User talk:KirtZJ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Please use the + New section tab above to start a new message and remember to Sign Your Message by typing four tildes.
Thanks for stopping by.

Orphaned non-free image File:Diabolik Lovers Video Game Cover.png[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:Diabolik Lovers Video Game Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Black Clover[edit]

Why not just redirect it to Weekly Shōnen Jump#Features? The series was published in English so it could be is a likely search term. Looking at the page view stats, Black Clover has generated an average of over 100 views prior to the AfD note added [1]. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm okay with that. Although, given the recent behavior of the creator and another major contributor I didn't want to risk an edit war with them once their block expires. —KirtMessage 14:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
I would take that up at the right venues then, deleting the article also wont stop the same people from re-creating it. I suggest WP:ANI and/or WP:RFP once it is a redirect. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:38, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
I don't have the time to get into debacles right now or (or the next few months). You have more experience with AfDs than I do, so if you think its worth an uncontroversial redirect then be my guest to do that. —KirtMessage 14:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
I understand and sorry if I made you feel pressured. I will let the AfD run it's course, no harm done if it is redirected anyways through that. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:48, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
No worries. I have to go. I'll see how this plays out later. —KirtMessage 14:49, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Satoko Kiyuduki Notability[edit]

You recently added a notability flag to Satoko Kiyuduki. I wrote about why I thought the article subject was sufficiently notable on the talk page, if you think it's not reasonable could you comment on specific problems there? --Polm23 (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


I didn't want to but I undid your edits, try redirecting the articles or AfD. Its not going to be worth waiting for days only for an admin to decline the prods in the end *sigh*. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I already knew that. It seemed utterly ridiculous to me that even though the edit was suspicious, it could be undone the very second before deletion no questions asked with no changes made. Thanks anyway. —KirtMessage 02:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
I agree with you, if you know an admin I would ask for his/her advice on this one maybe the articles would stand a chance at a Prod. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)