User talk:kmzayeem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Zayeem's talk page
User Talk Edits Email Sandbox Guestbook

User:Rainmaker23[edit]

He was found to be a sock of User:Bazaan. Now blocked indef. One problem less for the handful of active Bangladeshi wikipedians on en. Thanks to User:Nafsadh, who reported Rainmaker. Aditya(talkcontribs) 11:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Rainmaker23 started editing six days after Bazaan and Uck22 got blocked. We should keep an eye on, any other sock could pop up soon. – nafSadh did say 16:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Speak of the devil! Bangladesh needs to be randomly Patrolled by an administrator. I am not interested in receiving nasty (Personal attack removed) again. awful!—Samudrakula (talk) 13:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
@Samudrakula:, Umran is definitely a sleeper of Bazaan. Can you prepare a report? – nafSadh did say 17:30, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Nafsadh, that account has no relation to the socks.--117.103.81.14 (talk) 12:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

What a little ghetto we have here. And they call others uncivil. Wavy would do well to take this advice, seems he's been warned of his chauvinist ways before.--114.134.89.21 (talk) 10:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Good riddance... --Zayeem (talk) 10:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Have fun being their pet. You're a good for nothing (Personal attack removed).--114.134.89.21 (talk) 12:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Nafsadh and Samudrakula, bigotry and chauvinism go hand in hand.--JKhan20 (talk) 04:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

And Samudrakula, some of your contributions can prove whose the one off track.--JKhan20 (talk) 06:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) WP:DEADHORSE. Aditya(talkcontribs) 16:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
People have a right to self-defense, you started a festival of personal attacks here earlier. Just goes to show how uncivil you are, in fact as someone said, you really are pure evil.--202.191.123.125 (talk) 07:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Nafsadh could never have been able to make that SPI without this confession. Amazing how things are twisted around.--202.191.123.125 (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Sure. Now think of what YOU can do. You can stop sockpuppetry, Mr. Bazaan/rainmaker/whatever. Aditya(talkcontribs) 15:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
From CU note: Also note that Rainmaker23 (talk · contribs), who was blocked per WP:DUCK is also now Confirmed as Bazaan. Although Bazaan is Stale, they did log in and interact with mediawiki (I'm being purposefully vague here) which shows a clear technical connection between the accounts. -nafSadh did say 17:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

The ban is a result of block evasion. No forums were manipulated. No one was actually deceived. Only one account was editing.--202.191.123.125 (talk) 12:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

TWL Questia check-in[edit]

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of My 31st Demerit for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My 31st Demerit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My 31st Demerit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arr4 (talk) 14:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

TWL Questia check-in[edit]

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:35, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Mukti terror[edit]

Mukti Bahini was a terrorist organization who helped hindus during Bangladesh Liberation War. Muslims must join the discussion at talk pages of Mukti Bahini and Bangladesh Liberation War[1]--------------------And I request Muslims must delete this page 1971 Bangladesh genocide Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bangali pigs (talkcontribs) 04:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Invite[edit]

A Barnstar!
Please comment

There's a afd going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. More participation is needed. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 21:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandraprabha Vidyapitha, Paksey (2nd nomination)[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandraprabha Vidyapitha, Paksey (2nd nomination). Thanks. Worldbruce (talk) 06:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Jaaz Multimedia[edit]

Merge-arrows.svg
An article that you have been involved in editing—Jaaz Multimedia —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Kmzayeem. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://takbeeremusalsal.blogspot.de/2012/03/indian-mukti-bahani-terrorism-massacres.html