User talk:Kodak11111

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Kodak11111 and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking Insert-signature.png if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 00:39, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

November 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page New Winnipeg Blue Bombers Stadium has been reverted.
Your edit here to New Winnipeg Blue Bombers Stadium was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-New-Winnipeg-Blue-Bomber-Stadium/145547255532339) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:39, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cody Baldauf[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Cody Baldauf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. 2Flows (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

March 2015[edit]

Hi Kodak, the changes you reverted at Springs Christian Academy were made with an edit summary explaining why they were made - the paragraphs do not make sense (for example, the first one does not even say who/what it is talking about), they do not adhere to a neutral point of view (for example, the second one states an opinion with no source "clearly not the case") and they are incorrectly formatted (for example "vice principals" is not a recognised infobox field and thus results in the information not being displayed; the comment "please see the link below" is not how encyclopaedic referencing works). Please do not revert explained edits without giving an explanation of your own; and rather than simply revert, if you feel the information should be included, you should first improve it to address the problems given for why it was removed. Thanks Melcous (talk) 01:31, 12 March 2015 (UTC)