User talk:Kitb132

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Kitb132! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! GW (talk) 15:37, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Dispute resolution on St Helens RLFC[edit]

You have reverted the same claim three times now. Further such action will not be tolerated before resolving the dispute between yourself and Ymron on the article's talk page, where I have provided a section for you to put your argument across. You may also wish to read the guidelines on dispute resolution before posting there. Many thanks, GW (talk) 15:37, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Further to this message, you have again reverted the claim in question. Please use the article's talk page to resolve this dispute. For your information, I have refered this to the Rugby league Wikiproject where I have asked for further feedback. GW (talk) 22:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see[edit]

Informational note: this is to let you know that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards,

Ymron (talk) 10:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

You appear to be involved in an edit war, according to the reverts you have made on St Helens RLFC. If you edit disruptively including breaking the three-revert rule you may be blocked without further warning.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards a version that represents consensus among editors.
Alternatively you can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection.
Do not edit war even if you think you are right.

Continuing to edit St Helens RLFC in the manner you have been doing without first achieving consensus may result in the suspension of this account. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

March 2011[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If, when this block expires, you continue with this edit war to remove content from St Helens RLFC against consensus, you will most likely be blocked for longer - perhaps even indefinitely. You cannot win this content dispute by edit-warring - the only way you will succeed in making your change is by discussing it on the Talk page and getting a consensus. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]