User talk:KH-1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Click here to leave a message


Concerning your "undisclosed payments" tag[edit]

Hi, I was wondering how I could improve the article so that it does not look like this tag may be suitable. Can you please clarify for me what cleanup is required to improve it? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anastasiia Kovalinas (talkcontribs) 14:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

I understand the meaning of the tag and that if a contributor is being paid, he/she should notify the Wikipedia community. However, I am not being paid for my contributions here. I am trying to contribute to Wikipedia on a volunteer basis. What should I do to clean up the article to remove the tag? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anastasiia Kovalinas (talkcontribs) 08:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to move forward, you will have to be honest with us. -KH-1 (talk) 00:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Reference Link Quickly Removed[edit]

Hello KH-1. Please help me to understand why my reference link I have tried to replace with a dead link has been removed so quickly and marked as spam. We had no intention of putting spam link in the article and only were trying to provide value to the article.

I have reviewed the Wikipedia Spam guidelines fully and the only thing I can think is because there is an external link on our page to a corporate site we work with. If I remove that link would that make it acceptable for you? If it is something else please let me know.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cvn74oliver (talkcontribs) 07:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Great bot[edit]

It IS a ridiculous concept because marriage considers both individuals to be the same person, hence the concept of rape in marriage is impossible. However, if you have developed a bot that immediately flags and reverts relevant notation then so-be-it. Good job on the A.I., sigh*

Why my contribution has been removed[edit]

Hi KH1,

I don't understand, even after providing all clarification, and the contribution that I made, was perfect to this section, and you removed it. Can you tell me what was wrong with it? I explained every single thing about my changes, still you removed it. Thanks, Rahul

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
Wiki Project Med Foundation logo.svg The 2017 Cure Award
In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

Page: Warhammer 40,000[edit]

Why did you restore the content? You do not adhere to the condition of consensus. How many sources do you need to change your mind in this decision?

Warhammer 40,000 is a whole universe. What did you doubt when making the return revision? In doing so, using the preposition "good faith". All the content that I added is not not with any negative character.

I look forward to hearing from you.

It wasn't an improvement. The wording was awkward and it was already mentioned in the following paragraph. -KH-1 (talk) 23:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Terrell Edmunds[edit]

Why are you removing his draft information and NFL Profile when he was drafted?

I was removing vandalism, but reverted a bit too far. -KH-1 (talk)


Thank you for your reverts on my edits.


Thank you for your reverts on my edits. Musthaq n (talk) 03:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)musthaq nMusthaq n (talk) 03:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekta Kapuur (talkcontribs) 07:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Please let me know what to change to revert back the changes. The content is genuinely informative with trade brushes, and you will not be able to find this anywhere on the internet. The industry-specific terms are used across the world. The Company name was removed as per the previous changes and it does not qualify to be a spam. If you need more documentation please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Not sure why are my edits treated as spams??[edit]

If you can respond to my earlier query and not revert my changes without any reason that'll be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:43, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Removal of my image[edit]


My image was just taken down unfairly. I have shot most Australian whiskies and am not loyal or do not own STARWARD. The image I uploaded I thought better represented the page as STARWARD is the largest Australian whisky producer, just as the American whiskey page might have a photo of a Jack Daniels bottle. I am going to re-upload the image as the current image is of bad quality and doesn't portray the Australian whisky making community well at all.

Thank you for you time and care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackWHawkins (talkcontribs) 05:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


Hi, can you please help me understand why you are deleting the information I am adding to the Starkville Academy page? I am trying to add current and factual information to the information that is already on the page.

Harpy eagle[edit]

What is the meaning of this?--Manwë986 (talk) 17:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Edit Reverted[edit]

You replied "the whole thing". I've only used public information and cited resources. What specific sections are not allowed?

Why did you remove an entire, well-sourced and informative article?[edit]

I'm the author of text of Carmel Snow that has been on this site for a decade.

I had deep knowledge of the subject and considered it a scholarly entry. I aimed to present her, as she was, as a cultural force who brought the work of some of the greatest talents of the last century, from Truman Capote to Cristobal Balenciaga to Henri Cartier-Bresson (and many more) in to the pages of her magazine.

I don't think readers will be served by this new version.

You have added new information re her wedding dress, etc. Fine! But why delete the original material that placed the subject in context and made a case for her enduring importance?

The details you add could be easily woven into the existing text.

Biographer1 (talk) 10:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

The article needs to be properly sourced with in-line citations (see WP:IC). Your version had nothing other than a link to Amazon. -KH-1 (talk) 00:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Adding Home Ownership and /* Alternative models and management philosophies */[edit]


I spent a lot of time adding 2 new paragraphs that you removed entirely as SPAM. You are certainly right that 3 out of the 11 total links I provided as references were from my website, but in each case they were for free services and if you have better links from somewhere else that answer the topics better than my own website (free credit boosting, a list of ways to have low cost and free unconventional shelter where I am not paid a dime, and free down payment assistance list), why not just edit my additions by replacing those 3 links? By removing my edits entirely, you removed a plethora of important information without providing any substitute. If you are unaware of a better substitute, why change anything when each of the 3 websites were for free services? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamBGarrett (talkcontribs) 01:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

See WP:COIEDIT. There's not much that can be salvaged from that name dropping spiel. -KH-1 (talk) 02:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

That's ludicrous. Have you ever been homeless? It's very important that they are able to get quality content, especially free content.

Dear KH!

I'd love to have a chat with you about this edit and how we can collaborate on this text. My goal is to craft a well-written, informative text about a fascinating woman, Carmel Snow.

My thought was to combine the information you so recently contributed with my own information, which is based on extensive research and a fairly academic assessment of her role in 20th century culture.

My edit yesterday sought to combine both of our perspectives.

My understanding re Wikipedia is that there can be multiple contributors to any post.

I would love to collaborate with you on an excellent text that we both feel serves the subject well.

Shall we confer together to see what we can come up with? I'd welcome the opportunity. Please let me know how you'd like to proceed

Warm collegial wishes,

Biographer1 (talk) 22:58, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Why did you remove my edit ?[edit]


I am very surprised you removed my edit about Convertigo Studio ? This product is very well known product available on the market since 2011 and used by many European and US companies. Also this an Open Source and free product.

My company is using this product and we are very happy about it, and I think this technology deserves to be known on Wikipedia like all the others?

There is a Web Site about the product ( and you can see this product is available on GitHub, proof that this is open source ..

Please reconsider.

Thks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wulkanman (talkcontribs) 04:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of {{Persondata}}[edit]

Hi KH-1,

I'm the bot who is deleting {{Persondata}}. I noticed your edit on Des Newton (Gaelic footballer) in which you added {{Persondata}}. This template is deprecated and deleted. Please stop adding {{Persondata}}. In case you want to support the Persondata project you can help with the migration of the dataset to Wikidata at KasparBot's tool. See Wikipedia:Persondata or contact my operator T.seppelt in case you have any questions.

Thank you very much, -- KasparBot (talk) 01:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Spam refs[edit]

Hello KH-1 Why you removed my citations? Those were according to the articles.Sbshuvo (talk) 18:40, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

They're crappy content marketing links and in no way a WP:RS. Stop. Kuru (talk) 00:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

hello,I saw that you just deleted my changes, my English is not particularly good, I am sorry. I got this emotional information from the Chinese link, and they also admitted on Weibo (a social software), can I add this information if I need to do it, thank you。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by HITJiangSiqi (talkcontribs) 02:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)


hello,I saw that you just deleted my changes, my English is not particularly good, I am sorry. I got this emotional information from the Chinese link, and they also admitted on Weibo (a social software), can I add this information if I need to do it, thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by HITJiangSiqi (talkcontribs) 02:11, 4 July 2018 (UTC)



Can you explain why my content was removed?

I added: After the age of 7-8, the energy levels of a beagle reduces (they are super hyper dogs in the initial years) and they enjoy their space and regular nap times. If they are not given enough exercise, their tummies tend to bloat, making them lazier.

just want to understand where i went wrong

Thanks Praneet 12:03, 5 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Praneet Sidhu (talkcontribs)

Changes to City Harvest Page[edit]

Hi KH-1,

I was wondering why you changed the edits I made to the City Harvest page yesterday. I work at City Harvest and am trying to update the information, language, and data to reflect the charities current operating level and preferred language. The edits I made all come from City Harvest's website, or internal City Harvest metrics that we have. Over the next couple weeks I will be making more changes as well. Such as getting rid of "Healthy Neighborhoods" (we no longer use this title) and updating City Harvest's programs to reflect how they operate currently.

Feel free to email me at if you want to verify that I do work at City Harvest.


Duncan Gans

Changes to City Harvest Page 2[edit]

Hi KH-1,

I actually just noticed your comment about my edits being self-promotion. Is there specific language that I should change so that it doesn't come across that way? I can also just update the quantitative data so that it's up to date, without changing the language on the page too much.



Removal of recent updates[edit]


I was hoping for some clarity on your removal of my edits? They all had sound attribution and addressed the concerns from wikipedia.

Thank you. (talk) 19:50, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

page entitled James J. Riley[edit]

After I was elected as Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, someone -- unbeknowst to me -- set up a wikipedia page for me. Unfortunately it was extremely limited, and in fact gave a very limited opinion of my career (for example, not mentioning that I am a member of the National Academy of Engineering, etc.). So my choices were to either have the page deleted, or to expand on the page with some additional information about myself. I chose to do the latter and extended the page to what now exists; all of my input on the page is is easy to verify. But I am not sure what to do next; I know very little about setting up or editing pages on wikipedia.James.joseph.riley (talk) 00:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The Kings of Wessex Academy & "peacock" banner[edit]

Back in February you added a "peacock" banner to The Kings of Wessex Academy. I have just got around to looking at this on the wikiproject Somerset cleanup list and wondered if you could be a bit more specific about the specific words or phrases you think are promotional as I requested at Talk:The Kings of Wessex Academy#Peacock terms or promotional langauge? I will then do my best to address them.— Rod talk 13:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

I probably should've used the {{advert}} tag instead. The section on academics and Ofsted inspections seems excessive. -KH-1 (talk) 03:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
I can't see a section on academics - do you mean "Academic performance" - which seems to have all claims cited. The inspections bit is again cited and although mostly positive does include less "outstanding" comments such as "recommendation for improvement was the raising of teaching standards, by increasing the proportion of lessons rated outstanding from their current good rating", "Teachers do not always check on students' learning in lessons closely enough. Consequently, some students, particularly the less able, are either not challenged enough or do not receive the help they need to succeed" & "Development plans are not clear enough about how actions will be evaluated, particularly their effect on pupils' achievement" etc. Would you mind having a go at the bits you feel are excessive?— Rod talk 17:49, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Want to add some relevant information by linking about checklist of a successful audit[edit]

Please read this article which is very informative and consist of phases of a successful audit & how to conduct Audit? I think it will be a great source to add on Wikipedia. Thanks!!! .

Please contact me by email if necessary:

Thanks again!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehedi Hossain Chowdhury (talkcontribs) 09:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Why do you keep on removing my edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1011:b102:9210:858b:86bf:5392:4d (talk) 04:42, 8 August 2018‎ (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pmsltech[edit]

  • @KH-1: Hello KH-1, you have mentioned for Speedy deletion nomination of Pmsltech. I know there is lots of criteria on wiki to publish article. I have used the reference list that published many government websites. I believe small organization can't left information through wiki. The article written by me similar to this page Bluehost. Can you please review the article again.

Removed my notable example[edit]

Hey I saw you removed my notable example of a CDC from the 504 loan program page. Why so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielthealltimegreat (talkcontribs) 16:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your work on Duncan D. Hunter. Bearian (talk) 13:55, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! -KH-1 (talk) 01:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Revert of Significant Edits[edit]

Hello, I will be as polite as possible here. But I would like to know why my hard put info is straight being rejected and reverted without any justification and under some foolish concept as spam on some of them. My info as well as the time and genuine effort involved in trying to bring further information into the inquiring minds of thoughtful individuals ... simply reverted: no update, no questions, nothing. Rude. Discourteous. And quite frankly infuriating. Few hours of time for what? To be reverted to the much less informative version it was before? Really!? My info is detailed and to the point and comes from the source, me, my research. Information comes from somewhere, citations and sources are needed and expected in professional environments, providing the source of information that includes further information relevant to what the individual is seeking is absolutely needed within this age of information. The info I am trying to add and make available to people is difficult to find and only available to those within this particular, fairly individualized industry who know it or who know how to find the info.

So--if we can please avoid any further issues of this sort, it would greatly appreciated so the route doesn't have to go a different way. Thank you, A. S. Eccles (talk) 22:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit on the Local SEO page? It was valid information; keep it, it will help people better understand what differentiates Local SEO from Normal SEO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Intermediate Bulk Container Page[edit]

Respectful Question: Why is my legitimate and well-researched info being moderated and removed as ecommerce spam? You have claimed the info is sourced from spam with only sell intention, but this is not true as industry advancement and furtherance of knowledge is the main goal, and the information beyond the IBC containers on those pages is extensive and sourced from governmental regulations and certification authorities only (Title 49 CFR, DOT/UN, ANSI, NSF, ASME, UL142, NFPA, IMDG, etc.)

My additions are made in good faith. I am not erasing every other link on there. I did not remove Metano Usa nor Action Sealite, because even though they are companies that sell products, they are also professional resources in their fields and likely have some knowledge concerning the subject.

And so on that note, I would politely ask for perhaps more consideration concerning my additions and its overall source content.

Proposed deletion of Crowdfunder[edit]


The article Crowdfunder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Currently sourced to two press release - unable to find more than mere mentions in sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:10, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Maybe you should check the history first.KH-1 (talk) 13:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)


Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png 反破坏星章
Thank you for your contributions for anti-vandalism — phenolla 🖋 talk · contribs 13:32, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Phenolla. -KH-1 (talk) 02:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)


STAR_P.A (Was Born "Pender Augustine (Sep, 4Th, 1999. In Orere Town In Ughelli South L.G.A of Delta State of Nigeria. "Pender Augustine" is a music artist/songwriter e.t.c well known and called by the stage name "STAR_P.A"., Him has be into music since before 2010 and he had recorded many hits songs, with mind blowing lyrics., he is hot when it comes to music and that is what his fans knowns him for., He released his first track "NOV, 25TH, 2017"., and he titled that track "#E.O.N.S"., which means END OF NON SENSE., while in 2018 he released another one titled "#MONEY" in which he said ; "this the hit, the hit of the year, i done blow" the song was really a hit., In addition, STAR_P.A is really loaded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pender Augustine (talkcontribs) 11:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

/* September 2018 */[edit]

You marked an extremely relevant citation as a potential spam source. This is 100% false if you read the reference source. I've been publishing content related to these topics for over 15 years. Please explain. --SHVseth (talk) 03:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Rolled Back Changes[edit]

Hi, I added a paid disclosure statement to my talk page as I work for the charity and the information on the page is incorrect, so I added sourced information from both our official website and newspaper articles. Can you help me understand why it was rolled back and what I can do to ensure the public is shown factually correct information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pressinfoaus (talkcontribs) 06:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Learn to write in objective prose. Take a look at WP:BESTCOI. -KH-1 (talk) 06:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)


Dear friend,

Why have you revert my contributions to article "Errors, freaks, and oddities"? The ref was linked to very relevant and high quality article.

Sigrid Rausing[edit]

I don't mind the reversion, but I wish you would explain. Keith Henson (talk) 05:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Can't think of a way to "warn" prospective readers without bringing undue attention to the message. I don't think it's our responsibility anyway. -KH-1 (talk) 05:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

on your aditing[edit]

Please note Pools By Nature had developed a unique method to build organic pools as described the paragraph. With reference to PbN organic system it describe the system (even more them others) and added vital and critical info on a new method that exist in the market thanks to PbN. This should be in the article on Natural Swimming Pools with Regeneration Zones as much as Total Habitat or other companies offering other options. Please let me know if you need us to add more info. Thanks, Etan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etangm7 (talkcontribs) 18:08, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

How I can submit changes versus making edit[edit]

Thank you for the advice on Conflict of interest! I'm new to the wikipedia. Trying to understand how to make changes. If there is a conflict, can I submit to someone for making changes? For example, if my book was written about the Intel SL Architecture for both the 386SL and 486SL, how do I submit changes if I have a conflict of interest? Thanks, Desmond... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Desmond Yuen (talkcontribs) 04:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


please note my open talk and corrections. I am, an expert in the field and ask you leave vital info in the article as described. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 03:30, 17 October 2018 (UTC)