User talk:Kailash29792

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

27 May 2015[edit]

Happy New Year, Kailash29792[edit]


Thank You for the guidance Kailash![edit]


Enthiran worldwide gross[edit]

Your statement: Please give me your source which states that Enthiran grossed 2.89 billion worldwide.

This is my reference. [1]

Also I received a message from Wikipedia: We don't use primary sources like producers, directors, actors, distributors for controversial data like film financials, because these people have every reason to inflate or deflate the numbers to suit their personal gain. We only care what secondary sources that have arrived at these values independently have to say.

It is there on my talk page. So I suggest you change the box office report of Enthiran as Sun Pictures could have given wrong data.

Sorry, this IB Times source cannot be used either. It gets its information from Andhra Box Office (a non-RS) and therefore falls under WP:FRUIT. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Sun Pictures' report is a non-RS. They need not provide correct info. They could manipulate it to gain profit.

References - [2][3] comment added by Rajan51 (talk

The IP address, which kept calling me a traitor, contradicted you, calling Sun Pictures the most reliable. Now who do I trust? I think India is full of people like the blind men and an elephant. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:49, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

B. Rajasekar[edit]

Respected sir, My article on B. Rajasekar Cinematographer has been rejected for insufficient references. Please I need your help to improve the article for publishing. Thank you, Manommayan (Manommayan (talk) 04:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC))

Manommayan, I'll give you a suggestion: please provide me with the sources required (read User:Cyphoidbomb/ICTF FAQ to know the types of Indian sources that can be used) and I will try to develop the article. Since you appear to be close to the subject personally but not professionally, I suggest you to refrain from showing conflict of interest. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:05, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the help sir. I will try to get more reliable source material and forward them to you sir. Thank you. (Manommayan (talk) 08:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC))

Respected sir, I have included some reliable sources regarding B. Rajasekar in the draft. I couldn't find exclusive articles on the person himself. Actually I am professionally related to him. I work as Co director in Tamil and Telugu films, both are currently working in same project. Trying to help him as he has worked with some big names in South Indian film industry but still don't have a wiki page on him. I assure you that I don't have any Conflict of Interest sir. Please help me in developing and reviewing this article. Thanking you. Manommayan (Manommayan (talk) 11:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC))

Respected sir, Please help in reviewing and publishing this article. Thank you, Manommayan (Manommayan (talk) 13:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC))

I checked all the sources used in the draft. They all mention Mr. Rajasekhar only in passing, but I need sources that focus on him; so far I have not found any. But I can give you a suggestion: he must be interviewed by major media sources, and links to those interviews may be passed to me. I can add info from the same interviews. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:42, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you sir, may be we should wait for his new movies to get released so that he may get interviewed by media. Thanks once again. (Manommayan (talk) 03:16, 18 August 2016 (UTC))

Salman Khan[edit]

May i know why you revert my good article nomination from Salman Khan page?? That was not even reviewed. Then what was the problem?? Ambeinghari (talk) 15:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Because you nominated the article at a premature stage; without making significant improvements to it. You do not seem to have read WP:Good article criteria before you nominated the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Can you please help me to make Salman Khan to good article nominations Ambeinghari (talk) 14:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


The poster that you replaced on File:Manichitrathazhu film poster.jpg is a 200 days completion poster of the film. I think the previous will be good for it.--U+20B3 (talk) 15:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

What do you mean? The previous pic was a DVD cover, and as per Template:Infobox film, posters should ideally be used. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
So which caption should be written 200 days poster or Theatrical poster? --U+20B3 (talk) 16:02, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
I think the former caption may be used as it is more accurate, but the poster still refers to the fact that the film completed 200 days in its theatrical release. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Kailash, thanks for taking interest in finding a proper poster for Manichitrathazhu. But the image you uploaded was a paper ad for the film. I doubt whether it can be called a poster, also the image emphasizes on 200 and the only two characters are not properly visible. I think the DVD cover identifies the film better. Charles Turing (talk) 12:23, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Maybe it's an old habit of mine to refer to paper ads as posters; I guess it is largely bcos theatre posters are reproduced in papers just as they originally were. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi there...[edit]

Thought you might like to contribute your two-cents worth to this talk page disscussion. LLArrow (talk) 22:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Golden Hollywood Contest[edit]

Doc's just started up this contest about topics and articles covering Classical Hollywood cinema. It really will be worth your while. Do express if you are interested or not by signing up under the "Editors Interested" section. Thanks. Face-smile.svg  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Kalidas (film)[edit]


The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Kalidas (film) has been completed. This article was extremely well written and required very little work on my part. I was glad to see that the article's on-line citations had been archived. Most authors can't seem to be bothered doing this, which is a shame since "dead" links inevitably occur.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:08, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Gotham Characters result[edit]

I finally got a chance to look over the main cast table. I didn't spot anything incorrect. I had to double check using the main cast listings on Futon Critic. Everything seems fine at the moment. DarkKnight2149 00:37, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Chakradhari (1948 film)[edit]

I named it as Chakradhari (Tamil Film) because there is a Hindi film (Chakradhari) by the same name. There is also a Telugu film by the same name released in 1948.(See Gora Kumbhar. Therefore, a person looking for the Tamil film may find it easy if the title has the words Tamil Film. Also, I have now enhanced the text by removing spelling and grammar errors. Therefore, please consider removing the tag. Thank you. --Uksharma3 (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

What is better is, to title it "Chakradhari (1948 Tamil film)". Does the namesake Telugu film have a Wikipedia article yet? Kailash29792 (talk) 15:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Quint[edit]

Hello, Kailash29792. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Quint, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Joe Roe (talk) 19:15, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

  1. ^ "2nd Saturday Box Office Collection: Baahubali Beats Endhiran's Lifetime Record in 9 Days". 2015-07-19. Retrieved 2015-12-23. 
  2. ^
  3. ^