User talk:Keivan.f

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message.

If I have left a message on your talk page, please reply there; I am watching it.

If you leave a message here I will usually reply here, so please click the 'watch' tab at the top of your page in order to add my talk page to your watchlist.



Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (Keivan.f) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! bodnotbod (talk) 10:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to British Royal Family. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. bodnotbod (talk) 10:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Diana, Princess of Wales[edit]

...was styled, after her divorce, like a divorced peeress – [1]DBD 14:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

"The" before Prince or Princess[edit]

Hi, I saw your edit at Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, and I wondered was it correct. I think Catherine would only be "The Princess William" if her husband were "The Prince William" (leaving aside his Duke of Cambridge title). And I think he'll only become "The Prince William" when Charles becomes King. I've left a query at the article's talk page. Thanks. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 23:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Template:Angels in Abrahamic Religions[edit]

So, why did you remove the italics again? Or add them, in the case of Michael and Gabriel? Are you suggesting that they are not "recognized by all denominations."? StAnselm (talk) 10:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

EIIR infobox[edit]

Please stop reverting at Elizabeth II. There was a long-standing consensus version for that infobox section that you overrode a month ago without a new consensus and are trying to impose again over a subsequent change. I am almost finished putting together something at Talk:Elizabeth II. You should undo your last revert; but, at least please discuss the change you want to make at the talk page. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 16:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Your edit to the infobox was correct, Keivan. Except that you should've placed it below the image. GoodDay (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

OK! I think that's rightKeivan.fTalk 09:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I believe you've been on Wikipedia long enough to know that, when your edit is quickly reverted, you should be seeking a consensus for your change at the article's associated talk page; you saw that only just a few days ago when you tried to alter the infobox at Elizabeth II. The infobox you are now trying to replace at List of titles and honours of Charles, Prince of Wales has been in place since November of 2008; consensus by silence is obviously well established. Please take the matter to the talk page, thanks. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 16:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fermentation Family. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. @-Kosh► Talk to the VorlonsMoon Base Alpha-@ 20:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Reverter's note: the "Gook" part was removed. "Gook" is a slur to Asians, I hardly think that's the correct last name for him, given that.

@-Kosh► Talk to the VorlonsMoon Base Alpha-@ 20:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

I don't know about you...[edit]

...but I'm pretty sure the Duke of Cambridge is a child of the heir apparent. ✝DBD 15:42, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

No worries. We just need to find a capable artist who would create new versions... ✝DBD 16:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Corbin Bleu[edit]

I can't help but notice your sudden interest in Corbin Bleu, which seems completely different from your normal field of interest. We have a problem with a banned Farsi-speaking editor that occasionally contacts people and attempts to get them to edit Corbin Bleu related articles on his behalf. He is a banned editor, and no editor should edit on his behalf. Has he contacted you?—Kww(talk) 12:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't know his real life identity. We primarily deal with him under his Chace Watson account, but he has falsely claimed to be dozens of people, include me. What prompted your sudden interest in Corbin Bleu?—Kww(talk) 17:11, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Damon Salvatore Page[edit]

I dont know what gave the impression but I haven't made the current Damon Salvatore page. Yes I made it a long time ago but that was deleted by a moderator so i never tried to get into it again. Nasirakd (talk) 15:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

It was JAY008 Nasirakd (talk) 14:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


Why did you revert my edits? It is not necessary to specify that their occupation is the Prince or Princess of Japan. This is not cited on other royal articles of other nations. Furthermore, both the infobox and article already make the statement perfectly clear. These people do not have occupations, they are born into royalty. Dasani 03:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Princess Takamado[edit]

Hello! A widow is only called dowager if the new holder of the title is married. For example, if the Duke of X dies and his successor is unmarried or he has no successor at all, then his wife remains Duchess of X. Anyway, having a succession box makes no sense if there is no succession, don't you think? If a person is the first and so far only holder of the title, there is no need for a succession box. Cheers, Surtsicna (talk) 10:26, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi again! When the subject of the article is a consort, the parameters 'predecessor' and 'successor' are not used. Infoboxes are supposed to contain essential information only and when it comes to consorts, that's hardly essential. I think there is a manual of some sorts somewhere. I'll look it up if you wish. Surtsicna (talk) 12:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

I think other articles are fine. If you encounter one that's not, feel free to fix it :) Surtsicna (talk) 12:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Keivan.f. You have new messages at Chip123456's talk page.
Message added 16:23, 24 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you. Chip123456 (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Shigeko Higashikuni. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 00:39, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

That wasn't an unsourced edit. I just added her Royal name in Japanese and of course her full name. Keivan.fTalk 05:11, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
OK, but you'll need to include a source for any claimed religious affiliation. --DAJF (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes, of course but for example about her title or royal name there are enough sources in the article. Keivan.fTalk 05:34, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Lady Ogilvy[edit]

Hi, re this undo, this is a title assigned to a royal, this is Her Higness' official title making it royal. See her official title on the title and styles section of her article. I didn't want to undo your undo as I thought it would be better to come to a mutual agreement! Cheers--Chip123456 (talk) 15:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Ancestry charts[edit]

Hello! The ancestry of the Empress of Japan is nothing but trivia. You will find no reliable source mentioning her mother's father's mother or any great-grandparent whatsoever. The Queen of Spain's ancestry is notable, however, as she was not a commoner before marriage but a princess of Greece and princess of Denmark. There are no ancestry sections in articles about other former-commoner-consorts (and if there are, there shouldn't be); see, for example, the articles about the Queen of Sweden and the Queen of Norway. Surtsicna (talk) 11:50, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Of course, this is true for Japanese princesses by marriage as well. Surtsicna (talk) 12:32, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

I really don't understand you. About Michiko you were right, but about Masako you are wrong. Firstly, her ancestry isn't trivial secondly Masako is a daughter of a famous diplomat and she comes from a notable family. Keivan.fTalk 12:45, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
The Crown Princess's father is notable, of course, and he is mentioned in the article. His father's mother, however, is not (just an example). There is no reason to have the ahnentafel just to show her relationship to her father, who is already mentioned several times in the article. Besides, such unsourced and contentious information must not be inserted into the article about a living person per WP:BLP. Please don't revert anymore; if you believe the ancestry chart is useful for some reason, find reliable sources and we will discuss it. Surtsicna (talk) 12:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
As for the ancestries, I hope you understand my point. If their ancestries were significant in any aspect, I wouldn't oppose including the ahnentafels. However, they did not become what they are due to their ancestries; the fact that the Crown Princess's mother's father's mother was a woman named Yoneko is not relevant to any aspect of her life. Wikipedia is not a geneaological database. Surtsicna (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

I must tell you I was under impression that you were French. I do not know why. I had no idea Keivan was a Muslim name. What language does it come from? Surtsicna (talk) 12:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

I was asking because I am Muslim too and I had never heard of it before. I like it nevertheless :) Surtsicna (talk) 13:06, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Masako Sen[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Masako Sen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:25, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Photo of Duke & Duchess of Cambridge[edit]

Hi Keivan,

You took a good photo of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, but unfortunately it was added to an inappropriate part of the article - ideally we should have had a picture of the chateau at that place as that would link into the section.

Good luck with your photography - why don't you look at articles connected with the area where you live - some are probably lacking good photographs - in that way you can make a real contribution to Wikipeadia.

Best wishes Martinvl (talk) 15:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

OK! You are right. :) Keivan.fTalk 15:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Date format[edit]

Hi! I saw this edit of yours. I restored the original date format. See WP:DATE. Please do not change the date format. If you have changed the format of other articles without checking the original format, please check it and undo your changes if necessary. Please remember, most of the Japan-related articles use the mdy format. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 06:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Well! I don't understand why the Japan-related articles use the mdy format but I think you are right.Keivan.fTalk 15:28, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


Until Princess Yoko dies, pictures of her are replaceable. There are probably thousands of private snapshots. You could fly to Japan and take one yourself if you so chose. NFCC#1 doesn't mean that you have a replacement handy, it means that one could be made.—Kww(talk) 14:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Firuze / Hümeyra[edit]

Selam Keivan,

Only in the last episode she appeared, it was mentioned that her real name is "Hümeyra". During all the episodes she was called Firuze. If you would ask people who follow the series, more than 90% will not remember the real name. Several Women in the Harem changed their name, Aleksandra/Hürrem being the most prominent one. So i don't think it is necessary to mention this name here. Arved (talk) 10:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

I also checked Turkish Wikipedia and I saw that that name was written in her roles. But if it isn't really necessary, you can remove that name. Keivan.fTalk 08:19, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muhteşem Yüzyıl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sultana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)


Is there an explanation for the template changes? removing the steps? (Monkelese (talk) 17:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC))

Those sections should include family members, not stepfamily members. Keivan.fTalk 17:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Also, I must say that I removed the steps from all those templates. (Templates of Diana, Camilla and William) Keivan.fTalk 17:17, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Ok, just wondering (Monkelese (talk) 17:39, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Farsi help needed[edit]

Hello Keivan.f, I'm contacting you because we need some Farsi translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on fa.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Farsi Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Of course I will be really happy if I help you with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on fa.wikipedia and also your personal message. I also should say that I'm sorry for answering after a week, but tell me every time you want for helping you in Persian translating.Keivan.fTalk 14:33, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Keivan, thanks for getting in touch. First priority is making a page on that describes the VisualEditor, so interested users can find out more about it. You could translate this page: [VE Portal (or a shorter version, whatever you have time for), and we could copy it over to This would also give Farsi wikipedians a place to leave comments and bug reports. Let me know what you have time to do, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 18:56, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahidevran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


hi there, thank you for your message. No I am sorry, that is all I have. Good luck with finding more information about the painting. Gryffindor (talk) 20:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Hürrem and Mahidevran[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Keivan.f. You have new messages at Nedim Ardoğa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 21:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Unsourced personal info[edit]

Hi Keivan.f, note that I partially reverted your edits at Nur Fettahoğlu as some of the personal info (including spouse names, marriage dates and parent names) you added was not supported by sourced article content. In addition to the BLP issues, the instructions at Template:Infobox person note that height should only be included if the individual is noted for their height or if it is particularly relevant (e.g. for sports figures or models). The names of family members are generally only included if they are independently notable (per WP:BLPNAME). --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 19:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

It's not better for me to "to search about her in internet", it's better (and policy) for you to include your sources when you add the material. If the Facebook page confirms the details of her second marriage, then include the source when adding the material. You also added the name and marriage dates of her first marriage, this requires a source as well. The Turkish wikipedia entry is irrelevant as wikis are not reliable sources, and the information there is equally unsourced. The onus is on the individual adding or restoring content to verify the content, so please ensure you include a citation for each of the claims being made. As the infobox is supposed to be a summary of article content, it would be beneficial if the material is added as prose to the article (with the relevant citation), then added to the infobox if relevant. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 22:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Mahidevran's photo[edit]

Stop it! If there is a conflict, first before you talk. Belongs to you, not any opinion on discussion [2]! Next time, I will report to Administrator your vandalic edits other languages! Maurice07 (talk) 14:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Aisha move[edit]

I was coming here to tell you how to request a move, but I see you already know how. I've reverted you here. It's an article with a number of editors and any move should be discussed. Dougweller (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Gerald Shields leading the masses to improve Wikimedia one cosmetically fashionable photograph at a time. North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar
Gerald Shields, founder of the North Korean Fashion Watch, awards you the North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar for your continuing efforts to add reliable and poignant discussions about North Korean topics, such as Ri Sol-ju. Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:39, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Keivan.f. You have new messages at Talk:Raziye Sultan#Raziye's mother.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Fatma Sultan (daughter of Suleiman I)[edit]

Hello, Keivan.f. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Fatma Sultan (daughter of Suleiman I), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Fatma Sultan (daughter of Suleiman I) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 12:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muhteşem Yüzyıl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sultana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


I wanted to let you know that your signature violates WP's signature policy because it has markup that enlarges the text. This is what your sig would look like without that markup:


Regards, --AmaryllisGardener talk 17:43, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Ice Bucket Challenge[edit]

Hi Keivan, please note that the humor thread on the AfD is hatted and closed, so please do not add to it futher. The page is for AfD discussions. If you have any other off-topic comment, please place them on user Talk pages. It's not fair to others who have the AfD on their Watch Lists to deal with these off-topic comments any further. Thanks very much! Softlavender (talk) 09:06, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

@Softlavender: Sorry, you're right. ;) Keivan.fTalk 09:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Roxelana/Hurrem Sultana[edit]

If you wish to move the article, start a new move discussion. The most recent move discussion was opposed to a move, so that is the prevailing consensus. If you wish to check to see if consensus has changed, start a new discussion. --Jayron32 19:31, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mihrişah Valide Sultan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Consort. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Keivan.f. You have new messages at Nedim Ardoğa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.


Hello, and thank you for all the good work you are doing!

When making drastic changes however, such as removing relevant coats of arms that have been there for years from the templates of royal families, or such as applying your own name formats to them, you should be more careful to have consensus with you. That is normally done by starting a discussion to which any and all interested editors may contrubute, best done on an article's talk page.

On the subject of royalty, just as an example, it is not WP policy that a few select royalty editors, with whom you might communicate exclusively, decide any- and everything that goes into or out of those articles. All editors have a right to be heard and to contribute as well as they can, in the same way that you or I do. If you continue to do things your own way, and the results are drastic changes to Wikipedia's contents, you'll find yourself at odds with other editors who may feel your good faith actions are offensive and destructive, not to say vandalism (yet). That will then lead to disagreeble situations that nobody will enjoy.

WP:Bold is not meant to encourage editors to get themselves in trouble by habitually appearing headstrong and inconsiderate.

Keep up the good work, but please be a bit more considerate and careful! Discuss openly before you remodel extensively! Sincerely, --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

"Headstrong and inconsiderate"? "Offensive and destructive"? "Vandalism"? Whooaaah. Did two edits, easily undone with a single revert, really warrant such strong words? And "drastic changes"! Really? A drastic change would be translating the template into Thai, not this. Nobody appreciates condescending lectures on her or his talk page, especially not over something blown out of proportion. I believe you've been told that when you left a similar message on another user's talk page. Surtsicna (talk) 18:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
You have either misread what I wrote or else you are just trying to pick another fight with me again. There is no personal attack here. I'm trying to tell this young and enthusiastic user to be more careful lest he be misunderstood as a problem user, and to use the talk pages of involved articles to avoid such problems, which I believe you have been told many times. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Dear SergeWoodzing, I understood what you said, but what about you? Didn't you just change the names of Swedish royals to the format you like and revert my edits? I didn't find any discussion about this. Also what was the purpose of those images that were in royal families' templates? Of course if anyone feels my edits are offensive and destructive, s/he can discuss it with me. And about the infobox of Carl Gustaf, I should say that I changed the name formats, for example I changed Prince Carl Philip to Prince Carl Philip, Duke of X, because the children of sovereigns and consorts are mentioned by their titles in their parents' infoboxes. Take a look at George VI's infobox. Her second daughter's name is written like this: Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon not just Princess Margaret. And also we are friends here, and there's no personal attacking as you said. Keivan.fTalk 19:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I have been told that. By you. Who else on Wikipedia enjoys lecturing others more than writing articles? Oh, good thing you said there was no personal attack here, because the words "headstrong and inconsiderate" and "offensive and destructive" were quite troubling. Allow me to remind you of that the next time you try to lecture me about my tone or something similarly trivial. Wikipedia needs "young and enthusiastic" users to do exactly what Keivan.f is doing - contribute, do whatever they believe will improve an article, and they do not need to seek anyone's permission or blessing beforehand. Surtsicna (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Wow, thanks. ;) Keivan.fTalk 21:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

"Who else on Wikipedia enjoys lecturing others more than writing articles?" ~ gross exaggerations, overly familiar insults and personal attacks like that are what you get if/when you ever disagree with some editors. Best of luck to you, Keivan.f, I mean that. I've seen how you in fact do seem to feel you need to "seek ... permission or blessing beforehand", and that's very good, but all I'm saying is: do it on the talk pages, not in messages to other users. Just my advice, take it or leave it. And you'll also see that I in fact do use the talk pages of articles as a basic rule whenever any reverting is done. That's what we're supposed to do, no matter what you see some other editors doing. Try to forget all the nasty animosity that was created here. That was really not my intention. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 02:28, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

OK! The result of your statements is this: please discuss on talk pages and share your opinions with others. And I forgot all the nasty animosity that was created here. ;) Keivan.fTalk 12:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Bravo! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:04, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Please do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point, as you appear to have done by removing the images from over 50 royal family templates, without edit summaries, after a 'slow burn edit war' at Template:British Royal Family where you were advocating that such an image be kept Reventtalk 09:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

He/She should be asked why he is reverting so many approved articles and erasing info without explanation. (talk) 00:53, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

@ Adding unnecessary photos that have no purpose is not a precious information. Stop adding pictures to the articles of Ottoman consorts with explanation like this: Murad III, son of Nurbanu Sultan. If someone really wants to see his photo, s/he can visit his article's page. Keivan.fTalk 06:28, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
And also I find no rule in Wikipedia that we should always explain the other users why we edit an article. Here's not a primary school. We don't need the others permissions on talk pages before a little edit to an article. Also reverting an IP user's vandalism doesn't need explanation. Keivan.fTalk 07:21, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Spelling error for Oprah[edit]

On the Oprah Winfrey page under the section "born" her name is spelled Orpah. Just an Fyi

The sources say that she was born Orpah, but because it was difficult for her family to pronounce this name they changed it to Oprah after a while. Keivan.fTalk 22:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Noriko Senge may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • son-of-izumo-taisha-priest-relinquishes-royal-status/#.VDFoc1e5_y0}|accessdate=5 October 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)


Wikipedia is very good tool!I enjoyed it soon much and its writers r also very intelligent but I want Wikipedia to show pictures also by the way it is very informative and detailed and it tells about every point.By using it I got so many information. Please show pics of everyone's. I like Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 10:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

It's good that you have become interested in Wikipedia and I hope you like the place. Actually, we can't add images to every article in Wikipedia because of copyright licenses that they have. Only free images can be uploaded under Wikipedia's rules. I suggest you create an account and start editing if you really like here. Keivan.fTalk 15:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Uthman ibn Affan[edit]

I have commented on the talk of this article about changing the title of this Article. I think you belong to Shia form of Islam

@Owais khursheed: Yes, I belong to Shia form of Islam but I have read about Sunni caliphs too and I think it's not really good to have the three others' articles under the titles Abu Bakr, Umar, Ali and then this one as Uthman ibn Affan. You said that Uthman is known under the name "Uthman ibn Affan" but I think Umar is also known as Umar ibn al-Khattab and Ali as Ali ibn Abi-Talib. So I think it's better to move Uthman ibn Affan to Uthman. Keivan.fTalk 15:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

yeah they should have these names. you should instead request an admin to change their titles to their proper name. But you are going in the other way. Abu Bakr is popular by this name. you should request Admin for changing Ali to Ali bin abi Talib and like wise for Umer (may allah be pleased with them). Owais khursheed (talk) 15:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

But it seems that the other users won't agree with changing the name of these articles (Umar and Ali), so it's better to move Uthman. As I see it seems to be a normal move because you and maybe some other users won't agree with changing the name of Uthman's article. Keivan.fTalk 15:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Keivan.f. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 18:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dougweller (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

User rights[edit]

Hello Keivan.f. Your account has been granted the "rollback" and "reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.

Rollback user right
Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg
Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
Reviewer user right
Wikipedia Reviewer.svg
The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

@Tom Morris: Thanks a lot! Keivan.fTalk 15:59, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Prince Chichibu[edit]

Prince Chichibu was passed over in the line of succession in October 1940 in favour of his younger brother Prince Takamatsu. I have found several references relating to this matter (in the article Line of succession to the Japanese throne, see the section "Succession debates and conteoversies, reference #12). Please do not make any changes to the article without supporting references. Thank you. Aumnamahashiva (talk) 15:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Japanese royalty[edit]

The recent revisions on pages on japanese princes and princesses nearly gave me a fit. The user's rationale seems to be based on information given on the official website of the Imperial Household Agency which doesn't hold up since that information hasn't been updated properly in ages. Besides, official pages for British Royals refer to them by their ducal titles where possible, but Wikipedia pages for all those people don't omit their names -.- . What's your stance on the situation, since you were active on those pages before ? I'm in favour of reinstating their name + title because it's less confusing. --Killuminator (talk) 23:40, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

I would also argue Avicenna and Averroes need a move but then again both their latin and real names are kind of equally represented in all sorts of media. --Killuminator (talk) 14:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
@Killuminator: A few months ago I wanted Roxelana to be moved to Hurrem Sultan, her Ottoman royal name. But users opposed the move and gave examples such as Avicenna and said that in these cases Latin name should be used. Keivan.fTalk 15:25, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Regarding Hurrem, there is this Turkish sitcom Magnificent Century, and since they of course use the Turkish name, the term Roxelana was largely pushed out of use in many places in SE Europe. --Killuminator (talk) 17:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
An example of a good move is Uluru. When I was learning about Australia in elementary school, the most common name was Ayers rock and it still is a rather widely used term, of that there can be no doubt. But, our teacher told us that Uluru war the correct name and over time, the word Uluru simply demoted the term Ayers rock. Words and meanings simply change over time, but we people are rather nostalgic beings and it takes us some time to adapt to changes. Anyway, a week has passed for those princely members of the Japanese imperial family, can we move them now ? Also I had a suggestion for this page, check out the last post on the talk page. --Killuminator (talk) 17:25, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
@Killuminator: I'll try again to give a move request for Hurrem Sultan in the future. And about the Japanese Imperial Family, well an administrator will close the discussion tomorrow and move the pages himself. I will answer to your suggestion on the article's talk page. Also I posted a paragraph from Japanese Wikipedians on Prince Akishino's talk page that shows why their empresses are called like this. Keivan.fTalk 20:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
I asked for help from someone named Ryulong to help me with Japanese empresses' articles but he just removes my messages without any clear reason and escapes from answering. Keivan.fTalk 21:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
So much for traditional Japanese hospitality. Sadly, I'm not competent enough to trim down the family tree, do you know someone adequate for the job ? --Killuminator (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
@Killuminator: Yes, I think I know someone. Keivan.fTalk 22:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
@Killuminator: Also do you think Roxelana should be moved to Hurrem Sultan? Keivan.fTalk 11:56, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I didn't see your question, I was so busy these day. My last exam was this morning and I hope I pass, yikes. That should clear my semester. I would support moving it to Hurrem Sultan since it's clearly gaining on usage seeing how there's a sitcom that propelled the popularity of Suleiman I and people of that era. There's even a song about it : HUREM . --Killuminator (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
And yeah, the admins didn't move those pages we discussed earlier, even though there is a clear unanimous vote on the matter. --Killuminator (talk) 13:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for posting three times in a row, my brain is scrambled. A similar person from the same time period as Roxelana would be the infamous Redbeard but still the page is titled by his real name Oruç Reis. --Killuminator (talk) 14:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
@Killuminator: Hello. I hope you pass your exams. As I said previously I requested moving Roxelana to Hurrem Sultan which was opposed by some users. Many Ottoman sultanas were known by nicknames in Europe but on Wikipedia the form of their articles' titles is "Name Sultan". Her royal and official name is Hurrem Sultan and she is known by this name in Asia, Eastern Europe, and North Africa. Over 300 millions of people in over 50 countries watched the TV series Magnificent Century and almost all of those people know her under the title Hurrem Sultan. It's true that here is English Wikipedia but we shouldn't forget that this language is international. But I think this time you should give a move request and I'll support it absolutely. About Japanese royals, well I think there are too many pages listed to be moved and during these days one of admins close the discussion and move the pages. I'll try to talk to one of them to move the pages sooner. Keivan.fTalk 14:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
@Killuminator: I think my brain is scrambled too. I wanted to say Africa but I wrote America. However as that TV series is currently airing in USA, so she will become known by the name Hurrem. Keivan.fTalk 14:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
@Killuminator: Giving some examples of Ottoman sultanas who also have nicknames: Mihrimah Sultan (Hurrem's daughter) is also known as Cameria, Mahidevran Sultan (Suleiman's another consort) is also known as Rosne Pranvere, and many other examples. Keivan.fTalk 14:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm not experienced enough to request it and I think it's a bit early. Regarding the family tree (Japan), some user made it EVEN SMALLER ! It's outrageous to me seeing how I wear glasses and reading such puny letters requires me too get closer to the screen. Can you get that guy to trim the family tree down pleaseeee ? --Killuminator (talk) 20:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
I just noticed something regarding Russian empresses, there is no navigational template for consorts. None, zippo, nix. --Killuminator (talk) 23:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

I saw this discussion here now. I do not agree with it, because you are inventing a format that is incorrect. Gryffindor (talk) 09:29, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Regarding my user talk page[edit]

When someone reverts a message you left for them, the general consensus on Wikipedia is that person has read it and simply did not wish to respond to it. Your insistence that I respond to you is not a right you or anyone has as you have so dutifully figured out yourself when you reverted my response to the fact that when you link to someone else's screenname in a thread, it automatically notifies them that they were mentioned like if you tag someone on Facebook or Twitter. I apologize for having not left a more valid reason for the initial revert. I hit enter too many times and didn't get to put in the edit summary that I do not care and do not wish to be involved in your unnecessary request to change several articles' titles.

Also, you are incorrect in your knowledge of rollback. Not only do I not have WP:ROLLBACK (I use WP:TWINKLE) I am free to use it as I see fit in my userspace and I would not be considered edit warring if someone repeatedly posted there against my wishes.

So please, do not link to my userpage again unless you want to get my attention. Do not involve me in your request to move every page on a the empresses consort of Japan. And do not assume I'm Japanese.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:15, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

@Ryulong: Hi. First I apologize for saying bad words to you. I became really angry that time. I didn't become sad that why you're not interested in the topic, all I wanted to tell you that you could just say: "No, I can't help you". Since I hadn't heard that reverting someone's edits on your talk page means that you do not wish to be involved in his or her request, I thought that I had written something wrong in your talk page. I'm also a rollbacker but usually I don't use it for reverting the other users' edits and I try to answer them. And my purpose isn't to change Japanese empresses articles' titles, I just want to expand them. I needed a person who is interested in Japan's culture and know Japanese language and I thought that maybe you can help me. I asked some interested users for help and they answered. Again I apologize if I made you sad. Keivan.fTalk 23:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Also, before you revert that, the editor was blocked as a banned user's sock. Also he lies about any restrictions I may have not that they're even relevant here tbh.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

@Ryulong: Sorry but I didn't understand what you said. Which editor do you mean exactly? Keivan.fTalk 21:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
It's in your talk page history. I would rather apply WP:DENY to say anything further, but I've previously had to eal with editors who constantly restored attacks on me posted by banned editors sockpuppeting.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:44, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diana, Princess of Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Morton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Edit summaries, please[edit]

Hello Keivan, and thanks for your contributions. Please consider making a habit of providing an edit summary when you make a change to an article. Doing so makes it easier and quicker for your fellow editors to understand the intention of your edit and to collaborate with you on the encyclopedia. Thanks in advance for considering this suggestion. Eric talk 16:19, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

@Eric: Thanks for your suggestion. I'll do it. Keivan.fTalk 10:02, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Copying Camilla's article[edit]

Is there a reason why you keep doing that to Diana's? Every article should be written in its own way, you're making it so obvious and sad. (Monkelese (talk) 15:45, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Diana's article need two different sections, her early life, education and career needs to split, Camill's article didn't need to be split.

I know this wikipedia but please stop doing that, although it's already done, hope you happy. (Monkelese (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi dear @Monkelese:. Actually I have expanded Diana's article since two years ago. During these years I just tried to get inspiration from other articles, the Queen Mother's article, Camilla's article, etc. But you're right too. There should be some differences between articles. They shouldn't look exactly the same. I try to make more differences from now. Thanks. Keivan.fTalk 08:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
HEY KEiVAN WHAT DO YOU THINK YOU ARE DOING? You just copy whatever I write in Camilla's article to Diana's, again i said stop it, the articles look too similar in the lead and most parts all because of what you are doing, just today I wrote, She has also raised awareness in areas including rape and sexual abuse, and literacy, for which she has been praised, and you write the same for Diana, using AIDS and leprosy, why do you keep making both articles similar, I suggest you remove the duplications and come up with your own ideas, it is wrong and immature stealing someone's way of writing. You are not like looking for inspiration, you're looking to make both of articles the same, which is severely wrong after I told you to stop it. Yet after I edited Camilla's page, you edit Diana's page writing the same as if it some sort of competition. I will report this if I can, I took Camilla's page which was not edited years ago and edited with my own style, you should have and should do the same. This is not about thinking her article is mine, but protecting it from unneccesary edits. Now you take Camilla's article and write it like Diana's, it is very wrong and if I were you I would remove it all and rewrite on your own. Again, every article has its way of writing, I get inspiration from other articles including Diana's but i DO NOT duplicate or copy exactly what is on her article, this is what you are doing, I had to revert Childhood and Youngadulthood on Diana's page because it was irrelevant for you to copy it from Camilla's. Again what do you intend to gain? Its like you are comparing both ladies whom you and I know are completely different from eachother. I wonder if I can report your childish behavior. (Monkelese (talk) 16:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
@Monkelese: Calm down. I just thought that you have written that sentence long time ago. You really think that I'm waiting for you to do something with Camilla's article? Hah. I don't follow you and I don't have to give answers to you about what I do with the other articles. Maybe you're right, I was wrong, I shouldn't add a sentence that is completely similar to Camilla's one, but if you look at Diana's article you see the information are completely different. Actually I was the person who separated Diana's early life section to two different parts long time ago and created another one for her education and career. Diana had a section for her charity work before Camilla, which I have expanded during these two years, if I added the title "areas of interest" it doesn't mean that I have stolen your precious way of writing. I created a section titled princess of wales after I read the Queen Mother's article that has a section titled duchess of york. If you really think using a sentence is stealing your way of writing then change it or every sentence you might think is similar to Camilla's article. Keivan.fTalk 18:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
@Monkelese: I think you're the one who's behaving like children. I don't understand the reason of your anxiety. As you said they're two different individuals. Their appearances, their charity works, everything about them is different. If you feel that there are some similarities that makes you annoyed, tell me and I think about how to change it with your help and advise. You seem to be a wise person, so let's solve this problem in its right way. Keivan.fTalk 18:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't know how old you are but you're very childish, this is not Diana's fansite, look at my edit on Camillas [Camilla, and look at Diana's on the same day Diana's you're copying exactly what I write, I don't care about sections like Areas of Interest, I care about duplicating the same thing I write, you should know better than that, even her grandfather, you do the same to to Diana's grandfather, why? As I said I have been inspired by articles including Diana's but never thought of copying the way her article is written, if you can't come up with a writing style, then stop editing. (Monkelese (talk) 18:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
@Monkelese: I removed that sentence. Anything else? Even when I asked you to tell me the problems, you behave like this. I'm really sorry for you. Keivan.fTalk 18:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
I will tell you who's aritcle I got inspired by highlighting the works on the Duchess, I got it through Michelle obamas article and overall the first ladies, but i never thought of using the same writing style. There is a difference, what I see here is basically taking most sentence in Camillas article to Diana's, and you don't rewrite it. They way their lead is written is very similar, it should not be. I don't have to point it out to you, you know which sentences (Monkelese (talk) 19:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Did you mean to delete your !vote?[edit]

You appear to have added a !vote and then deleted it. Was that what you intended to do? Cheers! bd2412 T 21:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@BD2412: Hi dear. Actually I wanted to support the move at first, but after looking at the books written by her and some other official documents that the others had provided, I changed my mind. I don't know to support it or opposse it. I also really don't have enough time currently to participate in such discussions. I hope all of the users choose the best title for the article. Keivan.fTalk 05:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
That is entirely reasonable. Thanks for explaining. bd2412 T 12:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions at RfD[edit]

I am not good at giving barnstars even though you deserve one, because I edit everything longhand, but would like to thank you for your contributions over at WP:RFD. I for one very much appreciate it and appreciate your expertise on Turkish Turkik?) subjects. Please forve me my typing mistakes, my fingers are larger than the keys. WP:RFD is a good place to hang out, because there are a few intelligent people who can cast their eye in all kinds of different directions, and that is the fun of it: I hope you shall become a regular there. Don't let anyone put you off, I may well disagree with you from time to time, but never personal, just arguing the case. Wittgenstein after all said the world is everything that is the case, at the start of Philosphia Mathematica, and finished with "whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent". (Or in other words, "If you don1t know, shut up"). But what more can you expect from a German :) Si Trew (talk) 09:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

@SimonTrew: Hi, Thanks dear. Sorry for replying late. I was too busy. I should say that I really enjoy to discuss both in real life and in the social media. Unfortunately, I can't neither come to Wikipedia everyday nor participate in such discussions currently, because I'm studying for my final exams at school and also for my university entrance exam. But I'll promise to come and be more active on WP:RFD and everywhere as soon as possible. Keivan.fTalk 16:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Well bloody good luck to you. I was just translating a SPanish article from WP:PNT so my English is probably even worse than yours! All the best for your exams, you are a clever chap, you should sail through them. Si Trew (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
@SimonTrew: Thank you so much. I wish you the best in everything you do. Keivan.fTalk 16:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
I do nothing. I cook and clean and can translate and stuff like that, but I can't really work properly cos I lack concentration, I used to have it, but after a couple of hours now, I drift off and start singing Chas and Dave songs or something from Billy Bragg and just start playing on the joanna and completely lose the plot. Now, I can tell you how a joanna works but I have no idea what the black ones do, they seem to have stuck them in just to make Irving Berlin and George Gershwin put everything in B flat minor. And what have all the other keys got that the key of C major hasn't, I ask you?
I used to be able to concentrate, but I can't now. Si Trew (talk) 16:54, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
@SimonTrew: It's just a negative feeling. I'm sure you can take back your concentration in the future. And also everything you do in your life, try to do it in its best way. No matter what it is, cooking, washing, etc. I liked to talk more but I should go back to my room and rest, after a day full of stress because of Mathematics. Keivan.fTalk 17:16, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
That's all one can do, do one's best. My three rules in life are don't hit, don't lie, don't cheat. After that everything is a bonus. Si Trew (talk) 17:18, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

there you again[edit]

Please remove other areas from Diana's section , seems you are not listening, come up with your own title, it ridiculous how obsessed you are right now, and stop removing things from Camilla's page, rewrite or let it be, its high time you stop this{Monkelese (talk) 20:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

@Monkelese: I changed the title, but I'm really tired of your orders. How about changing the sections' titles in Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge's article because they're also similar to Camilla's article!! And I removed that sentence from the lead section of Camilla's article because it says that she uses the title "Duchess of Rothesay" because of the strong association of the title "Princess of Wales" with Diana. It's completely wrong as Diana was also Duchess of Rothesay in Scotland. Camilla adopted the title "Duchess of Cornwall" because of Diana. You reverted my explained edit without a clear reason. I think you have become sensitive on each of my edits. As I said before try to be optimistic a little and stop this behavior. And let this discussion end here now because neither me nor you have time to discuss for silly reasons and I have nothing to say and no more time for discussing anymore. Keivan.fTalk 08:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The Duchess of Cornwall's other title are all supposed to mention, only thing mentioned is the princess of wales, why? Look at Diana's all is mentioned, you could have rewrote it, although it already makes sense, yet you choose to remove an entire sentence, you could have wrote, in scotland she uses duchess of rothesay and her other titles are the rest. removing it was uncessary, we HAD a discussion about this, you seem to be making sure both women have their page and everything written the same way, again they are different, even after I added extended family to Camilla's template, you do the same to Diana's, why? her template was fine before...listen to what you're doing wrong and stop coming up with excuses (Monkelese (talk) 14:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
As you can see it has been added, not removed, I will also not have this conversation anymore, regardless of what I say or said it doesn't matter to you, and I will say too, i have nothing to say to you anymore or discuss regarding this. This is my final say on this matter (Monkelese (talk) 01:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
@Monkelese: But isn't that making the lead sections the same? Because Diana's titles are mentioned in the lead section they have to be mentioned in Camilla's article too. OK. And yes, we had a discussion over this matter, but adding a new section to a template is not copying. I will add extended family to Charles and William's templates too and I see no problem here. Also as we agreed before the articles shouldn't have the same sentences. Another user and I changed Diana's lead section after you mentioned this, but similarity in third-level headings doesn't make that much problem. "Charity" section in Diana's article is a little bit similar to Queen Rania of Jordan as most of the royals perform public duties and it should be mentioned. I think we won't have more problems in the future as we discussed almost everything about these two articles. Keivan.fTalk 05:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Kit Harington[edit]


With regards to Kit Harington's page, to my understanding both Kit himself and the show creators have advised that 'Jon Snow is dead'. When pressed for more information about the character, they further confirmed that, saying 'dead is dead'. I believe that this is sufficient information to change the dates of Kits presence on the show.

Yours sincerely,

An active Wikipedia user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Pippa Middleton[edit]

Are all of my ref. OK on this page? Srbernadette (talk) 07:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC) Thanks