User talk:KHC5

Monitored in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for accuracy.

File copyright problem with File:Al waleed.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Al waleed.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Zoo Fari 04:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good news and bad news[edit]

Hi there, thanks for the interest in maintaining the integrity of His Royal Highness's article, accurate and neutral portrayal are fundamentally important.

Bad news first: I blocked this account. By policy, this username operates as a role account. By nature of licensing when you contribute content to Wikipedia, the submission must be by a single individual with a single account. One account cannot identify the individual that submitted text or pictures.

The good news is that this is an opportunity for His Royal Highness as well as other staff members to create their own accounts, either under their real names or by pseudonyms. We encourage a good read over our policies and guidelines to ensure that their contributions will not be removed. We are always willing to assist others in editing, and if there is a private or sensitive correction that needs to be made, you can always email info-en-q@wikimedia.org for a private consultation on how to resolve your issue; or you can visit the help desk. You can also contact me by clicking the "talk" link in my signature once you have created a new account.

Thanks so much for your interest in working toward accuracy and fair representation of subjects on Wikipedia, and apologies for the inconvenience. I think the users of this account will find having their own to be a rewarding experience!

Yours, Keegan (talk) 18:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello KHC5! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 951 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Princess Deborah of Saudi Arabia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Princess Deborah of Saudi Arabia[edit]

The article Princess Deborah of Saudi Arabia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uncited - Possible hoax

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Off2riorob (talk) 12:25, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Al waleed.jpeg[edit]

The file File:Al waleed.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, uploaded by a user who had an article deleted as a "blatant hoax".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ⟲ Three Sixty! ^Talk? _Work. 19:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]