|This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.|
I totally understand the copy right issue that is fine. Is it possible to still leave the dates up for Royal Ascot 2011 and for the removal of Ascot United as they are no longer based at the racecourse? Tomascot (talk) 15:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Re: Go Kan Ryu karate
Here's the link I was talking about above: http://www.martialedge.net/forum/off-topic/re%3Agkr-on-wikipedia!!!-cliiickkkk-quickly!/
I've visited the wiki page previously over the past 6-12 months and found it containing legit information that wasn't attempting to abuse anyone. Sometimes an anon user would come along and sneak in some abusive edits and I'd just revert the change back out to the correct version again. Unfortunately the edits I made I must have be done without being logged in so there's no log of them besides whatever my IP was at the time.
Came across this while I was looking about the web which seems to contain nearly exactly the same type of content that the old page used to contain - http://martialarts.vkwebs.com/styles/oceanian/go-kan-ryu-australia/. Whether the wiki page was based off this or this page was based off the wiki page I don't know. Cooper52 (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Did some more searching about found a link to the old wiki page which I was thinking that I had seen before - http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GKR_Karate Cooper52 (talk) 15:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey there. Thanks for the reply and suggestion for a course of action. Just chasing up some sources so I (or someone else) can hopefully write something up to be submitted. Thanks again. Please leave this for the time being as I've forwarded the two talk pages onto some members of the Karate club. Cooper52 (talk) 16:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
I can haz favour?
I see you were kind enough to add something to the whitelist from www.www.holocaustresearchproject.net. Since no good deed goes unpunished, I thought I might ask a favour. I requested that something from the same website be whitelisted back in November, and it has been lost in the backlog. The people at the meta-wiki blacklist seem to be in favour of de-blacklisting the entire site, but they are dragging their feet. (the site was blacklisted in the first place because of a copyvio, I'm told)
I was wondering if you could review the request I made to whitelist [www.holocaustresearchproject.net/essays&editorials/larouche2.html#_ednref9]. It's a valuable essay by the academic Matthew Feldman, about the LaRouche movement. Hopefully the whole site will be de-blacklisted soon, but you know, it's already been months, and my requested got deleted in error before... Any help would be greatly appreciated :) BillMasen (talk) 14:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I've been leaving the Quintessentially deletion debate to bubble along on its own. Don't worry, I'm not going to edit the page, but I'm putting together a quick list of references which I believe will demonstrate the company's notability. I will be putting it on the article's talk page for editors to have a look at, but I thought I'd draw your attention to it too. Prdharmer (talk) 11:56, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
I certainly do not mind. It is a project for a class at Suny New Paltz and my group and I chose this since it had not yet been created. I am very new to this and have no idea how to work a wiki page. Feel free to make little edits as needed.