User talk:RobertEves92/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page!  fetchcomms 21:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

No Problem. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤)21:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Double Thanks[edit]

(Jordan S. Wilson (talk) 23:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)) Greeting Fellow Wikipedian, Thanks for refilling my page. If you see on you page I have created some barnstar for you. If you need anything you let me know.

User blanking of articles[edit]

I notice that you recently reverted an edit where the author of the article Department of postgraduate education had blanked that article, and you placed a warning on that user's talk page, using Huggle. However, it is generally accepted that if the author of an article blanks the article, and no other user has added any significant content, then the blanking is taken as indicating that the author wants the page deleted, and it can then be tagged for speedy deletion with {{db-blanked}}. Very often new users who don't know how Wikipedia works see an article they have created tagged for deletion, accept that the article should be deleted, and remove the content, thinking that is deleting it. It is much better in such a case not to bite the newcomer by giving them a warning that they have done something wrong by trying to comply with the deletion notice. You may know all this already: I know from my own experience of using Huggle that it is very easy to slip into simply clicking on the revert button and moving on without checking the edit carefully enough, but I thought it would not harm to mention this. I have taken the liberty of removing the user warning: please restore it if you think there is a good reason why it should be there. JamesBWatson(talk) 15:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

I can only apologise for this, occasionally it is very easy to do this without realising. However i do have a lot of experience with huggle, and as you have said from your experience too it is all too easy for this to happen. Again i can only apologise that this has happened. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤)21:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I am also in the process of modifying the huggle sourcecode to make it harder for these things to happen by checking the creator of the page against last edits to see if this is what may have happened. KiraChinmoku (T,¤) 21:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
No apology is needed: I was just letting you know in case you didn't realise. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


In no way did Jpgordon ask me to "leave". Please stop inhibiting my attempts to get to know Josh.Hiineedrequestforcomment (talk) 21:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Your RfA...[edit] failing, as there are 0 supports, 10 opposes, and 1 neutral. Please consider withdrawing your RfA soon.December21st2012Freak Happy St. Patrick's Day! 23:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

I wont be withdrawing it for one reason. That reason being if it is closed i will miss out on alot of comments. Comments left on the RFA will help me to improve for the next time i try. This is because i cant see where i am going wrong, so comments help, what i cant see others can, and comments like yours will help me to improve my work on wikipedia. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 23:49, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

An RfA, once it has been transcluded and several users have !voted in it, does not qualify for CSD G7. If you wish to withdraw the RfA, the correct way to do so is to post a withdrawing statement below your self-nom statement. After the RfA is closed and archived, you can request courtesy blanking. However, closed RfAs are generally not deleted. Nsk92 (talk) 00:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Ok thanks, ill go do that now. KiraChinmoku(T, ¤) 00:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Your RFA has been closed[edit]

I regret to inform you that your RFA has been closed (per your request) as unsuccessful. I recommend reviewing the comments made by those participating in the discussion there to determine what you can do to improve your chances in the future, should you choose to run again. I also strongly recommend involving yourself in areas where admins work (WP:AFD/TFD/CFD/MFD, WP:CSD, WP:AIV, etc.) and become very familiar with how they work. Reading Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship and the information found atWikipedia:Administrators#Becoming an administrator (especially the links there). Please let me know if you have any questions. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Boolean logic[edit]

Minor nitpick on the clever code from your user page:

assert((x == true) == x); // Will never throw an exception, regardless of the value of x

Or, as most logicians would agree, the statement "x is true" is functionally equivalent to the simpler statement "x."

Best wishes, Mike Duskis (talk) 05:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks muchly KiraChinmoku (T, ¤)11:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Flight Avia Flight 7100[edit]

Re this edit, you added a parent cat to the article. Category:Aviation accidents and incidents in Ireland is a sub-category ofCategory:Aviation in Ireland. No major harm done, I've removed the parent cat. Mjroots (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Ah ok, thanks mate. --KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 13:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space[edit]

Hey there Kirachinmoku, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. Iremoved some files I found on User:Kirachinmoku/TT.

  • See a log of files removed today here.
  • Shut off the bot here.
  • Report errors here.
  • If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

2014 FIFA World Cup scores.[edit]

Hello, Weather it has a reliable source or not, It still doesn't change the fact that wikipedia is not a live scoring system site.Skyblueshaun (talk) 14:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

The MIP template exists for a reason. Although wikipedia is not a live score website, if users choose to update match scores and the information is correct and verifiable, which in this case it is, there is no point reverting it. Wikipedia is an excellent source of information and the more up to date it is the better. To the best of my knowledge there is no part of Wikipedias policy that says you cannot update sports match scores live KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 3:04 pm, Today (UTC+1)
I have reported your issue to people higher up in wikipedia and they should get back to you. I would like to tell you that I got banned from editing on wikipedia for using live scores, So I am not messing around here. Skyblueshaun (talk) 14:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
The person you have passed this on to is not an administrator and therefore cannot make decisions regarding this matter. There is no part of policy that says that live score information is not allowed on wikipedia. Please get an actual administrator / sysop / Jimmy Wales to contact me regarding the rules of this matter. Until then I shall remain rollbacking and protecting good faith edits that are reliable and have citations. I'm not doing this to be a pain or cause problems to you or anyone else, I'm simply doing it because the information is correct and reliable and therefore has every right to be on the relevent page as part of Wikipedia. Best Regards KiraChinmoku (T, ¤)14:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Both of you should consider this a final warring about edit warring, carry on and I will block both of you, and Kira I have to agree with Shaun here, do you not see the pointlessness in adding live scores when you could just wait 90 minutes and then add them? Or are you intending to do this for every sporting event ever? --Jac16888 Talk 14:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Very well. I would however like to point out that every edit I made was in good faith to others and I can't help but feel Shaun jumped the gun a little reporting me for vandalism, which quite frankly was unnecessary. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 14:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
You exacerbated the situation by reverting Shaun rather than discussing properly - please adhere to WP:BRD in the future.--Jac16888 Talk 14:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
I attempted to discuss it, I was even "told" it wasn't allowed, but up until a few mins ago I was offered no proof that is wasn't allowed. And I'm not naive enough to simply believe something just because someone says it is true. Anyway, the matter has been dealt with so thats it over. Thank-you for your comments Jac KiraChinmoku (T,¤) 14:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


Regarding this edit: I wouldn't consider this vandalism (it's a legitimate link), but I'm also reluctant to un-revert it because I'm not sure how notable it is. I'm not that familiar with Wikipedia policies, so if you could take a look at it that would be great. Thanks! --Lethosor (talk) 17:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

My apologies. I jumped the gun, your edit was in fact fine. KiraChinmoku (T,¤) 17:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
It wasn't actually my edit, but thanks anyway. :) --Lethosor (talk) 17:54, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Richard Markham (field hockey)[edit]

Some of the tags are rather puzzling - how is the article outdated? StAnselm (talk) 21:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately some of wikipedia's tags are poorly named, that one is listed as "page requires updating" which is misleading. What I mean was the page requires updating with more information, not that the information is out of date as the tag would indicate.KiraChinmoku (T, ¤)21:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Ah, OK. Of course, this is what the whole stub system is supposed to be about. That's what I created - a stub. If you like, you could use Template:Missing information or Template:Incomplete. StAnselm (talk) 21:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Updated: Page now has stub tag replacing the tags I placed earlier

Stortford, Essex redirect[edit]

I declined your request for speedy deletion, primarily because the redirect was not "recently created" but has been around for several months now. I also think that an argument might be made that, even though factually inaccurate the redirect is still potentially useful, as the town is on the border of Essex according to Bishop's Stortford. At any rate, I think it's better to discuss it at WP:RFD. Cheers, postdlf (talk) 20:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Don't care. — Preceding unsigned comment added byAncientwishes (talkcontribs) 22:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

  • Yep that's fair enough. Thanks for your comment. KiraChinmoku (T,¤) 22:49, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waytemore Castle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Norse and Convex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Zyngfing etc page protection requests[edit]

Hi there. Just to let you know, both the pages you asked to be protected already are, and were already yesterday when you asked. It's a feature of the software that you might not be able to see that protection, but you certainly won't be able to create the article, only an admin can. Thanks. GedUK  11:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Ah smashing, thanks for the clarification. Is there any way at all to tell for future reference? KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 11:47, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
No worries. Try and edit the page. If you can't, it's protected. If you can, it's not (or only semi-salted). GedUK  11:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Replied on my talk[edit]

I replied before I realised your note said to reply here. (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Reporting on Admin boards[edit]

 Note: Thank you for your help by reporting vandalism. You reported the same user at AIV and UAA at about the same time. Please report only once and to the more appropriate board. In this case the user was blocked temporarily for adding spam. Although AIV is for vandalism (which this was not) it is ok to use for blatant spammers. Your report to UAA was unnecessary and not applicable as the username is not in violation. Thanks for your help. -- Alexf(talk) 16:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for that, I'll remember that in future. Wasn't sure what the general procedure was so reported on both to play it safe.KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 17:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
NP. We were all beginners in need of learning at one point. The boards are sometimes overwhelmed, so adding unnecessary reports does not help. Cheers. -- Alexf(talk) 17:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
You did it again on User:Royharter at UAA and AIV. besides, the user has had no warnings whatsoever as of this writing, whic is needed, and I fail to see the case for UAA. Please read the board's rules published there. Thank you. -- Alexf(talk) 16:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Sorry once again, user was reported due to username linking with 2 articles I consider to be G11 (one of which has an identical name to the user, see Roy Harter), clicked to warn the user about the removal of speedy deletion tags which sent a vandalism report. Wasn't my intention to post 2 separate reports. KiraChinmoku 16:29, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Stortford Music Festival Logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Stortford Music Festival Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letterhere. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

I can get proof of permission however it may take longer than a week. The original permission came verbally so obviously there is no proof of that. Would a screenshot of an email suffice? KiraChinmoku (T,¤) 09:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
A copy of the e-mail(or a screenshot) to the address listed should work.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Regarding your message[edit]

you recently reverted my edit to Peter Cushing saying that i did not explain my edit. If you pay attention a little better you will see that I did explain the edit as: unnecessary info, it belongs on the Sherlock Holmes and Van Helsing page not on a personal Bio. (talk) 22:10, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Apologies, occasionally Huggle doesn't show edit summaries, or shows them as not having left one. But yes you are right you did leave one. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤)09:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Stop undoing my changes.[edit]

The content is cited. Read the page. Learn something. Shill.

The section is cited, your changes are not. KiraChinmoku (T,¤) 14:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

They are now, and they were cited all over this page. If you want to omit facts to give yourself national pride or something good on you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by216.52.54.253 (talk) 14:14, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

National pride has nothing to do with it, I'm not american. You edited and added uncited and otherwise dubious information, it was reverted, you then re-reverted it without realising that perhaps you are in the wrong. Friendly advice, in future if you edit something stop and think as to whether or not you may need to cite it. Take it or leave it. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 14:18, 12 September 2013 (UTC)


Thanks for reporting username violations at WP:UAA! Just a friendly reminder that new entries go at the top of the list :)Singularity42 (talk) 14:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I use huggle and it likes putting them at the bottom haha! KiraChinmoku (T,¤) 14:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Really? That's unfortunate. I've left a change request at Wikipedia:Huggle/Feedback#WP:UAA entries.Singularity42 (talk) 14:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Ah nice one, was looking for where to make a comment on that. I'm pretty sure it does the same for AIV reports too, though I've never checked specifically. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 14:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)


This is a really minor issue, and I don't want you to stress over it, but I'm a bit concerned about the markup length of your signature. I was a bit surprised at the markup length when I went to reply to your messages (especially given that the appearance length is so small). The markup length would be frowned up upon by guidelines for signature length. When you have some time, do you mind taking a look at that? Thanks. Singularity42 (talk) 15:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Yep no problem. I've had that sig for so long, its probably about time it was changed anyway! Thanks for the heads upKiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 15:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Unexplained page blanking[edit]

You [1] Jpendergraph (talk · contribs) when xe blanked Computer Simulated Universes Evolutionary Hypothesis. Since Jpendergraph is the only author to have made any substantial edits to this page, can we not interpret this page blanking as an implicit request to delete (per WP:CSD#G7)? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Yeah thats fair enough, though it did already have a proposed deletion template anyway KiraChinmoku 15:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

i wanted to remove the unwanted links of references which is not in the current page.I don't know how to do that. its appearing at the end of the page — Preceding unsigned comment added byBlackwizard2000 (talkcontribs) 17:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Los Finales no son como tu lo ESCRIBES[edit]

Mira me di cuenta espero que seas tu que has estado cambiando de PRESENT y ya estas poniendo las supuestas fechas de finales en novelas como LA TEMPESTAD, MENTIR PARA VIVIR, CORAZON INDOMABLE...ETC. Lo que no es asi...ya que en algunas paises no pueden transmitir un capitulo ya sea que transmitan un partido de su seleccion o den un megaproyecto. Al grano, en Panama la fecha del final de LA TEMPESTAD no es esas ya que en una semana solo dieron 2 capitulos de la telenovela y no es justo que yo arreglo y tu lo cambies, TE MOLESTA DEJARLOS EN "PRESENT". — Precedingunsigned comment added by (talk) 01:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)


That section is full of promoting mohanlal that he played central character without any source — Preceding unsigned comment added by111.92.14.165 (talk) 09:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Changes to Saint-Lambert sur Dives[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that one can't just make changes without explanation to Wikipedia pages ! Sorry about that, I didn't realise... The change I made concerns the Falaise pocket battle of 1944 in Saint Lambert sur Dive in the Orne deparment of France. In the English Wikipedia the battle is stated as taking place in Saint-Lambert in the Calvados department about 35 miles to west. This is incorrect. It took place in the village of Saint Lambert SUR DIVE in the Orne department. The mistake is understandable after all, 2 villages called Saint Lambert 35 miles apart :). To check this just look up Saint-Lambert, Calvados in the English Wikipedia and click on the French link. You'll find that there is no reference to the battle in the French Wikipedia. Then do the same for Saint-Lambert sur Dive and you'l find an interesting summary on the French page. Regards Richard

  • Hi Richard, that's fine. In future make sure you add citations and edit summaries. That way users like myself won't immediately assume your edits are vandalism or something like that. Regards KiraChinmoku 09:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Wilfried Martens[edit]

Hello Kirachinmoku

Source is added in the next edit (language: Dutch)

@, thats fine, thanks very much! KiraChinmoku 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

M1 120mm Stratosphere gun[edit]

information on M1 120mm Stratosphere gun that was removed vandal/dubious info was obtained from the book On Air Defense by James D.Crabtree,1994 ISBN 0275949397,Chapter 9 United States,pgs-120-129. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:05, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

@ - You need to add that as a citation when you add the information. Feel free to revert my edit in order to add that in! The issues was less that it was dubious and more it was uncited and therfore un-proven. Many thanksKiraChinmoku 20:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Delvin Hughley page[edit]

How long does the speedy deletion process take? My personal life is being exposed and I hope the page can be deleted ASAP. ThanksDelvin5 (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Huggle help[edit]


I need help configuring Huggle.
Every time I try to sign in, it asks to check the configuration page. I received the rollback right recently and was trying to make use of Huggle, but in vain. Please let me know of the configuration procedure... Thanks in advance! Martinian Leave a message! 20:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
@In Transit: - Hiya, its quite some time since I actually originally set it up! To the best of my knowledge the config stuff should check if it already exists and if not create it all with the defaults. Failing that, take a look here[2] and follow all the steps. Sorry i can't be more help!KiraChinmoku 20:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Instructions on that link worked :) ... Thanks a lot!!! Martinian Leave a message! 20:54, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

New Message[edit]

Hi, The reference says 2.46. --Connie (A.K) (talk) 20:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

@La Avatar Korra: - The reference clearly states 2.467 which rounded correctly to 2 decimal places is 2.47 KiraChinmoku 20:46, 11 October 2013 (UTC
Aha, sorry an thanks. ;). --Connie (A.K) (talk) 20:52, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
I did not know. Sorry. --Connie (A.K) (talk) 20:54, 11 October 2013 (UTC)