User talk:Kailash29792

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Anurag Kashyap filmography[edit]

Please if you could take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Anurag Kashyap filmography/archive1 as well. Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:39, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

27 May 2015[edit]


Three major doubts.

  • How come Baahubali - the conclusion shall become a sequel? Technically speaking, Baahubali is a two-part film.
  • Should we create two articles, Baahubali - the Beginning and Baahubali - the conclusion? Or, just Baahubali is recommended?
  • Can we have an article similar to this in the upcoming future for Baahubali also?

Kindly answer these? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

You may start work on that. Maybe you can rename the section to "Followup". But I am unsure whether there has been any media coverage on the production of Part 2, and that could be an obstacle to creating an article on Part 2. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
I am not talking about today. Once the conclusion completes its trade, what is the situation? Part 1 and 2's production together can be written similar to that of Ben-Hur's. My concern is, Baahubali may get divided into two citing Viswaroopam and Gangs of Wasseypur as examples. That would give out disastrous results soon. What say? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:46, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Yes that is the best idea. We can create a separate article titled "Production of Baahubali (film)", and it may include production info for both the parts. We can create an article called for Part 2 once its poster and plot details come out, as well as release info. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:57, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
That should be the best idea. Because, Reception and BO figures themselves will eat away the article space to a larger extent. So, After creating "Production of Baahubali (film)", we will add it to both the parts using {{Main|}} template. The existing article of Baahubali will be converted to something like this, with the main articles being linked. All we have to do till then, is to wait till 2017 and make the groundwork from now.

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PS : Looks like, we too are turning similar to SSR i.e. one year of pre-production and two years of execution. :P Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

This and this could also be our sources of inspiration. BTW, I saw Baahubali the Beginning in Tamil, and I think it was amazing, like a straight Tamil film. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
You managed to get the tickets? At Hyderabad, stampedes are happening. Thanks to Godavari Pushkaram, i got two tickets on July 13. Let me see what SSR made these three years. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Pavan, behold! Production of Baahubali has been created. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:07, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you Kailash. Phase 1 begins! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

You saw it? I saw it twice and loved it so so much. Really I was blown away. I have neither seen Magadheera nor Eega, but after this S.S.Rajamouli is one of my favorite directors. All the actors were great, but Ramya Krishnan steals the show. I didnt thought I would like it so much. The music was again a brilliant addition to the film along with the mind boggling cinematography, art direction and VFX. The VFX in two scenes felt very fake that's due to fast frame rate in avalanche scene, But as whole it was by far the best vfx used in indian film. Now, I can't wait for the sequel.—Prashant 05:09, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

You know the answer, and I am sure it will dominate all technical categories in this year's award ceremonies. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Yep! It will dominate NFA next year. I hope Rajamouli wins NFA Best Director. Filmfare and others are assured. This film deserves everything. By the way, I have downloaded its soundtrack from iTunes and I'm loving it.—Prashant 09:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Watched Baahubali: The Beginning today at this theatre. A grand, spectacular and excellent film from Rajamouli! Waiting for Part 2. Face-smile.svgSsven2 Speak 2 me 16:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Baahubali: The Beginning[edit]

Yes check.svg Done - (talk) 07:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Shall join here once i recuperate completely. Kindly give me some time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:16, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dasavathaaram ten roles.jpg[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:Dasavathaaram ten roles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)


Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Marchoctober (talk) 17:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

lead section[edit]


In The lead section main information about production design, and visual effects has to be covered. Box office information has to be covered. There is a separate section for production design. I am not adding again and again. Experienced editors like you are expected not to push other editors. Arichuvadi (talk) 12:43, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Cover as much as you want, but please make sure that the lead and infobox DO NOT CONTAIN REFERENCES. They just bloat the article. And you seem to have reverted User:Krimuk90's mature edits, which I must undo; his edits were most superior to yours. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:47, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

hello. sure I will do so. Arichuvadi (talk) 12:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

hello. Can I know why you reported edit warring. As u said I am correcting the infobox. please allow some time. Just for the sake of it dont over whelm and push other editors. please message me your concerns.Arichuvadi (talk) 12:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

You are (inadvertently) reverting other users' edits while you edit. There must be NO information about the budget in the infobox, and NO references in the lead at all. But you are doing otherwise. There was a user Padmalakshmisx who behaved much like you, and now I am suspicious... Kailash29792 (talk) 12:57, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

hello. I am not doing any harm to the article deliberately. And I dont find any inappropriate messages sent by me above. I hope you are an experienced editor and understand the tone of english better than me. I am not responsible for your suspicions. Arichuvadi (talk) 13:10, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

hello. please message me if you find any problem, and solve the issue here. I am open to your suggestions.Arichuvadi (talk) 13:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)


You know I am feeling so bad right now that how some people befriends administrators and highly respected users to manipulate things. Some people have an agenda that "Live but Not let others live". This is an exact example. This user has made my life a hell. I can guess when you are well-settled and have no worries. But, at least let a person who is studying and still working hard here. I guess that's why this era is called "Kalyug".—Prashant 14:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The ice fishing story listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The ice fishing story. Since you had some involvement with the The ice fishing story redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 20:51, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


Would you please take a look here. Thanks.—Prashant 18:14, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

A gentle reminder. I'll be more than happy.—Prashant 17:47, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Kalidas (film)[edit]

Tamil cinema task force[edit]

Hey there Kailash, I responded at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema/Tamil cinema task force but one thing I noticed was that Enthiran which is a featured article that hasn't been made to the Main page. Maybe make a request for the page to get to the main page which will bring a lot of eyeballs to the article and from there to Indian cinema and perhaps Tamil cinema. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: I have made a request here. Face-smile.svgSsven2 Speak 2 me 05:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Already beat me to the punch. I figured it was something easy and simple as a start. I think it would be cool if the lead actor woke up on his 65th birthday and saw that his film was on the front page. Good luck on the next idea then. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

29 July[edit]

Wish you many happy returns of the day, bro!! Face-smile.svg Pavanjandhyala (talk) 00:59, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Read the source properly[edit]

You thought this news was about Baahubali.

Read the article. The heading is misleading but the article is about Vasan and Chandralekha, not about Baahubali. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arindam Skywalkar (talkcontribs) 16:16, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

That is not what I mean. Your edit was unconstructive and written like a 5-year old child, that is why I reverted it. And Chandralekha was reshot in Hindi, not completely dubbed. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:24, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

There must be something new in that news which can be sourced; something that has not yet been mentioned in Wikipedia. I didn't write my own line and modified the existing lines to insert the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arindam Skywalkar (talkcontribs) 16:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

To Kailash(Ghibran)[edit]


Ghibran doesn't want his personal life to be in wiki and more over differentiating Indians as Tamil/Telugu People. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musicstudent.philip (talkcontribs)

ROFLMAO! 😆 You know what this is like? It's like Richard Nixon not wanting information on the Watergate scandal or his resignation to be on Wikipedia! I just can't stop laughing at this statement you gave as the reason for removing that information about Ghibran! 😂 Kailash29792 (talk) 12:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DC Comics' shared universe films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)