User talk:Krakkos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Krakkos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Go Phightins! (talk) 19:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


Dear User:Krakkos, due to Graham's hierarchy of disagreement, when there is a disagreement going on you should at least find the mistake and explain why it's mistaken using quotes, but in Xiongnu page, you're unfortunately doing an Ad Hominem, in which you're just attacking the characteristics or authority of the writer without addressing the substance of the argument. I do believe that as an experienced Wikipedia writer you should strictly reconsider your edits. Richard Keatinge, AlexiusHoratius , Zyma

-- (talk) 15:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Vangio and Sido, Krakkos!

Wikipedia editor Falkirks just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I have reviewed and passed your new article. Great Work!

To reply, leave a comment on Falkirks's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

new sock[edit]

uses same strange unverifiable russian sources and only edits central asian articles. you must watch him too.-- (talk) 04:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


I don't know anything about the socks, you can check my older contributions, but those references in Xiongnu are just looking convenable. I hope you would reconsider them. -- (talk) 09:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Genetic history of turkish people[edit]

This is the third time you are doin this. What was the reason for this:?

--Nedbud (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

IP sock?[edit]

This article have vandalised again. Another ip sock? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)