User talk:Kindness59

March 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm NZ Footballs Conscience. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chuck Close without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NZFC^(talk) 23:27, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chuck Close. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:54, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have complained for years. My voice doesn’t count. My life and livielhood doesn’t count. Please stop with the inaccuracies. It’s my life[edit]

I should know. I’m Sienna Shields. The nytimes never fact checked with me. That article wrote about my supposed life after Chuck Close divorces me. Please be kind and let me live Kindness59 (talk) 23:58, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chuck Close. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NZFC^(talk) 00:00, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring on Chuck Close[edit]

You have ignored the previous warnings so I'm trying one more time here. Please stop edit-warring on the Chuck Close article. We are not here to right great wrongs and listing somebody on an article is not harassment in any jurisdiction. Also, you should be aware that claiming legal harm has been done is a violation of the policy on No Legal Threats. Even if your assertions are correct (and we require reliable sources to demonstrate such things) he was still married to this woman at some point and she is therefore one of his spouses. I will report you for administrative action for edit-warring the next time you remove this material without discussion. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:03, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck close[edit]

I’m just asking to please be accurate. But I guess that doesn’t matter to you people Kindness59 (talk) 00:18, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]