User talk:Kailash29792

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

27 May 2015[edit]

Happy New Year, Kailash29792[edit]

Cheers![edit]

Thank You for the guidance Kailash![edit]

D

Dhananjayan[edit]

Too disappointed with him, aren't you? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes. It almost feels like I wasted thousands of rupees buying both his books (though the posters in his books are still useful for scanning). If you want to know how much disappointment I have in him, it's the same amount of trust I had in him earlier. This situation can be compared to the following fictional incidents (I've made them collapsible if you want to avoid spoilers). Kailash29792 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Reminds me of Mahesh Babu and Sonu Sood's story in Athadu as well. I think the books still can be used to destub articles and GA-level articles. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:33, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Article for deletion[edit]

Please nominate Greeku Veerudu (1998 film) for deletion. It is currently redirected to Dasari Narayana Rao.PhysicsScientist (talk) 00:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Rajinikanth in Kabali.jpg[edit]

Not sure what's your point since the image is rendered smaller even than the resolution I used in the infobox, but I suppose that resolution is still low enough for a poster, so I'm not going to argue about it. nyuszika7h (talk) 11:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you don't argue further about it. The 280px image was malformed, so I replaced it with a properly formed 270px one. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
None of the images were 250px, only your version at 10:53 was malformed (it isn't as bad as it looks on the thumbnail, though the color was off – if mine looked stretched that's due to caching, you need to purge the article). nyuszika7h (talk) 11:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Shah Rukh Khan[edit]

Hello Kailash29792 (talk), you recently undid my revision on the page Shah Rukh Khan. We all know that, Info seekers are going to read Infobox first, than they will read "early life". In case they head there and read. And his graduation University must be available right at the top. That's why I restored it. In case you think I have done a wrong thing, you can message me. Cheers. Deepanshu (talk) 04:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Andha Naal[edit]

Good luck for the FAC plans. Surely better than many overrated Ganesan's films (at least for me). Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:54, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Still needs a fair amount of work. Let's not be in a hurry! Vensatry (talk) 09:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Yes, there is no rush, and I have listed it at the GOCE. But Vensatry, you do not mind being listed as co-nominator, do you? In fact, it was you who made it GA. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Not at all! Vensatry (talk) 09:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

This may be a good addition. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Already used in "Themes". Kailash29792 (talk) 02:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Vensatry, as a "will-be-co-nominator", could you review the article and make/suggest any improvements if necessary? Kailash29792 (talk) 13:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Sure, but not until the weekend. Vensatry (talk) 15:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Something useful from today's Eenadu: Impressed with Nayakan, Rajinikanth wanted Mani Ratnam to write a similar script for him which never materialised. Its similarities with Pa. Ranjith's script for Kabali made him accept to star in it. The source link is here, its title is "రజినీ మేనియా... ఇంతింత కాదయా!" which loosely translates to "Rajini's mania... is unrestrained!". Rest is your call. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done: added to both Nayakan and Kabali. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, but one link is still missing, though it only needs a partial inclusion of this statement if possible. BTW, Rajinikanth opting for such an intense film (if true) at this stage of his career is really appreciable. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mathar Kula Manickam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghantasala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

JM[edit]

Something of interest for you here. -- Sriram speak up 17:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Enthiran[edit]

Please be mindful of WP:3RR and use the talk page to work out disputes. --NeilN talk to me 05:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Help[edit]

Need your presence here. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Scar lion king.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scar lion king.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

WP teahouse logo 3.png
Hello, Kailash29792. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Missamma[edit]

Do you think the article is better now? Taking cue from Siva and Eega, i prefer to keep it simple and concise. 50+ references and 50K+ content are enough for a possible FAC requirement IMHO. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

IMHO, it is at its best possible. For now, you may list it at the GOCE, followed by a PR before the FAC. And do source every cast member to comply with WP:CASTLIST. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)