User talk:Kelvintjy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Kelvintjy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Allen4names 05:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pirate Rangers[edit]

SamuraiCast and JEFusion are not reliable sources because they are fansites. Also it's April Fools' Day, so don't believe anything that anyone is claiming is official today.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator[edit]

Can you help me delete the photo of the gohonzon in the Sōka Gakkai as the user named Catflap08 keep restoring the picture. I also do not want to be blame for vandalism on that article.

According to my Buddhist believe, photographing of the Gohonzon are discouraged because the resulting copies can be easily desecrated, abused, or misused.

--Kelvintjy (talk) 15:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate that your beliefs may restrict the distribution of certain images, I'm afraid that our policy is that Wikipedia is not censored. Many religions have such beliefs and trying to satisfy all of them would be incompatible with our goal of building an encyclopedia. There is some room for compromise in terms of placement and size of images, but this is a matter for discussion on the talk page of the article in question. If you want to avoid seeing the image yourself, please see Help:Options to hide an image. If you feel there is some copyright problem with the image being used, you could raise the issue at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Cheers, Bovlb (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taiseki-ji: Shōhondō edits[edit]

The information about the architects' opinions on the destruction of Shōhondō reflects Sōka Gakkai bias and does not, in my opinion, merit placement on the page. --Scandiescot — Preceding undated comment added 10:04, 13 September 2013‎

The temple was in fact regarded as a masterpiece of modern architecture, and architects in Japan and elsewhere did in fact deplore its demolition. There is nothing biased about reporting these facts. I located an archive of the Washington Post article, and put that paragraph back into the Shōhondō section. --Margin1522 (talk) 11:47, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Unexplained revert[edit]

You recently reverted one of my edits but you didn't use an edit summary or open a discussion in Talk. Can you please explain why you reverted my edit? In other words, what is it about the cited source that makes you believe that it's (a) reliable and (b) noteworthy enough to include in an encyclopedia article? Have any scholars or experts ever used that ranking or written favorably about it or is it just one of dozens of new rankings that proliferate on the Internet as people try to proclaim themselves experts whose products we should purchase? ElKevbo (talk) 16:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


February 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Prolog. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Club of Rome, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 18:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Wolf of Wall Street (2013 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 17:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see you made this same change before, also without explanation. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before continuing. - SummerPhDv2.0 17:54, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


= Soka Gakkai Educational activities[edit]

I know you have edited the section on "educational activities" on the Soka Gakkai page. Are you the one responsible for the new "Soka Education System" page? If so - nice going. If not -- check it out. Thanks. --Daveler16 (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Nichiren Shoshu[edit]

Thanks for the tip. I'll check it out. You know, Hardly ANYTHING in the N Shoshu entry has a valid reference. --Daveler16 (talk) 17:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]