User talk:Keith D/Archive 55

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 50 Archive 53 Archive 54 Archive 55 Archive 56 Archive 57 Archive 60

19:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Please check my last edit and the refs that are from the book by C. A. Lupton. Ate they done Correctly? OnevThanks again you are always helpful.Srbernadette (talk) 13:15, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Please "tweak" if you are able - please Thanks!Srbernadette (talk) 07:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

15:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Keith Are you able to look at refs number 1 and 3 on this page - (kind of in north of great Britain!). Please leave all the quotes in. Thanks from M. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.182.141.11 (talk) 14:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

19:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

21:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - August 2016

Delivered August 2016 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

22:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Please tweak the above pages - they are Yorkshire- Scottish page in many respects! Thanks 144.139.149.95 (talk) 06:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

 Done Keith D (talk) 17:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do a link on the name James Matthews in the personal life section of this page. The link is to James Matthews (racing driver) Thanks Also, Please tweak the James Matthews (racing driver) page. Thanks mate101.182.141.11 (talk) 08:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

 Done Keith D (talk) 17:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Dates format

You probably know this already, but just in case, when the visual editor is used to convert a bare url, it automatically creates it with the dates incorrect per 'dmy' format. See recent edits to James Matthews (racing driver) for example. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 10:29, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I am aware of that and try to align them again after they have been put in incorrectly. I did make a complaint about this to the visual editor team but did not get any satisfaction. (By the way it is interesting that the notification of your post came up as a reversion notice rather than a new message notice) Keith D (talk) 10:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Really? That is odd... Possibly something to do with the recent changes of icon perhaps? Or a cache type issue? With regard to the dates, the 'template' is unseen most of the time unless using 'edit source' for a whole page. Editing sections (or 'top') doesn't reveal it nor when using the visual editor; so even though cites can be edited after conversion using vis it's not always obvious that they should be. Eagleash (talk) 11:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Please place a copy - without the quote- of ref number 4 (The UK Express ) beside reference number 2 for citation purposes in the opening paragraph. . I cannot do it on this really slow iPad. Thanks for all your work. 101.182.141.11 (talk) 12:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

 Done though probable not needed in the lead as sourced in the body of article. Keith D (talk) 17:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks so much. Can you place the link laird in the category section please at the bottom of the page.101.182.141.11 (talk) 23:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

15:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Keith - I have made another edit - please check (esp. dates format) and leave in all quotes. Thanks mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.182.141.11 (talk) 03:51, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

RAF Stations

Hi, Keith. Sorry to be a pain again, but how do I get the listing at Royal Air Force Stations in Yorkshire to Alphabetise? RAF Manywells Height, RAF Sutton on Hull and Leeds East Airport all appear non-alphabetically. The first two appear under 'R' because of them being with the word Royal. Thanks.The joy of all things (talk) 13:09, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Is it a defaultsort that's missing?The joy of all things (talk) 13:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Use [[category:Royal Air Force Stations in Yorkshire|<name>]] for a specific category or use the defaultsort to sort all of the categories in the list. Keith D (talk) 13:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks - Sorted. regards.The joy of all things (talk) 13:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

South Yorkshire Railway and River Dun Company

Keith: The South Yorkshire Railway and River Dun Company is the same information as included on the South Yorkshire Railway article. Wikiproject Railways are happy for it to go to a re-direct (talk page here). I am happy to sort all, but I am unsure if I need to just blank the page and apply re-direct and do I leave the tags on the Talk page alone? Regards.The joy of all things (talk) 13:17, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

You can just change it to a redirect, though if you want the name to appear in the categories then leave the categories after the redirect. You can leave the talk page templates, but change the class to Redir and blank the importance field. Keith D (talk) 13:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks (again), Keith. Like what you did with the template (splitting the text) - will note that for the future. Ta. The joy of all things (talk) 16:43, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

2016 - desire for improved entry for Alice Wheeldon, and COI

Hi Keith D,

Greetings! I am a novice:)

First my apologies. I waded in without preparation: overlooking the need to declare COI - on account of I'm Alice Wheeldon's great granddaughter. Further, I failed to first learn the syntax for citations.

Currently, the site has many errors and has much repetition, and there is new published research that it doesn't pick up. I would cite some sources but first need to read the guidelines on citation syntax.

I believe that I can contribute factual material, correct errors, and remove presumptions that have been regurgitated in the secondary sources for almost a century!

What shall I do next?

Chloe Mason Chlo masonChl mason (talk) 02:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for declaring any COI you have on article, looks like a couple of regular editors have stepped in and made some changes to the article to reduce some of the duplication and restored some material that you removed.
I would take a look at WP:COI first and follow advice there. Probably best to stick with general copy-editing and minor changes to the actual article or anything that is not controversial. For anything controversial or that other editors feel is not suitable/correct than use the talk page to discuss the change that you want to make to the article. Obviously you will need to cite third party sources to back-up any new/modified information. I would not worry to much about getting the formatting of the references correct, so long as readers can be understood what is intended, others can step in and tweak them later. Keith D (talk) 10:53, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Archive 50 Archive 53 Archive 54 Archive 55 Archive 56 Archive 57 Archive 60