- 1 E=MC2 Barnstar
- 2 FamilySearch
- 3 BLAST is not in the List_of_astronomy_acronyms
- 4 New Page Patrol survey
- 5 June 2012
- 6 July 2014
- 7 Merger proposal
- 8 One last issue related to Legend disambiguation
- 9 Merging partial disambig pages
- 10 capital letter namespace
- 11 Mila (given name)
- 12 Wild Arabia, Wild Brazil
- 13 A cheeseburger for you!
- 14 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 15 A barnstar for you!
- 16 HFZ
- 17 Reference errors on 23 August
- 18 Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council listed at Redirects for discussion
- 19 church disambiguation pages
- 20 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
As you have contributed to a related article, you might want to know about the AfD for FamilySearch. --
BLAST is not in the List_of_astronomy_acronyms
Now it is. Thanks, CarpD 14/12/06
Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) has smiled at you! Smiles are good! and hopefully this one has made your day better. Why not smile at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend? Happy editing!
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation
Hello Ketiltrout! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *[[Asatru Folk Assembly]], formerly Asatru Free Assembly)
Since you took the time to consider the issues at Talk:Legend (disambiguation)#Merger proposal, I am hoping you might help us consider a related issue at Talk:Legends (TV series)#Call for a vote on hatnote for this page.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- So far, about half of the people who took part in the recent merger discussion have considered this related matter and half haven't. This leaves us on the border between consensus and no consensus. It would be great if could take a moment to consider the simple matter at Talk:Legends (TV series)#Call for a vote on hatnote for this page. A few more voices should make it clear if there is a consensus opinion or not.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:01, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Merging partial disambig pages
Howdy. I see you have gone ahead and merged a load of partial disambig pages; good job. Unfortunately it looks like (in some cases) you've done this without checking that the content has been merged properly. To give an example, James D. Smith was created because it had incoming links related to more than one person - here "James D. Smith, president of the New York Stock Exchange 1886 - 1888" and "James D. Smith, Comptroller of Connecticut, 1881-1882". However, the page to which this title now redirects (James Smith) doesn't mention the first of these at all.
A reasonable amount of effort went into tracking down some of these and establishing that several similarly named people were involved; can I check that you intend to merge the now missing entries please ? - TB (talk) 10:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
capital letter namespace
- Sorry, my mistake - I started off referring to the "redirect", then somehow switched to "move". At any rate, do you have the 'powers' to kill (speedy delete) the existing Extension service, so we can move Extension Service? Thanks, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 22:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mila (given name), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.mtv.com/artists/mila/.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Wild Arabia, Wild Brazil
Greetings Ketiltrout, I was wondering whether you could create two pages for Wild Arabia TV series (2013) and Wild Brazil TV series (2014). It's because they are part of the BBC Natural History Unit's Continents strand, which all other series in the strand have pages of their own, Wild Arabia is narrated by Alexander Siddig, while Wild Brazil is narrated by Stephen Mangan. Both series have 3 episodes each. I think the website "Docuwiki" has a lot of information on each of them and also the BBC websites for them. They both aired on BBC Two. In the strand, Wild Arabia succeeds Madagascar with David Attenborough and proceeds Wild Brazil, while Wild Brazil succeeds Wild Arabia and, to my knowledge has no series yet that succeeds it. If you can create the pages or know someone who can it would be greatly appreciated by myself, if you can't do it then no worries, thanks, --Emperorofthedaleks (talk) 17:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
|Eat, food! —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 07:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)|
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|The Original Barnstar|
|For creating the Hij page. Maharayamui (talk) 01:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)|
Reference errors on 23 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Radiation effects from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council. Since you had some involvement with the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
church disambiguation pages
Hi Ketiltrout, i notice a couple of edits on my watchlist where you have revised church disambiguation pages, including this edit to the First United Presbyterian Church page. Could I ask that you stop and discuss, before editing more? Because there are a few hundred of these, I think, and it is not obvious what is best formatting, but we don't want some editors going one way vs. others going another. On that page, I do agree that some editing was called for. I will edit there now, to what I think it should be, then can we discuss? sincerely, Doncram