User talk:K9rosie

Welcome!

Hello, K9rosie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Neoaztlan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Teapotgeorge^Talk 14:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neoaztlan

A tag has been placed on Neoaztlan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 14:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Neoaztlan

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Neoaztlan. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 14:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Neoaztlan

I have nominated Neoaztlan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neoaztlan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:51, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, AllisonAshleyArm, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Edison (talk) 00:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as AllisonAshleyArm, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Vianello (Talk) 00:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/K9rosie for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 00:50, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/K9rosie, and you are therefore blocked indefinitely.
If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 01:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

K9rosie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you are appealing that Feinoha is my account, you are invalid. I have never used another Wikipedia account besides this one. Please check my logs.

Decline reason:

I did, and there's persuasive evidence that the three blocked accounts are all related. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

K9rosie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was blocked >10 years ago (when I was around 13 years old) for sockpuppetry. I'm appealing again because I seriously have no clue who made the accounts that I was accused of sockpuppeting; they likely all shared the same IP of a public computer I accessed, likely while I was at school. K9rosie (talk) 19:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Welcome back! Yamla (talk) 19:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]