User talk:Kinu/Archive 15

UTRS Account Request
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Kinu t/c Good to go! Let me (or another tool admin) know if you have any questions! ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 06:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC) Thanks! --Kinu t/c 16:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #13164

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. The account is HolyChildAcademyDrexelHill. Do you want the appeal back with the info? Or want someone else to respond to the user? Lemme know. :) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 20:54, 20 February 2015 (UTC) Ah, that makes sense. Since I have been and will continue to be AFK for a bit, I'll defer to someone else. Thanks! --Kinu t/c 19:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Toronto Transit Commission Fleet Request
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Are you able to add back the Auto Confirmed users for the page? TorontoTransportGuy 17:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Socks?

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello! Yesterday you blocked the user Paulii122222 for socking. I suggest you also take a look at user Paul2244567, who recently created an article about Universum Studio. Last August an article on the same subject was created by Pauilii12222 (since deleted). Thanks for checking on this. I am taking the Universum Studio article to AfD, so if you find out anything relevant, you might say so at that discussion. --MelanieN (talk) 16:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC) Ah yes, the socking appears obvious, given that all of these users are involved in creating articles about the nonexistent television show Alex and Amy and its alleged star, so I've blocked on those grounds per WP:DUCK. As for this article, as you state at the AfD, there is the possibility that it might not actually be a hoax, so I'll do a little more investigating and chime in there when I get the chance. Thanks for letting me know! --Kinu t/c 16:53, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of content at Yale University

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello. You restored the sentences I deleted regarding Yale University "Campus Life" as regards homosexuals. I deleted the sentences because I thought it was unimportant, unnecessarily promotional of the lifestyle, and clearly politically motivated. The facts of the "Campus Life" section should end with the statistics. Why should we care about sexual orientation within the student body32.211.77.32 (talk) 19:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)? I believe the content is properly sourced, objective, and an appropriate discussion for this section; indeed, I would say that this section should likely be split off and expanded using additional reliable sources. I find no basis in your claim that the content is "promotional of the lifestyle" and "clearly politically motivated"; ironically, I find your estimation that this content violates WP:NPOV to be a highly POV-laden statement itself. If you wish to contest its inclusion or discuss the general organization of the article, please do so at the article's talk page. Thank you. --Kinu t/c 22:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC) Well, I looked at six other Ivy League university Wikipedia entries, and NONE mentioned anything about gay campus life. Clearly you have an axe to grind and are grinding it on Yale University's Wikipedia entry. I would ask why this is so. And again: why should anybody care? Why don't you include all the other Politically Correct cultural groups in the "Camp[us Life" section, expanding your version to include all but white men (the only official group you're allowed to discriminate against)? Frankly, I care very little about the entire affair - but it seems I have no power to do anything regardless of whether I am correct in my assertions. Apparently, I need to be politically correct. I hear the transvestite action is pretty good as well - why don't you add that to the "Campus Life" section as well? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brprivate (talk • contribs) 20:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC) For not caring at all, you seem to be the one with an axe to grind here. Unless you can explain why your removal of sourced content is justified on the article's talk page without resorting to soapboxing or POV screeds, you're not going to get very far here. --Kinu t/c 20:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Mahendra Niraula

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Perhaps I am wrong, but this User:Kingpapiofficial looks like sockpuppet of Mahendra Niraula, especially due to this edit. What do you think? The Banner talk 03:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC) The poor grammar certainly looks suspicious, of course, but I'm hesitant to call it a WP:DUCK right now, since that first edit might have been random vandalism. An SPI might not be unreasonable, though, if you feel like it's worth it. I'll keep an eye on that account in case the pieces fall into place, of course. --Kinu t/c 18:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

2006 December

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/2006 December I was typing this out as you were blocking DietCokeIsTheBest, so thanks. I have a feeling we're going to be playing whack-a-mole with this kid, so hopefully a CU can flush out a couple more socks. –Fredddie™ 23:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Who in heck do think you is to are blocking people when they not part of that sockpuppet? OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC) I is a fake administrator who dose blocked people with out get the facts straight. (LOL.)--Kinu t/c 20:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Yo

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. I got bored at work so I started patrolling WP:CSD today. Are you still active on here? Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 16:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Good to see you back! I'm certainly still active; like you said, it's a reasonably productive way to alleviate boredom. --Kinu t/c 17:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC) I used to a lot of this stuff when I worked at Ferguson when i was bored. I figured might as well contribute positively to society when I have nothing to do at work!Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 17:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Oh, and that conference publication also resparked some of my interest in this. On a side note, pretty awesome that Dail is moving out there! Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 17:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Troll cleanup

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Could I trouble you to delete User_talk:PINGAS_SUCKER please. You indeffed them yesterday. In the cleanup I CSded one of their attack pages, but the script dumped a welcome message back onto their freshly-deleted talk: I tried to get this shifted today, but there has been an outbreak of remarkable wiki-stupidity and a bizarre defence of this page's right to continue (See [1]). If only we were so good at defending articles sometimes... Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Done, per the rationale given in the deletion log. Thanks for letting me know. --Kinu t/c 19:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Seriously, you are going a bit over the top. Please remember that speedy deletion of the page was declined twice by two different administrators. 103.6.156.167 (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

A Small Diversion

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. I'm curious about the SHA-512 hash you included in your userbox ("5912d12572f1374f0cbc34b81309e048cee0800e2226c997a1f0d06d763b98cb4eee68d7afe8a5903f5a34f8b528da4c0a531afdb17f961152874549899635ec"). I have run it through every decrypter in my arsenal, but get nothing. Care to elaborate? Ormr2014 (talk) 19:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Nope. --Kinu t/c 04:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Review of deletion at User:Ncox

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. If you don't mind, I would appreciate it if you could take a look the user page I deleted at User:Ncox and let me know if you think I made the right decision. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 20:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC) Replied at said user's talk page. --Kinu t/c 20:30, 4 May 2015 (UTC) I appreciate the second opinion. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 12:52, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Essay on Notability

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. I am working on an essay on the WP:GNG guidelines, and would appreciate your feedback/thoughts on it (it is still in an early stage., but I have been bouncing the idea around for a while now and decided to start writing something). User:Chrislk02/anarticleaboutaschoolthatcantfindagermanteacherisnotnotable Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 15:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Redland City

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hi, I saw you marked the user as a sockpuppet. Are there any other accounts I should be looking for? And should I request for temporary semi protection? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:40, 15 May 2015 (UTC) I think the only sock was the one I tagged and blocked. I don't think protection is necessary right now, but I'll keep an eye on it in case any other new socks pop up and continue the same behavior. --Kinu t/c 15:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Notable Artists

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. I found the "strongest" argument to date for why I should undelete/keep an article about an artist,but there was nothing about "soothing voice" exceptions in WP:GNG on it so I had to decline it. "...and if you are still not convinced, do a google search for <artist here> and listen to her soothing voice...."[2]. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 12:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC) I've been told my voice is soothing. Where's my article?! :D --Kinu t/c 19:45, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. The Original Barnstar Keep it Up! C E (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2015 (UTC) Given your editing and block history, I choose to decline this award. --Kinu t/c 19:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Request for help

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hi I am contacting you because you helped block a user (User_talk:Zachtron#Blocked) after he made up articles and I found your name in all three deletion discussions: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rocket_Records Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Christopher_Pasquin Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tim_Coons I suspect he is back, because someone is constantly editing the following articles: Cheiron Records (redirect page) Cheiron Studios Cheiron Studios was a Swedish production company that was shut down 15 years ago, but this user keeps adding information about a “revival”. The new company is based in USA and is of course run by Christopher Pasquin, who is linked to Rocket Records and Tim Coons (same story as last time). There is no evidence and on this “revived” company’s website the same statements are repeated (Tim Coons’ company being world-renowned etc.). As you can read in the deletion discussions, several of the sources back then were made up. One of the references he used this time for his article Cheiron Records (I have now reverted it to a redirect page, but I don’t know how long it will last) is a discogs.com biography he wrote himself. When I revert his edits and ask for reliable sources he only undoes my edits and calls them vandalism. What should I do? 84.209.76.114 (talk) 12:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Request to ignore and block IP 84.209.76.114

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Requesting your help. These 2 articles in question are continuously being vandalized by this IP address user. There is no mention of a Rocket Records, Pasquin, or Coons, and I suspect this user is actually some kind of fan or sock puppet with a spam agenda. This IP user mysteriously popped up the other day when no edits to the 2 pages in question had been made in many months. I tried undoing the Vandalism a few times hoping this IP user would stop, but now it seems hopeless as he or she is trying to use these articles as a way to force attention on himself or herself. Please view the history of both articles and you can see when this IP user first began initiating Vandalism on the 2 articles out of the blue the other day. Music2015 (talk) 16:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC) (talk page stalker)I've been following this battle, and the IP makes sense. Music2015, this is at worst a content dispute, it is definitely not vandalism, and calling someone a vandal when they are not vandalizing is a personal attack, which can get you blocked. Whether or not this account is related to User:Zachtron, the article should probably be deleted and the re-direct restored, as none of the sources in any way tie the current American Cheiron Records (which certainly exists), to the old Swedish studio. I could start a record company, and call it Gennett Recordings, but that doesn't mean my company would have anything to do with the legendary, defunct record label. This name-dropping and attempt to inherit notability is frankly very similar to previous behavior regarding Pasquin/Coons. Where are any reliable, independent sources that mention this new record label with the old name? 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC) I would have to respectfully disagree with you completely on that. The company is an official revival using logos, music, photos, history, and much more copyrighted content. Any of us could start a record company and name it whatever we want, i.e. "Bob's Records", but you have to have legal licenses and ownership of a brand (especially with that famous history) to do what they are doing, especially as an active company distributing music. I also see absolutely no mention of a Pasquin or Coons in the history of either Wiki article in question, just the company's/brand's history itself. Also, I never called the user a vandal, I simply pointed out what I perceived to be Vandalism of the 2 articles in question. That is not personal attack. I simply see no valid justification or good faith editing to alter the articles in question, but perhaps others can chime in. Music2015 (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC) You haven't answered 78's question: "Where are any reliable, independent sources that mention this new record label with the old name?" And as for not calling the IP a vandal, what do you think this is: "... are continuously being vandalized by this IP address user"? - David Biddulph (talk) 17:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC) I perceived what took place out of the blue with no good faith editing to be Vandalism. If I'm wrong for that, then sorry. Also, this is not a new record label we are talking about here and the independent sources already in the article are about the label itself and its vast history. This is not an article about some completely new company or music studio from Sweden which is now in America. An official revival with logos, music, and more is much different than creating something new and simply naming it after something old to get some notoriety. That is the way I see it at least. Music2015 (talk) 17:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC) For the THIRD time (and I apologise to other readers for shouting): "Where are any reliable, independent sources that mention this new record label with the old name?" - The only source in your article which mentions any connection is not independent. - David Biddulph (talk) 18:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Fine, I guess we will leave 78's most recent revert to the Cheiron Studios article in place until better independent sources become available. I'm not fully comfortable with this given that this so-called "new" Cheiron Studios seems to be an official revival of the same exact company/brand in question, complete with logos, history, licenses, and more, but it is what it is I suppose. Good day. Music2015 (talk) 19:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Unfortunately he does not respond to that question. I have tried: http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=CheironRecords#user=CheironRecords&item=label%2FCheiron (registration required, but I may provide screenshots if desired). I have asked him to prove that this company has acquired the rights to the Cheiron brand from Sony Music (Cheiron Studios was owned by BMG). I even confronted him with the fact that the original Cheiron staff does not appear to be informed (Sveriges Radio had a documentary about Cheiron Studios just a month ago). He completely ignores the burden of proof and asks me to get in touch with Pasquin’s company in order to get the sufficient evidence. My guess is that he hopes I will email them using my full name so that they will know my identity. He has already threatened me on Discogs with legal actions for “slandering” the company by asking for proofs. 84.209.76.114 (talk) 19:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC) 84.209.76.114, you are in clear violation of a personal attack against me, as I have never been a Discogs website editor in my entire life. You obviously have an issue going on over at Discogs with somebody there, but I would appreciate you not confusing me with that person and saying on here that I am the one who threatened you on Discogs. Your false statement is a blatant personal attack against me and is a direct violation of Wikipedia policy. Get your facts straight and don't confuse me with some Discogs editor you are fighting with. Music2015 (talk) 19:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Oh, please … On 21 December 2014 a Discogs account named CheironRecords was created. Whoever created it only edited label pages belonging to Cheiron. No reliable sources were provided. Only hours later your account on Wikipedia was registered and the only edits you made were to the articles about Cheiron. You even used the Discogs biography written a few hours earlier as a source. It is also an incredible coincidence, to use your own words, that you have undone my WP edits about the same time CheironRecords answered me on Discogs. Every. Single. Time. Both you and “not you” have failed to provide even a single reliable source for the information that you have submitted. Your language is the same. Both you and “not you” claim to have nothing to do with Cheiron (even though the nick on Discogs was CheironRecords!). On Discogs, “not you” threatened me with legal actions: “attorneys might be highly interested in having your IP address traced” (go on btw, it is 84.209.76.114 (IPv4) / 2a02:fe0:c412:1741:6d0e:fe5a:f0a4:7ffa (IPv6)). How would you know my IP if not for Wikipedia? Discogs does not reveal that information. I understand that you want to promote your company, but both Discogs and Wikipedia are fact based sites. You need to provide sources. 2A02:FE0:C412:1741:6D0E:FE5A:F0A4:7FFA (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2015 (UTC) (PS. 2a02:fe0:c412:1741:6d0e:fe5a:f0a4:7ffa = 84.209.76.114. My browser alternates between IPv4 and IPv6, I do not know why) 2A02:FE0:C412:1741:6D0E:FE5A:F0A4:7FFA (talk) 20:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Your IP address is available for all to see right here on Wikipedia since you are editing as an IP. For the last time, take your Discogs argument elsewhere and stop tying me in with them. This is Wikipedia, not Discogs, and your whole intent is to obviously draw attention to yourself which is why you started messing with the Wiki articles about Cheiron in question in the first place. I wouldn't be surprised at all if you are the same person(s) or a Sock Puppet of the blocked Rocket/Coons/Pasquin article creators you keep obsessing over and brought to the forefront because you sure seem to be behaving like them from the archived deletion logs you provided above. How many times were the Cheiron articles edited recently until you started "not vandalizing" them and immediately began drumming up conversation about Rocket Records/Coons/Pasquin? You seem to be fighting multiple fires with multiple people across multiple platforms trying to create whatever attention you can about these Coons and Pasquin guys, classic Sock Puppet behavior. Also, I checked out your multiple mile long Discog rants and they are scrolls of text, just like the long scrolls of text written by the banned Sock Puppets. Coincidence? I don't think so. Take your reverse psychology nonsense and quit trying to get attention for yourself (or your Rocket friends). You guys were banned a year ago, move on. By the way, I see that it was an elaborate team of Sock Puppets who were banned, and they had multiple long conversations and fake arguments with themselves just like it appears you are doing on Discogs. Your same behavior is hardly a coincidence. Music2015 (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC) “your whole intent is to obviously draw attention to yourself” That’s why I use an anonymous IP, right? “multiple long conversations and fake arguments with themselves just like it appears you are doing on Discogs” You gave yourself away there. You are now accusing me of creating the Discogs account “CheironRecords” in order to have fake arguments with myself. Well, that user added the information that you added to Wikipedia hours later. If I did create that account in order to troll, that means your edits are built on made up information. Quod erat demonstrandum. 84.209.76.114 (talk) 21:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC) I have blocked these two users for violating 3RR. Please see my post at WP:RFPP for my rationale and comment. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 22:38, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Arbitrary section break Apologies to all. I have been way too busy in real life to respond to this, but will take a look at everything when I get the chance. Allowing the AfD to play out is a good start... --Kinu t/c 19:12, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

User:Do you like my socks

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Just wondering, but who is the sockmaster? Dustin (talk) 05:56, 19 June 2015 (UTC) Based on this, it's this one from yesterday. There might be an older one, but the combination of WP:DENY and WP:RBI is good enough. --Kinu t/c 06:00, 19 June 2015 (UTC) This must be User:Blueberry Aardvark, I reverted all of their edits as vandalism. Some examples of the user's socks vandalism [3] and [4], Possibly User:Blueberry Aardvark could be the sockmaster. Regards EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 06:07, 19 June 2015 (UTC) Okay; thanks for the response. Dustin (talk) 23:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arr4/Archive_7&diff=prev&oldid=659245789 The user:Yasmin542 writes in Bengali(using English alphabets) that she is a sockpuppet of Bishal Khan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bishal_Khan --Cosmic  Emperor  07:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Tunisian Arabic

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Dear User, As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic. Yours Sincerely, --Csisc (talk) 13:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/2006 December

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. What's your thoughts about the latest round (especially the last two "unrelated" socks)? CU can't be used to prove a negative, but on behavior there seems to be some disagreement. --Rschen7754 16:33, 4 July 2015 (UTC) I feel like the behavioral connection to 2006 December is there, but it's incomplete, so I can understand Mike V's line of reasoning. Nonetheless, I certainly feel like those last two are at least related to one another, which might be reason enough to block. I'll take a closer look at it and see if it's actionable (if no one else beats me to it). --Kinu t/c 21:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

It appeared to be
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. It appeared to be a quote from here. Why, I know not. But amusing, yes.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2015 (UTC) Indeed, quite random. *scratches head* --Kinu t/c 21:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Farm to Market Road 3351
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. I Just created the Page FM 3351 but can you make it better. Blake675 (talk) 22:05, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Dudeperson176123

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Based on this, we have an admission of block evasion/sockpuppetry. Imzadi 1979 → 01:16, 28 August 2015 (UTC) Thanks for the heads-up. --Kinu t/c 05:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC) Possibly a sock of this tiresome user. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC) I see some overlap in the WP:CIR issues and the poor grammar, but the editing scope was different. Still wouldn't surprise me, though. --Kinu t/c 17:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Recreation of deleted page

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello Kinu, I just wanted to let you know that I have recreated page Tejpal Singh. This page was earlier deleted by you on G11 (was created by someone else and not me). Person is notable and three term MLA in India. Kindly let me know if you have some observations / comments on this. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:23, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Thanks for the note. The new article appears to be about a different (and certainly more notable) individual than the original, so it is appreciated. Cheers! --Kinu t/c 15:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Intriguing proposal

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. I'm intrigued by your proposal at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMoatassemakmal&type=revision&diff=641613492&oldid=641600414 I came across it because the editor wrote directly to Wikimedia. While I am not optimistic in this specific case, I like the concept. Have you done it before? If so, how well has it worked?--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

ANI closings

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Sorry about that. The 166. IP is a chronic evader & thus the reason I reverted its edit :) GoodDay (talk) 19:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC) No worries... it took me a minute to figure out what was going on as well. :D --Kinu t/c 19:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Braxton Moral

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Sorry to bother you but my article was deleted. I am 13 years old and attend both high school and will graduate with ALB from Harvard about a week before high school grad. My article was well sourced and it seems notable for 13 year old to attend Harvard. Can you clarify your position? Thanks Braxton Moral — Preceding unsigned comment added by Braxtonthomas (talk • contribs) 03:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC) I agree with the response JohnCD provided on your talk page. I encourage you to read those links so that you may contribute here in a more effective manner. Good luck in your future endeavors. --Kinu t/c 16:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

mailed the agreement of donation still deleted the article.

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. sir i am new on Wikipedia and i have read that you will delete if i post on top. sorry sir but i am not able to find some option to write in bottom please kindly consider it in bottom. because i am new and dont know very much about writing on Wikipedia i have written my first article on "hydroelectricity generation by recycling of water" but you have deleted it by giving the reason that it is from stm journals (http://stmjournals.com/tech/index.php?journal=JoWREM&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=1205). I just want to say that I am the author (copyright holder) on stm journal as well as on Wikipedia. and i have mailed the agreement of donation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. but you have still deleted the article. please kindly tell me what to do if i want to publish it on Wikipedia. please dont mind if i have said or done something wrong. thanks and regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aditya agrawal hydro (talk • contribs) 21:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC) The copyright status is clearly noted here, in that you will not publish this content elsewhere. Regardless, Wikipedia is not a place to publish your original research. --Kinu t/c 21:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oxymorphine

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello Kinu, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Oxymorphine for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC) Instead of deleting, it would have been better to investigate the history of the article and revert to the redirect, which I have done. --Kinu t/c 13:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Surface Pro 4 and Surface Book edit warring

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello, Kinu, seems like I am participating in an edit war in articles Surface Pro 4 and Surface Book. Some unregistered editor refuses to take a conversation in the Talk sections and keep reverting my revisions. I think maybe it's time to intervene and protect the articles? Or maybe you suggest how should we handle such cases? TranslucentCloud (talk) 08:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC) There is an explanation for keeping that content, please, go to Talk:Surface Book and provide an explanation for the removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.3.100 (talk) 18:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

About revert

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. although there is no summary.--Takahiro4 (talk) 07:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC) It should be fairly obvious that the edit was reverted for the same reasons as the last two times you made the edit. Repeatedly edit warring will earn you another block. --Kinu t/c 16:32, 10 May 2016 (UTC) One more question, you say the same reason, although I did not the same edit. I think bad things was not written especially. It is correct that you are block.--Takahiro4 (talk) 11:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC) I don't respond to threats, especially incoherent ones. --Kinu t/c 15:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC) So you did threat, just I did too. So you are an administrator, it maybe that I am blocked. I don't respond to administrator's threat. You have a pistol of administrator and companions, as you say such a thing, I just have no choice but to laugh. You could choose unclear article of david eppstein. Congratulation! You have a aggressive heart of administrator against others. It's fantastic.--Takahiro4 (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC) None of this makes any sense. I will simply note that there is a policy against edit warring, and that the notion that policy will be enforced is not a threat, but a fact. --Kinu t/c 04:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)