack of the wiki-knowledge. Thank you for your notice of that disruptive behaviour.Justice007 (talk) 09:27, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

@Justice stop hounding on editors, and I don't think but I believe that you need a complete rest forever :)
@Justice If it is redlink, remove the link, do not revert the work, And one more advice to you, do some research before blindly reverting any edit.
@ Lionelt, you are mistaken, Is it better to revert or to develop the contents? My intention was not to make it a redlink but to correct and restore that poet with reliable sources 1, 2, and before I could work it out, The reverting editor (Justice) jumped in between like an illiterate and without discussing or trying to know my cause, started edit warring, before I could complete the work.
@ Lionelt, I think you missed to read this text on article, according to which I wanted to apply sources, any way If you are talking about this consensus read it properly, the editors agreed for the redlinks if it is a notable poet based on this Wikipedia:REDLINK#When to create red links. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 09:08, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Are you still confused?, I reverted only red link, this one. And I received directly "Edit warring" notice from you while first you undid my legitimate edit, that I reverted.Justice007 (talk) 09:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
You reverted simple text, and You are arguing that you reverted REDLINK, (see your brilliant work once again, this one what you placed above), Really it proofs what you are ??? :)
Well if you want details see below :),
  •  :: I ( Omer123hussain ) made a edit at 22:57, 13 July 2012.
  •  :: and you ( Justice007) reverted that edit at 22:59, 13 July 2012.
  •  :: Before I could apply reliable source, with in difference of 2 minutes of my edit you reverted it, is it not edit warring???
Please stop playing on WP, I am really fed up with your non-scene, false blaming and edit warring. and as I advices you above, Please please please do some research before blindly reverting any edit. It is not you but me who is ignoring your edit warring. But this is last time, next time If you blame it will be reported further.
* NOTE: Seen you edit once again what you reverted REDLINK or Simple text, okay I will link it for you here. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 10:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
  • You are realy confused, before reverting I wikified the name, that was red, and it is the name of author or poet but not text, red links or black links have not notability. I am very cool person, I am here to help everyone and improving and expanding the articles. Please think twice before writing or speaking your views.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 13:46, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
No one bothers if you are cool or what ever, just discuss according to WP policy, and please as I told you make it your last excuse. And if you do not understand any thing please feel free to discuss. Regards :) --Omer123hussain (talk) 21:08, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Lymari Nadal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ponce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Rebecca Hammond Lard[edit]

Was curious as to how/how often the wiki-class on articles is checked/changed. I was thinking that this article was getting close to a C-class, but it is still a Stub? --David Holmer (talk) 07:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Justice, the major edit changes were made for the assessment from Stub class to Class-C. Please don't undo... at least discuss before changing it back, it's scheduled for assessment. Thanks. --David Holmer (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Redundant content does not make klass-C, edits should be per policies and guidelines of the wikipedia.Justice007 (talk) 10:29, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

It is NOT redundant... the info is different. It is a summary look at Walt Whitman PLEASE!--David Holmer (talk) 10:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC) Justice, Why are you NOT communicating with me? Why don't you look at the article I suggested? Why don't you want this article to improve? Please, TALK TO ME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --David Holmer (talk) 10:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

  • * All your version is redundant, do not spoil the article, you do not own it, and cannot edit as you want or like to see it.Justice007 (talk) 10:42, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

YOU DONT OWN IT EITHER... Gillaume was assessing it for C-class until you started undoing all the work of improvement!--David Holmer (talk) 10:45, 17 July 2012 (UTC) You are suppose to IMPROVE the article NOT maintain it at STUB-CLASS !!!--David Holmer (talk) 10:47, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

  • * Adding multiple sections with redundant content do not make it klass-C, I do not think Gillaume will do that. I do not own it too, but you created the article, leave it to others if you cannot expand and improve it properly.Justice007 (talk) 10:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
I am NOT going to argue with you, I will ask Guillaume to step in and compare both edits, and will abide by his decision--David Holmer (talk) 11:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm done with Wikipedia. Spangle has ruined Rebecca Lard... sounds like sh!t because he can't speak English and shouldn't be working on an English site. I am tired of having to argue and explain proper English to people who are too lazy to put forth the effort to listen or learn how to speak it properly. Congrats on the saving of Dunes Review. I just wanted to stop by and thank you for being the sole editor that I truly enjoyed meeting on here. Thanks again for your efforts! --David Holmer (talk) 00:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Burden[edit]

Read WP:BURDEN and do not restore source misrepresentation and WP:SYNTHESIS--DBigXray 12:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Discuss there, on proper talk page, not here.Justice007 (talk) 13:26, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

There is a report regarding you at WP:AN3. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:24, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

afd[edit]

Please read and follow WP:DISCUSSAFD --DBigXray 18:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry[edit]

Hi Justice, you may want to defend yourself here on an SPI report initiated by Omerhussain123. Just bringing it to your attention since he did not notify you. Mar4d (talk) 20:10, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

If I can suggest something Justice, don't even bother commenting there unless there is something really egregious. I don't think this will go anywhere, so don't even get upset. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 20:47, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Awards[edit]

Salaam Justice007, I noticed that you added your awards to your talk page. I added some additional ones from your archives! I hope this helps! With regards, AnupamTalk 01:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Hi, Anupam, Thanks doing that,my mentor Nolelover did for me, as I am not familiar of many things, I ask mostly other experienced editors to help. Justice007 (talk) 08:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Re:Barnstar[edit]

Dear User:Justice007, thank you for your kind barnstar. I'm glad to know that I'm making a difference here and appreciate the fact that editors like yourself notice my work! I hope you have a nice day! With regards, AnupamTalk 06:38, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: July Newsletter and August Drive[edit]

EdwardsBot (talk) 21:27, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Jinnah[edit]

Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DBigXray 13:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

  • I have not been through cited sources, I am just copy editing and making layout.What you reverted that passage was not added by me I just reverted someone els edit, and you seem to agree with my concerns. I will look at the references that are not cited to any passage (though not mentioned by you.) Justice007 (talk) 13:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

  • Without checking, you did not believe me, look at this, I came here first time to edit the article. I just reverted because editor himself was not sure about the meaning.Justice007 (talk) 13:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
  • I leave it to other involved editors. Justice007 (talk) 13:44, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
If you are reverting/undoing an edit, you should say so in your edit summary , the edit summary here was misleading.--DBigXray 13:59, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done self reverted and restored your edits, cheers--DBigXray 14:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

  • No problem, you were right on your place and point as your concerns.That's ok and thanks.Justice007 (talk) 14:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Justice007. You have new messages at TopGun's talk page.
Message added 16:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

A small cup of coffee.JPG Thanks for Helping :) Zunaira jamil (talk) 03:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
  • My pleasure, and thanks. Justice007 (talk) 10:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Comment on the Content not on contributors[edit]

To prevent the WP:Drama WP:Comment on content, not on the contributor Please read and follow this , You may rephrase your recent comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan_sentiment--DBigXray 18:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

  • My comment is very accurate and valid question, neither drama,nor personal attack. Justice007 (talk) 18:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Please[edit]

Explain how you got to this article and why you reverted me. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

  • I have nearly 2000 pages to my watch list, especially Pakistan related articles, is it objectionable?. I undid your reverting because of illegitimate revertion, while there is reliable source available.I hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 19:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
You have never edited said article with this account before, how does it come to be on your watchlist? Darkness Shines (talk) 19:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes I never edited that, but well I watch every time all edits all of editors who contribute the Pakistan and India related articles, where I think, is appropriate to contribute, I do without any hesitation, assuming of course good faith.Justice007 (talk) 19:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • More further, I patrol all new pages and recent edits or changes too.Where I find illegitimacy, I go there with no problems, only for fairness.Justice007 (talk) 19:36, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Bull, it is not possible to watch all edits by all editors in this topic area, especially as you have never been to this article before under this account. Given there has been a fair few edit wars on it since you joined Wikipedia it strikes me as strange you should suddenly turn up now. Please disclose any account you used previously with which you edited this article. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Further, to say you saw this on RC rings hollow. Your contributions history shows no evidence of an active RC patrol, nor could you have seen that edit fully three quarters of an hour after I made it on RC, it would have dropped off the list. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:49, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Don't be suspisious, I patrol all pages thoroughly that I have on my watch list,or I glance at. It is not necessary to go everywhere,but you must know every editor has right to be bold to edit everywhere, there are no any restrictions, regulations and limitations about, whether to do or not. If you have any concerns relating that, please go to file at proper notice board rather than wasting my time that I can use to improve and expand other articles.I have replied you in very clear way, if you don't believe me that is your matter not mine. I hope this is enough to help you. Thanks. Justice007 (talk) 22:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for not even remotely responding to my questions. All you have managed with your prevarication is to ensure that you are in fact a sock or a rather unfortunate meatpuppet. Darkness Shines (talk) 23:45, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Justice should this persist, take it up to ANI. You might not be aware, but calling established editors a sock is a personal attack and is blockable, esp for some one with the history like DS. You don't have to explain anything to another editor on how you get to another articles. Stalking is only brought into account when the two editors have a history of disputes or when you have a pattern of appearing at new articles one editor edits. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks TopGun, you are doing best contributions to wikipedia, especially Pakistan and India related articles, my watch list shows all activities of users/editors, who are added to my list. I have replied on the talk page of Anti-Pakistan sentiment. Justice007 (talk) 00:14, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Hi User, you have reverted my work (rather than discussing it on the talk page) with some abusive and humiliating sort of edit summary.

  • Rather than involving in edit warring, I ask you to justify your revert.
  • What made you to revert the work rather than discussing it?
  • I ask you to justify your accusation : You are here again for disruptive editing which you commented in your edit summary.
  • Last but not least, Avoid personal attacks. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 00:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Omer, I found nothing in WP:MOS to substantiate your position. However WP:IC says "Wikipedia does not have a '"one inline citation per sentence" or "one citation per paragraph"' rule." That said, it is always best to discuss issues on the talk page. And Justice, it's always better to talk about the edit, not the editor. Hope this helps! – Lionel (talk) 01:24, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
@Lionelt; I clearly mention c/e (copy editing), any way what is the logic of repeating same single source 3 times in the two line sentence? and abusing/discriminating the editors through edit summaries, without discussing or bothering to discuss. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Not guilty![edit]

Purple Barnstar Hires.png The Purple Barnstar
Awarded for bravely asserting your innocence and mounting a powerful defense against the charges brought against you.
Lionel (talk) 01:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012[edit]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on WP:Articles for deletion/India and state sponsored terrorism. Thank you.

P.S. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 09:16, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Justice, updated article on P.K. Kaul[edit]

I've been working on a number of India related articles, and have recently updated and improved the article on P.K. Kaul. Would appreciate it if you could take a look and leave your comments on the talk page on how it may be further improved. Any edits and modifications/improvements to the article would be most welcome. I am still looking for a free image to post on Pratap Kishen Kauls wiki page. Any help in this regard would also be welcome. Thanks. -Ambar (talk) 02:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Muhammad Iqbal Page[edit]

Dear Justice 007, Not sure why you revert my edit. Iqbal is known as the 'Poet of the East' only among the Urdu-Hindi speakers. Arabs, Farsi-speakers, Chinese, and other Eastern linguistic groups have no clue Iqbal is being hailed as the 'Poet of the East' by the Urdu speakers. Please provide references showing other linguistic groups calling Muhammad Iqbal the 'Poet of the East', if you really have such a belief. warm regards, Cemendtaur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cemendtaur (talkcontribs) 14:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Source 9 states only Poet of East, we have to follow that, not personal view point or description in this regard that you are doing,I have also replied you on the talk page of Muhammad Iqbal. May I ask you why you are especially interested to make him limited??.Justice007 (talk) 14:44, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Malik Ram[edit]

Malik Ram's surname is Baveja and not Ram; Ram is part of his first name; he is to be addressed as Malik Ram. Kindly restore to Malik Ram from Ram. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soni Ruchi (talkcontribs) 03:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

  • I know, and personally I have no problem what should be the name, our subject of area uses the names differently, but I change the name according to wiki rule WP:surname, about same problem I had once with an editor clashing arguments, because I had same idea that you have now. I am going to ask him for more clarity of the policy, may be we find some solution in this regard.Justice007 (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Malik Ram was always known as Malik Ram in the literary world, not Malik and not Ram. A lot of people in India have Ram as part of their given first name e.g. |Jagjivan Ram (called Jagjivan Ran and not Ram). In fact, even Malik Ram's mother always called him Malik Ram, according to a biography I have read and never Malik or Ram. Malik Ram is listed under M in official literary lists and library catalogues. No one has heard of him as Malik, the Urdu scholar or Ram, the Urdu writer. He is always called Malik Ram. I agree with Soni Ruchi.
In this interview he gave, the interviewers call him Malik Ram and, having read the WP guidelines regarding usage of names, Malik Ram appears to be appropriate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs9iWrPfzhI--Zananiri (talk) 19:14, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes dear, I know, just wait,I have posted my comment, lets see what is answer?.Justice007 (talk) 19:24, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your efforts. I have had a look and don't agree. The WP guidelines say:
"People who are best known by a pseudonym should be subsequently referred to by their pseudonymous surnames, unless they do not include a recognizable surname in the pseudonym (i.e. Madonna, Snoop Dogg, The Edge), in which case the whole pseudonym is used."
Malik Ram is actually one name. Ram, as Soni Ruchi, who created the article, and I have pointed out, is not his surname. Malik Ram should be regarded as one pseudonymous name in this case, according to the guidelines. I consider the remark about the number of edits one has made facetious. Quality not quantity is what matters when editing. I don't think you yourself have to change names elsewhere if you change this!--Zananiri (talk) 21:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I realy do not know any thing other than that, if you think Malik Ram is one name then go ahead and revert that, I will not object, but do not know about other editors what they think. Cheers.Justice007 (talk) 21:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Will do so some time next week, as I am away for a few days. Perhaps Soni Ruchi can do it, if she sees this. Also, do we still need the tag you added yesterday, as all the reflinks have been edited and refined since you posted it?--Zananiri (talk) 22:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Poet of the East[edit]

The two sources I gave are solid, dunno why that guy is still belaboring the point. Who did you think it was a sock of? Darkness Shines (talk) 06:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Your given sources support the content, but he is not going to understand, why?, that I don't know. Well I consider his act and repeated question as a pretended ignorance. I am going to talk page of Iqbal to comment there too. Justice007 (talk) 18:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
And you think he is a sock of? Darkness Shines (talk) 19:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Just a daubt, not sure, don't want to label without surety.Justice007 (talk) 19:19, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Martand Sun Temple, my recent improvements[edit]

My edits (improvements and additions) to the Martand Sun Temple article are in the attempt to make a category A (or better) article. How are the articles rated, btw ? -Ambar (talk) 08:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Please Note[edit]

Please make sure you won't make comments like this ever again.You are supposed to be civil and calm + Make sure you use better language while defending your claim.Remember that you were even dragged to SPI for having similar language as that of some IPs. Cheers TheStrikeΣagle 07:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification[edit]

Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the {{wikify}} template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify

About İlknur Melis Durası's page[edit]

Hi there,

Thank you for helping me out with Melis's page. I don't know how to add the citation for her paper. It was at HIBIT conference Izmır/Turkey 2011 and her publication's name was IDENTIFICATION OF TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR BINDING SITES IN PROMOTER DATABASES if you can add it that would be great. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurgu Karga (talkcontribs) 08:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

  • I have added and cited some references, may be later any time or day,I will search more sources to add.Thanks. Justice007 (talk) 10:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Zia Fatehabadi[edit]

Greetings. The Mehr Lal Soni Zia Fatehabadi article has had that tag for a very long time. I think it should be removed now. Please have a look.--Zananiri (talk) 16:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done.Justice007 (talk) 19:18, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks. That was quick. Could you please also have a look at the tag on the Jagan Nath Azad page. I think that. too. may be ready to go.--Zananiri (talk) 19:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
  • First I have to check all sources thoroughly, that verify the content.May be any other day.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 19:41, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

{{BLP sources}}[edit]

Hi, Justice007. I noticed you reverted my edit to Joseph Noiret, stating in your edit summary, "Of course BLP sources, it is bio article". However, according to Template:BLP sources, "In non-BLP articles that require additional sources, the {{refimprove}} template should be used instead." As Noiret is not living, shouldn't {{refimprove}} be used? HueSatLum 21:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

  • You are right, I was mistaken,will care next and thanks.Justice007 (talk) 21:21, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Martand Sun Temple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Briggs
Murray Feingold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to United State
Talib Chakwali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Punjab

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Citation needed templates[edit]

Dear user:Justice007, I for one find it very helpful, in an article that has a template at the top indicating a lack of reliable sources, to see where other editors have recommended the references should be added. I'm sure this helps others aside from me. I often then try to find references to replace the templates. Of course, I also do so regardless of existing templates, but I do find it helpful if others have marked the path (so to speak). Anyway, these are just my thoughts. I hope you don't mind me adding them here. Keep up the great work. Best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 15:20, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Imran Abbas Naqvi[edit]

The edit I made to the above article corrected grammar errors, not factual errors. You have just replaced the errors. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 15:29, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Ok, I have changed that in proper grammar, "showbiz" is very common to use, it is not necessary to write that informal.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 18:05, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ahmad Adaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to United State
M. Afzal Hossain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bangladeshi
Michele Stratico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Turkish
Zaytuna College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Guardian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

ANI[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wildthing61476 (talk) 12:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Yusuf Estes[edit]

Dear User:Justice007, I hope you are well. I feel powerless to prevent the vandalism occuring on the Yusuf Estes page. An editor -- User:Muslim Online -- repeatedly posts unreferenced and clearly partisan POV material that violates WP:BLP guidelines. I could continue to revert the edits to remove this content in accordance with the ruling that "contentious material about living persons (or recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion", but I am afraid that my own actions might be misconstrued as edit warring and that I could be accused of violating Wikipedia's three-revert rules.

Please see if you can help, or at least give me some useful advice.

Thanks you and best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Shafiq-ur-Rehman (humorist)[edit]

Could you please make clear your justification for moving Shafiq-ur-Rehman (humorist) to Shafiq-ur-Rahman (humorist). Just saying it's wrong is not a sufficient reason, WP:RS are required. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 15:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Well, SamuelTheGhost, as I am belonging to that part of the world, and I am also much familair to the Urdu, Arabic and Persian languages, and its grammar. "Rahman" is an Arabic word, it pronounces 'Rahman' but not 'Rehman'. Though mostly in India and Pakistan, it is commonly wrong pronouced, and translated into incorrect spelling. Academics do not make the mistake but having poor knowledge writers do that. When I come across that kind of translated wrong spelling, I make that correct, that's all, and for that there is no need of RS. Please take a look at these correct spelling articles of the same name: Ahfaz-ur-Rahman,Hamoodur Rahman, Tariq Rahman, Rahman Syed, Bushra Rahman, Rahman Baba. If you are native speaker of English, then I can imagine, and that makes me no surprise, but if you are from there, then I will suggest you please improve your knowledge of languages. I hope this helps. Cheers.Justice007 (talk) 16:17, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
    • No I'm afraid it does not help. Editors in wikipedia are self-selected and anonymous except where they choose to identiy themselves. I have not published my qualifications, my native language, or any other languages I know. If I did publish them, other editors would still have no way of knowing whether I had told the truth about them. The only evidence acceptable under wikipedia policy is WP:RS, not personal knowedge. These considerations apply equally to me and to you. WP:RS is the only evidence we can take any notice of.
Of course I am aware that the scholarly transliteration of Arabic: الرحمن ‎ is ar-Rahman or, more carefully, ar-Raḥman, but wikipedia policy for names is to use the transliteration found in the sources, whether or not they are "correct". In the case of Shafiq-ur-Rehman, English-language sources are using the form ur-Rehman, and apparently no other, so wikipedia policy is quite clear that that is the form we should be using. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 18:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • I do not agree with you, please indicate, that where RS allow the incorrect spelling, there is also a rule WP:common sense, I do not know that we should use or not, before I go futher to discuss this issue with you, first you provide the reliable sources to support your concerns, while the article's subject has no any reliable sources to even pass the notability, I do not see and find any one there. If you are so strict and fair to the policies, you must nominate the article for deletion because it falls under the criteria for proposed deletion.Justice007 (talk) 19:10, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Well, on a quick search I found the following three, where the first at least must count as WP:RS
There are plenty more using that spelling to sell his books. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 20:59, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • You even didn't bother to read the common sense, it is waste of time to search the skin of the hair. I have used my best judgment to correct the wrong translated spelling of the name, as I said you it is very common blunder in India and Pakistan, even in the media. There are many articles that need to be corrected , as I have done, Ahmed to correct Ahmad, for both wrong and correct spelling, there are reliable sources, on this point, we have to use common sense and our best judgment. What you have provided the sources, only one is reliable, and that can be use for the notability of the subject to save from deletion, other two are blogs, that are not reliable sources, I have also searched, but there are not much reliable sources, it is a great pity, that that notable and great humorist has no reliable sources?. As you provided, here are from me too, with correct spelling this and that. Again the main purpose is to the correct and best judgment that I have done.Hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 22:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Note

I have moved the discussion from my talk page to relevant talk page of the article. Please discuss there. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 22:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harry Gill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bisley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Ratan Pandoravi[edit]

Brother,this article is not about a living person. The subject died in the year 1998.Soni Ruchi (talk) 09:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

      • Thanks, Bhaijaan, for the cleanup and recasting. You are a gem. Regards.Soni Ruchi (talk) 13:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • My pleasure bahin ji, shukria. Justice007 (talk) 14:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:VAND[edit]

[2] Not vandalism, good faith edits never are. You could lose access to twinke if you use it in such a manner to often, use the rollback AGF option instead. Facts, not fiction (talk) 23:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Hi, good patrolling, his edits are not based on good faith, he has the history of spoiling the article, nevertheless, I will care next and act as you said. Thanks for care. Justice007 (talk) 23:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Undeleting Nandini Sahu[edit]

I have been going through the discussion page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nandini_Sahu) and it amuses me that the administrator Joe Decker assumes there can be only one Nandini Sahu. If someone made a wrong referencing to the TOI article, then it should not be treated as a judgment for deciding the authenticity of the page. The correct referencing to the TOI article is (http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Search&Key=TOIH/2011/01/24/32/Ar03201.xml&CollName=TOI_HYDERABAD_ARCHIVE_2009&DOCID=269529&Keyword=(%3Cmany%3E%3Cstem%3Enandini%3Cand%3E%3Cmany%3E%3Cstem%3Esahu)&skin=pastissues2&AppName=2&ViewMode=HTML). A few other online references to the subjest are as under :

1) http://www.worldofmanojdas.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=286:on-folk-in-modern-indian-literature&catid=54:interviewcat&Itemid=132

2) http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Writers&WriterID=941

3) http://www.isahitya.com/index.php/english-sahitya/467-secrecy-of-being-a-poet-a-conversation-with-nandini-sahu

4) http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=PoemArticle&PoemArticleID=97

In continuation to the references to the literary work of the subject, please find the below list which are articles in hard copy (might be non-online) :

• “A Symphony For Shanta”, B.Venkateswara Rao, Hayathanagar. Reviewed By Nandini Sahu, Poetcrit, Maranda, July 1999.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Spring Time”, I. P. Deepti, Bangalore, Reviewed By Nandini Sahu, Poetcrit, Maranda, July 1999. (REFEREED JOURNAL) • “ Myth as Revelation: A Study in the Poetry of W.B.Yeats”, The Scoria, Chandigarh, May 2001.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Kaleidoscope of the Indian Society-The Voice of Indo-Anglian Women Poets”, The Scoria, Chandigarh, March 2001.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Big Things & Small Things in Arundhati Roy’s The God Of Small Things”, Indian Book Chronicle, Jaipur, July, 2001.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Will”, K.B.Rai, Berhampur, Reviewed By Nandini Sahu & Padmini Sahu, Poetcrit, Maranda, July 2000.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Feminism: Opposing the Binary Opposition”, Pakistan Journal of American Studies, Vol-19, Spring and Fall 2001, Nos 1 & 2, Islamabad, Pakistan.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Rasa, Dhvani & Auchitya in the Indian & Western Poetics”, Modern Literary Criticism, Authors Press, New Delhi 2003.(EDITED BOOK) • “Love Poems: The Historical Alternative---Poems of Sylvia Plath and Kamala Das”, The Atlantic Critical Review, Volume 2, Number 2, New Delhi, India.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Rethinking Modernity, Rereading T.S.Eliot”, The Atlantic Critical Review, April-June 2004, Vol 3, No 2, New Delhi, India.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Academics of Teaching-Literary Theory and Practice”, Creative Writing and Criticism, Vol 2, No 1, October 2004.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Wild Urge of a Man on Earth to Touch the Heaven---The Extra-Literary Vision of Mulk Raj Anand”, Asian Quarterly, June- July 2005.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Nostalgic Note in their Flute: A Reading of Arundhati Roy and Jhumpa Lahiri”, Indian Writings in English, Atlantic Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi, 2006.(EDITED BOOK) • “Shakespearean Heroines: The Source of Energy and Vitality”, The Atlantic Critical Review, January –March, New Delhi, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Chemistry Behind Creativity: A Reading of Sylvia Plath and Ted Huges”, Creative Writing And Criticism, Sikandrabad, (U.P.) April, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Poetry for Life’s Sake: Voice of Judith Wright”, Explorations in Australian Literature, Sarup & Sons, New Delhi ,2006.(EDITED BOOK) • “Mother And Other Poems by –Pashupati Jha” Reviewed by Nandini Sahu, Indian Book Chronicle, Jaipur, July, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Emerging Innovations in Technology and Pedagogy” Indian Book Chronicle, March 2006, Vivek Trust Publication, Jaipur, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Concept of Love in Shakespearean Sonnets: A Study”, Creative Writing and Criticism, October, 2006, Sikandarabad, UP.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Religious Harmony and Political Cosmos: the Voice of T. S. Eliot; Ripples, Vol-I, Sep.2006 – Feb.2007.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Folk and Tribal Culture of Orissa: Religiosity, Historicity and Oral Traditions; Tribes of India: Identity, Culture and Lore; Angik Prakashan, Guwahati, 2007.(EDITED BOOK) • The Position of Women in Oriya Literature: www.boloji.com; 16th Oct 2007. • Gurudev Tagore; The Visionary with a Mission; www.bolokids.com; 23rd Oct 2007. • Valmiki : January 5, 2008; www.bolokids.com • Panini: 10th February 2008; www.bolokids.com • Two Dispossessed Habitats: A Study of Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies and The Namesake, 17th February 2008; www.boloji.com • Double Colonization for the Marginalized Children A Literary Delineation, 3rd March, 2008; www.boloji.com • The Cultural Designation of Feminism: Theory and Praxis,18th March 2008, www.boloji.com • Santh Kabir, 3rd May 2008; www.bolokids.com • Need and Strategy for Capacity Building through Communicative Skills in Open Distance Learning – Indian Journal of Open Learning (IGNOU), Vol. 17, November 1, Jan 2008.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Translation as Power; Dialogue,Vol-IV,No-1, 2008, Lucknow, India.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Two Dispossessed Habitats: A Study of Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies and The Namesake. The Atlantic Literary Review, October-December 2008, Vol. 9, No. 4.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • The Cultural Designation of Feminism: Theory and Praxis, New Urges in Post Colonial Literature: Widening Horizons;Atlantic Publishers and Distributors; 2009. • Words and Silences in the Poetry of Niranjan Mohanty ; Poesie India International, Vol 44,2009.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • The Cultural Designation of Feminism: Theory and Praxis, PARNASSUS:An Innovative Journal of Literary Criticism;Vol.I,2009.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Gerard Manley Hopkins: The Poet and the Priest: A Study of The Windhover, New Perspectives in British Literature, Atlantic Publishers and Distributors (P) Ltd., 2010 (EDITED BOOK) • Double Colonization for the Marginalized Children A Literary Delineation, Surviving Against Odds: the marginalized in a globalizing world, Ed. D.K SinghaRoy,Monohar Publications.2010. (EDITED BOOK) • Nationalism through Patriotic Books; All About Book Publishing, Aug-Sept 2010. (REFEREED JOURNAL) • Winds of Change: The Voice of Judith Wright and Kamala Das, ;The Atlantic Critical Review, April-June 2010, Volume -9, Number-2. (REFEREED JOURNAL) • Nandini Sahu in Conversation with Manoj Das, published in www.worldofmanojdas.in; 04.102011 (http://www.worldofmanojdas.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=286:on-folk-in-modern-indian-literature&catid=54:interviewcat&Itemid=132) • Nandini Sahu interviewed by G.S. Jolly, All About Book Publishing, Vol: II, Issue- VI, December 2011-January2012 • The Shadow of a Shadow, short story by Nandini Sahu in www.isahitya.com March, 2012 • Legitimacy and Homogeneity of Cross-Cultural Experiences—a study on ‘Language Death’, Folklore and the alternative Modernities, Vol.I, Authorspress, 2012(EDITED BOOK) • Gopinath Mohanty’s ‘PARAJA’: A Study of the Folk Culture of Orissa, Folklore and the alternative Modernities, Vol.I, Authorspress, 2012(EDITED BOOK) • Documentation within History—A Study on Language Death; Creative

Writing and Criticism, Volume 9 Number 2 April 2012   

• Children’s Literature: Text and Context , The Atlantic Critical Review 11:1 (Jan-March 2012). • http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=PoemArticle&PoemArticleID=97 (Nandini Sahu in Conversation with S.K.Padhy, August 2012) • The Wild Stream, Short Story by Nandini Sahu, Rock Pebbles, June 2012



P O E M S About 200 poems published in books/journals in India (from 1995 to 2010) (in Indian Literature from Sahitya Akademi, The Quest, New Quest, Kavya Bharati,Scoria,Poetcrit, etc.) and in USA ,UK and Pakistan . o Sabata Basanta; Adhunika, Odia bi-annual journal, Spring, 2011 o Odisha Landscape, Transfire, a literary Quarterly for Translation, Oct-Dec 2011 o Haiku by Nandini Sahu, Indian Book Chronicle, Jaipur, December 2011 o Sabda, Katha Katha, Kavita Kavita,Odisha, December 2011 o Smritira Nirvana,Dhvani-Pratidhvani, 25th March 2012 o Bridge-in-Making, Syndic Literary Journal, California, No.6 , April , 2012. o Two poems, Rock Pebbles, January 2012 o Freedom, Indian Book Chronicle,37:4, April 2012 o Chahala Samaya, Nabaneeta, April-June,2012 o http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Poem&PoemID=12388 (poem In the Andamans, August, 2012)

BOOKS

i) Recollection as Redemption, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2004.

ii) The Other Voice, A Collection of Poems, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2004.

iii) The Silence, A Collection of Poems, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2005.

iv) Post Modernist Delegations in English Language Teaching: The Quixotic Deluge, (Ed: Dr Nandini Sahu)Authors Press, New Delhi, 2005.

v) The Post Colonial Space: Writing the Self and The Nation, (Ed: Dr Nandini Sahu) Atlantic Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 2007 vi) Silver Poems on My Lips , A Collection of Poems, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2009. vii) Folklore and the Alternative Modernities(Vol. I), Authorspress, New Delhi, 2012. vii) Folklore and the Alternative Modernities(Vol. II), Authorspress, New Delhi, 2012


I think on the account of the above references, the administrator should undelete the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetcritic (talkcontribs) 03:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Khurshid Eqbal. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Note that notability has not been established in accordance with WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. If you need help, please feel free to ask. Cindy(talk to me) 12:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
For your cleanup efforts at Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi‎, in the face of considerable adversity! Yunshui  12:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Hi Yunshui, I am realy encouraged and appreciate your kindness of giving me barnstar. Justice007 (talk) 13:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi[edit]

Much better now. Well done, my friend. Drmies (talk) 14:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Seconded. Cheers, 76.248.149.47 (talk) 14:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • With your company, I watch and learn, thanks dear Drmies and all others.Justice007 (talk) 16:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

RE: Any problem[edit]

First of all, this is a stylistic issue and certainly not worth climbing the Reichstag to make my point. It's interesting that you provide Walt Whitman to make your point; that article (as best I can see from a quick look) provides either: more than one subheading per heading, or an introductory paragraph if there is only one subheading. I have no doubt that there are hundreds (I'm not sure about thousands) of articles with examples of poor style; after all, this is the encyclopedia that has no editorial oversight, that anyone can edit, and that relies on volunteers to watch over articles. It is entirely pointless to have one subheading under a heading; the heading alone is quite sufficient to help the reader navigate; subheadings allow the reader to move quickly past other information to get to the desired information; with only one subheading that is not necessary. But as I said, Wikipedia is full of articles with bad style, and I don't intend to argue or edit war over a matter when there are a lot worse problems to deal with. And BTW, as for "I don't know what you are": I have no idea what your point is with that rather bizarre comment, but it is beside the point; on Wikipedia we all have equal status; no editor has authority over content and stylistic issues that do not violate policy. Cresix (talk) 13:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

"But it seems to me that you have shown your authority and choice reverting me, is it not so?": No it is not so. Read WP:BRD. One does not have to be an admin or an "authority" to follow that tried and true guideline that is used thousands of time every day on Wikipedia by regular editors such as you and me. Do you honestly think that you are being singled out here? I don't know how long you've been editing Wikipedia, but let me suggest that you read WP:5P if you have not already done so.
"but be fair, access and assess that which style was/is better": Please assume good faith. I made the revert because I thought the style I was reverting to is better. But again, this is not a battle that I find worth fighting. There are many more important things to do, both on Wikipedia and in the real world. Cresix (talk) 15:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Indentation[edit]

Hello. Just a quick note to suggest you be a little more careful with how you indent your talk page comments - I misread this level-one bullet point as being a level-one indentation and a reply to my comment, when I think you probably meant it as a level-three indentation and a reply to another editor. It's also normal to use colons rather than bullet points, per WP:TOPPOST. --McGeddon (talk) 11:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Be bold![edit]

Re your comment at Talk:Dennis M. Lynch#Sources ... when acting as ordinary editors, administrators are just like any other editors, with no special privileges. If you see something that doesn't look right, be WP:BOLD and fix it. If it's questioned or reversed, it can always be discussed to gain consensus one way or the other from interested editors on the article talk page. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 17:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok, next time I will be bold and thanks.Justice007 (talk) 18:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul-Henri Campbell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

August 2012 wikification awards![edit]

The Working Wikifier's Barnstar.png The Working Wikifier's Barnstar
For wikifying the sixth largest amount of articles in the August 2012 drive, Justice007, I am proud to award you with the Working Wikifier's barnstar! Great job!!!
Bronze Wikification Barnstar.png The Bronze Wikification Barnstar
For wikifying 24 articles, I also award you the Bronze Wikification barnstar!!! Congratulations!!!

I apologize for the far-too-long waiting period; I forgot that this responsibility rests on my shoulders nowadays! Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 22:21, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

My great pleasure, better late than never. Thanks for all.Justice007 (talk) 22:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

A Great Wiki Editor[edit]

Justice007 really is a great,noted and hard working editor.We appreciate you and your patience also.Your articles have a loyal research foe wiki readers.cheers--118.103.234.63 (talk) 00:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Rafi ul Haq,Tina_sthi,Jses02,118.103.225.170,111.119.186.84,yunshui

And I second this :) Nolelover Talk·Contribs 17:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Hi Nole thanks for, how is life, wikipedia misses you. Justice007 (talk) 17:12, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Special Achievements[edit]

date of birth famous writer and educationalist Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi[edit]

Date Of Birth of famous writer Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi[edit]

I think Justice007 has a rest by this link --118.103.235.143 (talk) 01:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Rolf Vessel

Disambiguation link notification for September 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen D. Lovejoy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Javed Malik[edit]

Hello there I see you have also been cleaning up the Javed Malik article. I have made some additions in wiki mark up, and requested some sources to support some facts so that I could help with an email I received. I will advise this new contact to read the Wikipedia:Starting an article and Wikipedia:Writing better articles as they seem to be new to wikipedia. I will also put a request on the WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Pakistan, and WikiProject Journalism talk pages to see if anyone there also wishes to help out as I am not familiar with international biographies and content to know how promotional it is. I feel the majority of sources they provided are new articles and portray a NPOV, but as I say I don't know for sure. Thank you very much for helping SriMesh | talk

Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi is really Father Of Pakistani Children Literature[edit]

Prof.Dr.Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi is reliable called Father Of Pakistani Children Literature.Prof Hamidi is avery noted and hard working teacher and children writer also.The Wikipedia Encyclopedia compiled a great,awasome research thesis on Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi first time,ascension high most rating w.r.to content,writing and all possible reliable references.It is a great effort of wiki team(Editors).Thanks edi, thanks Wiki! Hi justice007 ! Plz further improve it....plz... cheers :)

References Father Of Children Literature[edit]

--111.119.185.173 (talk) 04:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC) Elinor Lyon Jr 47

I am become autoconfirmed user....Aanapk (talk) 09:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you![edit]

Erdbeerteller01.jpg Wishing you a very happy EID_UL_AZHA ..... Aanapk (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Dear Justice007,

I would like to show my appreciation for your multiple edits.

I would like also to ask you to act on my behalf and to accept my edit request published at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eric_Dill#Edit_request_on_2_November_2012

I would appreciate you understanding.

Best wishes,

Daniel Dwdimov (talk) 15:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


  • Lot of thanks for a barnstar, I am out of staion, and very busy, when I am back, will take a look at your request.Justice007 (talk) 02:16, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Join us at FB[edit]

Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: -- Captain Wikipedia! ( T - C - G ) 13:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ayub Sabir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Reverting my cleanup of Abhay Kumar[edit]

If you are trying to clean up this page, you are not doing a very good job of it by reverting other editors efforts at cleaning up. I would like to know in what way my removal of He travelled to Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka during his Indian Foreign Service. He has also written a paper proposing a SAARC University at Nalanda. is "illegitimate". All probationers travel to the SAARC countries as part of their training so in what way is this significant? Similarly, the alleged fact that he has written a paper proposing a SAARC university at Nalanda would be notable only if such a university has come up,not otherwise. And, as I wrote in my edit summary, this piece of information has so far only been attributed to the subject and is not independently confirmed. Sesamevoila (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Well my job is not very good, that is only your opinion. Why do you think the passage that you removed is not significant??. The source is reliable and third party, (By Ronisha Bhattacharyya (ANI)), is it not independent, then what is your description in this regard. I hope this helps.Justice007 (talk) 20:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
I was only trying to remind you that wiikipedia editing is a collaborative exercise and you cannot go around describing other edits as illegitimate. I have already explained why I think the passage I removed is not significant.You have not responded to the points I raised but are harping on the source. Sources are not an end in themselves and content should be added based on reliability and context. The article quoted is evidently based on an interview with the subject and there is nothing to suggest that the reporter has independently verified the claims made by the subject. Moreover, a startling claim like the one made in the passage should be quoted in more than one mainstream publication, going by Exceptional claims require exceptional sources. While you are at it, you could also take a look at Reliability in the context. I hope this helps. Sesamevoila (talk) 05:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I just went back to the page and I appreciate your efforts at cleaning up but I still feel the above passage is irrelevant, and not sufficiently sourced.Sesamevoila (talk) 07:47, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I have properly responded your raising points, I cannot understand your descriptions of the issue that you are taking serious unnecessarly. Though mentioned wiki rules by you are supporting the descriptions that I draw. To travel as a diplomate different states is not a big claim nor important issue, there is reliable source by third party, no matter as an interview or something else. It is written and published by Ronisha Bhattacharyya (ANI), and writer is telling the subject has been travelled etc, but not the subject. At the other hand if you do not consider it a third party source, then anyhow it is well primary source, that's why I have placed the BLP tag for additional sources for verification, that act exact meets the wiki policies and guidelines. I am moving that discussion on the talk page of Abhay Kumar, and that should be discussed there, not on my talk page.Justice007 (talk) 08:29, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your changes to an Article called Javed Malik[edit]

Dear Mr. Justice,

We need your help.

My name is Sandra, I work for Mr Javed Malik's friend, and I have been asked to update some details on the article to ensure that they are accurate. However, for some reason, you keep going into this article and un-doing the changes that we make

Can you please give me your e mail address, so we can discuss this matter.

We would like to have the accurate information on this article, and need your help please.

I am not a professional. This is the first time i am sending a message on Wiki, I dont even know where and how to pick up my reply. But if you can please CC me on Sandraroberts21@gmail.com


Thank you

Sandra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameszapper (talkcontribs) 22:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edit on the page Abhay Kumar[edit]

"He travelled to Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka during his Indian Foreign Service."- There is something missing in this sentence. As he is still part of the Indian Foreign Service and is posted in Kathmandu. Generally Indian Foreign Service Officers travel to the neighbouring countries during probation days for training.

It could be -

He travelled to Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka during his probation days in the Indian Foreign Service.

or

He travelled to Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka during his Indian Foreign Service probation days.

thanks for understanding!

Kalhause  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalhause (talkcontribs) 22:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)  
I have tried to do my best. Justice007 (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

That's much better. May be you can consider changing the following - He visited Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka at the time of his Indian Foreign Service.

into

He visited Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka at the time of his training period in the Indian Foreign Service.

Hope you get it. A sentence has to be complete to make meaning. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalhause (talkcontribs) 11:20, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Now it is fine. thanks.

Without going to the discussion earlier, I think the following sentence does not add much value to the article because there is already a SAARC University in Delhi and an International University is coming up in Nalanda. So the following line is not of much value and therefor may be removed along with the BLP tag. "He visited Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka at the time of his training in the Indian Foreign Service. He also wrote a paper proposing a SAARC University at Nalanda.[23]" (Kalhause) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalhause (talkcontribs) 12:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Could you please now remove the BLP tag from the page Abhay Kumar as several additional citations have been added. Kalhause —Preceding undated comment added 17:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Yes there are enough sources but for section ""=Personal life" still needs sources,please cite and remove the tag. Cheers.Justice007 (talk) 18:59, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Ruba'i Article[edit]

Dear Justice007,

In regards to a nasty comment you posted with your edits to the ruba'i article: Peter Avery and L. P. Elwell-Sutton were both eminent scholars in the field of Persian Literature who taught at Cambridge and Edinburgh, respectively, for many years. If you think they were both "silly person" who "do not know what is Ruba'i," then you are sadly misinformed. In the future, please refrain from disparaging work you clearly have not read.

Writer83175 (talk) 10:45, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

You have to learn much more about Ruba'i, and do not try to teach me, what you refer the source 4 that support us( me and Spanglej), that "known as ruba'i (four line poem) dobaith (two-couplet-poem"). You, suppose as IP 75.24.202.15 did this. Which books or scholars say "rubaí contians only two lines"???, that's why I said silly, though I was not polite.Justice007 (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
This discussion is being moved to the talk page of the article Ruba'i. Justice007 (talk) 17:30, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been warned[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writer83175 (talkcontribs) 19:41, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Last warning[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Ruba'i, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writer83175 (talkcontribs) 20:02, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Ruba'i article". Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you!

EarwigBot operator / talk 22:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Why are your edits so bad. You give wikipedia a bad name.[edit]

It is quite obvious you are building a some sort of paper trail by editing wikipedia pages. With my bio page you have consistently edited without any knowledge about my life or about my work or about the domain of my work. Your English is poor and many times the edits you have made are derogatory, sexist, and damaging.

My last edit add a reference to a published biography on me. Nadja Argyropoulou (Author), Anastasia Aukeman (Author): 'Lydia Venieri: Theogony. Charta 2011. ISBN 978-8-88158-792-6

You removed it with the comment "Not original research please read". What are you talking about????

Do you know who Charta is or who the authors are ? It's quite obvious from the comments of other people that you are very ignorant in many areas.

What authority do you have? I've looked at the edits you have done on many other pages that you claim are yours. They are often trivial and pathetic, and often damaging and irrational. What are you doing? Do you think you have some power?


I'm someone who has a well known documented career, who is recognized by my country and other countries for my work and I don't see why I have to have you editing my bio on wikipedia. Remember wikipedia has now become an important reference and your edits could be damaging. Please keep off my bio page. If you don't I will have to consider legal advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venieri (talkcontribs) 06:43, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Help[edit]

Please help for new created article Iqra Nadeem. Thanks.Waleed.P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.68.48.166 (talk) 17:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive[edit]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify, 22:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Re:Reliable source[edit]

Dear User:Justice007, thanks for your message on my talk page. The following guideline will be of help to you in determining whether that video can serve as a reliable source: Wikipedia:Video links. I hope this helps! With regards, AnupamTalk 15:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks dear Anupam.Justice007 (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Cardinal sources[edit]

Sorry, my friend, but "cardinal" is a routine adjective which can mean (with no religious meaning) "of the greatest importance; fundamental". Thus, my statement that Zaytuna College teaches from the cardinal sources of Islam -- the Qur'an and ahadith -- was eminently appropriate. Not to worry. I won't change your edit, which is fine too. Best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 03:40, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Well dear, I know already meaning that you mentioned but here in the article, word "cardinal" creates the confusion, it depends not only one meaning, it is commonly related to religious meaning. There are many words with same meaning but where to use is different subject. I do realy neither want to go deep in this regard and nor thinking of your any bad faith. Please just take a look at these articles and sites. Cardinal (Catholicism), Cardinal (bird), The Cardinal

1 2 3. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 09:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for replying. We can disagree politely with no awkwardness or need to devote time. You are a fine editor. Thanks and best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Shreya Ghoshal[edit]

I still don't see the problem here. The new source does support her birth date. The other source does support the "Day" honor. The comment about the picture is really old POV, and should be removed anyway. The added supporting text is better than just 'see also'... What else is there not to like? BollyJeff | talk 16:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

I have replied on you talk page.Justice007 (talk) 17:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi[edit]

Hi Justice007. I didn't actually tag the article with those notices. It was done by User:TheRedPenOfDoom with this edit. I think those references probably count as reliable third party sources so I have removed the notability tag. The Wikify tag was replaced with Underlinked as the wikify tag is being replaced across Wikipedia as a whole. The underlinked means there should be more blue links in the article. I've also removed the BLP sources tag as the article has sources for most statements. Happy editing! Delsion23 (talk) 23:26, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

I have replied on your talk page.Justice007 (talk) 23:39, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
The article has been nominated for deleteion. You may provide your views about whether or not the subject meets the criteria outlined at WP:N by participating at the discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not delete Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi ,save it and give protection to this awesome page[edit]

My dear Justice007 , please do not delete the page Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.Because Proff Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi]] is a loyal senior teacher.Please re write if possible but not to delete it.This page is helpful to education policy.Please dear Justice007 , Save Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.Please protect Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi. Thanks Justice007 . Yours' --Hasbi syed (talk) 13:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

You are actual creater of great page Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi[edit]

Dear ! Don't delete this great page Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.This is a unique page.Please improve it but do not delete this marketing adjusted page.You are the actual writer and creater of this awesome page , named Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi. Please save this page and take more protection in favour of world wide literary personality Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi. Thanks! --Hasbi syed (talk) 13:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Justice007 the great ! Please safe and save Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi[edit]

Dear Justice007 you are the actual writer of noted thesis of Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.This is the best educational article from wikipedia english.My dear Justice007 you have thousands best educational article from wikipedia and you are the symbol of real education,peace,respect of humanities and wel editing for english wikipedia.It is requested you to please save the best literary article of Proffessor Doctor Syed Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi,which is the certified article of your great success also.Please show the photo of Prof.Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi , is a unique photo for wiki lovers also.May God live you long my dear Justice007. A lot of thanks dear! --Hasbi syed (talk) 01:06, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

You are the real friend of english wikipedia and Proff Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi , we are proud of you Sir !![edit]

This is a cruel act which a person 'Wikipedia' of individual human rights is against policy. Mr. Justice 007 best knowledge, this paper is the creator and owner and their efforts to delete the bastard even care do not be jealous of his fire. wish your ego and ignorance of the ignorant, not scholars take revenge and English Wikipedia articles with the most 'Rush' does not hzf. Prof Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameed SahibDespite this knowledge, the knowledge of the dignity and value of editor with paper money is excellent references. Prof Mujeeb Hamid, the whole world knows, the work considers the wiki owner is unaware. Fraudster you are, in Wikipedia I strongly urge owners of our global paper to protect them from hackers, Prof. Syed Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameed Sahib Dr Allah gave children's education is the top attribute, the 'sury' and 'virtual' fact 'is' every two terms. Prof Mujeeb Zafar Hameed knowledge that the value of investments can not be in this world. several generations of Mujeeb Zafar Anwar known throughout the world and recognize. country Pakistan How lucky that here in ashes Mr Anwar Hussain Professor Mujeeb Hamid Sahib's personality of the ferment. Dear Prof Mujeeb Zafar Anwar al-Hamid and his family always kept intact. Amen! President of Pakistan (Islamabad)

File:Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:King of Urdu Children Literature Proff Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.JPG
King of Pakistani Children literature Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

Please use the inserted foto with article Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.Thanks Sir! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hasbi syed (talkcontribs) 03:32, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

My Dear please have the photo of Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi a new foto for english wikipedia only ![edit]

My dear please add this foto with article Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi. Thanks justiceoo7.This is free foto , only for wikipedia and wikimedia.

--Hasbi syed (talk) 04:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


  • Hi Hasbi syed, first of all, no one is doing wrong, that dispute is in accordance to wiki-rules. We should discuss and it is being discussed. At deletion discussion all editors reach consensus. Please be cool, civil and wait the result and outcome of the discussion. I understand your concerns.

About the image, please again up-load that without any restrictions, giving permission as a copyright holder. (your own work). Your recent up-loaded image violate the policy, that is being requested for speedy deletion.Justice007 (talk) 09:10, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi Justice :)[edit]

How are you doing? It's been a while...my studies are really getting tough, so I haven't even thought about Wikipedia for a long time...I hope everything is going well for you, although I see that you've semi-retired like me. :( I hope I can eventually come back, but it probably won't be for a few years, at this point. I'm sure you're glad to be out of college and stuff, but I'm just starting, haha. God bless :) Nolelover Talk·Contribs 19:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi dear, nice to see your comment, it was going good, but as a matter of my own principle, it is impossible to discuss with robots, because they don't have and are not able to use common sense. That's why now I am semi-retired. The articles I improved, are being spoiled, no one is interested to do constructive edits, there are too- much editors who devote their time to tagging the articles rather than improving those. Yes I am out of college but without a degree, because mentors are not having any qualification, so reliability is in question. Anyhow, I am sure you will achieve your goals as you desire. I realy miss you at wikipedia. I will be here just only to watch things off and on. God bless you too.Justice007 (talk) 14:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not delete awesome english wiki article Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi Thanks[edit]

Oh !!! Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi is the best article from wikipedia english.Please do not delete it.This awesome article has a huge traffic.Please further improve it with extra links and pages specially Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi's stories and poetry also.I appreciate Proff Dr Syed Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi who is the senior most writer and educationalist also.Please add Proff's new best photo also whis in past.Tanks a lot.

Personality and Work of Dr Proff Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi[edit]

Best Children Story of Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi[edit]

--119.160.48.67 (talk) 09:39, 26 December 2012 (UTC) Please add these above mentioned external links Thanks my dear wiki editors.I love you all. Teena Smith Canada

Tom_Stienstra[edit]

re: [3]. it is still completely unclear what the merging of the papers has to do with Tom_Stienstra changing from baseball to writing.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:11, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Ok mentor, I have tried my best.Justice007 (talk) 14:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Tony Vitti Fans[edit]

Hi there, we don't really know how to do it, but we thank you for helping keeping the page which has been created on our favorite singer Tony Vitti. When we heard the page we try to keep alive was subject of deletion, it was a pain in the heart. We appreciate it, whatever the end of this story. Wishing you a happy new year, Tony Vitti's fans family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.197.16.195 (talk) 23:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

  • You have also the right to comment at deletion discussion page.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

December 2012 Wikification Barnstars![edit]

WikifyBadge.png The WikiProject Wikify Badge  
Thank you for your participation in the December 2012 drive! Also, Happy New Year! Sert - happy smile.svg benzband (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Your work on the Joe Arridy article was splendid! It now looks much better then when I first started it. I like to make the base and then have others perfect it, a great example of why we have so many editors here Hell In A Bucket (talk) 02:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
  • That is the greatness of you, I appreciate and thank you.Justice007 (talk) 08:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Justice007. You have new messages at Talk:Kashmir conflict.
Message added 10:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 10:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Re:Would you comment.[edit]

Dear User:Justice007, I'd be happy to comment there for you. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 15:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 15:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Justice007. You have new messages at Talk:Kashmir conflict.
Message added 16:04, 3 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 16:04, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Tony Vitti[edit]

Perhaps there has been some misunderstanding.

  • There are several places in France called Saint-Rémy.
  • The source for that sentence does not say which Saint-Rémy he was born in. Meanwhile the infobox says he was born in a different location; Lyon. I realise you are keen to hit the revert button to preserve your version of the article, but this version is bad, because a person cannot be born simultaneously in two different towns.
  • If we don't know what we're talking about, we shouldn't just say it anyway. This is supposed to be an encyclopædia, not a collection of text which looks kinda plausible.

bobrayner (talk) 18:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

First, thanks for pointingout the error, I have corrected and second I knew When I wiki-linked the city, that was for me very difficult to decide to add proper name of the city, that's why I did not linked. The clarification needed template is for the phrase or sentence but not name of the persons or states or cities. May be you know better, if there is that description, please provide that, I would like to take a look at.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 19:07, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Is it possible to find out which Saint-Rémy? bobrayner (talk) 10:20, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I can realy not guess which one relevant is connected with a subject's birth place. If you can, please help in this regard. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 10:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Thank you for editing the article -- Lubna Rizvi 21:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lubna which one you mean, I am editing more articles at a time.Anyhow, thanks.Justice007 (talk) 21:55, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Lol it's Rebecca Masterton-- Lubna Rizvi 21:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Oh, that is my pleasure, no problem and again thanks.Justice007 (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013[edit]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. I'm noting that you've been warned a few times so far about assuming good faith like the Tony Vitti AFD when accusing another editor of socking, if you want to know why I posted a COI tag on Rebecca Masterton you should ask me. There is indeed an issue that you can actually find if you take the time to read through the diffs [[4]]. Where else have I incorrectly tagged an article as you see it? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 23:53, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

And as far as the Tony Vitti article tag [[5]] part of the reason I tagged it was the Anon IP statement. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Iris cat.jpg

For all your hard work! Thank you so much! شكريه

Lubna Rizvi 18:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


Thanks for that and خوش آمدید. Justice007 (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkpage archives.[edit]

We actually archive these notices all the time. Even on article talkspace. See Jehovah's Witness talkpage as an example. You can always start a new thread if you had other concerns but I have everything set to archive and I believe that particular conversation is in Archive 6 on my page. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I understand your point, no problem.Justice007 (talk) 00:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
In this case I understand what you were saying because when I looked that was not part of the archive, I will put it there manually. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 00:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Tony Vitti : end[edit]

Lol. Here my last word for this story. I just went to the page of "Koui2" and "Azurfrog", they were two "wikibros" looking for the end of the Vitti's page ! You can check their discussion after the deletion, they're just loling as two kids for their exploit. That's life. The thing you purposed me for undeletion is not allowed after a deletion, an admin told it to me. I won't fight, they are just submiting my other pages to deletion too : La Grande Battle (french wiki) etc... Don't have the time to bother me on a project like wikipedia if rules are respected this way. The Boss of wikipedia is always sending messages for asking money from users, that's probably why I'll never pay a f*cking cent to this mafia ruled by a few WoW players (exepted you as I can see, but you're not the majority).

Anyway, I thank you again for this thing, it took a lot, you wrote lines and lines when they were just giving some words, contradicting themselves etc... Anyway, wishing you a happy new year.

Frenchytv (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

You can ask administrator who closed the discussion, user Sjakkalle (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Make a request in a civil way. There are more possibilities for request. I hope this helps.Justice007 (talk) 00:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
I wrote something on the Sjakkalle (talk · contribs) talk page. Thank you Justice007 Frenchytv (talk) 00:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry[edit]

Hi, sorry for this and that, I'm the one who didn't count properly. --Koui² (talk) 11:04, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Recreation contra Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi[edit]

Do not repost articles that have been deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion; it is considered disruptive and can get your account blocked. I compared your repost against the previously deleted version and did not find any substantial differences, and so it was subject to being speedy deleted as a recreation of content that was deleted pursuant to a deletion discussion. The way to challenge this is at Deletion Review, where you would be expected to show that the AFD was closed incorrectly or improperly, or that there is new information that, in this case, would establish that the subject is notable according to Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks, postdlf (talk) 23:27, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

In fairness, I believe (I haven't checked, but I'm basing this on previous discussions with Justice007) that at least one new source had been added. Justice007, I'm sorry that your article got deleted, especially when I know how much work you put into improving the previous version. However, I agree with the deletion - the level of disruption caused by Hameedi's "supporters" (probably just one guy in Karachi, judging by the IPs, but a very dedicated guy!) was substantial, and only died down after the article was removed (aside from one particularly abusive tirade that got copy-pasted to several talkpages before the IP was blocked). I'm not advocating this as a reason for deletion, but given the borderline notability, Wikipedia is better served by not having an article on Hameedi - less Hameedispam means we can get on with more productive tasks.
On an unrelated note, nice work on the Jaine Green article! Yunshui  23:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Replied on your talk page.Justice007 (talk) 00:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Coinage of India: Image Gallery[edit]

check-mark
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi! User "Ronald zh" keeps deleting my image gallery under 'Indian Coinage'. I explained the gallery was essential to understand the art motifs on coins. Moreover, certain University students in US and elsewhere are using the resource for their study/research purposes and found my image gallery very useful. -ditto- curators from numismatic museums of universities. How do I get him to stop deleting my images? Grateful for your suggestion/help. Rgds. Meluha66 (talk) 09:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Firstly, the {{help me}} tag is usually only used on your talk page when you ask your question, and isn't needed when asking a specific editor a question as you appear to be doing here. Secondly in regard to your actual question, your best bet is to discuss it with the user directly, at their talk page, or on the article talk page, remember to assume good faith. If you need anymore help please re add the {{help me}} tag to your talk page. -- Patchy1 09:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Leonard Oprea[edit]

Hi! I have been involved in editing the article that was replaced by Biruitorul and then wikified by you recently. I am quite unhappy with the present product because it is very incomplete and it also skips the beginning of his career (in the early 80s) and jumps to him being banned in 1987. In the talk of that article I inserted numerous references to the fact that he was notable before he was banned, but that's not the point. I am trying to use the present article and add relevant details, but these are being deleted. I could put the references directly where I insert a statement, but it seems to me irrelevant as if someone has an agenda in keeping this article as sub-standard. I have already given the relevant info in the talk in the last two weeks. I am not sure who is in charge and how to go about it, I saw your page and I believe that you actually are impartial and honest. Unfortunately I am not so sure about others who deal with this page.Could you please advise? Thank youSensei2004 (talk) 03:48, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Sensei, it seems to me a kind of ownership, I made the best layout of the article, but some editors gaming the system and I believe here double standard exists. You can take the disput to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard and discuss there to resolve or compromise the matter. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 09:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment. Of course, I also feel ownership on stuff I inserted and I don't want to see it deleted for no reason. The problem is that the article as it stands is missing many details and omits many books and as such it diminishes his extensive work and I brought much evidence for this and waited quietly for it to be inserted. It is someone life achievements at play and I happen to be familiar with his work. I also was careful not to break into User:Biruitorul's edit, but only inserted stuff around it to complement it. (Haven't finished of course). But at the moment it seems to me that User:MSJapan is the one who deleted my text, not User:Biruitorul. And I know that a few of the people who handle that page have an axe to grind against Oprea (for reasons unknown to me). I can see this from their reactions in the past. I also don't understand why the previous article was replaced with the new one just when I finished inserting the missing references to all the statements. But I was ready to accept the new edit, I just want to make it correct. Unfortunately I see that dispute resolution might be the only way.14:06, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Sensei2004 (talk) 14:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Could you please advise if this should be taken to the regular DPN or to BLP dispute noticeboard?I have waited a few more days but nothing has happened. ThanksSensei2004 (talk) 20:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Revert on The Big Bang Theory[edit]

Just for an fyi I own The Complete Season Four DVD set of the show and can verify that the information I posted about the music video is correct as the jacket that comes with the DVD advertises the information and the feature can be found on Disc 2 of the DVD set. Amazon.com also supports there is a music video and that it is on both the DVD and Blu-ray. http://www.amazon.com/Big-Bang-Theory-Complete-Fourth/dp/B003L77G6A/ http://www.amazon.com/The-Big-Bang-Theory-Complete/dp/B003L77G6K/

  • In Special Feature section of Amazon.com it clearly reads: "The Barenaked Ladies on Big Bang Theory Featurette - Having created one of the greatest theme songs in recent history, the Barenaked Ladies bring it home when they come to the set of the Big Bang Theory to record a music video for the song. Featuring an interview with the band, behind the scenes footage of the filming of an episode, and clips from the new video itself, this piece carries with it all of the fun and energy you could expect from both the band and the show."

I have readded all this and corrected the information on the release date of this being released as a single with both iTunes and Amazon.com. 184.58.0.27 (talk) 03:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Justice, are you around? Please check in - I'd like to hear from you. LadyofShalott 03:30, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Oh my God, I shocked, who wishes that?, I just login and first I always review that page, if there is no any vandal, I check directly IP address that is from United States State/Region: Massachusetts City: Holden. A bit realy nervous. I am ok and healthly and enjoying life. Thanks lady for your feelings.Justice007 (talk) 16:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
    • I'm so gald to know that was just vandalism, Justice! I don't think you need to worry about it too much; people seem to do that crap to articles all the time, and it's not nice, but not really a threat. Thank you for letting me know that all is well with you. LadyofShalott 16:35, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
      • Likewise. Keep warm, Justice, and congratulations on your new king. Drmies (talk) 16:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks both of you. I taking break to have a cup of warm melk because outside is too much cold and vandalism made me more cold. Ya Drmies

eindelijk mannelijk koning. Justice007 (talk) 16:54, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013 Wikification Drive[edit]

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's February Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

Nomination of Nandini Sahu for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nandini Sahu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nandini Sahu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Bill william comptonTalk 17:04, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Katrina Kaif[edit]

Hello! I suppose you are aware of two conflicting theories on Kaif's background, mentioned in the main article. Unless a source confirms self identificaiton by Katrina, adding contents from that src on her background is an evident violation of WP:BLP. That being the case, do you believe in keeping Ayesha Shroff's version when Kaif's self-id on her background is different? Can you explain this? Hari7478 (talk) 23:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Replied on the talk page of Katrina Kaif. Justice007 (talk) 09:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi and Salaam[edit]

I hope you are enjoying your break. Whenever you get back to Wiki can you please look into my sandbox and suggest me whether the article meets up the notability criteria. Regards, -- Lubna Rizvi 14:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Edits at Katrina Kaif[edit]

FYI, Surya Nair aka Suri is a new editor, struggling to learn how to do things properly. I've been helping her via OTRS. She didn't know how to do a reference, I've given her an example. She may yet again struggle, I hope you will offer her a helping hand.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Alright and thanks.Justice007 (talk) 16:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

February 2013 Wikification awards[edit]

The Working Wikifier's Barnstar.png The Working Wikifier's Barnstar
For finishing ninth place on the leaderboard during the February 2013 Wikification drive, with a count of 2 articles, Justic007 (tied with Miniapolis and HueSatLum), you are hereby awarded the Working Wikifier's Barnstar. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 13:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

RFC[edit]

Hey,
We are having some problems with Jinnah's religion. Can you comment on the talk page so that we can end this debate once and for all. Thanks
--Inlandmamba (fruitful thought) 21:17, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Hawkins (Columnist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify April Drive[edit]

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

-- Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify.

All articles require sources[edit]

re your edit summary and action here ALL articles require in line sources. see WP:V and WP:LIST and Wikipedia:BLP#Categories.2C_lists_and_navigation_templates.

A claim that all the content is sourced in the target landing articles is 1) irrel as our policies require the sourcing to be in the particular article where the claim is made, and also 2) patently false. there are dozens of the landing page articles that do not have appropriate reliable sources that identify the subject as being someone who meets the list criteria. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:50, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Hi RedPen I always thought that you are a experienced editor, but what you are mentioning here, it seems to me your experiernce is not justifying the concerns you are raising. Please consult dispute with someone else who knows better than you. In the list no any red link exists and no any content is to be cite, it is very ridiculous when you add the wiki-links in the articles, and then templating "citation needed", similarly the lists of the articles are wiki-links/articles, there is no need of any tags. What you have mentioned the rules, I do not see anything relating or supporting your personal likeness. I hope this helps, and please discuss the dispute on the talk page of the article, so that other editors can give thier opinion too.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
    • I agree with TheRedPenOfDoom; it's a very long list with lots of claims about poets (including claims about living people) but it has zero sources. That's a problem. Strictly speaking, even just grouping together poets by language (or ethnicity) is original research unless you can provide a source which groups them similarly. It would be unhelpful to axe every unsourced line in the list - then there would be nothing in the article - but I think that following our verifiability policy is the key to fixing the article's flaws and improving it further. bobrayner (talk) 15:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Ok Bobrayner and thanks.Justice007 (talk) 16:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

stop vandlization[edit]

My edit is true authentic completely refrenced according to guidelines of wiki.you are reverting it with out any reason.it is vendlization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Am Not New (talkcontribs) 07:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

you questioned my sources[edit]

see Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri there are many other things refrenced from official site.BTW For those who were questioning my sources added another refrence from zemtv.com.Dil e Muslim talk 16:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Mention of Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri issue at ANI[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MezzoMezzo (talk) 08:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Repost of Nandini Sahu[edit]

Information icon A tag has been placed on Nandini Sahu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Speedy delete contest button.svg which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Jussychoulex (talk) 17:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Birbal Jha[edit]

kindly read through reference links given for social title in Birbal Jha. It sounds good and justified.thanks

Then Jerico[edit]

Dear Justice007, I hope you are well. I'll be very grateful if you can please help me keep the Then Jerico page neutral and referenced. One abusive and nasty editor -- whom has previously been blocked for sockpuppetry on this page -- keeps restoring unverified material. He curses and attacks me (including racially) when I try. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 20:21, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

There are already experienced editors involved, anyhow I will keep an eye on it. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 09:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Shamim Hashimi[edit]

Hi Justice,

I am a new editor on wikipedia, Shamim Hashimi is my 2nd article I wanted to confirm about standard of verification source the 2nd reference source is an online government library where the biography of Shamim Hashimi is available at "http://connemara.tnopac.gov.in/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=142451" so there are two sources of online government library and other 4 online libraries. And can I use the reference of the urdu magazines like: Mubahisa, Shayari, Ajkal, shair, rang o boo, funoon etc.? Please let me know if will this help me to keep this Article on Wikipedia? Thanks and regards, Rumi KhawarRumikhawar (talk) 19:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

I will take a look at all sources later. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 15:02, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
For Saleem Kausar and your other recent contributions :). I have also given you the "autopatrolled" user right. Ironholds (talk) 16:49, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
  • What a greatness of you,Ironholds. I appreciate your encouraging move to give me "autopatrolled" and The Original Barnstar. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 20:18, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
    No problem; keep up the good work :). Ironholds (talk) 22:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Iqbal[edit]

I just feel that "British India (now Pakistan)" is not quite accurate. It's either "British India" (as what now consists of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh), "Pakistan" on its own, or perhaps maybe a reference to the modern day states of Pakistan. Just seems a bit inaccurate. The Madras (talk) 14:56, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Ok, you are right, indeed British India, we cannot say now Pakistan---I did not see, I thought ofter "Lahore, British India". I realise my blunder. Especially Thanks to Darkness Shines.Cheers.Justice007 (talk) 15:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
No problem, I'll have a look at it now :) The Madras (talk) 15:54, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Najeeb Haroon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Najeeb Haroon''' ([[Urdu]]: ''' ﻧﺠﻴﺐ ﮨﺎﺭﻭﻥ''' (January 1, 1948), is a senior [[politician]] and a [[civil engineer]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 Wikification Drive[edit]

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

A Small Token of My Appreciation For You[edit]

Biographystar.png The Biography Barnstar
For your exceptional work on Biographical articles. Please accept this a small token of my appreciation. I know your work is way batter than this award. Keep it up dude & Stay blessed Crown Prince  Talk


Further reading[edit]

FYI, further reading should never be folded into the "References" section: the definition of further reading is that it is material that specifcially has not been used as a reference. Yworo (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Yworo. Noted. Justice007 (talk) 21:07, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Dear Justice007, Can you please research more about of Birbal Jha and do justice to the page devoted to him? I'm a fan of him and everything good about him should be displayed on the page. Thanks, Darrenmong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darrenmong (talkcontribs) 04:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Birbal Jha[edit]

Respected Justice007, I had made a request to you to do a justice to the page for Birbal Jha. I had given strong links and references in support of my editing on the page. You seem to be biased with Birbal Jha. Kindly do some researches on Birbal Jha and add more information about him for a good cause. Regards Darrenmong: Darrenmong (talk) 17:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive[edit]

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To unsubscribe remove your username from this list. EdwardsBot (talk) 22:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Ahmed Ali[edit]

Talk:Ahmed Ali, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Ahmed Ali and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Ahmed Ali during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 13:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikilinking[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

  • dates
  • years
  • commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
  • common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 03:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Celebrate Your Life[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Celebrate Your Life has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK, sourced to a single review (or press release?) - Kenya Star and AniNews articles are identical.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Celebrate Your Life for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celebrate Your Life is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrate Your Life until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McGeddon (talk) 08:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Extended bibliography for Birbal Jha?[edit]

Do you happen to know any of Jha's other titles? I'd like to be able to include some other titles in there. I suppose that all 20+ might be a bit bulky even with {{Multicol}}, but it'd be nice to include some others in there. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

  • First of all thanks for improving very nicely the article, it was a disruptive matter, you have solved, I do not know more titles of the subject, only another article British Lingua has been edited several times in the way of puffery, may you take a look at and improve that too. Thanks once again. Justice007 (talk) 10:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
  • I'll try to see what I can do- it's starting to get relatively late over where I am. (I work nights and do this as a hobby.) Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Me too as a hobby, when you have a time, may you take a look at--- Have a nice time. Thanks. Justice007 (talk) 10:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Justice 007, Kindly have a look at the end portion of the article on the link below and do justice for the page of Birbal Jha I had edited and you undid. The news article is published on the most reputed newspaper in IndiaDarrenmong (talk) 11:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks Darrenmong http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/Bank-employee-loses-job-due-to-poor-English/articleshow/31745221.cms

Birbal Jha[edit]

Hi Justice007, thanks for honoring my request to read the link on Birbal Jha. I've read a lot about Birbal Jha on the web. He is doing a great job for the poorest of the poor called Mahadalit in Bihar Can you please read through the few links below and improve the page Birbal Jha.thanks DarrenmongDarrenmong (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC) http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/First-ever-spoken-English-training-programme-for-Bihar-mahadalit-youths/articleshow/16712664.cms http://archive.is/6gVRS http://www.livehindustan.com/news/v/news/article1-story-258-269-377291.html http://www.jagran.com/delhi/new-delhi-city-10873843.html http://www.biharplus.in/news/press-release/birbal-jha-figures-in-world-celebrity-list/ http://www.veethi.com/india-people/birbal_jha-profile-3578-28.htm

Hi Justice007, I appreciate your consistency to edit the page Birbal Jha on which I also work time and often. However, there is a difference of opinion. The article on the link below says that Bap Society is launching.............under the leadership of Dr Birbal Jha. the moment you delete the name of Jha from there the meaning changes. kindly have a relook and do justice on the page. I do not intend to give a promo but then factual error must be avoided. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/Bank-employee-loses-job-due-to-poor-English/articleshow/31745221.cms

The below are the links which says how rural bihar is benefitting where Birbal Jha is playing a role. This needs a mention. http://news.oneindia.in/2011/02/11/nowrural-bihar-honing-its-english-communicationskills-aid0121.html http://in.movies.yahoo.com/news/now-rural-bihar-honing-english-communication-skills-20110211-022108-304.html http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/First-ever-spoken-English-training-programme-for-Bihar-mahadalit-youths/articleshow/16712664.cms http://archive.is/6gVRS

Further are the links which mention that Birbal Jha has got a celebrity status. Can you read them? http://www.livehindustan.com/news/v/news/article1-story-258-269-377291.html http://www.jagran.com/delhi/new-delhi-city-10873843.html http://www.veethi.com/india-people/birbal_jha-profile-3578-28.htm

Thanks.Darrenmong Darrenmong (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Darrenmong, it is an encyclopedia not a daily newspaper to mention day by day activities of him, article has already covered important things, no need of repeating the same thing in different words. I hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 07:58, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Birbal Jha[edit]

Hi Justice, you at times seem to be biased with the subject. I had edited the page with proper citations. Kindly do the justice with page, cross checking all references provided. darrenmong Darrenmong (talk) 02:02, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Brother regarding the Farhat Hashmi page. Please do not spread the negative against the Islamic scholar as what you have mentioned is absolutely Islamic and according to sharia as mentioned in Hadith. Im just writing a family and background about her. I hope you wont let me down. She has 3 million listeners worldwide and true spirit of Islam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.97.31.91 (talk) 19:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi,[edit]

You have removed several publications from the Hamza Yusuf article as they were not cited but particularly for an scholar you could at least use {{cn}} tag for other editors since you don't have time to find source yourself. Also, I have reverted your edit where you removed the honorific prefix from the infobox with edit summary WP:CREDENTIAL but you overlooked WP:HONORIFIC. Thanks, 117.194.205.42 (talk) 15:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

No your are not right, there is placed a BLP sources tag since 2011, citation needed does not mean the unsourced content remains, it should be supported with reliable sources. Justice007 (talk) 17:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
I posted the message from my ip and I feel to create a/c as certain options are restricted from ip. Now, would you please explain the need of {{cn}} tag then? Also, you didn't tell me why you removed the honorific prefix from the infobox. Anothereditorishere (talk) 19:04, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
I have already replied you, details you can find in WP:Citation needed, where it should be and how it should be, when there is question of more content citation needed, appropriate tag is BLP sources, not the multiple CN to multiple books or any thing else. Justice007 (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Nazia Hassan[edit]

Face-smile.svg --220 of Borg 13:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Face-smile.svg Justice007 (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

-Alex Gilbert[edit]

Hello. I did notice your tag on Alex Gilbert. Why has this happened?. If you look at the old proposal for deletion you can see how different the relevance is to the article now. Alex Gilbert has many sources.

Thank You --TreesCanTell (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Just to watch an enchanting and heart-warming documentary on his ordeal see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpUZV4p-ak8 werldwayd (talk) 21:55, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hey there[edit]

Hey Justice I seemed to have noticed that you are interested in the Kashmir region article there is a discussion going on about Rape in Jammu and Kashmir some believe that removing vast amounts of information and data will somehow contribute to the issues discussion merging will remove so much valid information whats your view? KAMari365 (talk) 08:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Pls Refresh Your Precious page english wiki Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi,was anice page.Thanks[edit]

Pls Refresh Your Precious page english wiki Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi,was anice page.Thanks Sir --39.50.205.122 (talk) 03:37, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Pls Refresh Your Precious page english wiki Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi,was anice page.Thanks[edit]

Dear Please Edit and Me to Edit and Finalise Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi for wiki English.Thanks Dear.

Contents [hide] 1 Early Life & Family 2 Early Education 3 Further Education & Work 4 Literary Work for Children 5 Hon. Phds & Awards 6 Publications 7 References 8 Creation of Article Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwaar Hameedi 9 Early Life & Family 10 Early Education 11 Further Education & Work 12 Literary Work for Children 13 Hon. Phds & Awards 14 Publications 15 References Early Life & Family[edit] His parents migrated to Karachi after independence of Pakistan but his paternal grandfather Syed Shakir Hussain Hameedi stayed at Badayun and worked as Principal, Islamia College, Badayun. He was born on 24th August 1960 in Karachi, Pakistan. His real name is Syed Yousuf Husain Jamal. His Fathers’ name was Syed Anwar Hussain Hameedi (Badayun, Uttar Pradesh, India) Educationist, Aligarh Muslim University His Mothers’ name was Syeda Fatima Akhtar Naseeri (Educationist, Professor, Aligarh Muslim University, Zubeda College Hyderabad Sindh)

Early Education[edit] He started his primary education in Karachi. He completed his matriculation in 1972 from Karachi Grammar School (Saddar) with first class division. He completed his Intermediate education from D. J. Science College with first class division in 1974-75. He completed his B.Sc from Karachi University with first class division in 1977. His subjects were Physics, Math and Chemistry. There was a gap in education after this and then he left for America. He got married and a daughter was born named Mariyam.

Further Education & Work[edit] Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi returned to Pakistan and then he did his MSc in Physics with first class division and was appointed as a lecturer in Physics at Karachi University. During this period, he got married with Syeda Naheed Nargis in Dec. 1987 and a son Syed Zainulaabdin (Zain Awaar Hameedi) was born in August 1991. Both children are living in America. During the job, Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi wrote columns in local daily newspapers and magazines and in 1991, UNICEF awarded him for his best writings for children. Director UNICEF invited Syed Mujeeb Zafar Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi to America and gave American citizenship to both of his children. During this period his interviews were published in Voice of America, BBC and Washington Post. After returning to Pakistan, Professor Mujeeb Zafar Anwaar Hameedi did his second M.A in Urdu language and linguistics with first position and was awarded Mir Khalil-ur-Rehman Award as well as President’s Award.

Literary Work for Children[edit] Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwaar Hameedi started his literary journey in 1964 by writing in magazines for children in Lahore “Bacchon ki Duniya”, along with “Khilona” (Delhi), “Pegaam-e-Ta’alim” (Delhi), “Guncha”(Bajnor), “Naunehal” (Karachi), “Taleem-o-Tarbiat” (Lahore), “Phool” (Lahore). Along with them he wrote thousands of thesis’ for Monthly Qaumi Zabaan, Afkaar, Duniya-e-Adab, Seep, Shab-e-Khun (India), Qaumi Zabaan (India), Qaumi Zabaan (Karachi), Urdu (Canada), Urdu Manzil (America), Auraaq (Lahore), Fanoon (Lahore), Majla Badayoun (Badayoun/Karachi). In 1999 Professor Mujeeb Zafar Anwaar Hameedi after writing in Azaadi did a PhD in children’s Urdu Literature. Before this Badayoun’s Dr. Asad Areeb did the world’s first PhD in Children’s Literature from “University of the Punjab”. In this way two people in the Urdu World earned PhDs of Urdu Children’s Literature and both were from Badayoun, one being Dr. Asad Areeb (Multan), and the other Dr. Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi (Karachi).

Hon. Phds & Awards[edit] After this Professor Dr. Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi got four Honorary PhDs, one D.Lit. and countless certificates, Best Performance Award, Governor Sindh Awards 2003 & 2008. In 2010 he was nominated for “Sitara-i-Imtiaz” but because Children’s Literature was not included in the main Literature Category, so he was held back from “Sitara-i-Imtiaz”. In 2012 The Literature Academy has nominated him for “Sitara-i-Imtiaz” in the catgegory “Bacchon ka Adab Number”.

Publications[edit] Tittlian (Children Poems) 1978 Pariyon ke Tazkare (Compilation) 1988 Khun Alood Khanjar (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2003 Pur Israr Sandooq (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2005 Chaabi Wali Motor (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2006 Garam Garam Rotian (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2007 Lijiye Icecream Khaiye (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2008 Aunty Hamari Gaind Dedain (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2009 Kash Tu Mera Beta Na Hota (Poems) 2010 Gazlian (In Process) 2010 Thesis on Dr. Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi’s Art and Personality Naye Rujhanaat bachon kay adab mai aur Dr. Mujeeb Zafar Anwar – Dr. Asad Areeb, Multan 1996 Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi, Bachon Kay Baba-e-Adb-e-Atfaal – Dr. Mir Hassan Ali, Karachi Hamdard University, 1997 Bacchon Ka Bara Adeeb, Professor Syed Mujeeb Zafar – Mazhar Yousuf Zai, Karachi, 2000 Dr. Mujeeb Zafar Adb-e-Atfal Ki Misal – Urdu Academy Delhi, 2001 Bacchon Ka Adab Aur Yousuf Hussain Jamal Say Professor Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Tak – Professor P.K Justin, Carlifornia, 2004 References[edit] ^ http://dailynews.net.pk/may2011/28-05-2011/childern.asp

^ http://dawn.com/2011/03/29/a-neglected-coup-de-plume-2/

^ http://www.dailynews.net.pk/march-2011/19-03-2011/e-paper/literary.asp

^ http://archives.dawn.com/2006/06/24/local19.htm

^ http://dailynews.net.pk/oct2011/15-10-2011/liter.asp

^ http://archives.dawn.com/weekly/yworld/archive/071006/yworld18.htm

^ http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-21863225_ITM

^ http://archives.dawn.com/2002/12/24/local14.htm

^ http://students.english.ilstu.edu/hradhik/351/creations/pakistan.html

^ http://bazmeurduusa.com/writers.aspx

^ http://www.krg.com.pk/krg/pic57.htm

^ http://www.globalurduforum.org/authors/view/8078

Creation of Article Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwaar Hameedi[edit] Dear Please Edit and Me to Edit and Finalise Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi for wiki English.Thanks Dear.


Early Life & Family[edit] His parents migrated to Karachi after independence of Pakistan but his paternal grandfather Syed Shakir Hussain Hameedi stayed at Badayun and worked as Principal, Islamia College, Badayun. He was born on 24th August 1960 in Karachi, Pakistan. His real name is Syed Yousuf Husain Jamal. His Fathers’ name was Syed Anwar Hussain Hameedi (Badayun, Uttar Pradesh, India) Educationist, Aligarh Muslim University His Mothers’ name was Syeda Fatima Akhtar Naseeri (Educationist, Professor, Aligarh Muslim University, Zubeda College Hyderabad Sindh)

Early Education[edit] He started his primary education in Karachi. He completed his matriculation in 1972 from Karachi Grammar School (Saddar) with first class division. He completed his Intermediate education from D. J. Science College with first class division in 1974-75. He completed his B.Sc from Karachi University with first class division in 1977. His subjects were Physics, Math and Chemistry. There was a gap in education after this and then he left for America. He got married and a daughter was born named Mariyam.

Further Education & Work[edit] Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi returned to Pakistan and then he did his MSc in Physics with first class division and was appointed as a lecturer in Physics at Karachi University. During this period, he got married with Syeda Naheed Nargis in Dec. 1987 and a son Syed Zainulaabdin (Zain Awaar Hameedi) was born in August 1991. Both children are living in America. During the job, Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi wrote columns in local daily newspapers and magazines and in 1991, UNICEF awarded him for his best writings for children. Director UNICEF invited Syed Mujeeb Zafar Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi to America and gave American citizenship to both of his children. During this period his interviews were published in Voice of America, BBC and Washington Post. After returning to Pakistan, Professor Mujeeb Zafar Anwaar Hameedi did his second M.A in Urdu language and linguistics with first position and was awarded Mir Khalil-ur-Rehman Award as well as President’s Award.

Literary Work for Children[edit] Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwaar Hameedi started his literary journey in 1964 by writing in magazines for children in Lahore “Bacchon ki Duniya”, along with “Khilona” (Delhi), “Pegaam-e-Ta’alim” (Delhi), “Guncha”(Bajnor), “Naunehal” (Karachi), “Taleem-o-Tarbiat” (Lahore), “Phool” (Lahore). Along with them he wrote thousands of thesis’ for Monthly Qaumi Zabaan, Afkaar, Duniya-e-Adab, Seep, Shab-e-Khun (India), Qaumi Zabaan (India), Qaumi Zabaan (Karachi), Urdu (Canada), Urdu Manzil (America), Auraaq (Lahore), Fanoon (Lahore), Majla Badayoun (Badayoun/Karachi). In 1999 Professor Mujeeb Zafar Anwaar Hameedi after writing in Azaadi did a PhD in children’s Urdu Literature. Before this Badayoun’s Dr. Asad Areeb did the world’s first PhD in Children’s Literature from “University of the Punjab”. In this way two people in the Urdu World earned PhDs of Urdu Children’s Literature and both were from Badayoun, one being Dr. Asad Areeb (Multan), and the other Dr. Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi (Karachi).

Hon. Phds & Awards[edit] After this Professor Dr. Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi got four Honorary PhDs, one D.Lit. and countless certificates, Best Performance Award, Governor Sindh Awards 2003 & 2008. In 2010 he was nominated for “Sitara-i-Imtiaz” but because Children’s Literature was not included in the main Literature Category, so he was held back from “Sitara-i-Imtiaz”. In 2012 The Literature Academy has nominated him for “Sitara-i-Imtiaz” in the catgegory “Bacchon ka Adab Number”.

Publications[edit] Tittlian (Children Poems) 1978 Pariyon ke Tazkare (Compilation) 1988 Khun Alood Khanjar (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2003 Pur Israr Sandooq (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2005 Chaabi Wali Motor (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2006 Garam Garam Rotian (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2007 Lijiye Icecream Khaiye (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2008 Aunty Hamari Gaind Dedain (Children’s Stories, Awarded, Ministry of Education (Pakistan)) 2009 Kash Tu Mera Beta Na Hota (Poems) 2010 Gazlian (In Process) 2010 Thesis on Dr. Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi’s Art and Personality Naye Rujhanaat bachon kay adab mai aur Dr. Mujeeb Zafar Anwar – Dr. Asad Areeb, Multan 1996 Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi, Bachon Kay Baba-e-Adb-e-Atfaal – Dr. Mir Hassan Ali, Karachi Hamdard University, 1997 Bacchon Ka Bara Adeeb, Professor Syed Mujeeb Zafar – Mazhar Yousuf Zai, Karachi, 2000 Dr. Mujeeb Zafar Adb-e-Atfal Ki Misal – Urdu Academy Delhi, 2001 Bacchon Ka Adab Aur Yousuf Hussain Jamal Say Professor Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Tak – Professor P.K Justin, Carlifornia, 2004 References[edit] ^ http://dailynews.net.pk/may2011/28-05-2011/childern.asp

^ http://dawn.com/2011/03/29/a-neglected-coup-de-plume-2/

^ http://www.dailynews.net.pk/march-2011/19-03-2011/e-paper/literary.asp

^ http://archives.dawn.com/2006/06/24/local19.htm

^ http://dailynews.net.pk/oct2011/15-10-2011/liter.asp

^ http://archives.dawn.com/weekly/yworld/archive/071006/yworld18.htm

^ http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-21863225_ITM

^ http://archives.dawn.com/2002/12/24/local14.htm

^ http://students.english.ilstu.edu/hradhik/351/creations/pakistan.html

^ http://bazmeurduusa.com/writers.aspx

^ http://www.krg.com.pk/krg/pic57.htm

^ http://www.globalurduforum.org/authors/view/8078 --111.119.164.144 (talk) 05:55, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

http://www.google.com.pk/imgres?imgurl=http://profmujeebhameedi.weebly.com/uploads/1/6/5/3/16537040/3262150_orig.jpg&imgrefurl=http://profmujeebhameedi.weebly.com/&h=800&w=571&sz=186&tbnid=oJsypJcpAckF3M:&tbnh=90&tbnw=64&zoom=1&usg=__xsVvIKnuPR0jCOtW9aTzkWrpxxo=&docid=yc-FKM2-7l5uBM&sa=X&ei=z_lQUrSjOqKn0wXW5YDwBQ&ved=0CFUQ9QEwCA http://www.google.com.pk/imgres?imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/1d/Prof_Dr_Syed_Mujeeb_Zafar_Anwar_Hameedi_Badayuni.jpg&imgrefurl=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Prof_Dr_Syed_Mujeeb_Zafar_Anwar_Hameedi_Badayuni.jpg&h=3888&w=2592&sz=2802&tbnid=iCddNP29EF058M:&tbnh=90&tbnw=60&zoom=1&usg=__kyZEd70_7Twb5fcWVQdOQaYR33U=&docid=FANClLJsDUTovM&sa=X&ei=z_lQUrSjOqKn0wXW5YDwBQ&ved=0CE0Q9QEwBA http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Mujeeb-Zafar-Anwar-Hameedi http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:rKTZ1Epj4t8J:www.governance.pk/index.php%3Farticle%3D41+&cd=11&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=pk http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:WsE7jgXs2JAJ:wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_real_name_of_Mujeeb_Zafar_Anwar_Hamidi+&cd=19&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=pk http://archive.is/tXhHm http://archive.is/9mmtC http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nnoxplyaNnwJ:www.kaliagrouppk.com/pic57.htm+&cd=25&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=pk http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:0-SuEc_Kxn4J:goldenevening.blogspot.com/2011/12/urdu-poets.html+&cd=29&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=pk http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:w05ZzAVc5AUJ:www.spokeo.com/Zafar%2BAnwar+&cd=28&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=pk http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:7srCbAU_LGYJ:www.bioscience.ws/result.php%3Fquery%3DMujeeb_Zafar_Anwar_Hameedi+&cd=48&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=pk Nisha Lata — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.50.205.122 (talk) 03:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Current issues at Alex Gilbert[edit]

Hello Justice007. Nice username by the way. I have noticed that an article I have been working on along with you and some other editors is currently up for deletion. This article needs to be saved. Please have a look when you can. Thanks --DmitryPopovRU (talk) 04:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hamid Mir may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • out of danger|newspaper=India Today|date=April 19, 2014|accessdate=July 1, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.dawn.com/news/1102056</ref> He was also the subject of a previous attempt

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:29, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Added Sources for Alex Gilbert[edit]

Hello,

I have added the following sources to Alex Gilbert , [6], [7] , [8] , [9] and [10] Major NZ Libraries that hold his Book is listed here. When can the deletion nomination be resolved and the article kept? It has been nominated for the past 2 weeks. --DmitryPopovRU (talk) 21:11, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonita Gandhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Dear friend, Please find about author Sulaikha Hussain who passed away few days before. you can find about her on below link http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Thiruvananthapuram/urdu-writer-sulekha-hussain-dead/article6214086.ece — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheriefbp (talkcontribs) 07:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Would like to thank you![edit]

Hello.

Despite the resolution that was decided on the Alex Gilbert article I would like to thank you on the help on the article. I also found this new source- http://www.nzherald.co.nz/northern-advocate/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503450&objectid=11310534 Does this new source and the old links - http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=11232549 , http://tvnz.co.nz/sunday/s2014-ep1-video-5821764 & http://tvnz.co.nz/sunday-news/alex-gilbert-my-journey-home-russia-5820767 Is this page notable enough now? to even maybe start from it from scratch? or would it be to early?

Thanks Dmitry- --DmitryPopovRU (talk) 03:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Update- I have created this to try rework the page- User:DmitryPopovRU/Alex Gilbert — Preceding undated comment added 04:36, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Fahad Mustafa[edit]

The Nazia Hassan page..[edit]

Hello, I was wondering why do you keep on deleted my edits from the 'Nazia Hassan' page. 'Camera Camera' fairly comes in the discography, it was their last album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.99.88.58 (talk) 03:26, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Just cite the reliable source, there will be no problem. Justice007 (talk) 05:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Saeed Aasi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • http://www.saeedaasi.com/enu/intro.php |title=Biography |publisher=saeedaasi.com|deadurl=no}}</ref>) is a journalist, columnist, poet, writer, trade union leader and a social worker]. Currently he is working as deputy editor in daily [[Nawa-i-Waqt]]<ref name=work>{{cite web |url=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:16, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

External links[edit]

Dear Justice007!

I am Fahim chouhdry from Iqbal Academy Pakistan, official institution from Pakistan for Allama Muhammad Iqbal. I added three external links on Muhammad Iqbal article of wikipedia which are official pages related to Muhammad Iqbal, but you have deleted these page. I just want to know the reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fahimchouhdry (talkcontribs) 20:10, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

  • I gave the reason reverting external links, there is no any new information and article has aready official website and government's Iqbal website is also in the references section. Please take a look at Wikipedia:External links. I hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 04:53, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Fawad Khan article[edit]

Hey! when you clean up the article in terms of unreliable sources can you let me know? I want to find reliable sources for the information that has unreliable sources and might be removed. Thanks!! Kazmia92 (talk) 06:25, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014 Wikification Drive[edit]

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saba Qamar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aina and Dastaan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Jinnah[edit]

There is very little evidence of substance, from neutral observers, and not pro-Hindutva (political hinduism, anti-secularism) extreme religious nationalists, that Jinnah advocated for Pakistan because Gandhi supported non-violent resistance, but that he left congress, and dominated the Muslim league, because he and his partisans felt, not a fact, but felt, that the Gandhi was not serious in addressing the grievances of Indian Muslims in a comprehensive manner.

Regarding misleading, I feel that adding in detail on the Kashmir conflict being caused by a lack of referendum is neutral. It doesnt support any claim of Pakistan or India, but states that a referendum, conducted by international observers was not carried out as it was in Balochistan and NWFP (Pashtun province) and that this lack of election has led to a sovereign dispute. I can not see how it might be construed as misleading or compromises WP:NPOV. The references regarding what I have put on the Kashmir Conflict, is then further vindicated in the article of Kashmir itself and a UN resolution which argues for an agreed solution to the conflict entailing the right to self-determination. (Wiki id2(talk) 21:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC))

Your unsourced edits are already reverted by another editor, it is a kind of consensus, the article is a featured article that you have to keep in you mind and it is edited by most experienced editors. I hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 06:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Wiki id2, things get a little strict once an article becomes FA. Try sorting it out on talk page and listing all your sources. I went thorugh that edit (and if I'm not forgetting), you were trying to put it as the view of muslims ie. being aggrieved and not properly represented (which I think was the actual reason too and needs to be addressed).. stating that so and so party holds such view is not POV in itself so hopefully sourcing it will resolve this. Take your time and back them up with WP:RS as even if you are right that still needs to be done. --lTopGunl (talk) 18:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Justice007. You have new messages at TopGun's talk page.
Message added 15:50, 24 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mujeeb Rahman Hussaini may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Hafiz Mujeeb Rahman Chandio Hussaini''' born 10 January 1999 in [[Larkana]]) is a [[Pakistan]]i who has travelled widely as a [[Naat Khawan]] (reciter of ''[[naat]]'').

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Malala Yousafzai may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • yusufzai.shtml | accessdate = 11 October 2013}}</ref> ''Malālah Yūsafzay'', born 12 July 1997)<ref name="Class dismissed"/> is a [[Pakistan]]i [[Activism|activist]] for [[female education]] and
  • that the [[Parliament of Canada]] confer [[Honorary Canadian citizenship]] upon Yousafzai.<ref>">{{cite news| author = Canadian Press| title = Malala Yousafzai Receiving Honorary Canadian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Malala Yousafzai may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 2012/10/121009_ns_malala_yusufzai.shtml | accessdate = 11 October 2013}}</ref> born 12 July 1997)<ref>{{Cite video | title = ‏امنسټي انټرنېشنل پر ملاله یوسفزۍ برید وغانده | date = 18 October 2012 |
  • that the [[Parliament of Canada]] confer [[Honorary Canadian citizenship]] upon Yousafzai.<ref>">{{cite news| author = Canadian Press| title = Malala Yousafzai Receiving Honorary Canadian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:14, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Question about WP:INDICSCRIPTS[edit]

I've posted a query here as now I think the information about that consensus is not complete to me. It might be a good idea to wait and clarify further before running a campaign on removing (or adding) scripts to articles. As there are two issues, 1) that consensus might have been about Indic scripts and not urdu scripts (see my talk; Urdu is not Indic, it's persio arabic), 2) if it did include Urdu scripts, it was achieved at a WP India page and would only affect WP India only articles and not the wider community or WP Pak, IMO. See my talk page for further discussion. Don't want you to redo / undo same edits later :) --lTopGunl (talk) 14:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Ok lets see.Justice007 (talk) 17:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
I thank both User:TopGun and User:Justice007 for bringing this issue up. I have personally found it really confusing that some members of WikiProject India decided to enact this guideline, especially since many articles associated with WikiProject India overlap with other WikiProjects, such as WikiProject Pakistan, WikiProject Afghanistan, etc. I am thankful to User:RegentsPark for clarifying that as of now, articles associated with WikiProject India can allow scripts for geography related articles. However, I do think that it would be a good idea to bring this topic up again at WikiProject India or elsewhere. I don't think it is appropriate for one WikiProject to make a policy about scripts different than that of the wider Wikipedia Community. I hope this helps and I will let both of you know when I have the time to start such a discussion. With regards, AnupamTalk 05:54, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes it is valid point, it needs to be discussed again, I hope the consensus will be on one line for each project application.Justice007 (talk) 08:21, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you are right about the application of the scripts and I found it a useful for articles to have native name along with English and the translation. Somethings actually are enacted (or more accurately the discussion was hosted on the project page; consensus was still there) by wikiprojects as they host a lot of editors that mainly edit in the topic area (hence the existence of the project). So as for the consensus of that project only covers the project's own scope, it is not counter productive to the rest of the community. I further clarified this on my talkpage with a few administrators and uninvolved editors - this does not apply to Indian topics that overlap Pakistan as they do not just come under WP India. So, the decision of WP India is not really affecting the wider community. You can still use native scripts elsewhere. If you would like to revise the consensus on WP India, I suggest that you challenge that consensus only (but keep in mind WP:SNOW if you don't think much hasn't changed yet) as in case of rest of the projects we do not need to fix what is not broken (given that we are already using scripts). If I was more active at the time of that discussion I would have opposed the removal though. --lTopGunl (talk) 10:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
TopGun, I am also not much active on wikipedia, I have much more matters and things to do in my real life. I was even not aware of the discussion and outcome of it. Anyhow, wiki-rules should be clear and on one line for all projects, otherwise editors will remain in state of confusion and it is not good for the editors, one remains adding and other reverting, it is the waste of the time. Indic scripts transliteration are important for the related subject's part of the area, but transliteration should be only in a national language, not in the regional languages., because that make the lead awkward with many scripts. We are editing all articles, not only project, Pakistan and India. I hope there will be any step to re-consensus the issue in exact concept of the wiki-rule for all project, not the one for this and other for that, it will be considered "discrimination" towards different scripts within its scope.Justice007 (talk) 13:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
I agree with you on that. I'm concerned about the same multitude of editors over running the consensus for Pakistan related projects as well (an already under resourced project with few but prolific editors) instead of getting their own reformed. So if this is to be raised again, it shouldn't be anything less than a wiki wide consensus from village pump. --lTopGunl (talk) 13:52, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
I am looking forward Anupam, he may initiate to reopen the discussion in a wide scale. I hope we will reach a positive solution in the consensus way.Justice007 (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

CSD tag removal[edit]

Hi Justice007 - I restored the CSD tag to Ayeza Khan for two reasons. First, you removed it noting that the CSD was contested, yet no one but the creator has done so and therefore the CSD tag is still valid. Secondly, you nominated it for TfD as a template, which doesn't make sense. Ultimately there is no reason why a second AfD needs to occur when the last one was closed just three days ago unless an editor other than the creator contests the CSD. --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

It went wrong automatically, yes I was using Twinkle and happened wrong click, anyhow as I remember, if there is no changing in the rule, creator can contest and by anyone tag can be removed. Now it is ok, no problem. Justice007 (talk) 21:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict)Were you using Twinkle or something? Maybe it was just a misclick. Anyway, anyone other than the creator can contest the deletion of the article through the removal of the CSD tag. As it stands the creator is the only person to have contested it, so there is no need to remove it. Another admin will come along and take a look and decide whether it meets CSD G4 criteria soon enough. --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The rule states, "The creator of a page may not remove a speedy deletion tag from it. Only an editor who is not the creator of a page may do so." Justice007 (talk) 21:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
I understand the policy; I've worked at CSD for years as an admin. No one other than the creator is contesting the CSD tag so there is no reason to remove it and fire up another deletion discussion when the last one closed 72 hours ago and no other editor is contesting the speedy. --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
OK.Face-smile.svg Justice007 (talk) 21:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!!![edit]

Caramel Peanut Candy Apples 2592px.jpg
Wilhelmina Will has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!

'"On Psych, A USA Network TV series Episode 8, The Tao of Gus, Season 6, Shawn refers to pumpkins as "Halloween Apples" because he thinks all round fruits are a type of apple.


If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

Candyapple.jpg


Cheers! "We could read for-EVER; reading round the wiki!" (talk) 17:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks dear, same to you too.Face-smile.svg Justice007 (talk) 22:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Re: October 2014[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Justice007. You have new messages at Johnmoor's talk page.
Message added 23:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Justice007. You have new messages at Johnmoor's talk page.
Message added 12:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Edit-warring with Johnmoor[edit]

Edit-warring with him won't solve any problems. Maybe it's time to write up a WP:COIN case to address his continuing problems, or do you have another approach you'd like to try first? --Ronz (talk) 18:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

The last COIN case started by you is not closed yet — Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 68#Editor Johnmoor. Thank you. —JOHNMOORofMOORLAND (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Ronz, I did my best, I am sorry I can't discuss with who has not capability to understand the rules in its exact concept of meaning, referring rules mindlessly, and remains reverting and violating to reach a consensus, I do really keep this proverb in my mind that "Casting Pearls Before the Swine", it is also a bonus song by Yngwie Malmsteen. I now keep away myself from that discussion and editing. Cheers. Face-smile.svg Justice007 (talk) 20:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate all your help and patience. --Ronz (talk) 00:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

iERA[edit]

Dear Justice007, I hope you are well. Another editor (RookTaker) and I are feeling a bit frustrated that our efforts to keep the iERA article neutral, balanced and reliable are being thwarted by an anonymous editor who changes his editor name (sometimes to mimic ours) and seems to want to whitewash the article. I don't have an view as to whether iERA is good or bad, but it is a controversial entity. That's not just my opinion. Neutral and reliable sources show that. Hiding the controversial nature of this entity will therefore prevent an accurate account being presented. I'm not out to paint the iERA as despicable. I truly don't have an axe to grind. I don't believe that RookTaker has either. Can you please take a look at the article and the edit history and see what you think? Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 05:26, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Imran Khan[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Javed Chaudhry may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • on matters of national and international importance.In January 2008, Javed Chaudhry joined ]]Express News (Pakistan)]] as an anchorperson of a political Talk show [[Kal Tak]], in which he analyses current affairs of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:28, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Re: Proposed deletion of Abdul-Majid Bhurgri[edit]

Many thanks for pointing this out. I have just updated the page Abdul-Majid Bhurgri. My colleagues will add more reliable sources soon.Rasool Sarang (talk) 14:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

adding press releases to Marko Stout[edit]

It is unclear why you keep on adding press releases to this article. I'm sure you understand that if an article is up for deletion because it is promotional and lacks independent sources, adding another press release is going to make the case weaker, not stronger. I deleted the last press release you added--there was no reason given for this press release to appear as an external link. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Logical Cowboy, it's no problem, I was searching reliable sources in the late night, I found those, didn't access thoroughly, just added to the external links for further assessment. You removed, it's ok.Justice007 (talk) 09:34, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Why keep removing?[edit]

I have been registered with Wikipedia since 2007. Do you believe that I as a post-graduate engineer, lack ability to understand guidelines, regulations, fairness, neutrality to follow?

May I please dare to ask you, as to what actually have you contributed to 'Shaikh Ayaz' - since last you left the following message on its Talk-page section on 30 December 2012 (except removing sourced-material)?

There are a lot of references, later or any other day I will try to work on the article and improve and expand, I hope so.Justice007 (talk) 18:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

it is 13 November 2014, to 'later or any other day - 30 December 2012'!(SarfarazLarkanian 14:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC))

Hi Indusengineer, If you knew the guidelines and rules, you didn't need to leave comments on my talk page, I just removed the content that was not supported citing reliable sources. Other thing, please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. I hope you will use your ability as well for.Justice007 (talk) 08:00, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
It has been fun-fact game for some users on Wikipedia to challenge and remove content (an only thing they believe they are good at). You did not answer my quoted message from you at 'Shaikh Ayaz' talk page - what exactly have you contributed to that page since 2012? (while sitting in Europe you will never be able to improve or expand any Pakistan-related article other than challenging their contents---and both you and I know why - lot of information on Pakistan is not well-documented on internet). You use 'guidelines' to find loopholes to challenge (like you did with this discussion in the end). This is a kind of contribution that anyone would love to perform, over researching for Wikipedia (no offense). SarfarazLarkanian 10:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)Unless you are paying Justice, you shouldn't require him for making good on his thoughts for improving an article. You are welcome to do it yourself (with reliable sources; you do not need online sources so feel free to go to a library and bring in print sources if you like as far as you give proper citations. See WP:SOURCEACCESS). Also, it would be great if you could actually leave the links to atleast your talk page in your signature. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:45, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Need help[edit]

Justice007, can you take a look at recent changes on Tajuddin Muhammad Badruddin? [11] Dazedbythebell (talk) 19:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Ali Haider[edit]

Just FYI, I removed this prod. The article was in terrible shape, but Haider is quite notable. His early 90s song "Purani Jeans" was a big hit that had enduring popularity in Pakistani pop culture. He's had other hits as well. I'm doing some work to improve it.--Milowenthasspoken 07:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Invalid Speedy deletions[edit]

Hi Justice007,
I have been looking at the edits of Taimurijaz97 for some time and noticed your CSD#A7 notices on Altaf Hussain University, Karachi & Altaf Hussain University, Hyderabad. Unfortunately the template message says "Note that educational institutions are not eligible under this criterion.". I also just saw that they have now been removed by another editor for that reason. Regards, --220 of Borg 07:45, 1 December 2014 (UTC)


It was I who removed them. A7 does not apply to schools or universities. All with a real existence are considered notable. The question is whether the two newly founded universities in question do yet have a real existence.
I see a decent reference that defines the situation [12].
At what stage something being planned becomes real enough to have an article is specified roughly at WP:CRYSTAL. I suggest afd. DGG ( talk ) 07:59, 1 December 2014 (UTC) indents added 220 of Borg
So, at least for Hyderabad, construction hasn't even been started? "... announcement of university on Friday, ..."Face-surprise.svg--220 of Borg 08:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi 220 of Borg, DIG, that is ok, the template was indeed not valid, anyhow the both subjects are not notable and those even don't exist, it was a just minor news of someone suggesting the establishment of the universities after Altaf Hussain. I do not think that is the reliability of Wikipedia to let create such articles that physically don't exist.Justice007 (talk) 15:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Well, if they don't exist yet then wp:CRYSTAL should apply perhaps? Other editor is DGG not DIG I think? (Are you sorry you gave Taimurijaz97 a Barnstar now?Face-surprise.svg Their editing is driving me 'nuts'!) --220 of Borg 18:21, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
OMG, Face-surprise.svg hi 220 of Borg, I never gave him barnstar, he just last month created his talk page, all user-boxes are false, he is misleading the wiki-community. Where are the page patrolling editors and admins?. There should be taken action.Justice007 (talk) 19:52, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Sorry! I never checked the edit history to confirm you made the award, but glad I mentioned it!. I'd say you're entitled to remove it then, and any other bogus awards. Probably just copied someone else's user page. I've seen this copying of other awards etc before, I smell a sockpuppet ducking a block. I suggest that you mention this at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (WP:AN/I). Note user DGG above is an Admin. --220 of Borg 20:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
I should have checked his user page before.. he simply copied my user page as is probably while he noticed me warning and tracking him, to troll / admire? / mislead... haha! --lTopGunl (talk) 03:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
TopGun, He chose your user page to copy, you know why?!; I think for that subject of area two things are very favourite; to be "Top" with "Gun".Face-smile.svg Justice007 (talk) 08:57, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Touche. Face-wink.svg --lTopGunl (talk) 13:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

More on Taimurijaz97[edit]

This guys 'articles' are looking more bogus all the time! See this search I did. They are just copy/pasting one pages text into another, changing the names & location etc. to create a 'new' page! There are now 9 university pages where the "Main campus extends on 74 Kanals, comprises ..."! WTF???

  • I think Lahore Garrison University is where its been copied from as Taimurijaz97 didn't create, and hasn't edited, that page, at least not under that username. (I have suspicions)
  • I've given them 2 'final' warnings for removing maintenance templates (especially 'Unreferenced') in less than 10 hours (last ≈75 minutes ago). I'm hours overdue for sleep (UTC+10 here) so I'm going to bed! (For one hours sleep?) Maybe they'll be blocked, again, when I get back! (AGF all gone now! Face-sad.svg)--220 of Borg 20:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Naeem Baig[edit]

Read WP:NOTE, WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:RS. The article has a single source, which is not sufficient for a biography of a living person, and that source does not verify the full text of the article (I've tagged the unverified statements) or satisfactorily establish the notability of the subject. Without more reliable sources that establish notability, the article may be deleted, and unsourced statements may be deleted at any time. Swpbtalk 19:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Swpb, thanks for referring rules, it is nice to read it again and again. I just know since October 2010, atleast one reliable source establishes the notability. Daily Dawn is a mainstream newspaper, there is an article/review, (written by mtiaz Piracha) that significant covers the subject's work. Over tagging I disagree with you. Please don't take it personal, I don't bother if article resulted deletion. I am neutral and fair.Justice007 (talk) 21:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
If you don't like having rules quoted at you repeatedly, follow them. Swpbtalk 22:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

December Wikification drive.[edit]

Greetings! Just letting you know the December wikification drive has been started. Better late than never. Cheers! :) Heading for the 20's, living in the Wild Wild Wikipedia! (talk) 18:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

History of Indian Subcontinent[edit]

Hey, want to get your opinion on this... History of India covers the history of the whole subcontinent while History of Pakistan, History of the Republic of India and History of Bangladesh are country history articles. This is creating some confusion in editors who are trying to split History of Pakistan as well into two articles (the second one being History of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan; it seems to be a good split by WP:MOS to shorten the aritcle though). It has started an editwar at the History of Islamic Republic of Pakistan between keeping it redirected to History of Pakistan and splitting. I think if History of India was moved to History of Indian Subcontinent, it will clarify things alot (because 'India' redirects to the country and not the subcontinent so that is the primary topic and we need to have a single format in both cases) and also keep the historical term "India" in the title in form of "Indian Subcontinent". Kindly comment on the discussion at WT:PAK#History of modern and ancient day Pakistan esp. refer to my third point there. I am thinking of starting an RFC for renaming the page if there are some more views from experienced editors on what to do. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:51, 6 December 2014 (UTC)


We need your help[edit]

Brother your country needs your help Battle of Chawinda is being attacked by biased pro India editors furthermore the user Occultzone has rallied allot of Indians through canvassing on the Indian editors group page so he has allot of votes for his agenda our only hope TopGun sadly has been trapped by this user and is facing a TBAN check [13] and for what? trying to edit neutrally occult has canvassed admins to block him and it seems to be working please could you spare some time and vote on the battle of chawinda for support of result outcome thank you brother for reading this and if there are any others out there who want justice on wikipedia let them know!!! thanks again. Meanbuggin (talk) 20:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Don't forget to check WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Nangparbat OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 22:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Merged Sections[edit]

Just letting you know that I merged the sections of Biggest Tank battle.. and Result as both are describing the same content. I've removed about the final result of the 1965 War as it is out of context there. Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle 17:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014[edit]

You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Battle of Chawinda. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 18:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Source misrepresentation and removal of maintenance templates is nothing better either. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 18:02, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


Stop icon This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Discussion is better[edit]

I strongly suggest you stop slapping useless self-detrimental warnings to users and answer the questions raised by us at Talk:Battle of Chawinda. That might prevent you from getting blocked. Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle 18:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

@Justice007: give vote in RFC heading it will decide. Harassment will be noted by admins. Some users like to follow your other disputes in revenge. Admins will find them. ---TheSawTooth (talk) 21:45, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

I have removed that malformed RfC because you did nothing more than falsely claiming me of WP:COI and other unfounded allegations. RFC is for solving content dispute not for escalating drama. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 01:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for threatening to continue edit warring, as you did here. 3RR is not a limit that can be used to one's advantage by gaming the system. You've already reverted three times after I had given blanket warnings on the EWN. Please do not restart your reverting behaviour on the respective article. Go by consensus. Follow dispute resolution in case talk page discussions fail. And do not give threats to edit war. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.   Wifione Message 00:38, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Justice007 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

This time out helped me take a step back and revaluate the position. Discussion, rather than reverting, is the right way to go Justice007 (talk) 07:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Indeed it is. And discussion of articles should focus on content, not on the editors. Huon (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.
  • No matter how short, the block does not remain preventive once the user has recognized and agreed to discuss at an article's talkpage without reverting and should be removed. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Please let .Justice007 edit again[edit]

I'm not involved in the article that caused dissention. But please let Justice007 edit again. In my experience he has been a highly positive Wikipedia editor. Sometimes situations with aggressive or unreasonable editors frustrate even excellent editors so much they can push them to make mistakes. Justice007 is worth reinstating straight away. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 11:39, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

You're comments don't affect the status quo one bit. If the other editors were aggressive and unreasonable, it is they who would be blocked. Not him. ƬheStrikeΣagle 11:41, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, ƬheStrike. I hope you are well. I was merely offering a view. I'm entitled to do that regardless of whether it brings change. By the way, I wasn't referring to you, or anyone else in particular, when I mentioned difficult editors. Your editor name is unknown to me. I was speaking generically. Have a nice day. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 11:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Personally I'm surprised. A member of Wikiproject Pakistan defending another member of the same Wikiproject?! Uninvolved??? Face-wink.svg Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. But I said (in truth): "I'm not involved in the article that caused dissention." George Custer's Sabre (talk) 11:59, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Gorge has every right to post here....it's better we close this case here.. Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle 12:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

February 2015 Wikification drive[edit]

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :) Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day!!![edit]

Happy Valentine's Day, to you and yours! Cheers, Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 23:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

April 2015 Wikification drive.[edit]

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the April drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 03:35, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Happy Easter![edit]

All the best! "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

A caution[edit]

Just as I left a note on AHLM13's page about certain terms, I'm also leaving a caution here. When you raised your concern to AHLM13 about the term "vandalism", you said in part "I am the main edito of this article". That's getting a bit close to WP:OWN territory - nobody owns any given article. I understand the meaning of the phrase, but you need to be careful about how you use the term and absolutely avoid anything that might be close to you trying to say "It's my article, and it will be done my way!". OWN calls it stewardship, and it can be a valuable service to Wikipedia but along with that you need to be open and communicate with other editors. When reverting, consider opening a discussion on the article talk page especially if there seem to be significant style differences. As I said, I understand the meaning of the phrase you used, but there's a lot of other editors who might not and get a wrong impression. Thanks, Ravensfire (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Muhammad Iqbal[edit]

Please understand that discussion does not take place in edit summaries. You are in danger of engaging in an edit war. Please seek to form a consensus before reverting again. Tiderolls 21:42, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Ravensfire , Tide. I did not mean that I own the article. I briefly told him that I was the main contributor of the article; It does not fall under own the wiki-rule. Maybe there was not the clarity. Iqbal has several titles that are not necessary to add to the info box. The language standard looked like an essay terms or just the flowery language; it is not the encyclopedic language. I appreciate if there are any constructive edits. Justice007 (talk) 23:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Ravensfire and Tide, thanks for having give us some tips. @Justice007, it doesn't matter whether you intended to say that you own the article. If on your behalf there was an IP or newly created account, then he would have been blocked. You're right, Sir Iqbal possess VARIOUS titles, which can't be added, but those 3 should be enough (but SIR might be removed). Moreover, I don't know which essay terms are you talking about, but most of them seem to be encyclopedic. You reverted all edits without reading them, such as reliable sources and even APPROPRIATE LINKS, like "[[Pakistani people|Pakistani]], [[Indian people|Indian]], [[Bangladeshi people|Bangladeshi]]" . Please use the articles' talk page. With regard to Hanif Tarin's article, could you tell me what does "INDIAN URDU POET" mean? It is same as "AMERICAN BRITISH LANGUAGE POET", which doesn't mean anything. I've just clarified that sentence, but you undid my edit by writing THAT I utilise Uncyclopedic language and I am spoiling the articles everywhere. This is unacceptable. -- AHLM13 talk 15:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Warning: Violating the three-revert rule[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Muhammad Iqbal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- AHLM13 talk 09:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Muhammad Iqbal[edit]

Hi, I saw your comment at Talk:Muhammad Iqbal. Please note that article talk pages are intended to discuss the improvement of the article but are less than ideal to complain about the behaviour of other editors. Please consider to strike or remove this and comment on the content dispute. Thanks :) JimRenge (talk) 16:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

JimRenge, I did not get your point, talk pages are for discussion of all issues, I am not discussing the behaviour, but that comes in the discussion and that leads to compromise towards the improving the article, and reach the consensus. I do not think there is any issue of personal motivation. I hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
How you started the section was not helpful - "...engaging in a blatant pattern of Wikistalking articles that I have edited". That's something for the drama boards (WP:ANI), not for an article talk page. Ideally, it should be used for that article and only focus on the edits, not the editor. Don't delete it, but I think starting a new section, focusing ONLY on the edits for that article and explaining why you think one version is better than the other would be more productive. Ravensfire (talk) 16:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
I agree with Ravensfire. WP:TPYES says: "Comment on content, not on the contributor". His talk page or ANI are better places to discuss his behaviour. JimRenge (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Okay, agree, later I try to focus on concerned issues. Thanks. Justice007 (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Muhammad Iqbal. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Tiderolls 13:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

  • If you edit this article again without a consensus being reached first, longer block periods will result. Tiderolls 13:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Tide rolls, please clarify your imposed restriction; If you edit this article again without a consensus being reached first.

Do you mean here only the dispute or also improving and expanding the article as whole Justice007 (talk) 07:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

It is simple. You have demonstrated that you do not understand the framework of rules and conventions within which we work on this project. Have you read the policies and guidelines to which you have been directed? I think if you had you would have been able to avoid your block. My restriction, as you call it, aims to help you avoid future blocks. Read the policies and guidelines. Observe and engage other editors. Ask questions. My point is that you have a bit more to learn. Tiderolls 18:03, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Tide rolls, yes, I confess, I have to learn not only some extent, but more extent, I remain in learning. Is it the clarity that I asked? I know very well, why I was targeted. I do not want to illustrate a point to win, but is that for the project to cheer, and this ??!!. You know very well, I was maintaining the policies per "neutral point of view" policy is to present the subject as they are presented and covered by the mainstream academics. You are not a child, but you are an administrator though I see to some extent your neutrality. Anyhow, I close this topic here. I will try to follow policies rather focusing on the editors, I hope other will do the same.Justice007 (talk) 11:14, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Justice007 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I am surprised being blocked from editing. I hope this is not as the punishment the users or counterbalance. I am always assuming good faith if the constructive edits considered disruptive, how to edit, and stop vandalism. I tried to discuss the dispute, but no constructive response If I was disruptive, I try it will not happen in the future. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 14:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your unblock request gives no indication that you understand the reason for the block, and therefore no indication that you will not do the same again. You were blocked for edit warring: if you are not sure what that means, click on the following link and read Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. However, considering the number of messages about edit warring that have been posted to this page since 2012, you should be fully aware what it means. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.


In the days when I created my account back in 2006, the account creation dialogue encouraged new users to read the username policy before choosing a username, so I did so. In those days, the policy gave a rather serious warning that using your real name might not be a good idea, so I quickly thought up another name to use instead. Later, I came to regret having chosen a usernmae that looks like a real name, because it is likely to give the impression that I am pretending to be someone I am not, whereas had I chosen an obviously nonsense name, such as "The emperor's sock", nobody would think I was making such a pretence. By the time I came round to thinking that, I had such an extensive editing history, and had been involved in so many discussions and so on, that I thought changing my username might confuse people, so I stuck with the name I had. However, as time went on, I became less and less happy about the possibility that I might mislead people, so eventually I put a note in my signature declaring that it is a pseudonym, so that nobody can be in any doubt. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:56, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


JamesBWatson, collective reply, wonderful story and reality, it looks like also my story. Yes dear, it is exactly so, similarly, give something of value to someone who will not appreciate it, as in the old professor felt that lecturing on Dante to unruly undergraduates would be casting pearls before swine. Take a look to that two Quotes by someone about-What the people think. Face-wink.svg

"When a consensus will base on the voting and non-neutrality and not following and acting on a concept of its originality, it is only the dissension and the politics, nothing else."

"If you are jobless, you have not any special ability, even you can't get the cleaning job. Join the Wikipedia and become an editor. You can knock all the educated figures, lawyers, professional journalists, academics and specialist of any subject down by the Wikipedia rules and policies that contradict each other. You have the specific weapon the consensus. Your friends can let you win all factors. You can make with that the wrong to the right and the right to the wrong. You can decide the reliability and the assessment of things, no matter you qualify for that or not. You have many tools for harassing others. That means the Wikipedia."

Anyhow thanks for clarity.Justice007 (talk) 09:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Information icon I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

what was wrong[edit]

AOA You have reverted the changes made in Pakistan page . About Rice and Lassi , MAngoes of Mirpurkhas , what is wrong in this ? isn't Mangoes largely produced in Mirpurkhas Sindh, Rice in Larkana and Lassi is also common drink of rural Sindh as well as its liked in many urban cities of Sindh. So therefore its requested you kindly have a moderate view and re-include those changes. Thanks and regards @JogiDon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jogi don (talkcontribs) 06:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

June 2015 Wikification drive.[edit]

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the June drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 04:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Sadda Haq (TV series)[edit]

I am really sorry if any of my contributions on the page had hurt you. Thanks. Hcns (talk) 07:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Oh, no, not at all, we are here for the project, we assume good faith. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 07:21, 5 June 2015 (UTC)