User talk:Kendog1982

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to New Haven Coliseum, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Kinu t/c 16:21, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Westlund[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Alex Westlund requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. --Kinu t/c 16:22, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dannel Malloy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John DeStefano, Jr.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Vieque (talkctb) 04:23, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vieque (talkctb) 04:24, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kendog1982 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

first and foremost i just saw this blockage and the indefinite status is a bit punitive don't you think? 1. i am the owner of this account yes. 2. im sorry i wasnt more responsible for it, but it was my 13 year old brother who did all this, not me. 3. what vandalism was made with regards to cover up? 4. i do apologize and will be much more careful with my account as wikipedia is a great tool sorry for the nonsense. Materialscientist Kendog1982 (talk) 05:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You should have been blocked after your very first edit. Nothing you've done since then has been much better. By the way, WP:BROTHER. --jpgordon::==( o ) 07:06, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kendog1982 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

im replying to jpgordon who not only thought i was lying, mocked me with a humor page! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BROTHER very rude! i DO have 3 YES THREE little brothers and my oldest, Greg who IS 13 was on this making those stupid edits. i just want the block reduced from indefinite. check my facebook!!! u will see my brothers on there!!! Jpgordon was very rude and i asked for an explanation as to what was covered up and didnt get an answer great monitors you have on here. im 32 years of age im way more mature than to mess with a good tol like Wikipedia than to vandalize it. Kendog1982 (talk) 08:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Apart from one seriously offensive edit in 2010, for which you should have been blocked, all of your edits appear to have been made today. I see two sensible ones - all the others are offensive, or vandalisms, or both. If your brother made them then your account is compromised ans as such cannot be unblocked. If you made them then the block is wholly deserved, and an unblock is not appropriate. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.