- 1 Apology to all
- 2 Another barnstar
- 3 Barnstar
- 4 Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page!
- 5 Fantastic Job
- 6 Barnstar
- 7 Upsetting IPs
- 8 Great job
- 9 Thanks
- 10 Thanks
- 11 Nice Job
- 12 Chick_Evans_(baseball)
- 13 Thanks
- 14 Question about the deletion policy concerning Dr. Roushdy Gundy
- 15 Speedy deletion declined: Dr. Ted Marcus
- 16 Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Catalyst-Benjamin Cummings-Laboratory Chemistry
- 17 User 220.127.116.11
- 18 Thank you
- 19 Latavio
- 20 AIV
- 21 Nathaniel Hitch
- 22 Thanks
- 23 Your user page has been semi-protected
- 24 John Boudreau
- 25 Thank You for reverting the edit on "Shia Islam"
- 26 Great Western Railway
- 27 Edmonds–Karp algorithm reverts
- 28 My 'unconstructive' edit
- 29 Ketamine
- 30 User talk:18.104.22.168
- 31 HI KATIE
- 32 hello Katie, I'm impressed
- 33 3RR on Noelia
- 34 Yehya Saade
- 35 consolecadet
- 36 Hello!
- 37 Thanks!
- 38 22.214.171.124
- 39 Copyrights
- 40 For you
- 41 Hello
- 42 For Article: - Lord Ghantakarna Mahavir
- 43 Dawn French
- 44 Norton Hill School
Apology to all
I spend a lot of my time reverting vandalism, but if I make a mistake and revert something which isn't vandalism, I apologise.--Katieh5584 10:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
|The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|
|The first time my userpage has ever been vandalised, and you had the... ahem... honour of reverting it. Nice catch, thank you :) Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 08:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)|
|The Userpage Shield|
|Thanks for keep my userpage clean! P. D. Cook Talk to me! 18:35, 7 May 2010 (UTC)|
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page!
|The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|
|I've been trying to revert as much vandalism as I can, and today, you seem to be beating me every time. Fantastic job, keep up the good work. Hi878 (talk) 18:49, 9 May 2010 (UTC)|
|The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|
|For excellent work on the recent changes patrol reverting vandalism. Immunize (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)|
Hi. You appear to do great vandalism work, but you recently reverted an attempt by an article creator to delete the article under CSD G7 by blanking a page they were they contributed the only substantial information. Please be a little more careful. Very Respectfully.--v/r - TP 18:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- And on the MicroVolts article, you reapplied a db-g7 tag after the author removed it. Please keep in mind that authors who request deletion can change their mind. Not a huge deal, but please just be aware.--v/r - TP 18:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Question about the deletion policy concerning Dr. Roushdy Gundy
Hi Katieh5584, I have a question concerning the abovementioned article. I placed a speedy-deletion template there, which was repeatedly removed by the creator (also by an IP, so nobody could be blocked). Then, suddenly, it was not reinstated as a speedy template, but as a prod-template, whíthout any reasons. Is this right? AdAstra reloaded (talk) 15:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Dr. Ted Marcus
Hello Katieh5584. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dr. Ted Marcus, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Catalyst-Benjamin Cummings-Laboratory Chemistry
Hello Katieh5584. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Catalyst-Benjamin Cummings-Laboratory Chemistry to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:57, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you were reverting the removal of the PROD from Latavio. You did so by saying that the person was removing an AfD template. However, WP:PROD and WP:AfD are two different processes. By definition, any editor, even the creator of a page, may remove a PROD for any reason or even no reason at all. AfD discussion templates cannot be removed, but that was not the template found on that page. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Oh dear! This is like a ball which keeps coming back.
A few days ago I accidentally pressed the wrong button. I am in the middle of writing an article on Nathaniel Hitch but that is a long way from being finished. I should have been using "sandbox" but was not and pressed the save button in error.
Gurt Posh the administrator was very helpful and removed the article. Great relief! However yesterday I advised Gurt that it was still popping up and this evening thought I would at least remove the text.
I did so but along came Katieh5584 on a white charger, undoubtedly intending to help and rescue the article.
Truth is that I do not want it resurrected. In a few months when I have finished the article to my satisfaction I shall load it again.
I hope that you now understand the situation and will allow the patient to pass away!
Your user page has been semi-protected
Hi Katie. Because of the excessive attention from the 4chan creeps, or whoever they are, I have semi-protected your user page indefinitely. No reason why any new or unregistered user should legitimately edit it anyway. Thanks for fighting the good fight! Favonian (talk) 13:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
I am all for fighting the good fight and keeping spam off of Wikipedia, so can you please work with me to create a better page for John Boudreau. His page was one of my first and I am trying to follow best practices for Wikipedia.I am working on pages that will help to tell the story of Astonish Results, as I am a freelance business writer from RI working on this project. Astonish has been named the largest growing company in RI for 2 consecutive years and I want to tell their story. The culture they have created is very interesting and the story behind how the business started is also very interesting. I do not want my page to be deleted so, could you please help? Thank you! AstonishResultsWiki (talk) 14:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)AstonishResultsWiki
Thank You for reverting the edit on "Shia Islam"
Just to let you know, your edit actually restored one IP's vandalism that had just been reverted by another IP. I expect you got into a muddle. Anyway, it's fixed now. -- Alarics (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Edmonds–Karp algorithm reverts
- I thought it was vandalism as the sentence no longer made any sense. --Katieh5584 (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
My 'unconstructive' edit
- Yes, I just did, that'd be quite unconstructive but all fixed now thank you... 13:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Wow, you are fast. This edit is not unconstructive but directly to the point, from the reference! It is an experiment on Xenopus oocytes, this are frog eggs, which are being used for such experiments. Can't you read the reference first before deleting? 126.96.36.199 (talk) 21:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
See link inserted above, it is a common model organism, because these frog egg cells are large and easily manipulated and probed. Read it. What was so strange about it, that it appeared as vandalism? Why does that happen to me so often? 188.8.131.52 (talk) 22:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I removed your "warning 1" and replaced it with a second block (I assume Huggle did it's "back to No.1" when a few days has gone past). This guy is a pain (and a static IP), and keeps added odd data to many F1 articles. Hopefully this block might do the trick - but I'm not hopeful... (Talk) 19:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
I am so sorry for my edit on toilet paper my edits on dr. seuss was a bit stupid of me but I was serious and that clockwork orange edit was true
hello Katie, I'm impressed
I had only made a small edit to demonstrate to a friend how easy it was to add to Wikipedia. You caught it in minutes, before I could walk home and return the text to my original. I'm impressed.Mlane 14:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlane78212 (talk • contribs)
3RR on Noelia 
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:45, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not really sure if your revert here is correct. the references are blogs, ok and thus unreliable, but the references (use google translate/babelfish) are talking about him. mabdul 13:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Just to let you know, when you see edits like this one again, that is actually a sockpuppet of User:Brianwazere. His usual MO is that he will add completely stupid stuff to anything associated with EastEnders and launching personal/homophobic attacks on User:Raintheone, User:GSorby and User:MayhemMario. Just a heads up for future in case you come across him again!--5 albert square (talk) 18:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
|CVU Anti-Vandalism Award|
|For beating me to almost every instance of vandalism that shows up on my Huggle feed! Keep up the great work! RA0808 talkcontribs 17:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)|
Hello Katieh5584. I am from mongolia. The part that you want to keep is very speculative in nature. Mongolian people used to live in small yurts in big families thus it was common for males to sleep together. I am not homophobic, but this entry is doesn't meet the encyclopedic standards.
For Article: - Lord Ghantakarna Mahavir
Please do not delete this article as its still incomplete. Give me some time I will complete it.
I recently made amendments to Dawn French's wikipage and you found my changes to be vandalous. This is absurd.
Dawn French's face has been a Terrys chocolate orange since 1997 and made the "Its not terrys, its mine" catch phrase famous. However in 2007, she was dropped from promoting the product. Terry's marketing manager Stephanie Lea saying: "We are grateful to Dawn for the major impact she has had on our advertising and for the value that she has added over the last 10 years." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Norton Hill School
Wow, you are having fun tonight. I have requested semi-protection for the page (WP:RPP) which means that only registered users will be able to edit. That will fix things and this lot will get bored and move onto whatever else they do for kicks. Good work fighting them off though! --Simple Bob a.k.a. The Spaminator (Talk) 21:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)