User talk:JKim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Kim for sure)
Jump to: navigation, search

A belated welcome![edit]

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm! Face-smile.svg

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Kim for sure. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Howdy Kim[edit]

Kim for sure, Howdy! Your message on my page "Wikipedia is not...aimed at boring burocrats. Now I confess that I am a little puzzled by your riddle, but I see that earlier I had reverted an edit you had made and I am reasonably certain that sparked our interaction. To explain my edit, wikipedia lists are supposed to be lists of wikipedia articles. Now when people are unaware of this standard, they come in and add names of people who don't have an article on wikipedia. When that happens the name that is linked appears red rather than blue. People who maintain these lists usually go through periodically and remove these "redlinks" (which explains my edit summary "removed redlinks") in order to maintain the integrity of the list. I am sorry if you felt I was being unfair, I was simply trying to keep the list within wikipedia's standard. Now if you feel that Jiménez del Oso, and Pedro Ribera deserve an article on wikipedia you are welcome to write it. Understand that they will need to fulfill wikipedia's notability standards if you expect the articles to stay. If you need some help feel free to contact me, Ill see what I can do to assist you. Good luckCoffeepusher (talk) 05:12, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Gravity of Earth[edit]

It is generally true that if you gain significant altitude, gravity is reduced. However, if your altitude gain is due to adding mass such as a mountain under your feet, gravity may be increased. The gravitational attraction near southern India and Sri Lanka is actually the lowest found on Earth's surface. In the map, the blue lower areas are reduced gravity, while the red, raised (mountains) are elevated gravity. Also, if you go "down" to the center of the Earth, gravity would be near zero as the gravitational attraction from all parts of the Earth would cancel. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2016[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. and of course your personal attack on me at Talk:Yonaguni Monument, it's pretty obvious that was you. Doug Weller talk 16:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)