User talk:Koala15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Koala15, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Koala15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

A belated welcome![edit]

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm! Face-smile.svg

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Koala15. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Koala15, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 23:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Hey Koala15! I'm awarding you this Barnstar for your works in articles mostly related to animation and others. Thank you and have a nice day! :) Mediran (tc) 09:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Czarface, Koala15!

Wikipedia editor Pjposullivan just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Terrific article, a pleasure to read. Many thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Pjposullivan's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Some baklava for you![edit]

Baklava - Turkish special, 80-ply.JPEG Thanks for your contributions to bring Monsters, Inc. up to GA status! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredibles[edit]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article The Incredibles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 11:56, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredibles[edit]

The article The Incredibles you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:The Incredibles for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Congrats! One of my favorites. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ratatouille (film)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ratatouille (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 00:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ratatouille (film)[edit]

The article Ratatouille (film) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Ratatouille (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Half Million Award[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Half Million Award
For your contributions to bring Ratatouille (film) (estimated annual readership: 632,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

You're also welcome to display this userbox:

Million award logo.svg This user won the Half Million Award for bringing Ratatouille to Good Article status.

Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Bug's Life[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Bug's Life you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 12:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Bug's Life[edit]

The article A Bug's Life you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:A Bug's Life for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 12:42, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toy Story 2[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Toy Story 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mediran -- Mediran (talk) 11:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Marshall Mathers LP 2[edit]

Orlady (talk) 01:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Berzerk (song)[edit]

Orlady (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


A barnstar for you![edit]

Special Barnstar Hires.png The Special Barnstar
For making Toy Story 2 a GA. Keep it up! ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 11:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Finding Nemo[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Finding Nemo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 19:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Finding Nemo[edit]

The article Finding Nemo you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Finding Nemo for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shrek[edit]

The article Shrek you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shrek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cars (film)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cars (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 3 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Rcsprinter (Gimme a message) @ 18:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

It has now passed. Rcsprinter (indicate) @ 23:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Half Million Award[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Half Million Award
For your contributions to bring Cars (film) (estimated annual readership: 964,012) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Bobnorwal (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Go get 'em, tiger! :D Bobnorwal (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pinocchio (1940 film)[edit]

The article Pinocchio (1940 film) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Pinocchio (1940 film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Loeba -- Loeba (talk) 20:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Koala - I was happy to do this GAN but wanted to mention that it's a wee bit disheartening not to get a word of thanks (reviewing does take time and effort). I'm sure you didn't mean to be rude but I wanted to give you a head's up for the future - it's always good to thank your reviewer. That's all, no hard feelings. Keep up the good editing --Loeba (talk) 08:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Good article star 2.svg The Good Article Barnstar
For making Disney's Pinocchio a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 04:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Fantasia[edit]

Well done for the quick work on another film GA. You will be happy to know that this article swiftly passed the review. I knew from the start this one would easily pass! Jaguar 19:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for all the help. Koala15 (talk) 20:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fantasia (film)[edit]

The article Fantasia (film) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Fantasia (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstarn-Mickey.png The Disney Barnstar
This is for making Fantasia (1940) a GA! And also because you made a GA out of three consecutive Disney articles (Cars, Pinocchio and this). I wish you all the best for making more GA's out of Disney articles. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Koala15 (talk) 05:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Jungle Book (1967 film)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Jungle Book (1967 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

I have finished the review and put it on hold for seven days. It's a good article - only a few minor points need to addressing. Let me know when you're done with them. Jaguar 18:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Editors Barnstar Hires.png The Editor's Barnstar
For making Disney's Jungle Book a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Corpse Bride[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Corpse Bride you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Corpse Bride[edit]

The article Corpse Bride you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Corpse Bride for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Quarter Million Award[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Quarter Million Award
For your contributions to bring Corpse Bride (estimated annual readership: 276,997) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 03:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

Million award logo.svg This user won the Million Award for bringing Corpse Bride to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! And again, congratulations! –Prototime (talk · contribs) 03:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for The Jungle Book (1967 film)[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Disney and Pixar articles[edit]

Your work in this area is unparalleled, and as a lover of these grand animated films, I can't thank you enough for your tireless efforts to bring them up to scratch. Just thought I'd let you feast your eyes on some stats I've put together on the article quality of some of the categories. Its fascinating to see how low many of the articles are (or at least were, when I first created these stat articles in 2012 - before your improvements). Nevertheless there is much work to be done.

I was also wondering if, due to your expertise, you could look over some of the work I've been doing in the realm of animated films and perhaps build upon them through copyediting, research, or other helpful advice to make the articles even better?--Coin945 (talk) 05:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks ill check them out. Koala15 (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Cheers. Though I'm the first to admit that I'm not the greatest Wikipedia editor, I have a massive passion for this topic so have tried to improve the articles with great effort. I sincerely hope you and I can make some of these articles really good. :)--Coin945 (talk) 16:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prashant! -- Prashant! (talk) 01:40, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Peanuts (film)[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Editors Barnstar Hires.png The Editor's Barnstar
For making Disney's Beauty and the Beast a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 04:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Good Article Barnstar[edit]

BarnstarGA.png Good Article Barnstar
For Disney's The Little Mermaid. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Gerald Shields leading the masses to improve Wikimedia one cosmetically fashionable photograph at a time. North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar
Gerald Shields, founder of the North Korean Fashion Watch, awards you the North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar for your continuing efforts to add reliable and poignant discussions about North Korean topics, such as the 2014 comedy movie The Interview. Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

A pie for you![edit]

A very beautiful Nectarine Pie.jpg Thanks for your contribution on VII – Teyana Taylor album. Karlhard (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

A small cup of coffee.JPG Hey, thanks for going through all the Children's BAFTA additions I made and fixing the citations! Luthien22 (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas[edit]

Happy New Year Koala15![edit]

A cookie for you![edit]

Choco chip cookie.png Hey! I know I'm a year late, but I just wanted to say nice job @ Finding Nemo! Bananasoldier (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Iris cat.jpg

A kitten for you, for being such a great user!

- Minionlover2015 (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


A cup of tea for you![edit]

Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! Face-smile.svgThis e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 05:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings![edit]

Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)


A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Just wanted to present this to you for your quantity and quality of your file uploads related to films! I monitor the Upload log from time to time, and I have to say that your uploads and the file pages you create ... It's great to not have to make any adjustments to them or find any reason to nominate them for deletion! I must say, I'm getting to a point where I know I can just pass over your uploads without having to even look at them, and that is quite refreshing. Steel1943 (talk) 21:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

I Am (Yo Gotti album)[edit]

Why did you revert my edit on I Am (Yo Gotti album) without giving a single reason? You merged the award nomination with the critical reception, making it look like an awkward one-line sentence at the bottom of that section. Also i removed the "featuring" parts from the singles section, because it was like this; "Act Right featuring Jeezy and YG was released as a single. The music video for Act Right featuring Jeezy and YG was released". Next time write an explanation while reverting other editors' edits, it's unprofessional. --Eurofan88 (talk) 08:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Colour compliance[edit]

Information icon Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of Alvin and the Chipmunks episodes, contributed colours that may cause accessibility problems for users with certain types of visual disabilities. We aim to use colours that meet the WCAG AAA standard for accessibility. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines on this subject, which can be found at WP:COLOR; this page provides further information about contributing AAA-compliant colours to this encyclopedia. For information specific to templates used in articles about television, please also see Template talk:Infobox television season/Archive 3. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

Just a heads up. Face-smile.svg Alex|The|Whovian? 03:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Ted 2: why delete?[edit]

[[1]] What was your reason for removing the white nigger detail? Thanks. Steven McIntire ALLEN (talk) 23:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:When the Game Stands Tall poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:When the Game Stands Tall poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Book of Shadows II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

RE this revert[edit]

Look, I'm an admin, not some random immature edit warrior, I wish you'd actually talk to me instead of reverting me with no explanation several times. Your last edit summary seems to indicate you believe the sourced information I added is incorrect. Simple question: why? The French review clearly said the movie was out in theaters on Feb. 24th in France and multiple sources mention the 19th in US/Canada. A simple Google Search can help you find dozens more sources discussing the 19th Feb. release date. [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] -- sure, some of them are more bloggy and less RS, but a few of them are clearly reliable sources and all of them speak of the Feb. 19th release date. My own presence in theaters at that date to see the movie is WP:OR but at least I know this release date to be factually accurate. What more can I do to meet your expectations enough that you'll allow the movie's release date to be mentioned in the article without edit warring over it? Failing to mention the movie's release date in its article does a great disservice to readers.  · Salvidrim! ·  16:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Well it hasn't been released in the United States yet, the only notable date is the United States date. Koala15 (talk) 19:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry, what? It was released on February 19th in the US (limited release or not), which is well-supported by sources. Can you tell me how I could convince you of this fact? What source are you using, what source would you consider reliable? Thanks  · Salvidrim! ·  19:18, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Most of the sources you cite are pretty unreliable, it hasn't been released in the United States yet. Koala15 (talk) 19:33, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Koala, you're on very shaky ground here. Wikipedia is not a United States only resource; if the film has been released in another country, that counts as an official release date. And if there is a source that lists that the film has been released in the US, you'll need to provide a better source to indicate that it hasn't. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
What do you mean? We're supposed to list the premiere date and the release date from the country of origin, which would be the United States. Koala15 (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
If that's what has been agreed on, then sure, it makes some sense at least to include first screening + origin country release. But I'll ask again: the movie was released on February 19th in the US (limited release or not doesn't matter), which is well-supported by multiple sources. Can you tell me how I could convince you that this is a real fact? What source are you using, what source would you consider reliable for this purpose?  · Salvidrim! ·  20:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
If it was already released their would be a lot more sources and reviews, box office records, etc. Koala15 (talk) 03:13, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, you know what, you might have a point. Most of the sources talk about an upcoming 19th Feb release but few speak of it after its alleged release date. iTunes lists it as expected for March 30th. I guess we can just wait and see what happens to the US release. Sorry for the bother and thanks for talking things through! :)  · Salvidrim! ·  03:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

What are you doing?[edit]

Hey! What's a big idea? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceb1031 (talkcontribs) 02:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

I was texting there is gonna be The Secret Life of Pets 2, Hop 2, Minions 2, The Peanuts Movie 2 and Zootopia 2 for the sequels! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceb1031 (talkcontribs) 03:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Kiyanu Kim/David Kyungil Kim[edit]

Hi. I just come here to need your help. A registered writer called Kiyanu Kim/David Kyungil Kim which has been misplaced to any repertoire by possible hacker [14] (page-by-page), and news article too [15] (which probably edited by possible hacker). Since I can't post to WikiProject Spam because extremely difficult and no one contact BMI for suspect. 183.171.181.90 (talk) 16:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Ridiculous 6[edit]

What was your reasoning for reverting my edits for Ridiculous 6. The current iterations is very hard to read and if you look at the talk page I'm not the only one who thought that? --Deathawk (talk) 07:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

I thought it was written better the other way. Koala15 (talk) 18:58, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
My Main problem with it is that your version is WP: Proseline vs mine which is WP:Prose. That is to say that it seems to of been created with each sentence being written as the news broke without considering how it all fits together. My version, on the other hand, carries the same info but it immediately lets you know the context. For instance, my version starts with a sentence stating that it's been through multiple studios. In your version you have to read the whole paragraph to gather that same information, which isn't the most effective way to present the information IMO. I realize what you were going for here, which is explaining thing chronologically, but it needs some context. --Deathawk (talk) 21:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

The Burns Cage has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

The Good Dinosaur edit[edit]

Hi. I was just curious as to why the edit was reverted of using this site as a source for the box office numbers: http://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Good-Dinosaur-The#tab=summary. According to this website, the numbers are slightly higher (and presumably more accurate) than what box office mojo currently states for the film. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 07:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, but isn't Box Office Mojo more of a reliable source? I'm not sure how accurate The Numbers is. Koala15 (talk) 15:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Vincent Margera[edit]

Hi Koala15, just wanted to generate some discussion regarding including his sex offender status in the header. Would you mind joining me on the talk page? Thanks. JamesBay (talk) 23:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi again, would really like to open some dialogue on this. Please feel free to hit me up at talk:Vincent_Margera#Registered_Sex_Offender or my talk page. Cheers. JamesBay (talk) 02:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Disregard the warning. That previous person was an imposter[edit]

Disregard the warning. That previous person was an imposter

Hi, Early you received a post about being warned and possibly being blocked. That was an imposter who created a similar username, but with only 1 “p” at User:Winterystepe. He's now blocked. im just letting you know that Im the real person and I won't do that. Shoutout to Tassedethe for taking quick action in 6 minutes. Happy Editing Winterysteppe (talk) 00:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Robot Chicken Season 6[edit]

Why did you revert the changes to the writers' field on Season 6? The breaks were there for a reason. This is what happens without them. http://imgur.com/ZJfT1i0 Ryan8374 (talk) 20:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Joey Badass[edit]

Hi! The "edit summary" box is there so you can explain completely unfair edits like this one. Why don't you use edit summaries? RunnyAmiga (talk) 17:56, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Rock Dog[edit]

Can you please stop undo'ing revisions that contain the accurate information?

SO seconded.

SO thirded

DYK for The Burns Cage[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 25 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Burns Cage, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Simpsons episode "The Burns Cage" takes its name from The Birdcage, a film starring Simpsons voice actor Hank Azaria? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Burns Cage. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Burns Cage), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Lucas Bros. Moving Co.[edit]

Is it seriously over? (WRT this edit.) 23W 03:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

According to this interview it is. Koala15 (talk) 03:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Aw, that sucks. A writer posted a comment on YouTube saying that the whole block has been axed, but I couldn't find any official announcement by the network. 23W 04:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

The Game, compilation vs studio[edit]

You've been undoing every editors remarks stating that YOTW is a compilation album. The artist stated it was, his label stated it was. Just because he took the "Presents" off the artwork at the last second doesn't mean it's suddenly a studio album. Instead of us edit warring for yet another year, let's take this to someone higher up who can make the decision because i'm tired of looking at the page. BlaccCrab (talk) 20:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

The question of whether the album is a studio album or a compilation album is not vandalism: it's a difference of opinions. You have now reached the third revert on this matter; per WP:3RR, don't revert again. Engage in the ongoing discussion at Talk:Blood Moon: Year of the Wolf. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Its pretty clear that it is billed as a solo album. If you had a copy of the album you would see that their is no mention of "Blood Money Entertainment" whatsoever. Koala15 (talk) 20:15, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
But I don't have a copy of the album, which is why we generally rely on reliable sources. It should also be fairly clear whether this is a studio album or a compilation album: was the material on the album available via other avenues before the release of this album? I.e. were the tracks released as individual singles or EPs, which would make this a compilation album, or were the tracks all or mostly all recorded specifically for release on this album (a studio album)? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:31, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Well then look at the sources, every source bills it as a solo album. Its pretty simple, but some editors don't get it. Koala15 (talk) 21:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
No sources call it his sixth studio album. Hence why they all called The Documentary 2 his sixth solo album. BlaccCrab (talk) 21:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Koala, could you specify which sources those are? All of the sources I've seen (there are several listed at Talk:Blood Moon: Year of the Wolf as well as those used within the article itself) that call it anything call it a compilation album. Can you point to a single reliable source that labels this work a studio album? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 00:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Sure, they call It a compilation album because It was originally billed as one. But when It was released It came out as a Game solo album. No mention of "Blood Money Entertainment" on the packaging. Koala15 (talk) 01:16, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Not having the label's name on the cover doesn't suddenly change it to a solo album. The artist himself stated it himself on social media multiple times. BlaccCrab (talk) 16:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Again, I ask for sources. Your say-so is not a valid source. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:50, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Also, can you please continue this discussion on Talk:Blood Moon: Year of the Wolf so that others interested in the matter can join in? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Kung Fu Panda 3[edit]

Hi! I read this edit

Keep in mind Kung Fu Panda 3 is a coproduction between the U.S. and China. Since it is a part-Chinese production, the Chinese names for the characters should be displayed. Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 03:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Special effects (Album) tracklist[edit]

Hi! last day you reverted my edit on Special Effects (album), even I did that a day ago but Aft197 provided me with a link that says that the tracklist is divided according to the days of the week. Give this a look. Abhinav0908 (talk) 11:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Dice[edit]

You have reverted my edit 3 times now without explaining yourself, so I guess I'll have to be the bigger person. I'm not really sure why you're so keen on listing the online release date in every episode air date. That is not how its done. Original Air Date refers to the date that the episode original AIRED on television. Unlike with House of Cards and Orange is the New Black, we do not list the Original Release Date for shows that air on television. If one episode is released early, then it is usually included in the episode table (see House of Lies season 5), but if more than 1 episode is released early, then a description is added above the episode table (see Billions). It is repetitive to add the same information six different times, so please stop adding the online release date into the episode table. A note above the table accomplishes the same thing with far less repetitiveness. Rswallis10 (talk) 01:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Metallica (album)[edit]

Rainbow trout transparent.png Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

Next time you see blacklisted links for that archive, replace the archive with a Wayback Machine ref instead, don't just remove it [16]. Now I can't revert back to it. If you check and there are none there, please trout me back :] dannymusiceditor what'd I do now? 03:30, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Its a screenshot so their weren't any sources in the wayback machine, I'll try to find a replacement source. Koala15 (talk) 16:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Savage Life 4[edit]

Thanks for your help. Plz put RBC/E1 as it counts as official . thank you. Hihiimpal (talk) Hihiimpal (talk) 17:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

please![edit]

Please do not change the official confirmed stuff i put on articles. Thank you . before your edits plz clear it with me first. Hihiimpal (talk) 19:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Hihiimpal: That sounds an awful lot like you wish to own these articles. That's not how we do around here. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) "Check with you first"? blatant WP:OWN. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 20:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Heart Speaks in Whispers, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted.

Please stop removing unanswered tags. The infobox is a SUMMARY. The singles listed there need to be mentioned and sourced in a Singles section.
Iknow23 (talk) 00:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Young Dro discography, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Iknow23 (talk) 01:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

There's nothing unsourced in the article, that's why I removed it, you tend to tag pages when its not necessary. Koala15 (talk) 01:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
There are some chart positions that are NOT possible within the chart parameters in this article, most likely meant to be Bubbling Under as the tag suggests. They are presented incorrectly in the tables. See WP:USCHARTS for how to properly indicate Bubbling Under. Either fix them or leave the tag to alert someone else that may want to fix them.—Iknow23 (talk) 01:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Re: States[edit]

What is not common practice is having articles that duplicate content. Please tell me, what information does United States presidential election in Georgia, 1968 have that requires a separate article? United States presidential election, 1968 has all of the state results, so there is no need to duplicate it with a two-sentence page, nor should state articles be full of content about the national election results. If there's actual unique content that's great, otherwise there's no need for it. Reywas92Talk 18:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Obviously it should be expanded, but that's no still no good reason to redirect it. Koala15 (talk) 19:19, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
If you feel the page should be expanded, all users are welcome to use their respective Sandbox page to work on potential articles. If a page is only two sentences long, that's absolutely a good reason to redirect it. It baffles me how you continue to act as though you can make whatever edits you please and assume it's the responsibility of other users to provide the logic to back up your questionable edits. Weweremarshall (talk) 16:33, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism[edit]

You've been reported for your vandalism on pages Khalifa (mixtape) and Wiz Khalifa discography. I've attempted to be cooperative with you but you continuously refuse to provide sources for your edits and also ignore attempts to resolve the issues on the appropriate talk page. Weweremarshall (talk) 16:30, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Courtesy notice[edit]

There's a report been filed about you by another user at WP:ANI. The thread is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent Harmful editing by user Koala15. — Diannaa (talk) 18:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

  • Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Removing reliable sources[edit]

Please do not remove reliable sources, as you did at Me Before You (film) in this edit. Per WP:V, we go by what reliable sources say, not original research. If you disagree with the source, you could start a talk page discussion. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Its not a British movie, a quick google search will tel you that. The movie was only produced by American production companies. Koala15 (talk) 16:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I did a quick Google search, and I found a reliable source for the country of origin. Variety doesn't explicitly say anything about the country, so I tried a different trade magazine, Screen International. They called it a US-UK co-production. It's not currently indexed by AFI or BFI, so we'll have more data once they add it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Cock of the Air[edit]

See article changes, FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Man Plans God Laughs (Public Enemy Album)[edit]

Koala15 has made numerous undos of edits and in many instances has not explained why or had valid reason. Case in point, information added to the Man Plans God Laughs entry I made:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_Plans_God_Laughs. The version he keeps reverting to has very little information about the album. Virtually no information about theme of the album or title. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Man_Plans_God_Laughs&oldid=725362642. I included description of the theme of the album as related by Chuck D on the Public Enemy website, including Chuck D quotes well as the background of the albums title. His view seems to be that any description of the theme of a piece of art or meaning of an album title is invalid. Of course that is ridiculous as there are extensive description of these things in hundreds of thousands of wikipedia entries from Shakespeare to Run DMC. For instance the entry on Public Enemy's It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back has extensive description of the album's theme and titles. So what Koala15 is doing is deleting such description if he personally doesn't like them. It's the type of censorship that goes against everything Public Enemy stands for and similar deletions are a pattern with Koala15 as noted by many users in this Talk page. The next time it is deleted I will take it to arbitration- and handled with experience — Preceding unsigned comment added by Central16 (talkcontribs) 14:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

A Bluegrass Barnstar for you![edit]

KY Barnstar.png The Bluegrass Barnstar
For your creation of all the remaining missing annual Kentucky Derby articles. This Kentuckian appreciates your hard work. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 13:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Why have you reverted all my changes to Bastille Day (film)?[edit]

Dear Koala 15, I just noticed that you have reverted all my changes and additions to the Bastille Day (film) article, without any explanation. Why? I have explained what I've done and why, and I have provided links to every change. I feel that my edits resulted in a much better article than the previous one.

To just revert an article, without bothering to go through and evaluate each change the previous editor has made, is really against the ethos of Wikipedia. Reverts should only be used when anonymous editors have vandalised an article. Thomas Blomberg (talk) 12:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Love Is in the N2-O2-Ar-CO2-Ne-He-CH4.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. nyuszika7h (talk) 09:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

We don't need to explain the title of an episode, that's not how Wikipedia works. Koala15 (talk) 19:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Comedy Central. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 05:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebirth (2016 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karl Mueller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Birdman poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Birdman poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Hold My Liquor and New Slaves[edit]

Why do you keep undoing my edits? JustDoItFettyg (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

The features are uncredited on those songs. Koala15 (talk) 16:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
If you look at Father Stretch My Hands, Famous, Real Friends, Wolves and Fade they are all uncredited yet they are featured on those pages. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 16:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Well we shouldn't list them if their uncredited. Koala15 (talk) 16:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
I think it's perfectly fine the way it is. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 17:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Why do yo undo my add on Raekwon associated with Parazitii,they have a song called,"Something to say".Stop changing things without researching. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catalin1920 (talkcontribs) 19:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Dante Clark[edit]

Hi. I undid your undoing of my change to Kicks because it seems to have been an error. Maybe check things before undoing them? Thanks. Thmazing (talk) 01:48, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:When a Feller Needs a Friend poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:When a Feller Needs a Friend poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Impastor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Vane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

A Better Tomorrow Track Listing[edit]

The one I put up is more informative and I believe a lot of people enjoy being able to see who did what on what song like on previous album pages, so could you stop changing it back all the time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.216.140.118 (talk) 14:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Chime in on this RfC?[edit]

Hi. Would you be willing to weigh in on this RfC regarding Metacritic should be both added in the prose section and the album ratings template at the same time. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Proseline[edit]

Ok this seems to be a problem between you and me, and I do not want it to end up in endless edit wars. What I am trying to do is avoid proseline. You can read up more about it on the link but basically it's saying "On XXXX, Y happened, On XYZ, X happened." This is really hard to read and get the full gist of what is going on. What I am trying to do is to get it to read like Wikipedia:Prose which is taking the information looking at it and then synthesizing it into a well written article. I am not trying to work against you and in many cases we are actually writing the same thing only in very different forms. Please, before reverting read and see if it's not actually a better read. --Deathawk (talk) 07:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Blanking on Same Kind of Different as Me (film)[edit]

Hello. I saw that you removed a production company from Same Kind of Different as Me (film) in this edit. I sourced this to Variety because it was unsourced. Please don't blank the citation and the sourced content. If you're going by the IMDb, this is not a reliable source, as it is user-generated content. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Max Steel[edit]

I tried to start this discussion with you before but you did not respond and reverted my addition to Max Steel anyway. I have no problem if you feel the need to add something I forgot, or if you want to expand on the ideas contained within. What I do have a problem with is you reverting my works multiple times without a reason and furthermore refusing to talk to me about it when I tried to discuss the issue. This is not contributing in any meaningful way to the encyclopedia, rather it's you just being petty. As I've explained above, everything is the same it is just contained in a more encyclopedic tone and less of a press release one. --Deathawk (talk) 14:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Its fine the way it is, removing content is not improving the article. You're writing is also very sloppy. Koala15 (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
What I removed largely were specific dates. There is no real reason why it's important that we note something happened on July 12 vs just July or even simply 2009. In fact adding specific dates without reason makes the article look like a series of unrelated events and gives the section a weird stop and go flow. Let's look at the Monsters Inc article: The production section hardly mentions any specific dates, and that isn't because the data does not exist, it's because it would just be a burden to read. I'm not great at spelling and grammar, I'll fully admit that and it's possible that I missed something important that happened or that it could be better worded in a different way, the correct way to handle this is to take the work and modify it. rather than simply reverting back to your version-doing the latter does not foster collaboration but rather just creates a hostile environmant where no one wants to participate. --Deathawk (talk) 05:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Child 44 poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Child 44 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Koala15. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

A request[edit]

Hi there. For the record, I conceptually agree with this decision, but in the future, could you try to explain your reasoning with edit summaries on discussion on talk pages? Continually reverting without any explanation or discussion isn't the preferred route. It'd also reduce confusion and the need for others to explain on your behalf. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 17:23, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations for over 100000 edits[edit]

Bästa nyskrivna.svg 100000 Edits
Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits on English wikipedia.The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts.Keep up the good work!

you can added this template to your user page.

Bästa nyskrivna.svg This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

- CAPTAIN RAJU () 12:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)



(I happened by one of your edits and noticed the 100K mark too, belated congrats! --joe deckertalk 05:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Silver City Kid poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Silver City Kid poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry![edit]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC) Lights ablaze.JPG

Unexplained removal of template at Black Market (Rick Ross album)[edit]

Could you please explain, why did you remove this template I placed at Black Market (Rick Ross album)? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


Trey Songz[edit]

A song getting a music video does not make it a single. This isn't 1997. You've been on here long enough to know how this works by now. BlaccCrab (talk) 17:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Talk:Alaskan Bush People.
Message added 18:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Archiving your talk page[edit]

Information icon Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 175.4 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 12:35, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Complaint that you are edit warring at Psycadelik Thoughtz[edit]

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Koala15 reported by User:BlaccCrab (Result: ). You can respond there if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 14:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Still edit warring. BlaccCrab (talk) 01:11, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

SuperMansion[edit]

On Crackle the SuperMansion episode "The League Of Cheesedom" it's spelled with a capital "O", click here to see what I'm talking about. Please make sure to keep the page updated, thank you, annonymous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:8200:B32F:1085:D230:D247:EA66 (talk) 04:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Dr. Devizo shouldn't be under guest starring, he's the main villain of Season 2. Please stop reverting my edits, I'm trying to help. annonymous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:8200:B32F:1085:D230:D247:EA66 (talk) 21:19, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Black America Again[edit]

Hello! You are credited with the image here. I am new to wikipedia and am hoping you can help me navigate something here. Would I be allowed to use this image on the page Lorna Simpson, who was the visual artist who did the cover art for this album? Thanks for any help. Terasaface (talk) 23:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Album covers are usually only supposed to be used in the infobox in the album article. Koala15 (talk) 08:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CTE World logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CTE World logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Crimson Romance[edit]

Check out this article you originally created; I did some work on it. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Cruise (film)[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruise (film). The prior version actually had a bit more content to it. --NeilN talk to me 03:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017[edit]

Why did you delete my revision on the latest edit to Sausage Part? You gave no explanation. Hawkeye75 (talk) 23:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Signing reverts[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Hawkeye75 (talk) 23:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jim Gaffigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portlandia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Leatherface[edit]

Hello, Koala. I'm Darkknight2149. I wanted to let you know that the "Incomplete" template on Leatherface (upcoming film) isn't there because it hasn't been released. It was there because the article is not at all up-to-date with the information we have. DarkKnight2149 22:34, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Hoped I wouldn't have to do this[edit]

But I am just getting sick and tired of you discarding all my edits, and NOT EVEN EXPLAINING WHY. I have double checked, triple checked all the trivia that I have added to the ATHF seasons page, and I'm 110% sure that all this info is true. And even after I politely asked you to explain why you were doing this, YOU KEPT QUIET, YOU SMUG DICK. All I want is an explanation. Is that SO DAMN HARD, you troll?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.197.164 (talk) 11:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

The trivia you added isn't notable. Its as simple as that. Koala15 (talk) 19:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

To some people it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.197.164 (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

IP, see your Talk page for a warning about civility. Koala, perhaps could have been avoided by including edit summaries with your reversions. (Though I can hardly claim to be consistent in doing so myself.) General Ization Talk 16:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Complaint about your edits of Ghostface Killah[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Koala15 reported by User:Wufan10304. You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:32, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

The DUFF[edit]

WP:G6 is for uncontroversial moves only, thus I have removed the tag from The Duff. Per WP:RM#CM, moves are potentially controversial if "[s]omeone could reasonably disagree with the move," and seeing as I moved the page just the other day, that clearly applies. Please list The DUFF at WP:RM under "potentially controversial moves" if you would like to pursue this further. Chase (talk | contributions) 20:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

I will say it once more: take the article to RM if you want the article moved. CSD G6 is not applicable as at least one editor (myself) clearly objects. Chase (talk | contributions) 21:06, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Koala, if the original move had been the subject of an RfC, I'd support the move. DUFF is an acronym. Also see how (most frequently) stylized in the real world. General Ization Talk 21:19, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at The Duff shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Create an RM if you want it moved back. Primefac (talk) 21:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries[edit]

I see that you do not seem to know how to use edit summaries. Here is a recommendation to use them: WP:Editing policy#Be_helpful:_explain, and here is a guide to how to use them: WP:Help:Edit summary. Please take the time to read both carefully. Editing, and especially reverting, without providing a reason, will give other editors the impression that you are attempting to intentionally frustrate them. Jd2718 (talk) 20:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

American Pickers Season 17 posting wrong information[edit]

Bob.altamont (talk) 03:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

As you probably already know, the history channel schedule is deliberately wrong to try to trip up people who torrent the show. Did you actually see episode - Mike's Bikes on the 3rd of May? Why is there no synopsis? Where is your citation? Usually actual new episodes are listed here http://www.history.com/shows/american-pickers, is Mikes Bikes there? No. So its not an actual new episode. It may have been a clips show?

Orphaned non-free image File:The Weeknd Kiss Land.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Weeknd Kiss Land.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Mating of Marcella.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Mating of Marcella.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Land of the Silver Fox (1928 film) poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Land of the Silver Fox (1928 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:23, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Doc Hudson Cars.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Doc Hudson Cars.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 13:28, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sally Cars.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sally Cars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 13:28, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Unauthorized Full House Story. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Musdan77 (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --Musdan77 (talk) 17:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yo Gotti discography, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing.

You have done this before. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yo_Gotti_discography&type=revision&diff=715182073&oldid=715110683
Iknow23 (talk) 09:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Yo Gotti discography. Iknow23 (talk) 09:28, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dog Years (2017 film). You reverted a large number of the most recent edits without provocation or justification. Judging by your talk page, you have been having issues with this all throughout June. I reported you for blocking at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, but then withdrew it, as I wanted to first have the opportunity to attempt to reason with you before I take the last resort myself. You need to explain your actions, or all anyone will be able to see is that you're disrupting for no reason. DARTHBOTTO talkcont 08:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

hello[edit]

Hello' care to tell my why you keep unnecessarily removing my (souced) edits? or is this just a bot? Univalve (talk) 11:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Univalve, thank you for starting this discussion. Before either of you edit the page, you need to have this discussion, because both of you very close to breaking 3RR and being blocked for editing. Koala15, when undoing another's sourced edits, it's generally a good idea in the edit summary to explain why you are undoing their action. Primefac (talk) 11:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Talk:Max Steel (film)#Edit war.
Message added 01:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Koala, I strongly urge you to participate in this discussion, or at the very least, post a note on that talk page to announce that you're dropping the stick. It's extraordinarily frustrating for editors to run into your silent year-later revert, then try in good faith to discuss the matter as they're supposed to do instead of edit-warring, only to be met with more silence. It's certainly not fair for you to silently stonewall changes/progress at that article. If for whatever reason you're not into discussion, then you need to understand that you won't have consensus for your preference, and if you change it again in the future, you can be sanctioned. This is a community project. We're supposed to talk to one another. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:10, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:We The Best logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:We The Best logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Blanking[edit]

Please do not blank citations and change sourced content, as you did in this edit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:32, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

In fact, it looks like you've already gotten a final warning for disruptive editing a few days ago. Please stop your disruptive editing, or you will likely be blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:33, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Seriously. Stop it now, or I'll block you report you to AIV to have you blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your edits are just simply wrong. Those movies were distributed by Columbia Pictures not Sony Pictures Releasing. Columbia Pictures is the label Sony releases their films under. You are the one being disruptive. Koala15 (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
You are disruptively removing citations to reliable sources and replacing them with your own original research. You will be blocked if you continue doing this. See this consensus that production companies require sourcing. This is your final and only warning. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Sure, you can source them, I'm just saying that your edits are inaccurate. And I don't like you threatening me with getting blocked since I haven't done anything wrong. Koala15 (talk) 01:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Verifiability, not truth. Seriously, it doesn't matter if it's "accurate" – it matters if it can be verified to a source. --IJBall (contribstalk) 22:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Shimmer Lake (Film)[edit]

Hi Koala15. I see that there has been some back and forth about Shimmer Lake. I've actually never contributed before, but I really liked that movie! I've seen many positive reviews, and I'm not sure why you keep getting rid of them. Sorry if this is the wrong way to go about this. Thanks!

[1] [2] [3]

June 2017[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 14:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Ongoing discussion at ANI[edit]

It has been alleged that you have returned to the same behavior which recently got you blocked. I strongly encourage you to desist and to join the ongoing discussion at ANI where I am sure we would all like to hear your side of this. I do not enjoy blocking people. But I particularly dislike blocking people twice in a short period of time for the same thing. For now I look forward to your explanation which I hope will not be long delayed. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://variety.com/2017/film/in-contention/oscars-halfway-mark-deserving-contenders-1202473420/
  2. ^ http://thatmomentin.com/2017/06/11/shimmer-lake-2017-review/
  3. ^ https://www.thehollywoodoutsider.com/shimmer-lake-rewinds-scene-crime-film-review/