User talk:Kim Bruning
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 1
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 2
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 3
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 4
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 5
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 6
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 7
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 8
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 9
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 10
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 11
Hello! Note that I am away. Please append your message at the end of the page, though I can't promise I'll do anything about it atm.
This page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III.
Discussion on Jimbos page
I am awake and waiting for your counterarguments. Prandr 11:09 CEST, 14 May 2007
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Hauptautoren. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eloquence (talk • contribs)
Wikipedia has a second Carlos admin
Governance reform and AGF challenge
Hi! I've been reading through some of your comments on WT:Governance reform. I find hard rules and binding decisions as appealing as the next person, but I also find your arguments very compelling.
Working within a corporate hierarchy, I see first-hand the tension between being bold to get things done, and waiting for the formal decision-making process to complete. When I do employee performance reviews there are usually questions on the form about display of management skills. Non-manager employees almost always skip these questions on the grounds that they simply have zero opportunity to exercise management skills. I tell them that the true test of management skills is exercising influence over others when you don't have a manager title, or when they don't report to you. I guess this corresponds to building consensus.
I followed the link to WP:Lectures, and I'm sorry to find that I missed the session on Fill's AGF challenge. I'm sure that you're really busy, but I'd appreciate any feedback you might have on my answers. Cheers, Bovlb (talk)
Kittey was shrunk =
Nomination of Lie-to-children for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lie-to-children (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andrew D. (talk) 12:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)