User talk:Knox1067
December 2017[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sony has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sony was changed by Knox1067 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854062 on 2017-12-04T20:53:38+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bed. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bed was changed by Knox1067 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871988 on 2017-12-04T21:07:44+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:07, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neck, you may be blocked from editing. Your account is only being used to vandalize. If you continue, you will likely be blocked permanently. Ifnord (talk) 21:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Washington ground squirrel. Ifnord (talk) 21:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. only (talk) 21:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)My school iPad was left unattended for several minutes while I used the restroom. Someone used my iPad to cause several problems on many websites I have accounts on. I will make sure that this streak of vandalism does NOT continue. I apologize for any inconvenience this has caused. Knox1067 (talk) 21:46, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Knox1067 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My school iPad was left unattended for several minutes while I used the restroom. Someone used my iPad to cause several problems on many websites I have accounts on. I will make sure that this streak of vandalism does NOT continue. I apologize for any inconvenience this has caused.
Decline reason:
Compromised accounts cannot be unblocked. Huon (talk) 21:56, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Knox1067 (talk) 21:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Knox1067 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Once again, I can ensure that upon being unblocked, this vandalism streak will NOT continue.
Decline reason:
Thanks for your note. I have reviewed your edits-- all of your edits, and I am happy to say that I absolutely, unequivocally decline to unblock this account. You claim your account was compromised though carelessness, but if that were the case, I would see constructive edits. There were none. The block stands. And even if, as you say, somone else edited for you, we cannot and will not unblock a compromised account. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Addendum Please read Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks#Agree_to_follow_Wikipedia_community_customs -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Once again, as Huon said, we do not unblock compromised accounts. Someone else had access to your account and we have no clue if it's actually you now requesting the unblock or that person. They could have easily changed the password and email address to something only they would know. So, we must keep it blocked as stated in the link Huon provided. (note: I originally posted this as a decline of the unblock request, but I forgot that I was the original blocker on this account). only (talk) 22:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Only: And yet you were spot on! -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Knox1067 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #19945 was submitted on Dec 04, 2017 22:49:04. This review is now closed.